EXCLUSIVE Read attorney's absurd defense of taking a $300K taxpayer-funded salary while working on a CRUISE
Jean Jordan, Executive Assistant City Attorney for the fiercely Democratic Southern California city, spent 117 days traveling the oceans while exploring stunning destinations.
She visited multiple exotic locales, including Africa, and spent three weeks in Europe, including Gibraltar - a British territory connected to Spain - and Italy, all while she was working; and reportedly accruing benefits and vacation time.
The 65-year-old left on January 20 and was thousands of miles away on the other side of the globe from her office before returning on May 16, according to emails obtained through by Daily Mail through a public records request.
After her controversial trip hit the headlines, internal emails from the City Attorney's office reveal Jordan messaged a city official on April 16: 'It is baffling to me that given all the things happening in the world-that this is front page news. Sigh!'
And she gushed: 'On another note, trip has been amazing! We are having a grand time.'
Jordan visited Africa and Europe, where she spent three weeks, with breaks in Gibraltar (pictured) and Italy as part of her exotic round-the-world adventure - all while she was working; reportedly being paid her salary and accrued full benefits, including vacation time
She wrote to Stephen Cushman, a board member with the San Diego Housing Commission, after he had called critics questioning the integrity and optics of Jordan's trip 'a bunch of jealous yahoos.'
Her boss, City Attorney Heather Ferbert, had previously insisted she was 'in constant communication' with Jordan despite her being on the high seas.
But the internal communications reveal the remote work set-up was far from ideal, despite claims to the contrary.
In fact, Jordan suffered multiple technology-related glitches and potential work-flow hurdles.
She also admitted to being hobbled by the extreme difference in time zones making effective communication with co-workers difficult, including having to reschedule online conference meetings.
She complained to several coworkers via emails, which sometimes included typos.
'The time difference is challenging,' Jordan griped to an assistant back in San Diego on March 6. 'Now that I am in this new time zone I am 13 hours apart.
'So in other words If it is 8:00 am you time it is -it is 9:00 p.m. my time. So for now the earlier in heather's the better for me. The meeting we have now for Friday is midnight my time.'
And on March 13, she wrote to colleague Leslie FitzGerald: 'Miss talking with you. The time difference makes it hard. I will text you later and see if we can make a time work.'
Jordan exchanged multiple emails with office 'Information Systems' specialist Kevin Westover over 'tech difficulties' and 'connectivity' issues, described as a 'problem.'
They appeared desperate to fix on-going issues with using her Hewlett Packard laptop and various systems error messages.
In one email, including typos, Westover asked: 'Hello Jean, your (sic) are still in Gibraltar? Is that considered Europe? Just trying to make sure that exception is on the list. Also, what type of error are you getting from the laptop while attempting to access SAP?'
Jordan wrote: 'Hi Kevin, I cannot access again. I am in Gibraltar. I will be in Europe for the next three weeks.'
She emailed him on March 26: 'I was in Gibraltar yesterday. We are on the way to Italy now and will remain in Europe for about 3 weeks. When I try to get into SAP it says 'This site can't be reached sharepoint may be down or it may have moved to a new web address.'
Also, 'Can't seem to figure out how to get into success factors.'
On the same day she wrote: 'I turned off Global Protect. It is working better now-but I cannot access SAP.
'I have turned off the computer several times. I turned off airplane mode and I tried to get into SAP and it says this site can't be reached.'
With apparent mutual frustration, Westover responded, 'have you restarted the computer?'
He also wrote: 'Can you verify you are connected to Global Protect and screenshot me the settings page from Global Protect.'
Jordan explained: 'I was in Gibraltar yesterday. We are on the way to Italy now and will remain in Europe for about 3 weeks. When I try to get into SAP it says 'This site can't be reached sharepoint may be down or it may have moved to a new web address.'
On the same day, March 26, Westover queried: 'Hmmmmm okay, do you even have access to internet.'
