Labour to ban over-60s from taking out student loans
Labour is set to ban over-60s from taking out student loans after taxpayers were saddled with £50m in unpaid debt.
A shake-up of higher education funding in England will end a clause which allows older learners to take out loans which they are unlikely to ever repay.
Last year, more than 1,000 students over the state pension age of 66 took money from the Student Loans Company (SLC) to cover their fees, data provided to The Telegraph under Freedom of Information rules revealed.
More than 3,800 students over the age of 60 took loans, with 1,824 also taking out maintenance loans. Since 2020, 18,127 loans have been taken by students over the age of 60.
This means that some pensioners could have received as much as £15,829 in government support, with a full maintenance loan on top of a full new state pension.
The outstanding balance for those over 60 was £49,011,160.
It comes as Labour doubles down on a Sunak-era commitment to ban those over the age of 60 from taking money from the Government to pursue degrees.
The 'Lifeline Learning Entitlement' will replace the existing higher-education funding system and will provide all new learners with a tuition fee loan entitlement to the equivalent of four years of post-18 education.
A spokesman for the Department for Education said: 'From January 2027, tuition fee loans will no longer be available to those aged 60 and over.'
Tom Allingham, of Save the Student, which provides financial advice to undergraduates, said: 'While the current system creates a generational divide – students aged 60-plus are far less likely to repay their loans, so for many, their degrees are effectively free – we believe the decision to limit student loans to the under-60s only is a step backwards, as it makes it much more difficult for older students to pursue higher education.
'Instead, we believe tuition fees should be abolished, allowing students of any age to gain a degree free of charge.'
Student loans can be taken out to cover tuition fees – which are set to rise to £9,535 in September – and living costs.
The amount that can be borrowed depends on the financial situation of the student in question, and the loans are not repaid until graduates earn over a certain threshold.
This means that those aged more than 60 when they take out loans are unlikely to repay their debt at all – unlike those who complete their studies when they're younger.
The average graduate in England last year was £48,470 in debt when they started repaying their loan. The ten most indebted students owe a collective £2.7m, with one on the hook for nearly £300,000 for their studies.
Liz Emerson, of the Intergenerational Foundation think tank said: 'While lifelong learning should be open to all who have never been able able to access higher education before, there is an obvious intergenerational unfairness if younger generations have to continue to pick up the bill for these older students who will obviously never pay back their student loans.
'This is another subsidy from young to old.'
Approximately £20bn a year is loaned to 1.5 million students, according to a briefing by the House of Commons.
The value of outstanding loans is forecast to hit £500bn by the late 2040s, government predictions show.
Debts to the SLC are wiped entirely after either 30 or 40 years, depending on when the loan was taken out.
A Department for Education spokesman said: 'This Government is committed to boosting opportunity and economic growth by building a skilled workforce, while ensuring the student finance system remains fair and sustainable.'
'The dire situation we inherited has meant this Government must take tough decisions to put universities on a firmer financial footing, so they can deliver more opportunity for students and growth for our economy through our Plan for Change.'
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
CUPE to Share Update on Air Canada Strike/Lockout
TORONTO, August 16, 2025--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Representatives from the Air Canada Component of CUPE and CUPE National will be available today to provide an update on the Air Canada strike/lockout. WHERE: Fuschia Room, 2nd floor, Alt Hotel, 6080 Viscount Rd, Mississauga, ON L4V 0A1 WHEN: August 16, 10:00AM WHO: Wesley Lesosky, President, Air Canada Component of CUPE Natasha Stea, President, CUPE 4091 (YUL) View source version on Contacts Hugh PouliotCUPE Media Relations (EN)hpouliot@ 613-818-0067 Nathalie GarceauCUPE Media Relations (FR)ngarceau@ 514-594-2747
Bloomberg
13 hours ago
- Bloomberg
Italians as Well Off as Brits Expose UK's Era of Stagnation
The UK economy has lost its edge over Italy and slipped further behind France over the past decade, according to per head gross domestic product figures that reveal a stark underperformance fueled by a population surge, high inflation and tepid growth. The findings will ring alarm bells in Keir Starmer's government, which is looking at how much the economy generates for each resident rather than aggregate output as a gauge of the living standards it has pledged to improve. GDP per capita was stagnant last year when Labour took office and fell in 2023.
Politico
a day ago
- Politico
Solar for None? What's next after federal program axed.
