Chinese Mobile App Luring Northeast Residents To Share 'Anti-India Content', Centre Mulls Ban
Last Updated:
The mobile application -- REDNOTE -- lures users with cash and other rewards to share "anti-India content", sources said.
In a new dimension of information warfare, China has reportedly resorted to plotting against India's northeastern states using a mobile application – REDNOTE – which lures users with money and other rewards to share anti-national content, intelligence sources said on Friday.
The residents of several northeastern states are on the app's radar, including those belonging to Arunachal Pradesh, Manipur, and Assam.
Appearing to be an ordinary app from the outside, REDNOTE is filled with fake RAW (Research and Analysis Wing) documents, disputed maps of India, edited videos, and content aligned with Pakistan's agenda.
The app aims to create mistrust among youth towards India with messages such as 'Delhi is far away". It also promotes the idea that being closer to China would be beneficial for the residents of the northeast.
Joint Operation By Pakistan And China?
According to intelligence sources, psychological operations experts from China and Pakistan are behind this app, which is being used to infiltrate the minds and society of Indians.
'China knows that Northeast India is extremely sensitive in terms of national security. That's why it's applying the same strategy it used earlier in Africa, Taiwan, and Hong Kong to create instability," sources said.
Sources said that the Centre and national security agencies are aware of the application's malicious activities in India, and the Ministry of Electronics and IT has initiated the necessary procedure to ban it in the country. India had earlier banned several popular Chinese apps, such as TikTok, ShareIt, and UC Browser, due to national security reasons.
First Published:
May 30, 2025, 08:25 IST
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
34 minutes ago
- First Post
‘Fighting India is in Pakistan's DNA, only deterrence is increasing costs for terror': Pak expert Tilak Devasher
The anti-India sentiment is in the DNA of Pakistan, which means that the only way to ensure deterrence is imposing increasing costs for every act of terror, said Tilak Devasher, a former Special Secretary at Cabinet Secretariat, in an interview with Firstpost. read more Pakistan's Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif, along with Chief of the Army Staff (COAS) of Pakistan Asim Munir, reviews the parade at the passing out ceremony of 151st Long Course at the Pakistan Military Academy (PMA) Kakul, Abbottabad, Pakistan, April 26, 2025. Press Information Department of Pakistan via Reuters With Operation Sindoor, India entered a new age in the war on terrorism. Unlike 2016 when India conducted cross-border surgical strikes or 2019 when India conducted airstrike on a terrorist facility, India this time struck at the heart of terrorism as it struck headquarters of Lashkar-e-Taiba and Jaish-e-Mohammed among other sites. In an interview with Firstpost's Madhur Sharma, Pakistan expert Tilak Devasher said that Indian actions, both kinetic actions like airstrikes and non-kinetic actions like holding the Indus Waters Treaty in abeyance, took Pakistan by surprise. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD ALSO READ: Operation Sindoor: With battlefield edge, India cornered Pakistan to seek peace & that's new normal 'They had not anticipated being attacked in Punjab — both the terror headquarters and airbases. So, yes, Asim Munir has lost face and hence his elevation to Field Marshal is an act of damage control, tell the people falsely that they won even though they suffered a major defeat,' said Devasher, a former Special Secretary at Cabinet Secretariat. As for the India-Pakistan relationship, Devasher said that the anti-India sentiment is in the DNA of Pakistan and the only way to ensure deterrence is imposing increasing costs for every act of terror, said Devasher, the author of 'Pakistan: Courting the Abyss', 'Pakistan: At the Helm', 'Pakistan: The Balochistan Conundrum', and 'The Pashtuns: A Contested History'. Read the full interview: With Operation Sindoor and the accompanying messaging from the government, do you believe that we now have a new 'Modi Doctrine' of national security? Yes, we do have a Modi Doctrine now. Its key components are that if there is a terrorist attack on India, there will be a fitting response; the nuclear blackmail will no longer work and India will strike precisely and decisively; and that there will be no distinction between terrorists and their sponsors. It had been said that the weak position of the Pakistani Army was one of the reasons behind approving the Pahalgam attack — the idea being that a confrontation with India would rally