‘Smear Campaign': Zikalala defends IDT CEO and slams media reports
Deputy Minister of Public Works and Infrastructure Sihle Zikalala has defended Independent Development Trust CEO Tebogo Malaka's appointment.
Image: Picture: Doctor Ngcobo / Independent Newspapers / File
Deputy Minister of Public Works and Infrastructure Sihle Zikalala has defended Independent Development Trust CEO Tebogo Malaka's appointment.
He has hit back at mounting criticism over his alleged role in irregular governance at the Independent Development Trust (IDT), describing recent media reports as part of a 'sophisticated political smear campaign' aimed at discrediting him.
At a press briefing in Pretoria on Tuesday, Zikalala said he had met and even exceeded his legal oversight obligations and had paused Malaka's appointment after assuming office in March 2023 to allow investigations into allegations of mismanagement at the IDT.
He also confirmed that he had referred all related documents to the Public Protector for an impartial inquiry into both his actions and broader governance concerns at the entity.
Zikalala's intervention follows weeks of reporting by the media, which alleged that he and former IDT board chairperson Kwazi Mshengu protected Malaka from scrutiny despite her alleged links to a R45-million office lease scandal.
The reports claimed Zikalala quashed a forensic probe initiated by National Treasury and facilitated Malaka's promotion from acting to permanent CEO.
But Zikalala rejected those claims outright.
'There is no investigation that was ever squashed,' he stated. 'All investigations I requested were obstructed not by me, but by a dysfunctional and divided board plagued by infighting and poor governance.'
Zikalala explained that when he entered office, Malaka's appointment was already in progress, backed by the IDT board under then-chair Zimbini Hill and endorsed by his predecessor, Patricia de Lille.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Next
Stay
Close ✕
Ad loading
'I found the process already before the Cabinet.''
Central to the controversy is an office lease signed with Moepathutse Property Investments without board approval. Malaka allegedly signed the lease outside her authority; however, there is no evidence to prove that Malaka did anything else.
In a reply that has now gone viral, Zikalala has slammed investigative body Amabhungane for what he termed "a calculated campaign against public interest governance"
'I will not allow the persistent onslaught masquerading as journalism to blackmail us into submission,' he said.
He claimed the reports sought to destabilise the IDT, an entity responsible for delivering critical social infrastructure, so it could be 'captured by private business interests.'
'There's a long-standing battle for the soul of the IDT,' Zikalala said. 'While we will never shield the corrupt, we must guard against forces attempting to liquidate the institution for private gain.'
In a move designed to affirm his commitment to transparency, Zikalala announced he had submitted all relevant records, including audit findings, legal opinions, correspondence, and ministerial memos to the Public Protector.
'This matter must be scrutinised by a credible, independent institution. I am confident it will reveal the truth and expose the narratives laced with distortion and innuendo,' he said.
He concluded with a firm statement on his public service record: 'In all my public life, I have never and will never attempt to escape public scrutiny. I remain committed to ethical governance, no matter the cost.'
The Public Protector's investigation is now expected to play a key role in determining whether Zikalala's actions were appropriate or part of a broader pattern of political shielding, while also shedding light on the governance challenges that continue to plague the IDT.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Maverick
6 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
Justice delayed, justice derailed — acting judge's ‘litany of errors' in Nulane case dealt blow to accountability
An acting judge's misunderstanding of the law has, for two long years, delayed accountability for alleged State Capture. The high court judge's pronouncements unfairly embarrassed the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) and demoralised courageous prosecutors fighting to restore faith in South Africa's justice system. Thankfully the Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA) has now set aside the Nulane judgment. Stingingly, the SCA found that 'the acquittal of the respondents was unfair to the prosecution and compromised the administration of justice'. Why is the Nulane case so important? In 2022, a mix of officials and businesspeople shuffled into a cold Bloemfontein dock, facing charges of orchestrating a R25-million fraud. With this, the NPA brought its first State Capture case to trial. Although R25-million was a pittance compared with what the Guptas would later purloin, Nulane was a dress rehearsal for the later schemes. The fraud itself appears glaringly obvious. In 2012, a Gupta-linked, foreign scrap metal company suddenly announced its intention to invest in an emerging farmers project in the Free State. Strangely, the foreign company insisted that a company it did not name must conduct a feasibility study first. Somehow, Nulane, owned by Iqbal Sharma, was appointed to that role. Evidence showed how Free State officials set about manipulating procurement processes to falsely and quickly appoint Nulane as a sole supplier. The feasibility study simply was outsourced to Deloitte for just R1.5-million. Nulane merely slapped its logo on the final report and sent invoices to the Department of Agriculture. The money went to Nulane and R19-million then ricocheted through various Gupta-controlled bank accounts before being siphoned off to Dubai. By the time the trial began, the