logo
DC police support Trump's federal takeover — are Dems and the media clueless on crime?

DC police support Trump's federal takeover — are Dems and the media clueless on crime?

The Hill4 days ago
National Democratic politicians and mainstream media commentators have spent the last 24 hours blasting President Donald Trump for announcing a federal takeover of Washington, D.C., police. For liberal and progressive critics of the president, this is undoubtedly yet more evidence of his authoritarian tendencies.
Former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, for instance, condemned the president's move as a deliberate distraction from his incompetence and accused him of hypocrisy because his failure to deploy the National Guard four years ago is what contributed to January 6 th — even though former Capitol Police Chief Steven Sund has repeatedly clarified that Pelosi herself was the person responsible for failing to enlist the guard.
And on CNN, Abby Phillip described Trump's takeover of the police as akin to Batman coming to save Gotham, as if that's a bad thing? I don't know about you, but I'm sold!
Now in all seriousness, there's plenty of reason to be generally suspicious of getting the feds more involved in local issues, so I understand a certain level of reflexive distrust at what Trump is doing here. I also think it's important to tell the truth and be mindful of the facts, not feelings. Just because D.C. feels unsafe to some people doesn't necessarily mean that it is. We should be mindful of statistics that show that crime in the nation's capital has thankfully gone down since 2023, although let's add a little asterisk to that — I'll circle back in a minute.
All that said, whether crime is technically down or technically up, it's crystal clear that Washington, D.C., has too much crime, from gangland shootings to mentally ill people attacking pedestrians to flash mobs of teenagers stealing cars and vandalizing convenience stores. That's why I find it very, very interesting that, at the local level, the relevant political authorities are not echoing the comments by national Democrats and the media.
Consider, for instance, the stance of Muriel Bowser, D.C.'s incumbent Democratic mayor.
Bowser issued a face-saving statement that the federal takeover was 'unprecedented and unsettling.' But she did not vow to fight it or to oppose it, and in fact, seems to be sending positive vibes to Trump that she wants to work with him rather than against him on this. That's because she knows city residents are tremendously frustrated with what's happening in the district, and more police could make a difference.
Moreover, D.C.'s police union straightforwardly supports Trump on this, though the union thinks full staffing of the local police department is more important as a long-term solution.
Indeed, the things that would really go a long way toward solving the crime problem in D.C. have to do with budgeting, staffing and government competence. The major problem — the single biggest problem impacting the justice system in D.C. — is the lack of a working crime lab.
D.C.'s forensics lab was de-accredited due to various problems several years back, and while it's now up and running again, it has no means of processing ballistics evidence. That significantly hampers the ability of prosecutors to charge criminals effectively. As a result, D.C. has a very low prosecution rate, and a very low conviction rate, for serious crime.
We need more resources for homicide detectives and prosecutors, and also we need the backlog of superior court judges to be addressed. If you don't have the system working to investigate, prosecute and convict criminals, you will have more crime. It's that simple.
Now let's return to that asterisk: It may not be the case that D.C.'s crime statistics are even accurate. I'll let former Rep. Peter Meijer make the case:
'I think Mayor Bowser may also know that there's an ongoing investigation in her police department over the potentially manipulation of those statistics, that there have been a down classing of some of the crimes. There has been a massaging of the numbers in the reporting in order to fit them more beneficially into the FBI crime stats,' said the Michigan Republican. 'So, she may know some things that national Democrats are not paying attention to.'
Food for thought.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

3 Republican-led states are deploying National Guard troops to DC: What to know
3 Republican-led states are deploying National Guard troops to DC: What to know

USA Today

timea minute ago

  • USA Today

3 Republican-led states are deploying National Guard troops to DC: What to know

The Republican governors of three states are deploying hundreds of National Guard troops to Washington at the request of the administration of President Donald Trump, who has portrayed the city as awash in crime. The announcements on Aug. 16 of troops from hundreds of miles away in West Virginia, South Carolina and Ohio came a day after DC officials and the Trump administration negotiated a deal to keep Mayor Muriel Bowser's appointed police chief, Pamela Smith, in charge of the police department after DC Attorney General Brian Schwalb filed a lawsuit to block the federal takeover of the department. Trump, a Republican, said this week he was deploying hundreds of DC National Guard troops to Washington and temporarily taking over the Democratic-led city's police department to curb what he depicted as a crime and homelessness emergency. Justice Department data, however, showed violent crime in 2024 hit a 30-year low in Washington, a self-governing federal district under the jurisdiction of Congress. West Virginia Governor Patrick Morrisey's office said in a statement he was deploying 300 to 400 National Guard troops to D.C. in "a show of commitment to public safety and regional cooperation." The statement said he also was providing equipment and specialized training. South Carolina Governor Henry McMaster responded to a Pentagon request by announcing that 200 of his state's National Guard troops would be sent. Ohio Governor Mike DeWine said he would send 150 military police members in the coming days, adding none of them were "currently serving as law enforcement officers in the state." After the announcements, Mayor Bowser posted on X: "American soldiers and airmen policing American citizens on American soil is #UnAmerican." Troops to other cities? The National Guard serves as a militia that answers to the governors of the 50 states except when called into federal service. The DC National Guard reports directly to the president. Trump, who has suggested he could take similar actions in other Democratic-controlled cities, has sought to expand the powers of the presidency in his second term, inserting himself into the affairs of major banks, law firms and elite universities. In June, Trump ordered 700 Marines and 4,000 National Guard troops to Los Angeles, against the wishes of California's Democratic governor, during protests over mass immigration raids by federal officials. South Carolina's McMaster said his troops would immediately return to South Carolina if needed to respond to a possible hurricane or other natural disaster. Hurricane Erin, now northeast of Puerto Rico, has become a catastrophic Category 5 storm that could bring ocean swells to the U.S. East Coast early next week, the U.S. National Hurricane Center said. National Guard troops often respond to natural disasters and rarely police US civilians. Drew Galang, a spokesperson for West Virginia's Morrisey, said the state's National Guard received the order to send equipment and personnel to D.C. late on Friday and was working to organize the deployment. The White House said on Aug. 16 that DC National Guard members have conducted patrols on foot and in vehicles around the National Mall and Union Station. The White House said the National Guard troops are not making arrests now and that they may be armed. It is not clear how the administration could deploy National Guard troops elsewhere. A federal judge in San Francisco is expected in the coming weeks to issue a ruling on whether Trump violated the law with the Los Angeles deployments. (Reporting by AJ Vicens in Detroit, Richard Cowan in Washington and Bhargav Acharya in Toronto; Editing by Donna Bryson, Matthew Lewis, Paul Simao and William Mallard)