people around the flag and restore the Army's primacy. Do you believe in this line of thought? If yes, do you believe that Field Marshal Asim Munir miscalculated and has now lost face? STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD This has been Pakistan's template when faced with serious domestic issues. They divert the issue and externalise the problem to manufacture a crisis. Nothing unites the population behind the Army more than a confrontation with India. However, in this case, the Indian reaction, both kinetic and non-kinetic, took Pakistan by surprise. They had not anticipated being attacked in Punjab — both the terror headquarters and airbases. So, yes, Munir has lost face and hence his elevation to Field Marshal is an act of damage control and tell the people falsely that they won even though they suffered a major defeat. As Pakistani military stands weaker after being battered by India, do you believe that various insurgent groups in Pakistan are now going to ramp up their operations to make the most of the situation? Yes, it is a strong signal to the Baloch and the Pashtuns — and even Sindhis. They could well ramp up their operations. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD In your book, 'Pakistan: Courting the Abyss', you have mentioned that being in a state of confrontation with India is a must for the Pakistani Army and hatred of India is quite integral to it. With such anti-India fundamentals, do you believe there is a possibility of Pakistan being deterred in the long-term? To retain its primacy in Pakistan, a confrontation with India is expected from the Pakistani Army. Any peace or normal relations with India will make the Army lose that primacy. So, the only way to deter Pakistan is to keep increasing the cost of confrontation. Given their economic situation, they will find it difficult to recoup their losses after every confrontation with India. For many years, it was said that the age of conventional warfare between India and Pakistan was over. Do you believe that India really called out Pakistan's nuclear bluff? Or did India keep the attacks well below the threshold to rattle Pakistan? STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD I think India did call Pakistan's nuclear bluff. Pakistan is the only nuclear weapons country that treats nuclear weapons as war-fighting weapons. For other countries, nuclear weapons are deterrents. Despite their bluster, when it came to the crunch, India tested this and called out the nuclear bluff. Several of Pakistan's so-called red-lines were crossed when their air bases were targeted but they did not or could not react. Do you believe that internal troubles in Pakistan, such as insurgencies, financial troubles, or political chaos, can ever put a check on its anti-India campaign? I don't think so since being anti-India is in Pakistan's DNA. The whole philosophy of eating grass for a thousand years stems from this deep-rooted anti-India hatred.
Time of India
42 minutes ago
- Time of India
Global universities step in as US cracks down on foreign students
Amidst policy shifts in the US targeting academic institutions, universities worldwide are actively attracting international students with incentives like tuition waivers and research grants. This comes as the US faces criticism for policies impacting international student enrolment, leading students to explore alternatives in Europe and Asia-Pacific, potentially affecting the US's reputation and economy. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Also Read: Federal judge extends order blocking Trump administration ban on foreign students at Harvard Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Universities around the world are stepping in to attract international students affected by US President Donald Trump's recent policies targeting academic institutions. These policies include cutting research funding, tightening visa rules—especially for Chinese students—and increasing taxes on elite Osaka University is offering tuition waivers, travel support, and research grants to students and scholars looking to transfer from US institutions. Kyoto University and Tokyo University are also considering similar initiatives. Hong Kong has instructed its universities to actively attract top talent from the US China's Xi'an Jiaotong University has issued an appeal to students from Harvard, offering fast-tracked admissions and full move follows actions by the Trump administration that critics say undermine US higher education. Last week, Harvard's ability to enrol international students was temporarily revoked, although a federal judge later blocked the Ishii, dean of Osaka University's graduate school of medicine, told Reuters, 'This is a loss for all of humanity.'Japan has set a target to