Labour to ban over-60s from taking out student loans
Did you go to university in your 60s? We want to hear if it was a success or not. Get in touch with us money@telegraph.co.uk
Labour is set to ban over-60s from taking out student loans after taxpayers were saddled with £50m in unpaid debt.
A shake-up of higher education funding in England will end a clause which allows older learners to take out loans which they are unlikely to ever repay.
Last year, more than 1,000 students over the state pension age of 66 took money from the Student Loans Company (SLC) to cover their fees, data provided to The Telegraph under Freedom of Information rules revealed.
More than 3,800 students over the age of 60 took loans, with 1,824 also taking out maintenance loans. Since 2020, 18,127 loans have been taken by students over the age of 60.
This means that some pensioners could have received as much as £15,829 in government support, with a full maintenance loan on top of a full new state pension.
The outstanding balance for those over 60 was £49,011,160.
It comes as Labour doubles down on a Sunak-era commitment to ban those over the age of 60 from taking money from the Government to pursue degrees.
The 'Lifeline Learning Entitlement' will replace the existing higher-education funding system and will provide all new learners with a tuition fee loan entitlement to the equivalent of four years of post-18 education.
A spokesman for the Department for Education said: 'From January 2027, tuition fee loans will no longer be available to those aged 60 and over.'
Tom Allingham, of Save the Student, which provides financial advice to undergraduates, said: 'While the current system creates a generational divide – students aged 60-plus are far less likely to repay their loans, so for many, their degrees are effectively free – we believe the decision to limit student loans to the under-60s only is a step backwards, as it makes it much more difficult for older students to pursue higher education.
'Instead, we believe tuition fees should be abolished, allowing students of any age to gain a degree free of charge.'
Student loans can be taken out to cover tuition fees – which are set to rise to £9,535 in September – and living costs.
The amount that can be borrowed depends on the financial situation of the student in question, and the loans are not repaid until graduates earn over a certain threshold.
This means that those aged more than 60 when they take out loans are unlikely to repay their debt at all – unlike those who complete their studies when they're younger.
The average graduate in England last year was £48,470 in debt when they started repaying their loan. The ten most indebted students owe a collective £2.7m, with one on the hook for nearly £300,000 for their studies.
Liz Emerson, of the Intergenerational Foundation think tank said: 'While lifelong learning should be open to all who have never been able able to access higher education before, there is an obvious intergenerational unfairness if younger generations have to continue to pick up the bill for these older students who will obviously never pay back their student loans.
'This is another subsidy from young to old.'
Approximately £20bn a year is loaned to 1.5 million students, according to a briefing by the House of Commons.
The value of outstanding loans is forecast to hit £500bn by the late 2040s, government predictions show.
Debts to the SLC are wiped entirely after either 30 or 40 years, depending on when the loan was taken out.
A Department for Education spokesman said: 'This Government is committed to boosting opportunity and economic growth by building a skilled workforce, while ensuring the student finance system remains fair and sustainable.'
'The dire situation we inherited has meant this Government must take tough decisions to put universities on a firmer financial footing, so they can deliver more opportunity for students and growth for our economy through our Plan for Change.'
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Labour MPs in call for benefits U-turn after change to winter fuel payment cut
Labour backbenchers have called for a Government U-turn on planned disability benefit cuts, after Chancellor Rachel Reeves restored winter fuel payments to a majority of pensioners. Ms Reeves' £1.25 billion plan unveiled on Monday will see automatic payments worth up to £300 given to pensioners with an income less than £35,000 a year. It followed last year's decision to strip pensioners of the previously universal scheme, unless they claimed certain benefits, such as pension credit. Nadia Whittome, the Labour MP for Nottingham East, warned ministers they risked making a 'similar mistake' if they tighten the eligibility criteria for personal independence payments, known as Pip. Leeds East MP Richard Burgon called on pensions minister Torsten Bell to 'listen now' so that backbenchers can help the Government 'get it right'. In her warning, Ms Whittome said she was not asking Mr Bell 'to keep the status quo or not to support people into work' and added: 'I'm simply asking him not to cut disabled people's benefits.' The pensions minister, who works in both the Treasury and Department for Work and Pensions, replied that the numbers of people receiving Pip is set to 'continue to grow every single year in the years ahead, after the changes set out by this Government'. In its Pathways to Work green paper, the Government proposed a new eligibility requirement, so Pip claimants must score a minimum of four points on one daily living activity, such as preparing food, washing and bathing, using the toilet or reading, to receive the daily living element of the benefit. 'This means that people who only score the lowest points on each of the Pip daily living activities will lose their entitlement in future,' the document noted. Mr Burgon told the Commons: 'As a Labour MP who voted against the winter fuel payment cuts, I very much welcome this change in position, but can I urge the minister and the Government to learn the lessons of this and one of the lessons is, listen to backbenchers? 