Guptas had long fled South Africa. Smaller fish faced charges for PFMA breaches, fraud and money laundering. Despite evidence to the contrary, much of it common cause, the high court outright acquitted one of the accused and granted section 174 discharges to the rest. The high court declared that there was 'not an iota' of evidence to even answer. The acting judge excoriated both the prosecutors and police for presenting a 'lackadaisical' case. The documentary evidence amounted to 'zilch', the judge proclaimed. The investigation was a 'comedy of errors', a phrase the judge called 'the understatement of the millennia'. This insult warrants scrutiny. Did the acting judge mean that no investigations across thousands of years, from Meletus's inquiries into Socrates, were more incompetently conducted than Nulane? Or did she mean the singular noun millennium, thus restricting her comparison to all the other bad investigations since January 2000? Ironically, the high court's reasoning is now discredited on all these scores. The SCA judgment chronicles a litany of errors, misconceptions and misconstructions; some so basic as failing to apply the elements of fraud to the facts. As for the acting judge's finding that the documents proved 'zilch', the SCA found otherwise. The documents and money flows established a prima facie case of fraud and money laundering which the accused should have been called upon to answer. On 'zilch', the SCA remarked: 'The use of this colloquialism is unfortunate; it does not belong in a judgment.' Thank goodness the State appealed. The stakes were high not only because the acquittals were wrong but because the high court judgment undermined extradition efforts. The collapse of Nulane led to the Guptas walking free in Dubai. The judgment also destabilised case theories for prosecuting other State Capture crimes. The court's position on accomplice witnesses, best evidence, common purpose and section 174 discharges created ripple effects that reverberate today. It is heard tell that the high court's errors emboldened magistrates in Free State courts to discharge other financial crime suspects with alarming ease. When cases are lost, criticism of prosecutors is often merciless. Media outlets joined the chorus of social media condemnation. The otherwise astute investigative journalism platform amaBhungane released a video suggesting that Nulane prosecutors lacked sufficient skills for what should have been a slam-dunk case. Legal reporting guru Karyn Maughan proclaimed that the acting judge 'was absolutely justified in describing it as a comedy of errors'. Maughan said she would be 'absolutely amazed' if the State succeeded in its appeal application. It will be amazing to see an apology to the vilified prosecutors and SAPS investigator. The media's ridicule compounded what was an intensely demoralising experience for NPA advocates Witbooi and Serunye and SAPS investigator Lieutenant Colonel Mandla Mtolo. How they managed to persevere despite such unfair criticism is hard to imagine. Of course every prosecution can be improved. But it was the fact that the judge had 'closed her mind to the evidence adduced by the State' that really prevented the NPA from advancing the State's case, as the SCA noted. The NPA's resilience deserves praise. In this instance, the real issue lies not with prosecutors but with wiser case allocation. State Capture cases cannot be entrusted to judges susceptible to their own 'comedy of errors'. The NPA chief, advocate Shamila Batohi, has herself implored heads of court to appoint experienced judges to seminal matters. A similar hint rang out in Bloemfontein's quaintly dilapidated SCA courtroom B when State counsel, Nazeer Cassim SC, remarked that high-stakes cases should be assigned to judges capable of navigating complex legal terrain. It was acting SCA Justice Cagney Musi (also Free State Judge President) who assigned the Nulane case to the acting judge who so badly mishandled it. As Justice Musi pored over his division's work, he must have regretted his decision. Wayward acquittals are a danger. They imperil South Africa's fragile hope of salvaging itself from ruin. Without the credible prospect of prison, South Africa's kleptocracy will only expand until the justice system is nothing but a laughable, hollow threat. One can only but agree with the SCA's finding that the way the high court trial was conducted 'can be summed up in a single sentence: This was a failure of justice. Regrettably, this erodes public confidence in the criminal justice system.' This critique is not about singling out a judge any more than a judge singled out police and prosecutors. Rather, Nulane serves as a lesson in how mistaken opinions, judicial and public, can delay accountability and demoralise those tasked with wielding justice on society's behalf. Nulane also forces us to confront larger questions. 'How many other Nulane judgments are out there?' This is a troubling question. Much like the temperature this week, the standard of acting appointments has, by all accounts, been plummeting for some time. This phenomenon is so noticeable, it has crept into techniques of civil litigation. No matter how strong a party's case may be, many are induced to take a puny settlement rather than risk the potluck of the court roll. Yet this should not be so. High court trials carry huge social stakes. They're not a CCMA con-arb or housebreaking case. It's all very well to develop lawyers or magistrates by gifting them an acting stint. However, acting judges still need to be drawn from an intellectual and professional elite. A deep, nonracial strata of legal excellence exists in South Africa. Many inspired acting appointments are routinely made and these represent the breadth of legal talent in South Africa, so this is not a 'transformation' issue. The problem is the almost back-of-the-envelope selection of adjudicators