Jordan wrote: 'I have rebooted computer several times. I looked up what that triangle means and it says it is a connectivity issue-something about authentication. Not sure what else to try.'
She also sent him photo images of her laptop screen to help to try to resolve the issue. shots of her computer
In a message to another colleague, with the subject 'BLocked,' Jordan announced: 'I cannot access again.'
On March 18, she emailed yet another colleague 'I am unable to access SAP,' followed by a emoji frown face.
The same day she had an email from the IT department telling her to reach out if she continued 'to have issues.'
Remarkably, a clearly agitated Jordan found time to accuse a Daily Mail reporter of 'lying' in a curt April 17 email to Paola Avila, Chief of Staff to Mayor Todd Gloria, when contacted about her floating workspace.
It followed a request for comment sent to Jordan on March 14 which prompted the following auto-reply: 'Thank you for your email. I am out of the office today April 14, 2025. I will not have access to email or voicemail. I will return April 15, 2025. lf you have an urgent matter please contact Leslie FitzGerald.'
In an email to staff on April 15, Ferbert wrote of the 'benefits to the Office and the City when an employee is willing and able to complete their work remotely but has circumstances that may take them away from the physical office space for a limited amount of time.'
Jordan was on her cruise away from the office for three and a half months.
In the email, Ferbert glowingly described Jordan an 'experienced, well-respected professional who has served the City of San Diego in the City Attorney's Office for the past four years.'
She noted that Jordan had planned to retire toward the end of 2024 and had pre-arranged her cruise but stayed on following Ferbert's appointment to the top post in November.
Ferbert, a Democrat, had 'every confidence' that Jordan was 'completing her work well above the expectations set for all the attorneys.'
Jordan is currently paid $282,651 per year and she was paid $239,000 a year prior to her recent promotion in, per the outlet. She was paid $155,000 in her previous job as attorney for Sutter County, north of Sacramento.
According to her LinkedIn profile, Jordan is a 'Level 1' CrossFit trainer and has a real estate license.
Marlea Dell'Anno, a former lawyer for the city, previously told Daily Mail: 'I can't tell you how many people have called me or emailed me about this. People are outraged!'
'I don't understand how as a leader you could ever think that's a good idea.
'How is the work getting done? You're talking about an executive and a taxpayer funded position.
'There's an expectation of being physically present to lead your team.
'Remote work has its place - but there's a significant difference between working from home and working from a global cruise.
'This stretches the definition of telework beyond what is reasonable.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
27 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Female TikTok star ends up in jail after filming herself running onto baseball field: 'Intrusive thoughts got the better of me'
A TikToker ended up in jail after filming herself running onto the field at a recent Los Angeles Angels game. Julia Hill, who has 1.7 million followers on TikTok, could be seen climbing over the barrier at Angel Stadium in Anaheim and sprinting onto the field during their game against the Cincinnati Reds. In the video, the camera is focused on Hill the entire time and she screams out in excitement as she sprints around the field. The post then cuts to a different angle where Hill can be seen lying face down on the field with cops and security placing her in handcuffs. She is then seeing being led off the field and to jail in Anaheim, where she claims she spent around six hours. Upon her release, she said: 'Guys, just got out of jail. It's like 2:23am. I was in jail for, like, six hours. Honestly I thought I was never coming out for a second.' Hill captioned the video on TikTok 'Intrusive thoughts got the better of me'. It has so far been watched 5.6 million times and has just over a million likes. In Anaheim, trying to run on the field in Angel Stadium is considered trespassing and, therefore, a misdemeanor. People who violate that law may face imprisonment for up to six months or a fine of not more than $1,000. But Hill didn't seem bothered by the potential ramifications. Titled 'Just got out of jail', she posted another video of herself outside the police station and was seemingly laughing off the experience. Set to Tee Grizzley's 'First Day Out', Hill can be seen mouthing the lyrics while dancing around. That video has been watched 1.7m times.
