‘Seeds of communal poison sown by RSS, BJP' blamed for poisoning drinking water in school
Speaking to presspersons at the Hubballi Airport on Wednesday, Mr. Kharge sought to know whether such people who poison children for the sake of getting a headmaster from another community transferred can be called human beings.
'The office-bearers of Sri Ram Sene are involved in the heinous act of poisoning children. Why are the leaders are not speaking on it? BJP leaders like R. Ashok and Arvind Bellad seek answers from the Congress on every issue. Why are they silent now. Why can't they speak on the issue now?' he sought to know.
On the Supreme Court's observation on Rahul Gandhi, Mr. Khage said that the BJP MP from Arunachal Pradesh himself has made a statement on the floor of the House in Parliament mentioning about Chinese forces occupying Indian territory and locals themselves have conveyed the same to Rahul Gandhi.
'If you don't believe it, then what to do. Should we bring certificate of patriotism from the BJP. What have the BJP and the RSS done for the country?' he asked.
Mr. Kharge also said that they have objection to those passing judgments without considering facts.
To a query, Mr. Kharge said that the process of finalising reservation for zilla and taluk panchayat elections is under way and a notification will be issued in two-three months and subsequently, elections will be held.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Economic Times
13 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Trump wants Intel CEO out: Meet the chip industry veteran Lip-Bu Tan who is under US President's radar
Donald Trump has urged for Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan's immediate resignation, alleging ties to China that pose a national security risk. Republican lawmakers, led by Senator Tom Cotton, have raised concerns about Tan's financial involvement in Chinese companies, including those with reported links to the Chinese military. Cotton also questioned a criminal case involving Tan's former company, Cadence Design. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads US President Donald Trump Thursday called for the for the immediate resignation of Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan , citing alleged ties to China that he claimed pose a national security risk. 'The CEO of INTEL is highly CONFLICTED and must resign, immediately. There is no other solution to this problem. Thank you for your attention to this problem!' Trump wrote on Truth President's remarks come amid heightened scrutiny from Republican lawmakers, including Senator Tom Cotton of Arkansas, who earlier this week raised alarm over Tan's reported financial involvement in Chinese companies. In a letter addressed to Intel board Chair Frank Yeary, Cotton cited an April Reuters report that disclosed Tan's personal and venture fund investments in hundreds of Chinese companies — including several with reported ties to the Chinese Senator Tom Cotton also sought clarification on a recent criminal case involving Bu Tan's former company, Cadence Design. According to a report, Cotton expressed 'concern about the security and integrity of Intel's operations and its potential impact on US national security.'"Intel is required to be a responsible steward of American taxpayer dollars and to comply with applicable security regulations. Mr. Tan's associations raise questions about Intel's ability to fulfill these obligations," Cotton reportedly named Lip-Bu Tan its new CEO in March this year, who succeeded Pat Gelsinger. Lip-Bu Tan, a Malaysian-born executive, grew up in Singapore, where he studied physics at Nanyang University. He then pursued a master's degree in nuclear engineering at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT).After gaining experience in venture investing, Tan joined the Cadence board in 2004 and then went on to become co-CEO in 2008 following Michael Fister's departure and assumed sole CEO responsibilities in led Cadence for over a decade before transitioning to the role of chairman, a position he held until 2023. Tan is an accomplished executive with more than two decades of semiconductor and software experience and deep relationships across the technology has received several accolades for his significant contributions to the industry, including the 2022 Robert N. Noyce Award, the Semiconductor Industry Association's highest honor, and was named one of Forbes' Top 50 Venture Capitalists, according to an official previously served as chief executive officer of Cadence Design Systems Inc. and was also a member of its board of his 12 years as Cadence's chief executive officer, he led a reinvention of the company and drove a cultural transformation centered on customer-centric innovation that enabled Cadence to more than double its revenue, expand operating margins and significantly outperform the is a founding managing partner of Walden Catalyst Ventures and chairman of Walden International, a leading venture capital firm. He has also served on the boards of public companies Credo Technology Group and Schneider Electric.
