NASA's Curiosity rover discovers unusual 'boxwork' patterns on Mars linked to ancient waterways
New images and data from the Mars rover have already raised questions about how the red planet's surface was changing billions of years ago. Scientists are still unable, though, to answer why the planet's water eventually dried up and converted the surface into a chilly desert.
Curiosity rover is in an area called Gale Crater, and evidence has shown that when it was formed, water was percolating under the surface.
NASA said the rover had found evidence of groundwater in the crater when it encountered crisscrossing low ridges, some of which were only a few inches tall and were described by geologists as being arranged in a boxwork pattern.
Beneath the ridges is bedrock scientists believe formed when groundwater trickled through the rock and left behind minerals that accumulated in the cracks and fissures. The minerals then hardened and became cement-like.
The formations were worn away after what NASA called "eons of sandblasting" from Martian wind, though the minerals remained and revealed a network of resistant ridges within.
Rover has already analyzed ridges that scientists say look more like a crumbling curb.
But the patterns created over time stretch across miles of a layer on the 3-mile-tall Mount Sharp. The rover has been climbing the foothills of Mount Sharp since 2014, NASA said.
What scientists also find interesting about the boxwork patterns is they have not been found anywhere else on the mountain by orbiters overhead or Curiosity.
"A big mystery is why the ridges were hardened into these big patterns and why only here," said Curiosity project scientist Ashwin Vasavada of NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Southern California. "As we drive on, we'll be studying the ridges and mineral cements to make sure our idea of how they formed is on target."
NASA said the patterns are found in a part of Mount Sharp formed during various eras of the ancient Martian climate. So, as the rover ascends from the oldest layers to the youngest, it is essentially time traveling and searching for signs that water existed on Mars and which environments would have supported microbial life in the planet's ancient times.
"The rover is currently exploring a layer with an abundance of salty minerals called magnesium sulfates, which form as water dries up," NASA said. "Their presence here suggests this layer emerged as the climate became drier. "Remarkably, the boxwork patterns show that even in the midst of this drying, water was still present underground, creating changes seen today."
Recent clues exposed on Mars may provide additional insight for scientists into why the boxwork patterns formed where they did.
The bedrock between the ridges has a lot of tiny fractures filled with white veins of calcium sulfate, which is a salty mineral left behind when groundwater trickles through cracks in rocks, NASA said. In the lower layers of the mountain, similar veins were plentiful, and one was even enriched with clays. But, until now, none of the veins had been spotted in the sulfate.
"That's really surprising," said Curiosity Deputy Project Scientist Abigail Fraeman of JPL. "These calcium sulfate veins used to be everywhere, but they more or less disappeared as we climbed higher up Mount Sharp. The team is excited to figure out why they've returned now."
The Curiosity rover was launched Nov. 26, 2011, and landed on Mars Aug. 5, 2012. Its mission was to find out whether Mars ever had the right environmental conditions to support life, and, early on, the rover discovered chemical and mineral evidence of habitable environments from the past.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
What if we've been thinking about dark matter all wrong, scientist wonders
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. Dark matter could be made from tiny black holes formed when so-called "dark baryons" collapse, scientists suggest. Or, alternatively, dark matter could be a type of particle created by a form of Hawking radiation on the cosmic horizon. Here's what all that means. Dark matter is the substance that appears to make up about 27% of our universe, compared to the 5% of our universe composed of "normal" matter. Scientists certainly know dark matter exists due to some peculiar effects observed in the cosmos that normal matter can't account for. However, nobody knows what dark matter is made of. For decades, the leading candidate has been WIMPs, or Weakly Interacting Massive Particles. But as the search for WIMPs begins to falter with experiments continuing to turn up empty handed, new theories of dark matter are starting to surface. Among them are two new models developed by Stefano Profumo, who is a professor of theoretical physics at the University of California, San Diego — and his ideas take a very different view of the dark-matter problem. "My attitude is that we've tried very hard to think about dark matter as a particle, but it hasn't worked out so far," Profumo told "I think it's natural to take a break and look at the whole thing from a distance, and wonder whether we are fundamentally thinking about this in the wrong way." In one paper, Profumo considers whether the "dark sector" could be what gives birth to dark matter. By dark sector, he isn't referring to how our universe is governed by dark matter and dark energy. Instead, he's referring to a kind of "mirror world" of particles that interact via forces that our world's kind of matter does not experience. Profumo says the concept is not as strange as it may sound. For example, he highlights how the quarks inside protons and neutrons are bound together by the strong nuclear force. "But then take electrons, which are absolutely blind to the strong force. They don't feel it at all. For them the strong force is a dark sector," said Profumo. "It's common in the Standard Model." Dark baryons would be the equivalent of protons or neutrons in this dark sector, except that they could contain