Durban man's bail appeal denied due to alleged R5000 bribe to witness
Image: File
A murder-accused Durban man has had his appeal dismissed by the Durban High Court after the Verulam Magistrate's Court denied him bail for the second time. This is after he allegedly paid a R5,000 bribe to one of his former employees, who he allegedly tried to kill, to change a statement that he made to the police and say that he is innocent.
Shirwin Nowtham is charged with murder and attempted murder of his two employees. The State alleges that Nowtham shot his employees, and one survived.
According to court papers on October 4, 2024, the lower court denied him bail. He did not challenge that, but he later applied for bail on new facts, and on March 14, 2025, the same court refused his application. After that, he approached the high court to appeal the bail refusal by the lower court.
The survivor, who cannot be named, made a statement to the police on September 11, 2024, in which it stated that Nowtham picked him and his colleague up in a Grey Polo, in August 2024.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Next
Stay
Close ✕
He said Nowtham was with a person named Stephen. He explained that he and his colleague worked for Nowtham and Stephen, selling drugs. On the day they were shot, the survivor said they were promised another job.
As their employers fetched them in a Polo, the survivor said they were made at some stage to get out of the car.
'Nowtham then took the firearm which was inside the vehicle and shot at us,' the survivor said.
When Nowtham applied for bail on new facts, he stated the continued illness of his son, his ongoing hypertension, and that the survivor has withdrawn his allegations against him. The second statement made by the survivor was on November 15, 2024, and it was not submitted in court.
On November 18, 2024, the survivor made another statement where he said Nowtham called him from prison and told him to change his statement and say Stephen is the one who shot him. The survivor confirmed that he received a R5,000 payment sent through Nowtham's friend Lunga.
The survivor further stated that he was promised R20,000 if he went to court on November 27, 2024, to withdraw charges against Nowtham. He said he did not want to do that. However, on November 25 and in January 2025, the survivor made other statements to different attorneys, where he said Nowtham did not shoot him.
Nowtham said this was a compelling reason for him to get bail as the survivors' statement ruined the State's case. However, State said it has more evidence, including cellphone records, and that before the employee died, he told a security guard that Nowtham shot him.
'I am not persuaded that the magistrate has erred at all in coming to her decision, and I am not able to find that the conclusion that she came to was the incorrect one,' Judge Robin Mossop said.
He said the evidence of the survivor that Nowtham was able to reach him and influence him was compelling evidence of Nowtham's willingness to interfere with State witnesses, a conclusion to which the magistrate correctly came to. Judge Mossop said he was unable to interfere in the decision of the magistrate.
nomonde.zondi@inl.co.za
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
an hour ago
- IOL News
Arrest claims linked to police commissioner Masemola
Experts say more police officials are likely to be arrested and suspended with police commissioner Fannie Masemola. Image: Picture: Siyabulela Duda/GCIS Police Commissioner Fannie Masemola is facing possible arrest, which could result in the suspension of several police officials, according to crime analysts. This comes in the wake of allegations that the Investigating Directorate Against Corruption (IDAC) obtained a warrant of arrest against Masemola. The alleged arrest is related to abuse of slush funds from the secret service account of crime intelligence. It has been alleged that Masemola conspired with Lieutenant-General Duminsa Khumalo, head of crime intelligence, to purchase properties without adhering to proper procedures. This involves the purchase of the Veroz Boutique Hotel in Pretoria North and Kyalami Lodge in Midrand. Veroz Boutique Hotel, which has 23 bedrooms and a presidential suite, is valued at R43,400,000 and Kyalami Lodge, with 75 bedrooms and ensuite bathrooms, is valued at R48,250,000. Both properties were acquired in September last year and were allegedly approved by Khumalo, who was arrested for fraud and corruption related to the purchase of a boutique hotel in Pretoria North and a commercial building in Durban. The properties are valued at R22.7 million and R22.8m, respectively. Sources said that President Cyril Ramaphosa was briefed and has given the go ahead. Crime expert and violence monitor, Mary de Haas, said the arrest, if it happens, means more officials could be suspended and arrested. De Haas said this could even expose why Khumalo and his co-accused have not been suspended. 'There are many interesting things to watch out for here. Khumalo and Major-General Philani Lushaba (the chief financial officer), have not been suspended. It will be interesting to see what happens to them,' she said. The allegations came after EFF leader Julius Malema last month told journalists that a warrant of arrest was issued against Masemola but a press briefing held by the KZN police commissioner, Lieutenant-General Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi, who blew the whistle about infiltration within law enforcement, caused the postponement of the alleged arrest. Malema said Masemola conspired with Khumalo to purchase the properties in Pretoria and Durban. 'There are a lot of imponderables here,' De Haas said. On Sunday, Masemola said he was not aware of the warrant of arrest, adding that questions should be referred to IDAC. Police spokesperson Athlenda Mathe also said the matter should be discussed with IDAC. An IDAC spokesperson on Saturday said the directorate cannot comment on Whatsapp messages or discuss any investigations. Meanwhile political analyst Zakhele Ndlovu said the arrest will prove Mkhwanazi's claims that all is not well in the SAPS and a broader criminal justice system. 'If one were to stretch one's imagination the rot permeates the entire institution of the SAPS and other institutions within the criminal justice system, and I dare say the broader state institutions. Another political analyst, Professor Sipho Seepe, said the speculation should be viewed within the context of Mkhwanazi's claims implicating the entire criminal justice system in the act of possible corruption. Get your news on the go, click here to join the Cape Argus News WhatsApp channel. Cape Argus
IOL News
an hour ago
- IOL News
Arrest claims linked to police commissioner Masemola: What it means for the SAPS