Indian Express
13 minutes ago
- Indian Express
As Russian oil discount narrows, economists think India can afford import diversification
With US President Donald Trump doubling the tariff on Indian goods to 50 per cent, economists think India can afford to reduce its purchase of Russian oil due to the narrowing of the discount on offer and diversify its sourcing. From around 2 per cent prior to the invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, the share of Russian oil in India's oil imports has increased sharply to 35-40 per cent, with Indian refiners lapping up discounted Russian oil that was shunned by developed nations. However, the tariff war instigated by Donald Trump – initially with a focus on addressing the US' trade deficit with other nations – has seen the imposition of so-called secondary tariffs on India for its purchase of Russian energy and defence equipment. On July 30, Trump threatened a 25 per cent on India and an additional unspecified 'penalty' for its Russian trade. On Wednesday, the penalty was revealed to be a further 25 per cent tariff on Indian goods that will come into effect on August 27. According to Barclays economists led by Aastha Gudwani, the purchase of discounted Russian oil helped lower India's oil import bill by around $7 billion-10 billion in 2024 to $186 billion. 'As of now, the discount on oil imports from Russia having narrowed to around $3-8/barrel lower than Middle eastern grade. Media reports suggest that Indian refiners would be pushed to pivot towards traditional West Asian suppliers and new players such as Brazil to make up for lost Russian supplies, with price increases around $4-5/barrel. With global oil prices in 2025 so far settling around $9/barrel lower than 2024, such a diversification of oil supply sources is unlikely to hurt India's oil import bill,' they added. Meanwhile, Nomura economists Sonal Varma and Aurodeep Nandi estimate the implied discount on Russian crude oil for Indian refiners declined to around $2.2 per barrel in 2024-25 from over $12 per barrel in 2022-23. As such, if India chooses to reduce its purchase of Russian oil, India's annual import bill may only rise by around $1.5 billion, they calculated. Morgan Stanley economists were in agreement, estimating that the discount India got on Russian crude oil in 2024-25 was only $2-3 per barrel. To be sure, Indian refining companies began cutting their purchase of Russian oil even prior to Trump's threat of a 'penalty'. In July, India's crude imports from Russia averaged 1.6 million barrels per day, as per data from Kpler, a global trade data and analytics firm, down 24 per cent from June. However, a move by India to procure more oil from countries other than Russia could push up prices globally, which would raise the import bill. While difficult to estimate, Nomura economists think that given India imported 1.8 billion barrels of oil in 2024-25, India's annual import bill could rise by around $1.8 billion for every $1 increase in global crude prices. 'Domestically, the government will likely keep pump prices constant, which means there is likely to be minimal inflation and growth impact from any shift in oil procurement. This also means that the ultimate cost of any transition will most likely have to be borne by public sector oil marketing companies, and eventually by the government if it needs to compensate them for these under-recoveries at a later stage,' Nomura said, adding that it did not see a 'major upside risk' to the Indian government's fiscal deficit target of 4.4 per cent of GDP for the current fiscal. Meanwhile, reduced demand for Russian oil from Indian refiners, especially state-run ones, is already beginning to reflect in prices, with Homayoun Falakshahi, head of crude oil analysis at Kpler, pointing out on Wednesday that private refiners were 'still scooping barrels, but at a lower pace. Four Aframaxes are currently waiting to discharge at Jamnagar and Vadinar'. An aframax is a type of oil tanker. According to Falakshahi, India's negotiations with the US could lead to New Delhi agreeing to raise its oil and gas purchases. The energy trade between the two countries is worth around $7.5 billion a year. 'This has already started to be the case, with the country's imports of US crude on the rise lately to an average of 225 kbd (thousand barrels per day) since May, nearly twice as much the levels from early 2025. Indian refiners could realistically increase their intake of US crude by another 100 kbd to previous highs of ~300 kbd in 2021,' Falakshahi said. However, he added he was sceptical that India will be able to completely stop the import of Russian oil. Siddharth Upasani is a Deputy Associate Editor with The Indian Express. He reports primarily on data and the economy, looking for trends and changes in the former which paint a picture of the latter. Before The Indian Express, he worked at Moneycontrol and financial newswire Informist (previously called Cogencis). Outside of work, sports, fantasy football, and graphic novels keep him busy. ... Read More
