British activist facing jail in Iceland after protesting against whale hunting
Two environmental activists are facing prison sentences after climbing onto the mast of a whaling boat and remaining there for 33 hours during a protest in Iceland.
Elyssia Phillips, a British woman from Lewes, and her close friend Anahita Babaei, who is Iranian, travelled to the European country to campaign against the controversial practice of killing endangered fin whales.
Only three countries in the world - Japan, Norway and Iceland - defy the International Whaling Commission 's ban on commercial whaling, which sees the enormous sea creatures killed with explosive harpoons and has been a cause célèbre for environmental movements for decades.
Since being released on bail following their arrest in September 2023, they have been charged with three criminal offences, which could see them spend six months in prison or pay a hefty fine.
Their lawyers, however, argue they are being made an example of as Icelandic police aim to crack down on civilian protests, in the wake of several anti-whaling and anti-fishery movements that have gained traction in the Nordic country.
Speaking to The Independent, Ms Phillips, 36, said that she and Ms Babaei, also 36, had travelled to the port to board two vessels owned by the company Hvalur, the country's last whaling company.
'It is civil disobedience, we didn't hurt anybody or damage anything,' she said. 'It is us peacefully sitting up there saying we didn't want the whales to be murdered.'
A report by Iceland's Food and Veterinary Authority last year found that using the harpoons to kill the large animals was taking too long, with some whales taking two hours to die after being hit several times by the devices.
After remaining up on the 15-metre high masts for 33 hours, in which they claim the Reykjavik police took Ms Babaei's bag of food and medical supplies, they returned to ground level and were arrested and taken into custody.
They also claim that they were 'manhandled' during the process of their arrests, despite complying with police orders and allowing themselves to be led to police vans.
Their lawyer, Linda Emilsdóttir of the law firm Réttur, said: 'It's part of the anti-whaling campaign, but it's also a bigger sense that we feel the police are pushing cases against protesters in Iceland.
'Maybe that's because there are a lot of protests now, such as anti-whaling and fish farming but also against immigration law and Israel-Palestine and so on.
'They've been investigating for two years now and have now decided to take it to court but we don't really see why. It was just a peaceful protest and although they went up the mast on the ship, they didn't cause any damage, it's part of a political conversation, it was peaceful.'
Their legal team has now applied to have the case dismissed, after the pair were charged with trespass and entering, breaking maritime law and refusing to obey police commands.
'Based on the provisions, they could be facing jail time or more likely a fine depending on the charges, but they didn't make any damage so there are no financial costs, there was no harm and the investigation has taken two years.'
As a result, the two women have been unable to apply for visas while they have waited in limbo to understand the outcome of the case, with Ms Babaei unable to visit her family in Iran and both struggling to travel for work.
Faced with the prospect of having to pay thousands in legal fees, they have now launched a GoFundMe to help fight their case.
Ms Emilsdóttir added: 'A primary concern is that the prosecution has brought forward three separate charges, none of which can be justifiably linked to the conduct in question. The indictment lacks sufficient reasoning or evidentiary support in both its text and the accompanying case files.
'Furthermore, the defendants' actions, which consisted of a peaceful protest, caused no harm, did not breach public order, nor did they pose any threat to public safety. The initiation of criminal proceedings appears to be motivated not by the pursuit of justice, but by an intent to implement a punitive stance against individuals engaging in protest.
'It is also of serious concern that the case has remained under prolonged police investigation. Despite efforts to expedite the process, the investigation has been unnecessarily delayed. The mere status of being under prolonged criminal investigation imposes a significant burden on the accused and effectively constitutes a form of punishment.'
They have now had to return to Iceland for court hearings, and are due to face trial in front of a judge in January 2026.