more than three quarks, Profumo says, and therefore be more massive. The next step in the researcher's theory was inspired by his teenage son asking whether a sufficiently massive particle could collapse under its own gravity to form a mini black hole. The dark baryons in the dark sector, if it so exists, could be massive enough to do just that — and these tiny black holes could then be rife in the universe and collectively form what we call dark matter. "I've worked with people who have thought very deeply about a dark-sector equivalent to the strong force, but they've never really pushed all the way to the black hole frontier," said Profumo. "But I really think it is a possibility that we need to take into consideration." Black holes, large or small, are surrounded by an invisible boundary called the event horizon, inside which gravity is so strong that not even light can escape. However, the event horizon is 'hot' – particles created at the boundary by quantum effects can radiate away as what we call Hawking radiation (named for famous physicist Stephen Hawking, who is credited with the idea). Over time, Hawking radiation removes mass and energy from a black hole, causing it to gradually evaporate. For supermassive black holes, this would take an unimaginably long time — 10^100 years at least. However, black holes on the smallest scales — what we call the Planck scale —- can evaporate in an amount of time less than the age of the universe. However, if we make certain assumptions about the nature of these black holes formed by the collapse of dark baryons, then their Hawking radiation could become suppressed, preventing them from evaporating and enabling them to act as dark matter. Meanwhile, Profumo's other idea plays on the concept of Hawking radiation as well, but in a completely novel way. We live in a universe that is expanding at an accelerating rate, taking regions of the cosmos so far away that their light will never reach us. This leads to a boundary, or a cosmic horizon, which defines the edge of the visible universe. There could be much more of the universe beyond this horizon, but we will never see it. Now, let's go back in time to the moment of the Big Bang. The universe began with a burst of expansionist energy known as inflation. This inflationary period lasted a tiny fraction of a second. However, some models also posit that there was a second brief burst of expansionary energy that followed inflation. "It is basically a period of mini-inflation," said Profumo. "It could be associated with inflation and how it ends, or it could be driven by a similar set-up to inflation." This second expansionary period created cosmic horizons like the cosmic horizon that borders the visible universe today. However, the visible universe today is 93 billion light-years across, with Earth at its center (the concept of a "visible" universe is very observer dependent — observers in different parts of the cosmos will see a different volume of observable universe centered around themselves). The vast size of the visible universe means the temperature at the cosmic horizon is very low because space itself has become so spread out. However, during the second burst of inflation, the universe was still incredibly compact and the temperature at the horizon was extremely hot. Profumo realized these early cosmic horizons could act like event horizons; indeed, the concept is a bit like a black hole but turned inside-out because everything beyond the cosmic horizon is forever disconnected from us, just like everything inside a black hole's event horizon is separated from us. And just as Hawking radiation is emitted from a black hole's event horizon, Profumo suggests the cosmic horizon could also experience Hawking radiation in the same manner, and that the energy of this radiation could transform into some kind of dark matter particle. "Maybe [dark matter] is as simple as that," said Profumo. "Early on, the universe behaved like a black hole, and there was stuff sprinkled into the universe because the universe was evaporating in the same way that a black hole evaporates." This might seem somewhat arbitrary, because the location of the cosmic horizon depends upon the location of the observer. However, because the universe is homogenous (the same at every point on large scales) and isotropic (the same in all directions) — two truisms that we call the Cosmological Principle —- then any two observers should see the exact same amount of dark matter, wherever they are. Profumo isn't necessarily saying dark matter has to be one of these two possibilities; indeed, the fact that he has developed two theories implies that he's reluctant to nail his colors to any particular mast. "The aim of the game is to understand the breadth and scope of what dark matter could be, and to cast the net as wide as possible," said Profumo. RELATED STORIES — What is dark matter? — 'Dark matter is more valuable than gold': Wobbly galaxies help shine a light on the universe's strangest stuff — Captured dark matter may transform some 'failed stars' into 'dark dwarfs' All we know for sure about dark matter is that it interacts via gravity, and yet despite its mystery it is utterly dominant in how matter in the universe assembles itself into galaxies. Almost a century since Fritz Zwicky first suggested the existence of dark matter, and about half a century since Vera Rubin confirmed the need for dark matter in our universe, we still don't know anything more about it. Experiments can narrow down dark matter's properties, so the more ideas we have on the table, the more likely it is that we will be able to match one of them up to the observed properties of dark matter. Profumo's dark sector–black hole hypothesis was published on May 9 in Physical Review D, and his cosmic horizon model was published in the same journal on July 8. Solve the daily Crossword
Fast Company
2 hours ago
- Fast Company
New study finds coffee is good for you, but there's a catch
