Independence fighter's bust to remain at military academy after relocation row
The bust of Gen. Hong Beom-do, a leader of Korean independence forces from the time of Japan's 1910-45 colonial rule of Korea, will stay at the Chungmu education facility inside the institution, the academy said in response to a query by Rep. Jung Sung-ho of the Democratic Party.
In 2023, the defense ministry announced plans to relocate Hong's bust to the Independence Hall of Korea in the country's central region and the busts of four other independence fighters erected at the academy to a third location. The ministry had cited Hong's controversial ties to Soviet communist forces.
The move sparked fierce debate over its legitimacy and drew strong protests from liberal political groups and advocates for independence fighters.
The busts of the five independence fighters were originally installed in 2018 at the academy under the previous liberal Moon Jae-in government. The relocation plan was therefore widely seen as an attempt by the conservative government of then President Yoon Suk Yeol to reverse Moon's initiative.
According to Jung, the academy said it also plans to keep the busts of the four other independence fighters.
Hong is known for leading Korean independence forces and spearheading major victories against Japanese troops in 1920. He moved to Russia the following year to seek refuge from Japanese forces.
He was forced to relocate to current-day Kazakhstan in 1937 under then Soviet leader Joseph Stalin's policy, along with many other ethnic Koreans before his death in 1943.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Korea Herald
an hour ago
- Korea Herald
S. Korea, US begin key summertime joint military exercise
South Korea and the United States kicked off an annual combined exercise Monday to bolster their joint defense readiness against North Korea's threats while rescheduling about half of the field training exercises to next month. The Ulchi Freedom Shield exercise, which runs for 11 days through Aug. 28, involves drills incorporating "realistic" threats aimed at enhancing the allies' capabilities across all domains. Some 18,000 South Korean troops will be mobilized for this year's drills. While the Joint Chiefs of Staff said this year's exercise will be held at a similar scale compared with last year, around half of some 40 planned field training exercises will be pushed back to September as part of apparent efforts by South Korea to mend frayed ties with North Korea. The North has long denounced the allies' joint exercises as a rehearsal for an invasion against it and has a track record of staging weapons tests in response. In an Aug. 10 statement, Pyongyang's defense chief denounced the large-scale exercise and warned of exercising his country's "self-defense" right in the event of a provocation. South Korea and the US have emphasized the summertime drills are "defensive in nature." The UFS exercise will be held alongside a four-day civil defense exercise that runs through Thursday, mobilizing about 580,000 civilians and will include efforts to fend off attacks from drones and cyberattacks. On Wednesday, an anti-air raid civil defense drill will be conducted nationwide as part of the civil defense drills. (Yonhap)
Korea Herald
an hour ago
- Korea Herald
Lee to send special envoys to China around early next week: sources
President Lee Jae Myung plans to send a group of special envoys to China around early next week, coinciding with his upcoming trips to Japan and the United States for summit talks with their leaders, sources said Monday. The delegation will include former National Assembly Speaker Park Byeong-seug, ruling Democratic Party lawmakers Kim Tae-nyeon and Park Jeung, and Roh Jae-hun, son of former President Roh Tae-woo, according to the sources. "It's not final yet, but I understand they are working to set the departure date in line with the anniversary of the establishment of Korea-China diplomatic relations," a ruling party official said on condition of anonymity. Seoul and Beijing formed diplomatic ties on Aug. 24, 1992. A presidential official said related discussions are still ongoing, declining to give more details. If realized, the envoys' visit to China would coincide with Lee's planned trips to Tokyo on Aug. 23-24 and to Washington afterwards for summit talks with Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba and US President Donald Trump. The likely dispatch of the envoys would reflect Lee's commitment to managing relations with China, alongside his engagement with Washington and Tokyo. Seoul is in talks with Beijing to arrange a meeting between the special envoys and Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi, the sources said. The envoys are expected to convey a letter from Lee to Chinese President Xi Jinping underscoring the importance of bilateral ties and requesting his attendance at the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation summit in South Korea in late October. (Yonhap)
Korea Herald
5 hours ago
- Korea Herald
[Editorial] Pricing power
Korea faces hard truth that cleaner energy means higher bills; only clear road map can sustain trust President Lee Jae Myung has said what most of his predecessors avoided: If South Korea is serious about cutting greenhouse gases, electricity must cost more. On Aug. 14, Lee told aides that the public must be prepared for higher costs to meet climate targets. For a politician once critical of price hikes, the candor is striking — and politically perilous. Few policies are as explosive as a power bill. The backdrop is the Paris Agreement, which requires nations to submit progressively tougher emissions pledges every five years. By September, South Korea must file its 2035 target, which is expected to aim for a 60-66 percent cut from 2018 levels. That trajectory is intended to keep global warming within 1.5 degrees Celsius and to set the stage for carbon neutrality by 2050. For South Korea, that means phasing out coal and gas, expanding renewables, and investing heavily in transmission and storage. None of it comes cheap. Solar and offshore wind remain multiple times more expensive per kilowatt-hour than nuclear. The necessary infrastructure must be built before any savings materialize. Holding down prices has been costly in its own right. Over the past two years, Korean households have enjoyed some of the lowest electricity rates in the OECD. At times, homes have even paid less per unit than factories — an inversion that distorts incentives. State-run utility giant Korea Electric Power Corp. has absorbed the gap, amassing cumulative deficits exceeding 30 trillion won ($21.5 billion) and more than 200 trillion in debt. Artificially cheap power has also bred excess: South Korea is now the eighth-largest consumer of electricity globally and near the top in per capita use. Correcting these distortions would encourage efficiency, but it will also test public patience. The case for restraint is no less serious. Industrial users have already seen electricity rates rise by roughly 70 percent over the past three years. Push further without relief, and the country's exporters could lose ground just as global competition intensifies. Shift the burden too heavily to households, and the backlash could derail consensus on climate goals altogether. The international context complicates the picture. Data centers built to serve artificial intelligence are straining power grids across the globe. Europe's turn away from Russian gas has left it juggling high costs and fragile supply. Even nuclear, South Korea's long-standing strength, faces risks as rising sea temperatures threaten cooling systems. Meanwhile, climate change itself is swelling demand: Successive summers of record heat are locking in more hours of air conditioning. Energy security now means securing reliable capacity as well as cleaner fuel. What would a credible policy path look like? First, the government should set out a phased and predictable pricing road map, tied explicitly to the 2035 target. Predictability matters more than one-off shocks. Second, support should be targeted: protect low-income households and small businesses directly, while channeling resources to help industry invest in efficiency and low-carbon processes rather than bluntly discounting power. Third, accelerate the 'plumbing' of the transition — new transmission corridors, modern storage and demand-response systems that reward consumers for shifting load. These steps are less visible than solar panels or offshore turbines, but just as decisive in lowering long-term costs. Finally, transparency will be essential. People need to know how the budget is spent, what investments it enables and how progress is measured. Lee is right that higher electricity prices are unavoidable. But appeals to 'climate' alone will not justify steeper bills for households already strained by inflation. Koreans may accept paying more if they can see the bargain: cleaner air, a sturdier grid and a competitive industrial base. What they will not accept are hidden costs and broken promises.