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Meet the Sheriff with MND who uses a computerised voice to dispense justice
The 15 men and women selected for the jury file into the courtroom to find the bewigged figure on the bench prodding at a laptop with two fingers. They sit in silence, unacknowledged, and wait. Finally Sheriff Alastair Carmichael looks up at them and beams. 'Good morning,' says a disembodied voice. He gestures a greeting with his face. 'You will have noticed that my lips are not moving. This is because my voice doesn't work properly.' In court number four, solemn procedure is under way. A man sits in the dock accused of sex offences and assaults on women. The evidence is expected to take a week or more. And the sheriff presiding over the trial, it seems, does not speak. Remarkably, no one present appears fazed by this, least of all the sheriff, who is back typing again. 'It will probably seem a bit weird at first,' he says, again not moving his lips. 'But you will get used to it.' The hearing unfolding in Dundee Sheriff Court is, in many ways, wholly unexceptional. It follows standard criminal court procedure established under Scots Law and, as always, requires the jury to return a true verdict based solely on the evidence they hear. And yet the trials heard by Sheriff Carmichael are both singular and extraordinary. No other judge in the UK – and possibly the world – uses synthesised speech to communicate in a courtroom. That he can do so with increasing aplomb – and no little wit – represents a triumph over a shattering diagnosis which was expected to be career-ending. It was in early 2024 that the 62-year-old learned he had a form of motor neurone disease (MND) called progressive bulbar palsy, which affects his ability to speak. It began in 2023 with a numbness inside his mouth and developed into a lisp. Soon he was struggling to enunciate clearly. He says: 'Verbal communication is a massive part of my job, so when I did think about the impact it might have on my job it didn't take long to work out that this was going to be a problem.' Sheriffs and judges have a key speaking role in every kind of court hearing. It might be sentencing an offender, addressing a jury, dealing with objections raised by the prosecution or defence during witness testimony or simply announcing when it is time to break for lunch. If the most senior legal figure in the room lacks the power of speech, do the wheels of justice not grind to a halt? Thanks to a spot of computer wizardry, they are still turning in Sheriff Carmichael's courtroom. His synthesised voice – a representation of how he spoke before his condition progressed too far – is now telling the jury to listen carefully to the charges which the sheriff clerk is about to read out. A few minutes later, as he embarks on a 20-minute address on the jury's role in the trial, he expands on the technological intricacies at play in having a computer do your speaking for you. Some of the things they will hear him say are 'pre-loaded' on to the computer. At the touch of a button, the appropriate words will come out of the speaker beside him. Other things he types in on the spot. 'I can touch type but it's not quite quick enough to beat the two-fingered style,' he admits. Longer speeches cannot yet be delivered in his own voice, he tells the jury, so they should expect to hear several different ones – all creations of Microsoft – during the trial. Indeed, he says, it's not always possible to control the program's choice of speaker. He smiles again as the Microsoft voice makes a little joke on his behalf. 'Sometimes it's a complete surprise to me which voice comes to the microphone – maybe they have a rota which they keep secret from me.' Sheriff Carmichael has given nicknames to the most frequently-heard of these voices. There's Flat George and his female counterpart Flat Hazel – and then there are Smooth George and Smooth Hazel. The latter two, he suspects, are 'moonlighting' because he recognises their voices from safety instructions on airlines. It's a disarmingly humorous way to begin a court trial involving serious charges which, if proven, could result in a jail term. Yet the brief bout of levity feels a wise and appropriate way to acquaint the jury with the uniqueness of the situation. Their key instruction is to remember that all the synthesised words they hear are the sheriff's own. They may not come from his lips, but he chooses them. You could say he is a sheriff of many voices but one mind. Meeting me in his chambers before the start of the trial, the lawman looks to be in fine health. His form of MND has spared him the muscle weakness, twitching and spasms that are typical symptoms of many sufferers. He moves around briskly, shakes my hand firmly and, you can tell at once, is warm and personable. It is only when he speaks that it becomes evident what the condition has done to him. His offer of a cup of tea or coffee is so indistinct I understand it only because it is a typical thing to say at the start of a meeting. I manage to make out some of what he says but, when he sees me struggling, he patiently writes his words in block capitals on a notepad. It's a strained form of dialogue which somehow feels worse for the fact the man losing his ability to voice his thoughts is clearly highly articulate. He is passionate about advocacy and has spent much time in his career training lawyers in improving their court performance. How distressing for a born communicator to be deprived of a tool central to his own performance. He invites me round to his side of the desk to see one of the two computer programs he uses in action. Developed in Scotland and introduced to him by the Tayside MND Team, SpeakUnique is a complex array of pre-loads and text-to-speech functions which took months to master. 