The Foreign Office said it has not been approached for consular assistance but is ready to support. The Icelandic police have also been contacted for comment.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
3 hours ago
- The Sun
Major high street retailers duping shoppers with ‘misleading discounts' on pricey TVs, Which? warns
SHOPPERS looking for a new television may want to think twice before trusting the discounts advertised by some of the UK's biggest retailers. An investigation by consumer champion Which? has revealed questionable pricing practices at Currys, Very, and other major sellers, potentially misleading customers into believing they are getting better deals than they actually are. 1 Which? analysed over 1,600 television deals across five retailers. More than half (56%) of the "was" prices used in promotions were not the most recent prices charged before the discount. Which? said this tactic can create the illusion of massive savings when, in reality, the higher price may not have been charged for months – or was only briefly in place. Plus, four in 10 TVs (40%) had a "was" price that was only in effect for less time than the discounted price. And a third of all the TVs reviewed (33%) were doubly misleading, with both intervening prices and promotional periods longer than the higher "was" price. Which? said the findings are concerning because UK consumer protection guidance states that a "was" price must represent the genuine price immediately prior to the discount. Retailers that dodge these rules risk enforcement action from authorities such as the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA). Lisa Webb, Which? consumer law expert, said: "Shoppers deserve clear, honest pricing - not smoke and mirrors. "If retailers are using dodgy was/now discounts to create the illusion of a bargain then we expect the competition regulator to take enforcement action. 'Anyone in the market for a new TV or any other expensive purchase should take any such discounts with a pinch of salt and check price tracking sites like CamelCamelCamel or Price Runner to ensure they are getting a genuine deal before making a decision." Shopping discounts - How to make savings and find the best bargains Which retailers were the worst offenders? Very emerged as the worst offender in the Which? investigation. Of the 399 TV deals reviewed, nearly nine in 10 (87%) used "was" prices that were not the most recent, and over half (53%) had higher prices that were in place for less time than the promotional price. For example, the LG OLED65B46LA 65-inch TV was advertised with a "was" price of £2,499 and a "now" price of £1,499. However, the £2,499 price hadn't been charged for five months and had been replaced by seven lower price points during that time. Currys also came under fire, with three-quarters (75%) of its 608 TV deals featuring outdated "was" prices. Plus, it had the highest rate (68%) of TVs where the higher price applied for a shorter time than the discounted price. An example includes the LG UT73 50-inch TV, which had a "was" price of £399.99 and a "now" price of £299.99. The higher price had only been in place for 25 days, compared to 207 days at the lower price. What about other retailers? While AO was also found to use intervening prices in a third (33%) of its deals, it provides transparency by publishing the dates of its "was" prices and acknowledging that lower prices may have applied. This makes AO's deals less likely to mislead shoppers, Which? said. Argos performed the best, with nearly all of its "was" prices reflecting the price immediately before the promotion, offering customers a more accurate picture of potential savings. Amazon's pricing practices were also reviewed, but the retailer uses a different approach. Its "was" prices reflect the median price paid by customers over the past 90 days, excluding promotional offers. While this is a distinct method, Which? has concerns that it could still confuse shoppers and make discounts appear larger than they are. Which? also revealed earlier this week that Sports Direct shoppers are being misled by deceptive pricing tactics, creating the illusion of bargain deals. How to compare prices to get the best deal JUST because something is on offer, or is part of a sale, it doesn't mean it's always a good deal. There are plenty of comparison websites out there that'll check prices for you - so don't be left paying more than you have to. Most of them work by comparing the prices across hundreds of retailers. Here are some that we recommend: Google Shopping is a tool that lets users search for and compare prices for products across the web. Simply type in keywords, or a product number, to bring up search results. Price Spy logs the history of how much something costs from over 3,000 different retailers, including Argos, Amazon, eBay and the supermarkets. Once you select an individual product you can quickly compare which stores have the best price and which have it in stock. Idealo is another website that lets you compare prices between retailers. All shoppers need to do is search for the item they need and the website will rank them from the cheapest to the most expensive one. CamelCamelCamel only works on goods being sold on Amazon. To use it, type in the URL of the product you want to check the price of.
