Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent says Trump considered re-appointing Janet Yellen as Fed chair
Powell's term as chairman of the US central bank expires in May 2026, and the Trump administration – already interviewing potential replacements – is casting a 'very wide net' in the search for his replacement, the treasury secretary told Fox Business host Larry Kudlow.
'The president has a very open mind,' Bessent said, when asked who Trump is eyeing to replace Powell.
'He even considered re-appointing Janet Yellen, so we want to see what everyone's thinking,' he added.
3 Trump is casting a 'very wide net' in search of candidates to replace Powell come next May, Bessent said.
AFP via Getty Images
'It's not ideological, it's about economics, what's best for the American people, what's best for the economy,' Bessent argued. 'And as I talk to the candidates, I'm looking at three things: monetary policy, regulatory policy, and the ability to run and revamp the organization, because it's really gotten bloated and I think this bloat puts its monetary independence at risk.'
Yellen, 79, served as chair of the Federal Reserve between February 2014 and February 2018, under former President Barack Obama and through the first year and change of Trump' first term in the White House.
She also served as treasury secretary for all of former President Joe Biden's one term in office.
Yellen recently slammed Trump's decision to fire Erika McEntarfer, the Biden-appointed former head of the Bureau of Labor Statistics, over accusations the agency had been manipulating and miscalculating employment data.
'This is the kind of thing you would only expect to see in a banana republic,' Yellen told the New York Times last week.
3 Yellen, a former Biden administration Cabinet member, has been critical of Trump.
REUTERS
As treasury secretary, Yellen also staunchly defended Biden's handling of the inflation-ravaged US economy and criticized Trump-era policies.
'Our economic agenda is far from finished,' Yellen told the Economic Club of Chicago in January 2024.
'Our country's infrastructure has been deteriorating for decades,' she continued, adding that 'in the Trump administration, the idea of doing anything to fix it was a punchline.'
The former Fed chair went on to claim that 'past measures like the Trump administration's Tax Cuts and Jobs Act increased the deficit by $2 trillion while doing little to spur investment.'
3 The Trump administration is in the process of interviewing candidates to replace Powell as Fed chairman.
Getty Images
Trump is reportedly considering as many as 10 people to replace Powell come next year.
Former St. Louis Fed President James Bullard; former economic adviser to President George W. Bush, Marc Sumerlin; National Economic Council director Kevin Hassett; former Fed governor Kevin Warsh; and current Fed governor Christopher Waller are among the candidates the president is considering, according to the Wall Street Journal.
Trump has raged against Powell for the last several months over his refusal to cut interest rates, nicknaming him 'Too Late Powell.'
On Tuesday, the president threatened to sue the chairman over the 'grossly incompetent job' he has done in managing a $2.5 billion renovation project at the Federal Reserve headquarters in Washington, DC, which the president claims 'should have been a $50 Million Dollar fix up.'
Trump named ally Stephen Miran, a member of his Council of Economic Advisers, to the Fed Board last week, to replace Fed Governor Adriana Kugler, who abruptly resigned.
Bessent noted that when Powell is replaced as chairman, Trump will have 'a majority of the board in DC.'
'An important thing to remember is we have two seats' Trump is looking to fill, Bessent told Kudlow.
'So there's the seat for the chair and then there will be another appointee joining — so we actually get two appointments and President Trump will have a majority of the board in DC.'
The White House did not immediately respond to The Post's request for comment.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Now Jimmy Fallon Is Using Taylor Swift To Suggest Trump Had Sinister Ties To Epstein
Jimmy Fallon is on a roll in taunting President Donald Trump with sexual jokes ― and some are making insinuations about the Jeffrey Epstein scandal. (Watch the video below.) On Wednesday the 'Tonight Show' host was back at it again, using Taylor Swift songs to sum up the president's Friday meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin. Fallon got a big response for noting that Americans are worried that Trump isn't ready for the talks to end Russia's invasion of Ukraine 'since his mind is basically a giant 'Blank Space.' ' Then the comedian waded into very sensitive territory. 'Also, he's distracted by the Epstein scandal. He'll tell Putin it's been a 'Cruel Summer' because everyone thinks 'I Did Something Bad' but I swear everyone on the island was '22.′' 'Oooooh,' the audience reacted in he-really-went-there fashion. Fast-forward to 1:50 for the Swift-Trump bit: To be clear, Trump reportedly has never been investigated over anything involving the late Epstein. The sex offender's hobnobbing with celebrities and politicians has generated high interest in what government files potentially contain about them. And while Trump was reportedly told by Attorney General Pam Bondi that he is mentioned in the files, the context is not publicly known. Trump brought some suspicion on himself by suddenly declaring the files to be a hoax. But some Republicans are backing a bipartisan House push for the release of all the files related to Epstein. Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) appears to be hindering the process. Fallon has taunted Trump for a while on his about-face on the Epstein front. On Monday the host noted that the president had hoped for a 'trilateral meeting' of peace talks involving Ukrainian President Volodomyr Zelenskyy. 'Last time Trump had a trilateral meeting was on Epstein Island,' Fallon cracked. On Tuesday, he again parlayed monologue chatter about the summit into another naughty dig at the commander in chief. 'Trump said that in his meeting with Putin, he will know probably in the first two minutes whether a deal is possible,' the host said. 'It's reassuring when a president talks about ending a war like a Tinder date.' 'Yep,' Fallon continued, 'Trump says that he'll know in two minutes, which makes sense because, according to Stormy Daniels, two minutes is plenty.' Related... A Funny Thing Happened To Ratings When Jimmy Fallon Had Fox News Host As Guest Jimmy Fallon Again Talks Dirty About Trump And We're Here For It Jimmy Fallon's Filthy Trump Burn Over Putin Meeting Gets A 'Whoa' From Audience
Bloomberg
21 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
US Two-Year Yield on Verge of Falling to Lowest Level Since May
US short-dated bonds yields are near their lowest level in more than three months, reflecting conviction among traders that the Federal Reserve will cut interest rates next month. The two-year yield, among the most sensitive to changes in monetary policy, was trading around 3.67% on Thursday. It has slumped nearly 30 basis points since the end of July, with much of the move following weaker-than-expected payrolls data.