NDTV
13 minutes ago
- NDTV
Kashmir Mediation To Russian Oil: Trump's 'Un'Truth Social
New Delhi: US President Donald Trump has made several misleading or outright inaccurate statements about India -- from falsehoods regarding trade policy to the economy, Trump's remarks have frequently clashed with facts. Trump's announcement of 25 per cent additional tariffs on Indian goods triggered immediate diplomatic pushback from New Delhi and raised questions about Western consistency on Russian energy sanctions. Fact-checking Trump 1. "India Stopped Buying Russian Oil" Trump's Claim: "Well, I understand India no longer is going to be buying oil from Russia. That's what I heard. I don't know if that's right or not, but that's a good step." Fact Check: According to government sources, India continues to import Russian crude oil. 2. "India is the Tariff King" Trump's Claim: India is the "Tariff King" and an abuser of global trade rules. Fact Check: India's simple average tariff stands at 16 per cent, comparable to economies like Turkey (16.2 per cent) and Argentina (13.4 per cent). India's weighted average tariff is only 4.6 per cent. 3. "India is a Dead Economy" Trump's Claim: India is a "dead economy" and the US does "very little business" with India. Fact Check: Contrary to Trump's assertion, India remains the largest trading partner of the United States for the fourth consecutive year, with bilateral trade touching $131.84 billion in FY 2024-25. Indian exports to the US rose by 11.6 per cent, reaching $86.51 billion, and imports from the US stood at $45.33 billion. The two countries have set a target of $500 billion in bilateral trade by 2030 under the "Mission 500" roadmap. 4. Ceasefire Between India and Pakistan Trump's Claim: He personally brokered a ceasefire between India and Pakistan and prevented a nuclear conflict. Fact Check: There is no official evidence to support Trump's claim. Both Prime Minister Narendra Modi and External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar have clarified that no ceasefire was brokered by the United States. "At no stage, in any conversation with the United States, was there any linkage with trade and what was going on. Secondly, there was no talk between the Prime Minister and President Trump from the 22nd of April when President Trump called up to convey his sympathy, and the 17th of June, when he called up the Prime Minister in Canada to explain why he could not meet," Mr Jaishankar said in Parliament. 5. "1,000 Years War" Trump's Claim: "There have been tensions on that border for 1,500 years... a thousand-year fight in Kashmir." Fact Check: The India-Pakistan Kashmir conflict began in 1947 following the partition and independence of India. There is no historical basis for Trump's 1,000-year claim. Prior to 1947, Kashmir was a princely state under British rule and was not subject to the Indo-Pakistani conflict. 6. Kashmir Mediation Offer Trump's Claim: PM Modi asked him to mediate on Kashmir in 2019. Fact Check: India categorically denied that any such request was made. The Ministry of External Affairs stated: "No such request has been made by PM Modi to the US President. It has been India's consistent position that all outstanding issues with Pakistan are discussed only bilaterally." 7. "India Got A Sweeter Paris Deal" Trump's Claim: India got a "sweeter deal" under the Paris Climate Accord, which justified his withdrawal. Fact Check: India is the first G20 country to have met its Paris Climate Agreement targets. India's nationally determined contributions (NDCs) have been praised by international climate monitors. 8. "India is Taking American Jobs" Trump's Claim: "India is taking our jobs... It's not going to happen anymore, folks." Fact Check: Indian companies have created over 425,000 jobs in the United States, with $40 billion invested as per a 2023 Confederation of Indian Industry report. Additionally, Indian students contributed $7.7 billion annually to the US economy between 2019 and 2023. Indian-origin CEOs head major US. firms, including Google, Microsoft, IBM, and Adobe-driving American innovation and competitiveness.