Daily Mail
6 hours ago
- Daily Mail
EXCLUSIVE Read attorney's absurd defense of taking a $300K taxpayer-funded salary while working on a CRUISE
A senior San Diego city attorney who was paid a $300,000 taxpayer-funded salary while working remotely on a luxury cruise liner for over three months boasted to colleagues that she was having an 'amazing' time, according to emails obtained exclusively by Daily Mail. Jean Jordan, Executive Assistant City Attorney for the fiercely Democratic Southern California city, spent 117 days traveling the oceans while exploring stunning destinations. She visited multiple exotic locales, including Africa, and spent three weeks in Europe, including Gibraltar - a British territory connected to Spain - and Italy, all while she was working; and reportedly accruing benefits and vacation time. The 65-year-old left on January 20 and was thousands of miles away on the other side of the globe from her office before returning on May 16, according to emails obtained through by Daily Mail through a public records request. After her controversial trip hit the headlines, internal emails from the City Attorney's office reveal Jordan messaged a city official on April 16: 'It is baffling to me that given all the things happening in the world-that this is front page news. Sigh!' And she gushed: 'On another note, trip has been amazing! We are having a grand time.' Jordan visited Africa and Europe, where she spent three weeks, with breaks in Gibraltar (pictured) and Italy as part of her exotic round-the-world adventure - all while she was working; reportedly being paid her salary and accrued full benefits, including vacation time She wrote to Stephen Cushman, a board member with the San Diego Housing Commission, after he had called critics questioning the integrity and optics of Jordan's trip 'a bunch of jealous yahoos.' Her boss, City Attorney Heather Ferbert, had previously insisted she was 'in constant communication' with Jordan despite her being on the high seas. But the internal communications reveal the remote work set-up was far from ideal, despite claims to the contrary. In fact, Jordan suffered multiple technology-related glitches and potential work-flow hurdles. She also admitted to being hobbled by the extreme difference in time zones making effective communication with co-workers difficult, including having to reschedule online conference meetings. She complained to several coworkers via emails, which sometimes included typos. 'The time difference is challenging,' Jordan griped to an assistant back in San Diego on March 6. 'Now that I am in this new time zone I am 13 hours apart. 'So in other words If it is 8:00 am you time it is -it is 9:00 p.m. my time. So for now the earlier in heather's the better for me. The meeting we have now for Friday is midnight my time.' And on March 13, she wrote to colleague Leslie FitzGerald: 'Miss talking with you. The time difference makes it hard. I will text you later and see if we can make a time work.' Jordan exchanged multiple emails with office 'Information Systems' specialist Kevin Westover over 'tech difficulties' and 'connectivity' issues, described as a 'problem.' They appeared desperate to fix on-going issues with using her Hewlett Packard laptop and various systems error messages. In one email, including typos, Westover asked: 'Hello Jean, your (sic) are still in Gibraltar? Is that considered Europe? Just trying to make sure that exception is on the list. Also, what type of error are you getting from the laptop while attempting to access SAP?' Jordan wrote: 'Hi Kevin, I cannot access again. I am in Gibraltar. I will be in Europe for the next three weeks.' She emailed him on March 26: 'I was in Gibraltar yesterday. We are on the way to Italy now and will remain in Europe for about 3 weeks. When I try to get into SAP it says 'This site can't be reached sharepoint may be down or it may have moved to a new web address.' Also, 'Can't seem to figure out how to get into success factors.' On the same day she wrote: 'I turned off Global Protect. It is working better now-but I cannot access SAP. 'I have turned off the computer several times. I turned off airplane mode and I tried to get into SAP and it says this site can't be reached.' With apparent mutual frustration, Westover responded, 'have you restarted the computer?' He also wrote: 'Can you verify you are connected to Global Protect and screenshot me the settings page from Global Protect.' Jordan explained: 'I was in Gibraltar yesterday. We are on the way to Italy now and will remain in Europe for about 3 weeks. When I try to get into SAP it says 'This site can't be reached sharepoint may be down or it may have moved to a new web address.' On the same day, March 26, Westover queried: 'Hmmmmm okay, do you even have access to internet.' Jordan wrote: 'I have rebooted computer several times. I looked up what that triangle means and it says it is a connectivity issue-something about authentication. Not sure what else to try.' She also sent him photo images of her laptop screen to help to try to resolve the issue. shots of her computer In a message