USA Today
22 minutes ago
- USA Today
It's not just DC: Republicans seem happy to let Trump do whatever he wants
For a party that claims to care about federal overreach, GOP leaders certainly have been quiet about President Trump's invasion of an American city. I'm starting to wonder when our government's checks and balances will kick in – or if they will at all. On Monday, Aug. 11, President Donald Trump announced he would be deploying the National Guard in Washington, DC, and taking over the city's police force "to rescue our nation's capital from crime, bloodshed, bedlam and squalor and worse.' The troops began showing up on Tuesday evening. According to Trump, violent crime is up in the nation's capital, and he's the only one who can rescue the city from societal collapse. It's a convenient narrative, one that feeds into MAGA's perception of him. For the rest of us, it's a terrifying move that shows he is willing to test the limits of presidential oversight. But while Trump's hostile takeover of DC public safety is concerning on its own, it's more alarming that Republicans in Congress are letting him do this with seemingly no regard for what is ethical. Even if this deployment is legal, there are certain lines that presidents should not cross. This is one of them. And I have to ask. Would Republicans be sitting on their hands if a Democratic president were doing everything that Trump is doing? I would hope not, but here we are. Of course, Trump is lying about crime in DC Trump seems to have called in the military after an assault on a Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) staffer on Aug. 3. While it's horrible that a government employee was attacked, Trump's declaration that Washington is crime-infested and dangerous doesn't align with reality. According to the Metropolitan Police Department, violent crime is down 26% compared with last year. In fact, 2024 marked a 30-year low for violent crime in Washington, according to the U.S. Department of Justice. Per a New York Times analysis, the homicide rate in 2023 was 40.4 per 100,000 people, the highest rate in 20 years. But that rate declined in 2024, down to 26.6 per 100,000 people. And homicides in the city continue to decline in 2025. While Trump is correct in saying this rate is higher than those of Mexico City and Bogotá, Colombia, it doesn't paint the full picture. A federal takeover is an extreme reaction. It doesn't matter, of course, that violent crime in the city is down overall this year. That wouldn't fit in with the Trumpian narrative, the one where he's the hero saving tourists and locals alike from violent crime. Are you worried about crime? Do you feel safe where you live? Tell us. | Opinion Forum Who even asked for this? It wasn't DC Mayor Muriel Bowser. All of this is happening to the dismay of Washington, DC, Mayor Muriel Bowser, who noted on the Aug. 12 edition of 'The Breakfast Club' that the militarization of the city will instill fear in its residents. '(Trump) wants to send the message to cities that if he can get away with this in Los Angeles, if he can get away with this in DC, he can get away with it in New York, or Baltimore or Chicago, or any other place where millions of people live, work and are doing everything the right way,' Bowser said on the radio show. Bowser is right, this is an escalation. It's Trump's way of showing everyone in Democratic parts of the country that he has the final say and that he isn't afraid to use the military to his advantage. Trump is a bully. He's using the National Guard to conquer DC as a test run. | Opinion Will Republicans hold Trump accountable for anything? For a party that claims to care about federal overreach, GOP leaders certainly have been quiet about Trump's invasion of an American city. In fact, it seems that many are supportive of the move. If a Democratic president were to try to do this, the Republican Party would decry authoritarianism's arrival in the United States. But because it's Trump, there has been zero pushback. Just like his tariff plan that's costing everyday Americans, the failed Elon Musk overhaul of the federal government, the deployment of soldiers against citizens in Los Angeles and his ruthless immigration agenda that includes trying to erase due process, the GOP is letting him get away with all of it. Republicans may even be happy about it. Imagine if Joe Biden did any of that? The Republican pearl-clutching would be generational. But this is fine because it's their king. Trump is considering extending the troop deployment beyond 30 days, something he will need congressional approval for. This seems entirely plausible, even likely, because of the Republican majorities in both chambers of Congress. I'm hesitant to throw the F-word – fascism – around, but if the Trump administration continues down this path, I worry that the rights we have as Americans will slip away. Who's stopping the president from deploying troops to other cities in the United States? It certainly isn't going to be Congress. There's some hope for the Supreme Court, but it has a 6-3 conservative majority. All of this is happening within the first year of Trump's return to the White House. There's no telling what the next three years will bring if this is how he's starting out. There should be firm lines that presidents do not cross – there are some things that are not appropriate or reasonable for a president to do. Yet that line keeps getting moved by Republicans, who don't seem to care as long as their conservative agenda is being implemented. Follow USA TODAY columnist Sara Pequeño on X, formerly Twitter: @sara__pequeno