'If the minister and the Government listen to backbenchers, that can help the Government get it right, help the Government avoid getting it wrong, and so what we don't want is to be here in a year or two's time with a minister sent to the despatch box after not listening to backbenchers on disability benefit cuts, making another U-turn again.' Mr Bell replied that it was 'important to listen to backbenchers, to frontbenchers'. Opposition MPs cheered when the minister added: 'It's even important to listen to members opposite on occasion.' Liberal Democrat MP Mike Martin warned that 'judging by the questions from his own backbenchers, it seems that we're going to have further U-turns on Pip and on the two-child benefit cap'. The Tunbridge Wells MP asked Mr Bell: 'To save his colleagues anguish, will he let us know now when those U-turns are coming?' The minister replied: 'What Labour MPs want to see is a Labour Government bringing down child poverty, and that's what we're going to do 'What Labour MPs want to see is a Government that can take the responsible decisions, including difficult ones on tax and on means testing the winter fuel payment so that we can invest in public services and turn around the disgrace that has become Britain's public realm for far too long.' Conservative former work and pensions secretary Esther McVey had earlier asked whether the Chancellor, 'now that she and the Government have got a taste for climbdowns', would 'reverse the equally ridiculous national insurance contribution (Nic) rises, which is destroying jobs, and the inheritance tax changes, which is destroying farms and family businesses'. Mr Bell said: 'This is a party opposite that has learned no lessons whatsoever, that thinks it can come to this chamber, call for more spending, oppose every tax rise and expect to ever be taken seriously again – they will not.' Labour MP Rebecca Long-Bailey pressed the Government to make changes to the two-child benefit cap, which means most parents cannot claim for more than two children. 'It's the right thing to do to lift pensioners out of poverty, and I'm sure that both he and the Chancellor also agree that it's right to lift children out of poverty,' the Salford MP told the Commons. 'So can he reassure this House that he and the Chancellor are doing all they can to outline plans to lift the two-child cap on universal credit as soon as possible?' Mr Bell replied: 'All levers to reduce child poverty are on the table. 'The child poverty strategy will be published in the autumn.' He added: 'If we look at who is struggling most, having to turn off their heating, it is actually younger families with children that are struggling with that. 'So she's absolutely right to raise this issue, it is one of the core purposes of this Government, we cannot carry on with a situation where large families, huge percentages of them, are in poverty.' Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
GOP lawmakers uneasy about package to codify DOGE cuts ahead of House vote this week
Multiple Republican lawmakers are voicing concerns about backing a high-profile measure later this week to codify Elon Musk's DOGE cuts – raising questions about whether it can pass the House at all. Two Republicans – Reps. Mark Amodei of Nevada and Nicole Malliotakis of New York – separately told CNN they have concerns with the White House's push to defund the Corporation for Public Broadcasting. 'Still mulling,' Amodei said when asked if he would support the package of cuts. 'The impact on local PBS stations appears to be significant.' Other Republicans have heartburn about how it could cut the Bush-era program, PEPFAR, devoted to fighting HIV and AIDS globally. 'If it cuts PEPFAR like they're saying it is, that's not good,' GOP Rep. Don Bacon of Nebraska told CNN last week. House GOP leaders plan to put the package of cuts, totaling $9.4 billion, on the floor as soon as Thursday, according to two people familiar with the plans. But Speaker Mike Johnson will need near unanimity in his conference for the package to pass the House, where he can only lose three votes. Johnson said on Monday that he's 'working on' getting enough votes for the Department of Government Efficiency spending cuts package he hopes to bring to the floor this week. 'The only concern I heard initially was some wanted a little more specificity and detail on what was in the package,' Johnson continued. Asked how he would persuade members that wanted more specificity in the package, Johnson replied, 'I'm gathering up all their questions and we'll try to get them all answered. I mean, that's what we do in every piece of legislation.' If it can survive the House, it will face major obstacles in the Senate. Sen. Susan Collins of Maine told CNN on Monday that she has major misgivings about the global health cuts, including PEPFAR. 'I think we can change it. We're still figuring out what the set rules are,' Collins said. The White House sent its long-awaited spending cuts request to Congress as it seeks to formalize a slew of DOGE slashes to federal funding. The $9.4 billion package – known as 'rescissions' on Capitol Hill – would claw back previously appropriated government funding. The move to cancel the funding through Congress would insulate the administration from legal challenges related to its cuts to federal funding. Johnson said on Monday, 'We'd like to do multiple rescissions packages, and this first one I'm sure will be successful.' This initial request, however, is far more limited in scope than the more than $1 trillion in spending cuts that DOGE has promised. The lengthy time it took the White House to send over a first round of cuts underscores the uphill battle for even a Republican-led Congress to codify DOGE's work. CNN's Molly English contributed to this report.
