Fortis plan to reduce wildfire risk across Southern Interior raises other safety concerns
But as the 'Public Safety Power Shutoff' initiative aims to decrease the chance of wildfires, it's raising other safety concerns.
'It sounds like a good idea, you know, I still have a few questions,' said Princeton mayor Spencer Coyne.
Princeton is among 10 communities in the Southern Interior where the plan is being implemented for the 2025 wildfire season.
They include Princeton, Midway, Greenwood, Beaverdell, Christian Valley, Westbridge, Rock Creek, Cawston, Keremeos, and Hedley.
The communities were deemed 'high-risk' for wildfires by Fortis.
The initiative will see Fortis cut off power in the mentioned communities, if warranted, during extreme weather events.
Story continues below advertisement
'When you have very high winds, high heat, low humidity and tinder-dry vegetation, we will reach out to local emergency services and make a decision whether we need to turn off power,' said Gary Toft, senior adviser of corporate communications with Fortis.
2:36
L.A. wildfires: Winds, low humidity threaten to fuel fires ravaging county
The power outage would prevent branches and trees from falling onto live power lines and igniting.
Get daily National news
Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day. Sign up for daily National newsletter Sign Up
By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy
'We're asking folks to be prepared,' Toft said. 'So make sure you have a backup plan in case of a power outage … for lighting, for staying cool, for preparing food. Make sure you have an emergency kit.'
While no one wants to see wildfire destruction, Fortis' plan is being met with concerns as residents could lose power for several days.
A staff report presented to the Regional District of Kootenay Boundary (RDKB) board on Wednesday states, 'Emergency Management staff are concerned that the health and safety of residents are being put at risk.'
Story continues below advertisement
The report adds, 'Many locations identified as cooling centres for extreme heat events do not have backup power generation'
The Regional District of Okanagan Similkameen (RDOS) echoed the sentiment, telling Global News, 'it shares many of the concerns.'
'We're talking to emergency services,' Toft said. 'We're in the process of implementing this so people, people have questions, people have concerns, we want to hear that feedback, because that's important and how we implement this.'
Fortis will be holding two public information sessions including one in Greenwood (Greenwood Community Hall) on May 14 and the other in Keremeos (Victory Hall) on May 15.
Both are scheduled fr0m 4 p.m. until 7 p.m.
The company will also hold a virtual public open house on May 22 to provide more information.
'After speaking with them (Fortis), they put a lot of my, you know, uneasiness at rest,' Coyne said 'It's only going to be in certain circumstances, and it's not going to be like weekly, or anything like that. It's strictly to prevent something like California, or you know other places, from happening here.'
For more information on the Public Safety Power Shutoff initiative or information on how to prepare for a power outage, you can go to the FortisBC website.
Story continues below advertisement
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Global News
2 hours ago
- Global News
Trump's new tariffs on dozens of countries take effect
U.S. President Donald Trump began levying higher import taxes on dozens of countries Thursday, just as the economic fallout of his monthslong tariff threats has begun to create visible damage for the U.S. economy. Just after midnight, goods from more than 60 countries and the European Union became subject to tariff rates of 10 per cent or higher. Products from the EU, Japan and South Korea are taxed at 15 per cent, while imports from Taiwan, Vietnam and Bangladesh are taxed at 20 per cent. Trump also expects the EU, Japan and South Korea to invest hundreds of billions of dollars in the U.S. 'I think the growth is going to be unprecedented,' Trump said Wednesday afternoon. He added that the U.S. was 'taking in hundreds of billions of dollars in tariffs,' but he couldn't provide a specific figure for revenues because 'we don't even know what the final number is' regarding tariff rates. Story continues below advertisement Despite the uncertainty, the Trump White House is confident that the onset of his broad tariffs will provide clarity about the path of the world's largest economy. Now that companies understand the direction the U.S. is headed, the Republican administration believes they can ramp up new investments and jump-start hiring in ways that can rebalance the U.S. economy as a manufacturing power. But so far, there are signs of self-inflicted wounds to America as companies and consumers alike brace for the impact of new taxes. What the data has shown is a U.S. economy that changed in April with Trump's initial rollout of tariffs, an event that led to market drama, a negotiating period and Trump's ultimate decision to start his universal tariffs on Thursday. Risk of economic erosion Economic reports show that hiring began to stall, inflationary pressures crept upward and home values in key markets started to decline after April, said John Silvia, CEO of Dynamic Economic Strategy. Story continues below advertisement 'A less productive economy requires fewer workers,' Silvia said in an analysis note. 