Soldier on. Hang it up. Fight. Those are some of the options that solar energy nonprofits and states are weighing after the Trump administration moved last week to terminate the Biden-era $7 billion Solar for All program. Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Lee Zeldin argued that July's passage of President Donald Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill Act means the agency lacks both the authority and the money 'to keep this boondoggle alive.' So far, none of the 60 awardees has announced plans to challenge the actions nor to agree to the terminations. But three recipients, granted anonymity to speak about internal discussions, told our Jean Chemnick they're weighing both options — including whether to accept EPA's offer for access to money to help wind down their programs. EPA is 'basically trying to make it sound like you'll never get your funding unless you agree to their terms, and that's just not correct,' Jillian Blanchard, vice president of climate and environmental justice at Lawyers for Good Government, told Jean about EPA's termination notices. 'People are owed what they're owed.' President Joe Biden's climate law created Solar for All as part of the $27 billion Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund. It was designed to promote community solar energy in underserved areas, through grants to each state and territory, though some grants went to nonprofits in states whose leaders did not want it. The awards ranged from $43.5 million to nearly $250 million. The Trump administration has been trying for months to terminate the other $20 billion of grants in the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund, but Solar for All had been safe, until Trump's megabill became law. Representatives of the three recipients told Jean that some awardees don't have the money to continue their activities without the federal money. Some can't even access EPA's grant portal to cover past outlays. Duanne Andrade, executive director of the Solar and Energy Loan Fund, which received a $156 million grant to set up a solar revolving loan for Florida, called EPA's move 'disheartening.' 'In Florida, we're about to see the highest energy rate increase in history,' she told Jean. 'And all of this impacts low- and moderate-income people more than anyone. These are the people that are paying more already for capital, for energy, for housing, for everything.' Senate Democrats enter the frayMeanwhile, supporters of Solar for All are pushing back on the Trump administration's justification for terminating the grants. Sens. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.) and Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.) argued in a Friday letter that the Republican law repealed only unobligated funds. EPA had already obligated the Solar for All money, so it can't be clawed back, they said, citing statements from congressional Republicans and the Congressional Budget Office. 'Neither CBO nor Republicans understood the repeal and rescission of the GGRF to save anything more than EPA's unspent oversight dollars,' the Democrats write. 'Wishful statutory interpretation on the part of EPA does not enable EPA to cancel lawfully obligated grants.' It's Friday — thank you for tuning in to POLITICO's Power Switch. I'm your host, Timothy Cama. Power Switch is brought to you by the journalists behind E&E News and POLITICO Energy. Send your tips, comments, questions to tcama@ Today in POLITICO Energy's podcast: Jessie Blaeser breaks down the exaggerated cost-savings numbers from the Department of Government Efficiency. Power Centers Wind, solar crackdown deepensThe Treasury Department tightened the rules Friday for renewable energy projects to qualify for federal tax credits. The new Treasury Department guidance would undo years of existing practice defining when a solar or wind project has started construction, a key metric that spells out when developers can claim tax credits, Kelsey Tamborrino and James Bikales report. The guidance comes after Trump ordered Treasury in July to tighten the definition for the start of construction, in an attempt to limit 'market distorting subsidies for unreliable, foreign controlled energy sources.' The Treasury rules have been at the center of tug-of-war between Republican moderates and hardliners in recent months, Benjamin Storrow writes. Sens. Lisa Murkowski of Alaska and John Curtis of Utah, moderate Republicans, have argued that Treasury should continue to employ the traditional definition for the start of construction, while conservatives like Rep. Chip Roy of Texas have argued for a more stringent definition. The still-mysterious Empire Wind studyA federal records request by POLITICO's E&E News returned an almost completely redacted study by the Trump administration that had been used to justify canceling the Empire Wind project off the New York coast earlier this year, Ian M. Stevenson and Mike Soraghan write. Interior Secretary Doug Burgum said the Biden administration 'rushed approval' of the project based on 'flawed science.' Construction later restarted, but Interior has repeatedly refused to release the study cited by Burgum. In the copy of the report, 27 pages were fully blacked out. Interior cited a 'deliberative process' privilege that agencies sometimes use. Plastics treaty negotiations collapseUnited Nations talks on a treaty to end plastic pollution collapsed in the early hours of Friday morning, as countries failed to agree on the basic parameters of the text. The latest setback in discussions followed a 10-day summit in Geneva, Switzerland. After nearly three years of deliberations, it was meant to be the final round of negotiations after previous talks in Busan, South Korea, also failed to yield a deal, Leonie Cater reports. In Other News Trump-Putin summit: The Trump administration has discussed the use of Russian nuclear-powered icebreaker vessels to support gas development in Alaska as one possible deal to pursue in talks with President Vladimir Putin, according to Reuters. Manufacturing change: Heat pumps used in industrial settings could offer $1.7 trillion in public health benefits from 2030 to 2050, the American Lung Association finds. Subscriber Zone A showcase of some of our best subscriber content. Human pollutants influenced a marine climate cycle in the Pacific Ocean, contributing to drought in the Western U.S., a study finds. The Department of Energy's Pacific Northwest National Laboratory is cutting 130 jobs because of budget uncertainty. U.S. utilities face soaring costs and worsening shortages in the supply of electric power transformers, threatening to slow the growth of data centers and artificial intelligence expansion. That's it for today, folks. Thanks for reading, and have a great weekend!