Coffee drinking has been studied for decades as researchers have aimed to answer one burning question: Is it good for you? Or is it better to stick to joyless drinks like, you know, tap water and mint tea? While there have been cases for just about every argument, one recently published study in The Journal of Nutrition just added another check in the 'healthy' column. Of course, there's a catch. You have to drink your coffee in a specific way. For the study, researchers at Tufts University analyzed the coffee-drinking habits of 46,332 Americans from 1999 to 2018. They found that drinking a cup of coffee each day has some major effects in terms of lowering mortality rates. One cup of joe per day was linked to a 16% lower risk of death, not just related to cardiovascular disease, which has been well-documented, but from any cause. More coffee is better, too—but not too much more. Drinking two to three cups per day showed a 17% lower risk of mortality. More coffee than that didn't offer any additional health benefits. However, these benefits didn't apply to all coffee drinkers across the board. The benefits were most pronounced in those who drank theirs sans cream and sugar (or with a very little amount of sugar). The ones who added cream and sugar had the same rates of all-cause mortality as those who tended toward non-coffee drinks. Essentially, the more cream and sugar added, the lower the benefits. 'Coffee is among the most-consumed beverages in the world, and with nearly half of American adults reporting drinking at least one cup per day, it's important for us to know what it might mean for health,' said Fang Fang Zhang, senior author of the study and a professor at Tufts. 'The health benefits of coffee might be attributable to its bioactive compounds, but our results suggest that the addition of sugar and saturated fat may reduce the mortality benefits.' Given that there is so much research around coffee, we always have to take findings with a grain of salt (and sans sweetener), but the good news does seem to be adding up for regular coffee drinkers. A study earlier this year similarly found lower rates of premature death for morning coffee drinkers. Another published in June 2025 found that coffee drinking is linked to healthy aging, particularly in women.
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Scientists raise red flags over hidden risks of popular garden plant: 'Should serve as a bright yellow warning'
Golden oyster mushrooms, with their bright yellow caps and nutty flavor, have exploded in popularity among home gardeners for being easy to grow and packed with health benefits. But new research has suggested that this trend could be fueling an environmental threat, according to The Conversation. Scientists warn that the species is spreading into the wild and disrupting native ecosystems — a development that "should serve as a bright yellow warning" that non-native fungi should be grown with great care, if at all. What's happening? The recent study found that golden oyster mushrooms, originally native to Asia, have become invasive in North American forests. By collecting and analyzing fungal DNA from trees around Madison, Wisconsin, the researchers discovered that trees colonized by golden oysters housed only half as many fungal species as unaffected trees — sometimes even less. According to the research, which was originally published in Cell's Current Biology journal, some native fungi, such as the mossy maze polypore, elm oyster, and the chemically rich Nemania serpens, were completely pushed out. The sharp decline in fungal diversity is a strong indicator that golden oysters are outcompeting native fungi for critical resources, altering the delicate balance of forest life. Why are invasive mushrooms concerning? Fungi play an essential role in keeping ecosystems healthy for humans and other organisms. They break down dead organic material, recycle nutrients, form symbiotic relationships with plants, and help sequester carbon in the soil. When an invasive species like the golden oyster mushroom takes hold, it can decimate native fungal communities that have evolved over centuries to support local forests, as The Conversation explained. As the native fungi are pushed out, forests may become more vulnerable to disease, biodiversity loss, and nutrient imbalances. This is an even more concerning problem in regions already stressed by climate change and habitat destruction. This disruption doesn't just affect trees and soil. Protecting native fungi and other species helps safeguard natural resources, food webs, and even the resilience of forest ecosystems against emerging threats. Would you live in a house made of fungus? Heck yes No way Maybe Only if you paid me Click your choice to see results and speak your mind. What's being done about invasive mushrooms? In The Conversation, study author Aishwarya Veerabahu recommended that mushroom growers and hobbyists avoid using golden oyster mushroom grow kits. Cultivating them indoors only and disposing of all substrate material responsibly was one suggested alternative to completely avoiding them. Commercial sellers can also include labeling to inform buyers about the species' invasive potential. Those eager to grow mushrooms at home can try cultivating native fungi from their local area. Choosing native species supports biodiversity and helps maintain the unique ecological networks your region depends on. Long-term solutions may include developing sporeless strains of golden oyster mushrooms or using biological controls, such as targeted mycoviruses. In the meantime, public awareness and responsible cultivation are vital to preventing further spread. As golden oysters continue spreading in North America and begin showing up in forests in Europe, Africa, and beyond, Veerabahu expressed hope that the research encourages more thoughtful approaches to growing and managing mushrooms. Join our free newsletter for good news and useful tips, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet. Solve the daily Crossword