we see sometimes. The 'proletarianisation' of the Bench is a threat to the state's legitimacy. The goals of inclusion and professional development must be tempered by a primary duty to select judges capable of deciding cases competently. This is the essence of the 'fair public hearing' promise the Constitution contains. It is especially hard for poor and already marginalised litigants to fix the damage made by learner-judges on appeal. As things stand though, NPA prosecutors have been vindicated by the SCA. Nulane also teaches judges and commentators alike to be less star-struck by defence counsel and their adamant speeches and charming tutelage. A careful examination of the record, not only snippets of the argument or judgment, will often reveal that less-flamboyant career prosecutors have indeed made out a case, at least to warrant the accused mounting a defence. Shakespeare's Hamlet lamented the law's delay and the insolence of office. Thankfully, the SCA has set matters right, for now. The NPA can do better but so can the judiciary. South Africa cannot afford further derailments in its pursuit of justice against the greedy stokers of our ruin. DM
Daily Maverick
6 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
NPA secures major State Capture win: Gupta associates and Free State officials face retrial
In a landmark ruling, the Supreme Court of Appeal has overturned the 2023 acquittals of Gupta lieutenant Iqbal Sharma, Gupta-linked executive Ronica Ragavan, and senior Free State government officials in the R24.9m Nulane fraud case. The court found multiple legal errors in the original trial and ordered a retrial before a new judge. In a tough week, the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) has won a major State Capture milestone as a four-judge bench of the Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA) on Thursday, 12 June 2025, ordered that a new judge hear the Nulane State Capture case after an initial acquittal. More than R280-million was squandered on the Vrede dairy case, which saw the Gupta family take over prime Free State land run by their henchmen from India, who then ran it into the ground as they knew little about agriculture and even less about dairy farming. This money was found to have been used to pay for the infamous Bollywood family wedding in Sun City in 2013. In April 2023, Acting Judge Nompumelelo Gusha threw out the case against Nulane's Iqbal Sharma, Ronica Ragavan (representing a Gupta company) and various Free State officials. 'The SCA judgment confirms our view that the acting judge (Nompumelelo Gusha) misdirected herself in applying the relevant principles with regard to the case and erred in her strong criticism of the prosecution team,' said the NPA. Andrea Johnson's Investigating Directorate Against Corruption (Idac) will reinstate the case, one of the first significant acts of State Capture by the Gupta family and their associate, former trade official Sharma. The Commission of Inquiry into State Capture heard that poor black farmers were deprived of up to R280-million in the Vrede dairy farm case. The Investigating Directorate Against Corruption charged Sharma, Ragavan (representing the Gupta company Islandsite Investment One Hundred and Eighty [Pty] Ltd), as well as Free State government officials, Mbana Peter Thabethe, Limakatso Moorosi, Seipati Silvia Dhlamini and Dinesh Patel (Sharma's brother-in-law). Thabethe, Moorosi and Dhlamini were senior Free State Agriculture and Land Reform Department officials. While Ace Magashule was premier at the time, he was not charged with this case but with other charges. Because of a separate judgment, the court ruled last week that the extradition of his secretary, Moroadi Cholota, was not legal, and his asbestos capture case has been pushed out to 2026. The SCA ruled that the high court made multiple errors of law, including those related to the doctrine of common purpose, evidence rules, and an incorrect interpretation of Section 204 of the Criminal Procedure Act, among others. The SCA said the accused may be retried on the exact charges before a different judge as if they had not been tried or acquitted. The Nulane accused face charges related to fraud, money laundering and contravention of the Public Finance Management Act with the first part of the contract. This was a scoping contract by Sharma's company Nulane, which paid R24.9-million. The State Capture commission heard that Sharma subcontracted this work to Deloitte for R1.5-million. In 2024, Daily Maverick reported here that the black farmers who had been deprived of their rights at the Vrede farm had received a R1,300 gift card and a 5kg meat hamper from the new farm owners, which has since reverted to state ownership. 'This judgment paves the way for the Investigating Directorate Against Corruption to reinstate the case within a reasonable period. The NPA remains resolute in its stance of effectively prosecuting and holding accountable those responsible for State Capture-related corruption,' said the NPA, which is under fire for slow progress. However, the Investigating Directorate Against Corruption has enrolled 50 State Capture cases and declared 133 investigations. It also works with the Asset Forfeiture Unit, run by Ouma Rabaji-Rasethaba, to obtain R14.3-billion worth of asset seizures through freezing and preservation orders. DM
eNCA
11 hours ago
- eNCA
SCA to rule in Nulane Investments case
BLOEMFONTEIN - The Supreme Court of Appeal is set to rule on the NPA's bid to overturn the acquittal of Nulane Investments fraud accused. The suspects were arrested for fraud and money laundering amounting to R25-million. The State is pushing for a retrial of Gupta associates and senior Free State officials. The first State Capture trial ended in the accused walking free. At the heart of the matter are government payments to Nulane for a feasibility study.