Experts say more police officials are likely to be arrested and suspended with police commissioner Fannie Masemola. Image: GCIS Many police officials are likely to face the music and be suspended if police commissioner Fannie Masemola is to be arrested, according to crime analysts. This comes in the wake of allegations that the Investigating Directorate Against Corruption (IDAC) obtained a warrant of arrest against Masemola. The alleged arrest is related to abuse of slush funds from the secret service account of crime intelligence. It has been alleged that Masemola conspired with Lieutenant-General Duminsa Khumalo, head of crime intelligence, to purchase properties without adhering to proper procedures. This involves the purchase of the Veroz Boutique Hotel in Pretoria North and Kyalami Lodge in Midrand. Veroz Boutique Hotel, which has 23 bedrooms and a presidential suite, is valued at R43,400,000 and Kyalami Lodge, with 75 bedrooms and ensuite bathrooms, is valued at R48,250,000. Both properties were acquired in September last year and were allegedly approved by Khumalo, who was arrested for fraud and corruption related to the purchase of a boutique hotel in Pretoria North and a commercial building in Durban. The properties are valued at R22.7 million and R22.8m, respectively. Sources said that President Cyril Ramaphosa was briefed and has given the go ahead. Crime expert and violence monitor, Mary de Haas, said the arrest, if it happens, means more officials could be suspended and arrested. De Haas said this could even expose why Khumalo and his co-accused have not been suspended. 'There are many interesting things to watch out for here. Khumalo and Major-General Philani Lushaba (the chief financial officer), have not been suspended. It will be interesting to see what happens to them,' she said. The allegations came after EFF leader Julius Malema last month told journalists that a warrant of arrest was issued against Masemola but a press briefing held by the KZN police commissioner, Lieutenant-General Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi, who blew the whistle about infiltration within law enforcement, caused the postponement of the alleged arrest. Malema said Masemola conspired with Khumalo to purchase the properties in Pretoria and Durban. 'There are a lot of imponderables here,' De Haas said. Masemola on Sunday said he was not aware of the warrant of arrest, adding that questions should be referred to IDAC. Police spokesperson Athlenda Mathe also said the matter should be discussed with IDAC. An IDAC spokesperson on Saturday said the directorate cannot comment on Whatsapp messages or discuss any investigations. Meanwhile political analyst Zakhele Ndlovu said the arrest will prove Mkhwanazi's claims that all is not well in the SAPS and a broader criminal justice system. 'If one were to stretch one's imagination the rot permeates the entire institution of the SAPS and other institutions within the criminal justice system, and I dare say the broader state institutions. "Factionalism and political interference are real within the SAPS as is the case with the ruling party. It is an open secret that the powers that be in the SAPS are friends with gangsters. South Africa is a crime scene and even the commander in chief has a cloud hanging over his head with regard to the Phala Phala saga,' Ndlovu said. Another political analyst, Professor Sipho Seepe, said the speculation should be viewed within the context of Mkhwanazi's claims implicating the entire criminal justice system in the act of possible corruption. 'Should the speculation regarding the imminent arrest of the National Commissioner prove to be true, they will send an unequivocal message that no one is above the law. This will be the case if this is not another ploy to remove individuals considered inconvenient by the establishment, 'he said. [email protected]
IOL News
2 hours ago
- IOL News
Divorce court case: Husband claims wife squandered millions on gambling
A husband wanted his divorcing wife to lose her half of their joint estate, claiming that she gambled their money away. Image: File A divorcing husband asked the Western Cape High Court to order that his wife forfeit her share of their assets upon divorce, as he claimed she squandered millions of rand they have accumulated in assets over the years on gambling. The wife, in turn, said she only gambled for entertainment, and she told the court that she only spent small amounts on this pastime. The wife turned to court to obtain a divorce from her husband, a medical doctor, and she asked that their estate be divided equally, as they are married in community of property. The husband, in a counterclaim, asked that because of her gambling, she either forfeited her half or a portion of the joint assets. While the wife alleged abuse by her husband for the break-up of the marriage, the husband, in turn, said it was because of her 'compulsive gambling addiction". The wife testified how, at various stages of the marriage, she has contributed financially to their joint estate, and she said it was only when they encountered financial problems that the marriage went sour. She conceded that she started gambling socially around 2012 when her son turned three and was at school. At that point, she had won about R4,000 from the R500 her mother had given her. The wife said that gambling became an enjoyable habit for her to have fun. She could not give a definitive figure of the amounts gambled over time in total. She admitted taking money from the business she ran to fund her gambling habits. She said she used her winnings towards household expenses. The husband's evidence was that his wife's gambling has resulted in significant financial losses to the joint estate. He said she withdrew and gambled substantial sums from the joint accounts and the business accounts. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading According to him, the gambling losses ran into millions of rands. He testified that his wife would be unduly benefited if she were to receive half of the joint estate, given her conduct and limited contribution to the growth of their joint estate. He said, 'one cannot claim or get what they do not deserve or work for". In countering his claims of her 'gambling addiction,' the wife said he also likes to try his hand at gambling on occasions. According to her, he further uses household money to play the Lotto. Counsel for the husband argued that using the wife's own testimony, where she said she only went to the casino about three times a week, at an average of R5,000 per visit for approximately the past five years, this equates to a minimum of R3.9 million in gambling expenditure. It was argued that this figure equates to a substantial portion of the joint estate that was wasted by gambling. The court accepted that the wife, by her own admission, gambled. Evidently, this gambling was probably more than social, as the wife would have the court believe, but the court said there was no proof that this habit was an addiction which impacted on the estate. It was found that there is not a basis for a court to order forfeiture. 'The evidence which this court accepts is that both spouses, to a greater and lesser extent, gambled or alternatively tended to go to gambling areas,' the court concluded.