increase its foreign student population from 337,000 to 400,000 over the next Turner, CEO of Quacquarelli Symonds (QS), which ranks universities globally, said to Reuters institutions in Europe and Asia-Pacific are seeing more interest from students who are rethinking plans to study in the US Countries like Germany, France, Ireland, New Zealand, Singapore, South Korea, and mainland China are gaining visibility as crackdown on Chinese students has drawn particular attention. On Wednesday, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio said the administration would 'aggressively' restrict Chinese student over 275,000 Chinese students study in the US, contributing significantly to both the revenue of educational institutions and the talent pool of tech companies. According to the US Department of Commerce, international students—more than half from India and China—added over $50 billion to the US economy in policy shift comes during the international application season. Many students are planning to arrive in the US by August to begin their studies. But some are now a 24-year-old Chinese student from Chengdu, had intended to complete her master's degree in the US but is now exploring options in the UK. 'The various policies (by the US government) were a slap in my face,' she said. 'I'm thinking about my mental health and it's possible that I indeed change schools.'The impact isn't limited to Chinese students. Tom Moon, deputy head at Oxbridge Applications, said students from Britain and the EU are now more cautious about applying to US universities In contrast, British universities are seeing more interest from students currently in the US, according to Universities UK, though it is too early to confirm enrolment Rickets, an 18-year-old Canadian student at Harvard, said her financial aid package may not be matched by other universities if she is forced to transfer. 'Around the time I was applying to schools, the only university across the Atlantic I considered was Oxford... However, I realised that I would not be able to afford the international tuition and there was no sufficient scholarship or financial aid available,' she Harvard's enrolment rights are revoked, she plans to apply to the University of reported that traffic to its 'Study in America' guide dropped 17.6% in the past year. Interest from India fell by more than 50%.'Measurable impacts on enrolment typically emerge within six to 18 months. Reputational effects, however, often linger far longer, particularly where visa uncertainty and shifting work rights play into perceptions of risk versus return,' Turner Thompson, a 20-year-old American student at Harvard, lives with eight international scholars. He said, 'If America turns these brilliant and talented students away, they will find other places to work and study.'(With inputs from Reuters)
The Hindu
43 minutes ago
- The Hindu
‘When will PM Modi break his silence?' Congress on Trump's truce claims
The Congress on Saturday (May 31, 2025) wondered when Prime Minister Narendra Modi would respond to U.S. President Donald Trump, who has repeatedly given more than an indication that it was he who brokered a truce between India and Pakistan during the latest armed conflict. In a series of posts on X, Congress general secretary Jairam Ramesh tagged a video clip of Mr. Trump to say this is the 11th time in 21 days that Mr. Modi's "great friend" claimed he had a role to play in the ceasefire between the two neighbours. This is 11th time in 21 days that PM @narendramodi's great friend and American President Donald Trump has made claims about how the ceasefire with Pakistan took place. When will the PM speak up? — Jairam Ramesh (@Jairam_Ramesh) May 31, 2025 "When will the PM speak up?" he asked. Mr. Ramesh earlier said, "This is the 9th time in 20 days, across 3 countries and 3 cities. Donaldbhai keeps repeating the same sequence of events of how he got the 4-Day India-Pakistan war to stop - US intervention and the use of the trade instrument to stop nuclear escalation. The equivalence of India and Pakistan gets reiterated yet again." Mr. Trump's Commerce Secretary made exactly the same claims in his submission to the New York-based Court of International Trade on May 23, the Congress leader said. "But Donaldbhai's friend Mr. Narendra Modi continues to ignore his claims with absolute silence. Why doesn't the PM speak up? "Is President Trump also doing what Mr. Modi does all the time and so well (i.e., lying)? Or is he speaking even 50% truth?" Mr. Ramesh said. The Congress has been urging the government to clarify Mr. Trump's claims and object to his hyphenation of India and Pakistan. The government has maintained that issues between India and Pakistan will be resolved bilaterally and without any third-party intervention.