'But there is more, the higher tariff prices lower workers' real wages. The economy has become less productive, and firms cannot pay the same real wages as before. Actions have consequences.' Even then, the ultimate transformations of the tariffs are unknown and could play out over months, if not years. Many economists say the risk is that the American economy is steadily eroded rather than collapsing instantly. 1:57 Trump tariffs: What's at stake for countries still looking to make a deal? 'We all want it to be made for television where it's this explosion — it's not like that,' said Brad Jensen, a professor at Georgetown University. 'It's going to be fine sand in the gears and slow things down.' Get daily National news Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day. Sign up for daily National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy Trump has promoted the tariffs as a way to reduce the persistent trade deficit. But importers sought to avoid the taxes by importing more goods before the taxes went into effect. As a result, the $582.7 billion trade imbalance for the first half of the year was 38 per cent higher than in 2024. Total construction spending has dropped 2.9 per cent over the past year. Story continues below advertisement The economic pain isn't confined to the U.S. Germany, which sends 10 per cent of its exports to the U.S. market, saw industrial production sag 1.9 per cent in June as Trump's earlier rounds of tariff hikes took hold. 'The new tariffs will clearly weigh on economic growth,' said Carsten Brzeski, global chief of macro for ING bank. Dismay in India and Switzerland The lead-up to Thursday fit the slapdash nature of Trump's tariffs, which have been variously rolled out, walked back, delayed, increased, imposed by letter and frantically renegotiated. The process has been so muddled that officials for key trade partners were unclear at the start of the week whether the tariffs would begin Thursday or Friday. The language of the July 31 order to delay the start of tariffs from Aug. 1 only said the higher tax rates would start in seven days. Trump on Wednesday announced additional 25 per cent tariffs to be imposed on India for its buying of Russian oil, bringing its total import taxes to 50 per cent. Story continues below advertisement A top body of Indian exporters said Thursday the latest U.S. tariffs will impact nearly 55 per cent of the country's outbound shipments to America and force exporters to lose their long-standing clients. 3:55 Trump confirms Apple's $100 billion investment in U.S., teases 100% tariffs on imported chips 'Absorbing this sudden cost escalation is simply not viable. Margins are already thin,' S.C. Ralhan, president of the Federation of Indian Export Organizations, said in a statement. The Swiss executive branch, the Federal Council, was expected to hold an extraordinary meeting Thursday after President Karin Keller-Sutter and other top Swiss officials returned from a hastily arranged trip to Washington in a failed bid to avert steep 39 per cent U.S. tariffs on Swiss goods. Import taxes are still coming on pharmaceutical drugs, and Trump announced 100 per cent tariffs on computer chips. That could leave the U.S. economy in a place of suspended animation as it awaits the impact. Story continues below advertisement Stock market remains solid The president's use of a 1977 law to declare an economic emergency to impose the tariffs is also under challenge. The impending ruling from last week's hearing before a U.S. appeals court could cause Trump to find other legal justifications if judges say he exceeded his authority. Even people who worked with Trump during his first term are skeptical that things will go smoothly for the economy, such as Paul Ryan, the former Republican House speaker, who has emerged as a Trump critic. 'There's no sort of rationale for this other than the president wanting to raise tariffs based upon his whims, his opinions,' Ryan told CNBC on Wednesday. 'I think choppy waters are ahead because I think they're going to have some legal challenges.' Still, the stock market has been solid during the recent tariff drama, with the S&P 500 index climbing more than 25 per cent from its April low. The market's rebound and the income tax cuts in Trump's tax and spending measures signed into law on July 4 have given the White House confidence that economic growth is bound to accelerate in the coming months. Story continues below advertisement Global financial markets took Thursday's tariff adjustments in stride, with Asian and European shares and U.S. futures mostly higher. Brzeski warned: 'While financial markets seem to have grown numb to tariff announcements, let's not forget that their adverse effects on economies will gradually unfold over time.' As of now, Trump still foresees an economic boom while the rest of the world and American voters wait nervously. 'There's one person who can afford to be cavalier about the uncertainty that he's creating, and that's Donald Trump,' said Rachel West, a senior fellow at The Century Foundation who worked in the Biden White House on labor policy. 'The rest of Americans are already paying the price for that uncertainty.'
Toronto Star
5 hours ago
- Toronto Star
We should all be demanding to find out what's driving Doug Ford's tunnel dreams
Between 2019 and 2021, three construction giants submitted high-level work-ups to the Ministry of Transportation, outlining schemes to build tunnels under Highway 401 and elsewhere in the GTA, according to freedom of information documents obtained by the CBC and Global News — a full four years before Premier Doug Ford first publicly bruited what will, if approved, become an extinction-level event for Ontario's finances. The question is whether Ontarians were asking for an impossibly expensive solution to gridlock, or whether this a case of the engineering tail wagging the taxpaying dog. Opinion articles are based on the author's interpretations and judgments of facts, data and events. More details
Global News
5 hours ago
- Global News
How Toronto considered a privately-operated tunnel to alleviate congestion
Long before Premier Doug Ford championed the idea of a tunnel under Highway 401, the City of Toronto briefly considered a near-identical proposal from a Canadian engineering firm — one that would have seen twin tunnels under the Gardiner Expressway to relieve congestion. The proposal, obtained by Global News through freedom of information laws, outlined plans for one tunnel between Jameson Avenue and Cherry Street and a second tunnel connecting Front Street and Spadina Avenue to Exhibition Place. The pitch, which was first made by John Beck, then-CEO of construction firm Aecon, in 2015, was formalized two years later and presented to then-mayor John Tory and senior staff. While the idea was later dropped, Tory's office appeared to be seriously weighing the project and pushed a Toronto-area Liberal MP to consider the proposal as part of the newly created Canada Infrastructure Bank. Story continues below advertisement 'Potential marquee, first-out-of-the-gate project for the Infrastructure Bank,' Tory's chief of staff Chris Eby wrote to the federal MP in 2017, under the subject line 'Gardiner tunnel.' Sources, however, insist the idea was considered moot when the city decided to rehabilitate the Gardiner instead. In an earlier statement to Global News, Aecon said the company has a long history of 'sharing emerging technologies and innovative new approaches with decision makers.' 'Aecon is proud to have built game-changing energy and transportation projects for Ontarians,' the company said in a statement. 'Building tunnels in support of transit and roadways to help relieve congestion is one solution that makes sense.' A tolled tunnel As part of its presentation to the city — titled 'GTConnect initiative' — Aecon proposed a wide-ranging solution for the Gardiner Expressway, Don Valley Parkway and Lakeshore Boulevard. Story continues below advertisement The idea would have included two main tunnels, a two-lane expansion to the DVP, and a potential transit corridor on a 'modified Lakeshore boulevard' — all of which would be financed, operated and maintained by the developer for a 50-year term. Get breaking National news For news impacting Canada and around the world, sign up for breaking news alerts delivered directly to you when they happen. Sign up for breaking National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy The benefit to the city, Aecon argued, would come in the form of 2,000 construction jobs, new land development opportunities and 'enhanced value of city and provincial lands.' View image in full screen A presentation about the proposed tunnel obtained using freedom of information laws. Global News While commuters would save '10-20 minutes during peak hours,' drivers would have to pay for the privilege. The company's proposal said the dual-tunnel route, along with the expanded lanes of the DVP, would be tolled for a 50-year period. The slide deck also includes key timelines for the proposed project: 18 to 24 months to conduct an environmental assessment; 36 months to build the Front Street tunnel and widen the DVP and 72 months to build the Gardiner Expressway tunnel. Story continues below advertisement Emails, obtained by Global News, show Tory's office was personally in touch with then-Aecon CEO John Beck and arranged a meeting with company representatives for Oct. 20, 2017. Six days after the meeting took place, Tory's chief of staff punted the idea to the federal government, asking for it to be considered for Infrastructure Bank funding. A provincial pitch To cover its bases, Aecon also went to the provincial government, which has significantly more financial firepower and oversees the rest of Ontario's highways, to pitch the same idea. Sources said Beck, who was appointed to the Order of Ontario in 2024, presented the same idea to the Ministry of Transportation, suggesting Aecon was looking for provincial support for the Toronto Gardiner tunnel. The proposal, sources said, never made it past the one meeting. Story continues below advertisement In 2019, the idea was revived once again, but this time it moved north to target the growing gridlock on Highway 401. The company filed an unsolicited proposal to Infrastructure Ontario offering a potential tunnel as the cure to highway congestion at a cost, sources said, of roughly $50 to $60 billion to build. The 22-kilometre expressway tunnel proposal would have taken drivers under the most congested portions of Highway 401 — from the 427 to the 404 — with periodic on and off-ramps and a potential connection to Toronto Pearson International Airport. While it's unclear how closely the two proposals would have aligned, Aecon appeared to be offering what governments had been looking for: a job-creating, traffic-alleviating solution along with 'world-class transportation infrastructure,' and entirely funded by the private sector. The pitch may have been tempting, with the Ford government now studying a strikingly similar plan to build beneath Highway 401.