'I banked my voice early on – when it wasn't badly impaired – by recording 300 sentences,' says the sheriff. 'SpeakUnique did the rest and produced my synthetic voice.' True, things can and do go wrong. One occasion, he was putting an interpreter on oath and he pressed the wrong key. 'There is no alternative to a custodial sentence,' the synthesised voice told the startled witness. 'Luckily, she was a regular in court and was familiar with me using my laptop,' he says. 'Also, she has a cracking sense of humour, so we were able to have a smile about it and then carry on. 'You are very exposed when you're in court because it's a public place and there are always people watching and listening – that's the way it's meant to be – so when things go wrong there's no hiding place. 'Things do go wrong, and I do make mistakes with this IT. 'However, it's just like somebody who can speak with their own voice saying the wrong thing; you have to correct the mistake and carry on. 'Courts are not inherently funny places because we deal with all sorts of bad stuff. But when something does go wrong, there can still be a humorous side to it.' His mastery of the two programs he needs to preside over trials is improving every day, however, and the process is becoming slicker. By the time the court breaks for lunch the lengthy instructions to the jury are delivered – even if the sheriff hasn't said a word. It helps that he engages them with his eyes throughout and uses facial and hand gestures to underline his points. It is only afterwards that he admits to me the jury speech did not go entirely as planned. It was delivered by the somewhat monotone Flat George – who turns up when there is no internet connection – rather than Smooth George, who does the talking when there is. 'I'm a big fan of Smooth George because he makes me sound rather suave and reasonably intelligent.' There is another light moment as the jury returns for the afternoon session. The sheriff smiles wryly as he and his computer tell them: 'I do hope that your jury lunch was all that you dreamed it would be, and more.' But, as the first witness is called, solemnity is restored. The challenges on the bench and the sheriff's monumental effort to overcome them are set aside and, just as it should be, the focus is solely on the evidence. It is true justice proceeds a little more slowly in Sheriff Carmichael's court – partly because he has deliberately avoided preloading stock phrases for every eventuality. He explains: 'If I just pressed a button for every situation it would be a robotic, unempathetic and sterile way to go about things. Juries and everybody else in court must be able to trust me to be fair. 'It's a fact that I can't speak, and also that I have to use this IT to communicate. It's a fact that it takes a wee bit longer to use this IT than it did when I could speak. 'But seeing me flailing away at the keyboard underlines to people that I am human, that I can't speak and that I am focused and invested in whichever case it is that I am doing at the time.' How have the various courtroom players responded to his cast of synthesised speakers? 'It's amazing,' he says. 'Most people think at first that it's a bit different – and they'd be right. What I appreciate the most is that people adapt very quickly to allowing me a wee bit of extra time to type and speak, and they are looking for visual clues.' Indeed, he suggests, it is they who make his work possible. 'Some people will tell me how amazed they are at what we're achieving. I suppose that they're right, but they often forget that they are playing a huge part in this too by adapting how they communicate with me.' His wife Helen and two grown-up sons remain the most attuned to his deteriorating speaking voice and, he says, 'keep retuning' to it as it declines. But he admits: 'Recently even they can struggle to get it sometimes or perhaps won't get it at all. I do write notes sometimes and will use the SpeakUnique app on my phone to talk to them as well.' Yet, with the backing of his boss, Sheriff Principal Gillian Wade, and 'fantastic' support from lawyers and court staff, he has prevailed in his job. How important was it for him to stay on in the face of a seemingly disastrous diagnosis? 'It means a hell of a lot. I have always been motivated by public service. I had a great start in life and have always wanted to use that to contribute to society as best as I can. 'I don't just want to a part of society, I want to be an active participant who makes a positive contribution.' He says he has no plans to retire before 70, which is the mandatory age for sheriffs to go. 'I don't know what MND has planned for me, other than that it won't be pleasant. All of the medicos have been at pains to say that it goes for different people in different ways and at different rates. 'I'm not going to consume time and energy thinking ahead to what might happen and to what I might not be able to do, I'd rather use it to enjoy what I can do today.' For a man dedicated to justice his diagnosis seems the opposite of that. But justice is prevailing in courtroom number four – inspirationally so.