Politico
6 hours ago
- Politico
Will GOP senators save Biden's energy tax credits?
Moderate House Republicans failed last month when the chamber voted to gut the clean energy tax credits that they had spent months urging their leaders to save. Now the fight is getting real in the Senate, where Republicans unhappy with the cuts have the leverage to reshape President Donald Trump's megabill — if they choose to, writes Kelsey Brugger. GOP Sens. Thom Tillis of North Carolina, Lisa Murkowski of Alaska and Environment and Public Works Chair Shelley Moore Capito of West Virginia — to name but a few — all told Kelsey they will seek significant changes to the budget reconciliation package ahead of their party's self-imposed July 4 deadline. Senate Republicans can afford to lose only three votes without tanking the bill. The party-line bill that the House passed May 22 would dramatically roll back Biden-era incentives for wind, solar, hydrogen and other clean energy sources. The cuts are expected to render useless hundreds of billions of dollars in tax credits from Democrats' 2022 climate law, even though they benefit many Republican-held districts. 'Every one of [the credits] is going to have some sort of extension' in the Senate version, Tillis told Kelsey. GOP House members who tepidly and unsuccessfully opposed the tax rollbacks lent their support to the new effort. 'We believe the Senate now has a critical opportunity to restore common sense,' a group of 13 representatives wrote in a letter to Senate leaders urging them to 'substantially and strategically' fix the House-passed language. Conservatives were quick to respond. 'You backslide one inch on those [Inflation Reduction Act] subsidies, and I'm voting against this bill,' said Rep. Chip Roy (R-Texas), one of the far-right House Freedom Caucus' most vocal members. That could be fatal for the bill when it returns to the House, where the vote last time was 215-214. The conservative Club for Growth has been taking out ads against some Senate Republicans, accusing Murkowski and Jerry Moran of Kansas of falling for a 'big liberal mistake' in seeking to preserve some of the Biden-era policies, and even accusing Kevin Cramer of North Dakota of 'betraying' Trump. How senators ultimately treat Biden's clean energy tax credits will be included in the Senate Finance Committee's section of the bill, which might not emerge until next week. It's Monday — thank you for tuning in to POLITICO's Power Switch. I'm your host, Arianna Skibell. Power Switch is brought to you by the journalists behind E&E News and POLITICO Energy. Send your tips, comments, questions to askibell@ Tune in! At 8 a.m. ET Tuesday, White House officials, congressional leaders and energy experts will explore the strategic choices shaping America's energy future under the Trump administration at POLITICO's Energy Summit. You can find more details about the event here and watch live here. Today in POLITICO Energy's podcast: Matt Daily breaks down how Republicans' mega reconciliation bill would almost certainly hurt Tesla's lesser-known yet growing solar and battery division. Power Centers Trump purges federal heat expertsTop heat experts are no longer at their government posts at the start of what promises to be a brutally hot summer, raising questions about the nation's ability to cope with extreme temperatures, writes Ariel Wittenberg. The entire staff at the climate office within the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention was laid off. And across other agencies, heat specialists have accepted deferred resignation offers. Some were fired because their work involved racial equity issues. Still others, after being ordered to cut communication with the public about the health risks of heat, decided they could help more people if they retired early. Trump sits out ocean protection talks French President Emmanuel Macron announced Monday that implementation of an international agreement to protect the world's oceans can begin now that enough countries have 'formally committed' to ratifying the High Seas Treaty, writes Leonie Cater. The news came at the third United Nations Conference on the Oceans in Nice, France. The United States did not participate, an absence that did not go unnoticed. A State Department spokesperson said the conference is 'at odds' with positions held by the current U.S. administration. In Other News Public health: This group is the most vulnerable to heat-related illnesses by far. River life: How climate change is reshaping life on the Mighty Mississippi. Subscriber Zone A showcase of some of our best subscriber content. The Trump administration is poised to release the first two rules in a high-stakes series of proposed Clean Air Act rollbacks that aim to dismantle Biden-era controls on power sector pollution. Solar analysts are lowering growth estimates significantly for the U.S. industry over the next five years as a 'perfect storm' threatens projects. A crew member died last week while aboard a vessel working on Empire Wind 1, an offshore wind project near New York. That's it for today, folks! Thanks for reading.