Trump-Putin Meeting Document Leak Sparks Backlash
Trump-Putin Meeting Document Leak Sparks Backlash

Buzz Feed

timea minute ago

  • Buzz Feed

Trump-Putin Meeting Document Leak Sparks Backlash

Add this to the list of embarrassingly bad national security errors the Trump administration has made — secret documents with details of Donald Trump's meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin were reportedly found in a public hotel printer. If you haven't heard, Trump and Putin met last Friday in Anchorage, Alaska, to discuss ending the ongoing war between Russia and Ukraine. Trump described the meeting as "extremely productive," but no ceasefire was confirmed. According to NPR, 8 U.S. State Department pages with "previously undisclosed and potentially sensitive details" appeared to be "accidentally" left behind in the business center of a hotel located 20 minutes from where the official Trump-Putin meeting took place. The documents, found by hotel guests, reportedly included information about "precise locations," "meeting times of the summit," and "phone numbers of US employees." When questioned about the incident, White House Press Deputy Secretary Anna Kelly told reporters that the documents found were a "multi-page lunch menu." "It's hilarious that NPR is publishing a multi-page lunch menu and calling it a 'security breach,'" Kelly said in a quote to News Nation. While some of the pages reportedly described details of a luncheon, others included a seating chart for the summit, room names where meetings would take place, and details about an "American Bald Eagle Statue" that Trump was set to gift Putin. This, of course, isn't the Trump administration's first national security incident, as we all remember "signal-gate." People have a lot of opinions, so let's take a look at what they're saying: What are your thoughts? Let us know in the comments below.

Rubio acknowledges Trump-Putin summit left US ‘long ways off' peace deal
Rubio acknowledges Trump-Putin summit left US ‘long ways off' peace deal

The Hill

timea minute ago

  • The Hill

Rubio acknowledges Trump-Putin summit left US ‘long ways off' peace deal

Secretary of State Marco Rubio on Sunday acknowledged the Trump administration is far away from reaching any kind of peace deal between Russia and Ukraine after President Trump's summit on Friday with Russian President Vladimir Putin. Rubio insisted progress was made at the Alaska summit, which the president declared a 10 out of 10 because of how well he got along with Putin. At the same time, Rubio in a Sunday morning interview in ABC's 'This Week' didn't mince words in discussing how much work still needed to be done. 'We made progress in the sense that we identified potential areas of agreement, but there remain some big areas of disagreement,' Rubio told ABC's Martha Raddatz. 'So we're still a long ways off. We are not at the precipice of a peace agreement. We are not at the edge of one. But I do think progress was made.' Trump is now scheduled to meet Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelensky on Monday at the White House. Zelensky will be accompanied by European leaders in a sign of their support for Ukraine. Trump's talk of land being swapped between Ukraine and Russia has raised alarms in European capitols, where his words have been seen as a sign that Ukraine might need to give up territory to Russia to reach a peace deal. Rubio brushed off the fact that Trump has not announced tougher actions against Russia after the summit, telling Raddatz that wasn't the aim of the meeting after she noted that Trump had suggested tougher penalties for Moscow could be coming without progress. Rubio, one of two U.S. officials who was in attendance for the Trump-Putin meeting, also said it would not be possible to reach a deal between Russia and Ukraine without Zelensky being at the table. The secretary of State suggested there is much people on the outside do not know about the talks, suggesting Putin could have signaled some concessions to Trump. 'I think we made some real progress. You talked about not knowing what was discussed. These peace deals, these peace agreements and negotiations, they don't work when they're conducted in the media, either through leaks or through lies,' he said. 'And usually, they're both the same thing, lying leaks. Okay? They don't work if you do it that way.' Responding in part to criticism that Trump was too friendly toward Putin at the summit and afterwards, Rubio also said peace would not be realized through insults. Peace deals don't work out, Rubio said, 'if you go out and say aggressive and abrasive things about one side or the other, because then they just walk away.' Asked specifically if Putin had offered any concessions, Rubio said he would not name any publicly but suggested there would need to be a give and take on both sides. He also made it clear that Trump had asked Putin for concessions. 'So, of course, concessions were asked. But what utility would there be of me going on a program and tell you, we've wagged our finger at Putin and told him, you must do this and you must do that. It's only going to make — it's only going to make it harder and less likely that they're going to agree to these things,' he said. 'So, these negotiations, as much as everyone would love it to be a live, pay-per-view event, these discussions only work best when they are conducted privately in serious negotiation in which people who have to go back and respond to constituencies, because even totalitarian governments have constituencies they have to respond to, people have to go back and defend these agreements that they make.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store