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Bay Area city scandalized by married female police boss's 'inappropriate relationship' with powerful male aide
San Mateo County Sheriff Christina Corpus is fighting to keep her job as a removal hearing probes allegations of her favoritism, retaliation and abuse of authority. If the Board of Supervisors votes to remove her, she would become the first elected sheriff in California history to be ousted in this way. The proceedings are being overseen by retired Santa Clara County Superior Court Judge James Emerson and follow the board's unanimous vote in June under a 2025 charter amendment that allows elected officials to be removed through 2028, SFGATE reported. Corpus, elected in 2022 as the county's first female and Latina sheriff, has denied the allegations and remains in office while her appeal is pending. The case centers on claims that Corpus gave her former chief of staff, Victor Aenlle, a lucrative job he wasn't qualified for, retaliated against critics, and ordered the arrest of a union president on the same day a scathing report about her leadership was released. That 400-page investigation, obtained by The Mercury News, concluded: 'Lies, secrecy, intimidation, retaliation, conflicts of interest and abuses of authority are the hallmarks of the Corpus administration.' According to the outlet, text messages presented in court showed Corpus describing her marriage as 'stressful.' In one exchange, former colleague Valerie Barnes told her, 'You deserve to be spoiled and doted on' and asked for a 'pic of your sparklies.' The outlet also reported that Corpus denied claims $8,000 earrings mentioned in the report came from Aenlle, testifying that she purchased them herself because her husband would not. She was also pressed about her use of a derogatory term for a lesbian councilmember. Corpus said she misunderstood the word, telling the court: 'It was not in Merriam-Webster and I don't read Urban Dictionary.' Other testimony has focused on her relationship with Aenlle. Former Undersheriff Chris Hsiung said he noticed 'unusual behavior' between them, including food sharing and coordinated logins on an encrypted messaging app, according to the Palo Alto Daily Post. Corpus denied a romantic relationship but said Aenlle helped her care for her son with special needs. Former Assistant Sheriff Jeff Kernan testified he confronted her about rumors of a Hawaii trip with Aenlle, warning it could hurt her reputation. A separate 59-page report by law firm Keker, Van Nest & Peters - covered by SFGATE - went further, alleging Corpus and Aenlle were seen kissing and that he gave her luxury boots and money for $12,000 earrings. The report also accused her of neglecting her duties, obstructing investigations and showing favoritism toward Aenlle, who had never completed deputy training. The county also highlighted the arrest of Deputy Carlos Tapia, president of the Deputy Sheriffs' Association, for alleged time card fraud on the day Cordell's report was released. He was later cleared of wrongdoing. Corpus defended the move, saying she relied on an internal investigation and cleared it with the district attorney before proceeding, The Mercury News reported. Her defense team, led by former U.S. Labor Secretary Tom Perez and Christopher Ulrich, argues she is being unfairly targeted by an old guard intent on blocking reform. They point to her decision to end wasteful overtime practices that cost millions and her push to clean up corruption under previous leadership. The appeal hearing is expected to last up to 10 days, SFGATE reported. Judge Emerson will then issue a recommendation within 45 days, with the Board of Supervisors making the final decision.