to another colleague, with the subject 'BLocked,' Jordan announced: 'I cannot access again.' On March 18, she emailed yet another colleague 'I am unable to access SAP,' followed by a emoji frown face. The same day she had an email from the IT department telling her to reach out if she continued 'to have issues.' Remarkably, a clearly agitated Jordan found time to accuse a Daily Mail reporter of 'lying' in a curt April 17 email to Paola Avila, Chief of Staff to Mayor Todd Gloria, when contacted about her floating workspace. It followed a request for comment sent to Jordan on March 14 which prompted the following auto-reply: 'Thank you for your email. I am out of the office today April 14, 2025. I will not have access to email or voicemail. I will return April 15, 2025. lf you have an urgent matter please contact Leslie FitzGerald.' In an email to staff on April 15, Ferbert wrote of the 'benefits to the Office and the City when an employee is willing and able to complete their work remotely but has circumstances that may take them away from the physical office space for a limited amount of time.' Jordan was on her cruise away from the office for three and a half months. In the email, Ferbert glowingly described Jordan an 'experienced, well-respected professional who has served the City of San Diego in the City Attorney's Office for the past four years.' She noted that Jordan had planned to retire toward the end of 2024 and had pre-arranged her cruise but stayed on following Ferbert's appointment to the top post in November. Ferbert, a Democrat, had 'every confidence' that Jordan was 'completing her work well above the expectations set for all the attorneys.' Jordan is currently paid $282,651 per year and she was paid $239,000 a year prior to her recent promotion in, per the outlet. She was paid $155,000 in her previous job as attorney for Sutter County, north of Sacramento. According to her LinkedIn profile, Jordan is a 'Level 1' CrossFit trainer and has a real estate license. Marlea Dell'Anno, a former lawyer for the city, previously told Daily Mail: 'I can't tell you how many people have called me or emailed me about this. People are outraged!' 'I don't understand how as a leader you could ever think that's a good idea. 'How is the work getting done? You're talking about an executive and a taxpayer funded position. 'There's an expectation of being physically present to lead your team. 'Remote work has its place - but there's a significant difference between working from home and working from a global cruise. 'This stretches the definition of telework beyond what is reasonable.
Daily Mail
6 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Family of girl 'sexually assaulted by Romanian teens' plead with Ballymena rioters to end violence as town braces for fourth night of chaos
The family of the girl who was allegedly sexually assaulted by Romanian teens, has pleaded with rioters in Ballymena to end the violence after three nights of chaos. Northern Ireland 's police chief Jon Boutcher said the young girl who was the victim of an alleged sexual assault in Ballymena at the weekend had been 'further traumatised' by the rioting that has been witnessed since Monday. The alleged sexual assault of the girl by Romanian teens triggered protests which descended into violence throughout the week. Mr Boutcher, who met with the girl's family on Thursday, delivered a stark message to the rioters as he spoke to the media in Belfast following a meeting with his oversight body, the Northern Ireland Policing Board. He said that 80 officers from Scotland were due to arrive today, as the town braces itself for a fourth night of rioting. It comes as three teenagers have appeared in court today in connection with riots this week. 'Stop this violence,' he said. 'We will come after you. We will arrest you. We will prosecute you successfully. It is not in any way a way for a civilised society to behave and it must stop now. 'I want to specifically mention the 41 police officers who've been injured. Each of those officers have put themselves in harm's way to protect our communities. 'And I want to send a very clear message to all our diverse communities: we stand absolutely shoulder to shoulder with you. We are here to protect you. 'We are your police service, and these bigots and racists will not win the day. This will be policed properly. We will deal with this - and we all know that in this room - but let's call an end to it now. 