"We condemn terrorism in strongest terms": Chief of Peace Committee, Security Council of the African Union Billy Winter
Addis Ababa [Ethiopia], May 31 (ANI): The Chief of Peace Committee, Security Council of the African Union, Billy Winter, expressed support for India's stance against terrorism. He observed that India and the African Union both have been dealing with the menace of terrorism and noted that in discussions with the all-party delegation, they (AU) shared their experiences and commitment to work together to eliminate terrorism.
Speaking to ANI, Billy Winter said, 'We are with India in these trying moments. We, as the African Union Commission, condemn terrorism in the strongest terms, whether on the African continent, globally, or on the Indian side. However, we have shared experiences. As far as the African Union, we have also had this menace of terrorism across a number of member states. So our experience and how we respond to this, we have discussed with the high-level multi-party delegation from India, and they have also shared their experiences and committed to jointly working together to eliminate this menace once and for all.'
In his remarks, he expressed that India has a right to respond to acts of terrorism as it is a 'sovereign right'.
Speaking about India's new approach towards countering terrorism, he said, 'The new doctrine of India, we have been told, says that wherever the terrorist is on the globe, if it strikes on Indian soil, then India has the right to respond. And that is obvious, because the right to respond is a sovereign right on every state that has been afflicted by this menace.'
He also said, 'It is terrorism that affects the livelihood of the civilians. So the way you respond to it is entirely through the national legislative measures. As the African Union, we have put in place normative frameworks. The Notch Court process, the Djibouti process, the counterterrorism centre in Algiers, and the information sharing centre in Entebbe, Uganda. Some of these are mechanisms that were put in place for sharing information and intelligence with our partners and allies.'
The all-party delegation led by Nationalist Congress Party-Sharadchandra Pawar (NCP-SCP) MP Supriya Sule, had earlier interacted with the Peace and Security Council of the African Union at its Headquarters in Addis Ababa.
The delegation's mission is to showcase India's resolve against terrorism and garner international support for a united stand against this global threat. The Indian government's diplomatic outreach efforts aim to strengthen partnerships with countries in East and Southeast Asia, emphasising the need for a collective response to the threat of terrorism.
India launched Operation Sindoor on May 7 in a decisive military response to the April 22 Pahalgam terror attack in which 26 people were killed.
Indian armed forces targeted terror infrastructure in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Jammu and Kashmir, leading to the death of over 100 terrorists affiliated with terror outfits like the Jaish-e-Mohammed, Lashkar-e-Taiba and Hizbul Mujahideen.
After the attack, Pakistan retaliated with cross-border shelling across the Line of Control and Jammu and Kashmir as well as attempted drone attacks along the border regions, following which India launched a coordinated attack and damaged radar infrastructure, communication centres and airfields across 11 airbases in Pakistan.
After this, on May 10, an understanding regarding the cessation of hostilities between India and Pakistan was announced. (ANI)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Wire
17 minutes ago
- The Wire
How India's New FTAs Reflect a Particular Geopolitical Vision
Menu हिंदी తెలుగు اردو Home Politics Economy World Security Law Science Society Culture Editor's Pick Opinion Support independent journalism. Donate Now Economy How India's New FTAs Reflect a Particular Geopolitical Vision Sharmila Kantha 3 minutes ago As India inks a landmark trade deal with the UK, it's clear: a decisive pivot is underway. FTAs are no longer just economic instruments – they're now central to India's global power play. Representative image. Photo: Real journalism holds power accountable Since 2015, The Wire has done just that. But we can continue only with your support. Contribute now India is according a ' high degree of urgency ' to entering into free trade agreements (FTAs) with the United States, the European Union (EU), the United Kingdom and other advanced nations, which are seen as complementary, more competitive and open-market economies with conducive business environments. The process of negotiations has gained intensity since US President Trump's announcements on 'reciprocal tariffs' to be imposed on all its trading partners. While the stated additional tariffs of 26% on Indian goods have been deferred by 90 days as with other countries, during Prime Minister Modi's visit to the US in February 2025, India and the US had already decided to finalise the first phase of a Bilateral Trade Agreement by the fourth quarter of 2025. They further agreed upon the terms of reference for the negotiations during US Vice President Vance's visit to India in April 2025. The renewed focus on FTAs with developed countries is part of a shift in India's global economic strategy over the last few years, where it has prioritised leveraging its own large market for better access to partner markets with transparent trading mechanisms. Accordingly, trade and economic agreements have been inked with the European Free Trade Association (EFTA), United Arab Emirates, Australia, and Mauritius over the last five years. The India-UK FTA was concluded this month, with the text of the many chapters yet to be finalised. In addition, negotiations are ongoing with New Zealand, Qatar, and Oman. Act East policy and the evolution of India's trade agreements India's first economic agreement took place with Sri Lanka in 1999, followed up with a spate of pacts with Japan, