Halifax-area vice-principal stabbed by student files lawsuit against security guard
HALIFAX - A vice-principal stabbed by a 15-year-old student inside a Halifax high school is suing a school security guard, claiming the guard failed to follow proper search and de-escalation procedures before the attack.
In a statement of claim filed April 28, vice-principal Wayne Rodgers alleges that on March 20, 2023, Ryan Cosgrove failed to complete a search of the student and his belongings after the security guard pulled a weapon from the student's school bag.
At the time, all three people were in Rodgers's office at Charles P. Allen High School in suburban Bedford.
ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW
According to an agreed statement of facts presented last year to a Nova Scotia youth court judge, Cosgrove left the office with a butterfly knife and called police, leaving Rodgers alone with the student in an office that was locked from the outside.
Moments later, the student pulled a folding knife from his school bag and stabbed the vice-principal twice as he tried to escape. The boy fled the office and stabbed an administrative assistant in the back before he left the building and was arrested on school grounds.
He later pleaded guilty to two counts of aggravated assault and was sentenced to two years of probation. His identity is protected from publication under the Youth Criminal Justice Act.
Rodgers was stabbed in the upper back and lower chest, which caused air and blood to leak into his chest cavity, according to the lawsuit filed with the Nova Scotia Supreme Court. The lawsuit also alleges Cosgrove failed to recognize the student was getting agitated and aggressive. And the document says the security guard's decision to close the office's locked door left the vice-principal trapped with the assailant.
Attempts to reach Cosgrove for comment were unsuccessful.
The lawsuit also names the Halifax Regional Centre for Education, alleging the education authority failed to properly train Cosgrove in search and seizure techniques or de-escalation procedures. As well, the lawsuit says the education authority is vicariously liable for the damages caused by the security guard, saying the centre was aware of the history of violence at the high school.
The authority was negligent for employing an improperly trained security guard and for failing to have any hiring or training policies for security guards, the lawsuit alleges.
ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW
ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW
On another front, the lawsuit alleges the education authority failed to warn Rodgers about the student's 'propensity for violence.'
The education authority issued a brief statement Tuesday saying it couldn't comment on the allegations because the case, which deals with a private matter with an employee on leave, is before the courts.
Meanwhile, Rodgers continues to suffer from pain, discomfort and other limitations, as well as unspecified psychological injuries, the document says.
The allegations in the statement of claim have yet to be tested in court.
This report by The Canadian Press was first published May 7, 2025.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBC
3 hours ago
- CBC
B.C. babysitter must be acquitted in toddler's 2011 drowning death, Supreme Court rules
Johna Baylon Tammy Marion Bouvette was caring for a 19-month-old girl in Cranbrook in 2011 when the toddler drowned The Supreme Court of Canada has ruled that a woman originally convicted in the 2011 drowning death of a toddler in her care must be acquitted. Tammy Marion Bouvette was babysitting 19-month-old Iyanna Teeple in Cranbrook, B.C., in 2011 when the toddler was found unresponsive in the bath. Teeple was flown to a hospital in Calgary, where she later died. Bouvette was originally charged with second-degree murder in the child's death, then later pleaded guilty to the lesser charge of criminal negligence. She was sentenced to 12 months in jail. But an independent review of the case determined that the Crown hadn't disclosed all the evidence to Bouvette or her counsel before she entered her guilty plea. In 2023, the B.C. Court of Appeal quashed her conviction and ordered a stay of proceedings, but declined to enter an acquittal. Bouvette appealed and, in a ruling released Friday morning, the Supreme Court of Canada concluded she should be immediately acquitted on the grounds that the Crown also sought an acquittal and said it would call no evidence at a new trial. 'A miscarriage of justice' The case became the subject of an investigation by CBC's The Fifth Estate in 2020 after CBC journalists uncovered a report that criticized pivotal pathology evidence in the Crown's case against Bouvette. Bouvette has maintained she did not abuse or kill the child and told The Fifth Estate she had wanted to avoid a lengthier prison sentence for a murder charge when she made her plea. In 2023, the B.C. Court of Appeal determined that the B.C. Prosecution Service had failed to disclose to Bouvette's defence lawyers several items of key evidence, including the pathology evidence report, which supported Bouvette's claim that she had not hurt or neglected the child. Bouvette's former defence lawyer told The Fifth Estate that he had not received that report from the Crown during the prosecution. At the time, the judges wrote that they "make no finding of bad faith or malice on the part of the Crown. But neither can we ignore that the disclosure breaches were not isolated or confined to information of dubious value to the appellant." B.C. Court of Appeal quashes conviction of woman in toddler's death, calling it 'miscarriage of justice' "As a consequence of material non-disclosure, the appellant was deprived of the opportunity to make an informed decision about how to plead, apprised of the strengths and weaknesses of the case against her on fundamental issues." The court ruled that Bouvette's criminal negligence conviction, causing the toddler's death, was "the product of a miscarriage of justice," and ordered a stay of proceedings because retrying her case would be an "abuse of process." 'Conviction would be unreasonable... with no evidence' The Supreme Court's Friday decision says the circumstances of Bouvette's case "weigh heavily in favour of an acquittal." "[Bouvette] has already served the entirety of her sentence. The victim's family fully supports an acquittal, and the conviction resulting from her false guilty plea has had a devastating impact on her life," the decision reads. The judges were unanimous in their decision that Bouvette should be acquitted, if for different reasons. Writing for the majority, Justice Nicholas Kasirer said the first possible ground for an acquittal under the Criminal Code is where there's a lack of evidence to ground a reasonable conviction. The second possible ground is where the Crown seeks an acquittal and says it would call no evidence at a new trial. Kasirer said Bouvette was acquitted on this second ground. The judgment notes that when Bouvette appealed to the court to seek an acquittal, the Crown also "made significant concessions" and agreed that she should be acquitted. It notes that the Crown clarified in submissions to the Supreme Court that if a new trial were ordered, it would 'call no evidence.' WATCH | B.C. Court of Appeal says Bouvette's conviction was a miscarriage of justice: "Unless it would be contrary to the public interest, an appellate court must acquit, thereby giving effect to circumstances that would lead directly to an acquittal if a new trial were ordered, because conviction would be unreasonable on a record with no evidence," the decision reads. Kasirer goes on to write that "rather than forcing the parties to go through pro forma proceedings to achieve this result [the acquittal], or standing in the way of this result by entering a judicial stay, the just result is for the acquittal to be entered now, even though there is evidence on the record that could lead a reasonable jury, properly instructed, to convict [Bouvette] at a new trial."
CTV News
4 hours ago
- CTV News
Youth pleads guilty to manslaughter in fatal 2023 Regina shooting
Court of King's Bench in Regina can be seen in this file photo. (Gareth Dillistone / CTV News) A teenager, who cannot be named under the Youth Criminal Justice Act, has been sentenced in connection with a 2023 homicide in Regina. The youth, who was 15 years old at the time, pleaded guilty to manslaughter in the death of an 18-year-old man in December 2023, according to a Court of King's Bench decision dated May 29. He also pleaded guilty to three other summary offences relating to firearms and failing to abide by court-imposed conditions prior to the shooting. Regina police initially charged the youth with second degree murder in January 2024, shortly after he turned 16. The victim was found the afternoon of Dec. 21, 2023, on Retallack Street in Regina with a head wound. He was taken by ambulance to hospital with a gunshot wound and later pronounced dead, an autopsy later confirming the cause of death. The shooting took place before 2:30 p.m., but police weren't notified until around 4 p.m., when a civilian called in having believed the victim was suffering from an overdose. Court documents identify the victim as Gregory Severight, who had just turned 18 years old at the time of his death. Surveillance video from a nearby home captured what police believe was the sound of a gunshot and then shows a male, identified by police as the guilty youth, leaving the scene. According to one woman's testimony, the youth came to her friend's home a day or two after the homicide and said he 'took someone for a dirt nap', and that he 'put him to sleep forever.' She also testified that he told the group he had shot the person in the head. The youth had a gun and was asking for help to get rid of it, along with his clothing. She described the gun as a sawed-off .22 caliber shotgun with the barrel cut at an angle. According to her testimony, the items were taken and disposed of by members of a gang associated with the house. Court was also shown evidence from Regina police's Forensic Tech Crimes unit, who captured a number of Facebook posts from the youth, including one three days after the homicide that read, 'head shot, give a f*** if ya vest work,' among others. The posts resulted in the youth's arrest at the Paul Dojack Youth Centre. Police also seized the youth's cell phone, leading to further evidence that corroborated the woman's testimony that he was trying to get rid of a gun. '[The youth] therefore admits that on the afternoon of December 21, 2023, he had a gun and while not specifically searching for Mr. Severight on that day, [the youth] admits that he fired a shot in the direction of Mr. Severight, without the intention of injuring him. However, he struck Mr. Severight in the head, and caused his death,' the court decision said, going on to explain the admission was made with advice and assistance from legal counsel. The case is under a publication ban for the youth's name under the Youth Criminal Justice Act, as well as any information that could identify the youth, but does outline the circumstances of the young offender. It describes a difficult upbringing and the use of marijuana and alcohol to cope with his mother's violent death. At one point the youth was moved from Regina to Prince Albert over concerns he was apparently being targeted by a Regina-based gang, who had shot at houses he had been residing at. The youth said while his father knew he was in a gang, he did not realize how deeply involved he was. Court also heard he was under the influence of crystal meth at the time of the shooting. The additional details relating to the youth's background and mental health led the court to find his case met the criteria for what's known as Intensive Rehabilitative Custody and Supervision (IRCS). In a joint sentencing submission, the Crown and the defence called for the youth to serve two years in closed custody in a youth facility and a third in the community under conditional supervision. Any violation of various conditions could result in spending the third year in custody. 'The plan evolves over time to specifically address issues and concerns presented by each offender. With IRCS programming, [the youth], hopefully, can be safely reintegrated into society in due course,' the judge said. 'It is recommended that treatment should include but not be limited to a program specific to and treatment for violence related issues as well as his psychological needs; substance abuse intervention, educational and vocational planning, life skills training, community-based criminality and violence prevention plan, psychiatric/psychological care, and other areas of intervention.' The sentence also carries with it a 10-year weapons prohibition. The youth has already spent a year in custody, but the joint submission did not include any deduction for time served. No victim impact statements were received, but the judge wrote 'there is no doubt the offence of manslaughter has had a significant impact on the victims, the family and friends of the deceased.' 'No sentence can address the loss of life or the impact of that loss. All the Court can do is sentence according to law.' Another area of consideration in the sentence were aggravating factors that include a firearm being used, the youth's apparent disregard to the possible harm shooting Severight would cause, and not calling for medical assistance. 'It is aggravating that he was callous in his conduct after the offence, especially bragging and posting photos, showing a failure to understand the seriousness of his conduct,' the decision said. The judge went on to say that while the youth's moral responsibility in the death is still high, but mitigating factors like his age, his minimal prior record, personal circumstances and his acceptance of responsibility through the guilty plea must also be considered. '[The youth] has shown remorse for the victims, and a desire to amend his life and engage in rehabilitative programming. He apologized in Court to the victim's family and to the community,' the decision said. The judge accepted the joint submission. -With files from Caitlin Brezinski
Vancouver Sun
4 hours ago
- Vancouver Sun
Babysitter must be acquitted in toddler's drowning death, Supreme Court of Canada says
OTTAWA — An acquittal is the appropriate outcome for a British Columbia woman whose conviction in the drowning death of a toddler was set aside two years ago, the Supreme Court of Canada has ruled. Tammy Bouvette was charged with second-degree murder but pleaded guilty to the lesser charge of criminal negligence causing the bathtub drowning death of a 19-month-old girl she had been babysitting in 2011 in Cranbrook, B.C. In April 2023, the B.C. Court of Appeal found the Crown had failed to disclose key evidence to Bouvette's lawyers, depriving her of the opportunity to make an informed decision about how to plead. Start your day with a roundup of B.C.-focused news and opinion. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder. The next issue of Sunrise will soon be in your inbox. Please try again Interested in more newsletters? Browse here. The Court of Appeal called the original conviction 'the product of a miscarriage of justice' because the evidence and circumstances established a reasonable possibility that Bouvette would not have pleaded guilty to criminal negligence causing death if full disclosure had been made. The Appeal Court ordered a judicial stay of proceedings, permanently halting the case without determining guilt or innocence. Bouvette then asked the Supreme Court for an acquittal — a declaration of being found not guilty. The Crown agreed that she should be acquitted. In its decision Friday, the Supreme Court unanimously said an acquittal is the appropriate remedy in the case and provided two sets of reasons for reaching the conclusion. Under section 686(2) of the Criminal Code, a conviction is quashed when an appeal has been allowed due to a miscarriage of justice. The appeal court then looks at the appropriate remedy: an acquittal, a new trial or a judicial stay. Writing for the Supreme Court majority, Justice Nicholas Kasirer said Bouvette should be acquitted immediately on the grounds that the Crown seeks an acquittal and has expressly stated that it would call no evidence at a new trial. Rather than forcing the parties to go through pro forma proceedings to achieve this result, or standing in the way of it by entering a judicial stay, the just outcome is for the acquittal to be entered now — even though there is evidence that could lead a reasonable jury, properly instructed, to convict Bouvette at a new trial, Kasirer said. 'Consequently, Ms. Bouvette must be acquitted by the Court without further delay or any possible distress associated with sending the matter back to the trial court,' he wrote. Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here .