'This girl's family and this girl want it to end. Our communities want it to end. We need it to end. So please don't come out on the streets tonight. If you do, we will police you and we will deal with you through the criminal justice system. Mr Boutcher added that he would "always be concerned" the unrest would spread to other towns. Earlier, a judge warned that courts will deal 'robustly' with those involved in violence in Ballymena. District Judge Nigel Broderick warned that young people who got involved were risking a significant custodial sentence as three teenagers faced rioting charges at the town's magistrates' court on Thursday. Michael Elliot, 18, of Lanntara, Ballymena, and two youths were the first defendants to appear in court since the sustained violence erupted in the County Antrim town on Monday. The officer told the court that Elliott was arrested at 11.50pm on Tuesday night following an incident where a house on Bridge Street had been set on fire. The detective constable said it was originally believed the occupants were still inside the property. Elliott was detained after he was seen running from the scene, the court was told. He was wearing gloves and a balaclava, the court heard. During police interview he had made admissions to the offence of riotous assembly, the detective said. He told police during interview he had become involved in the disorder because others were involved and blamed the situation on police. The detective constable said there was 'strong public feeling' currently within Ballymena. He said police believed it is important that courts send out a 'strong message'. He said if the court did not, there was a risk of further disorder that could lead to 'death or serious injury' for foreign nationals living in Ballymena. A defence solicitor said his client's involvement was limited to 'throwing stones'. The district judge told Elliott he was a young man who now found himself in the dock in court. He said the court would deal 'robustly' with those where there was evidence they were involved in the disorder. The judge refused an application for bail. He said: 'Your case should be an example to others who are considering getting involved in further public disorder.' The judge said there was a high likelihood that those who were charged over rioting would be refused bail and would face a significant custodial sentence if convicted. He remanded Elliott in custody until July 10. A 15-year-old boy and a 17-year-old boy also appeared in the dock charged with riotous assembly and criminal damage. Both were rejected bail and remanded to appear at a youth court on June 18. The riotous behaviour saw vandalism, vehicles burned and arson attacks on a number of properties across several towns. Forty-one officers have been injured in the unrest which has also resulted in 13 arrests by lunchtime on Thursday. Petrol bombs, fireworks, masonry and a hatchet were among items thrown at officers over the three nights of disorder. Police responded with with water cannon, dogs and plastic baton rounds in an attempt to disperse crowds in the town. PSNI chief Mr Boutcher said the initial lawful and legitimate process before unrest broke out was done in a way that was responsible and empathetic to the victim. However, he said the protest was subsequently 'hijacked' and turned into 'wanton, disgraceful criminal behaviour that is absolutely race motivated'. The chief said the service was under-resourced and needed to be funded 'properly' rather than 'disgracefully'. However, he said his officers would still bring people to justice: 'We've put our public order inquiry team together, we'll be releasing images of those responsible. We will be going after them.' The head officer described how PSNI members helped evacuate foreign national families who were hiding in attics and wardrobes in their homes in Ballymena as rioters went on the rampage on Monday night. He said the families targeted had done nothing wrong. 'They are not criminals. They contribute positively to society here and are well integrated,' he said. 'They are valued members of society in Northern Ireland. 'Fire Service colleagues described how they went to the scenes to stop arson attacks at those addresses, and how they, in all their years in the Fire Service, have not seen levels of violence to that level, and told me specifically and directly of the bravery, the courage of a very thin green line of police officers that without doubt, in my view, saved lives that night.' Secretary of State Hilary Benn described the scenes as 'mindless racist thuggery' while Stormont Justice Minister Naomi Long said it has been a 'three-day festival of hate and destruction' which needs to stop before someone loses their life. Thirty minutes from Ballymena, a leisure centre in Larne was subjected to arson after temporarily being used as an emergency shelter for those in urgent need following disturbances in the town earlier in the week. Communities Minister Gordon Lyons, who highlighted the use of the building in a social media post, said all those who had been staying at the leisure centre are in the care of the Housing Executive and have been moved out of Larne. Northern Ireland's First Minister Michelle O'Neill said Mr Lyons should resign over his social media post while the leader of the opposition in the Northern Ireland Assembly SDLP MLA Matthew O'Toole said he would refer the Communities Minister to the standards commission. Mr Benn also asked the minister to 'reflect upon his words' and 'not upon his position'. Mr Lyons has resisted calls for his resignation and said he would 'strongly hit back at any notion' that he had publicly revealed the facility was being used to house immigrant families who had been affected by violence in Ballymena.
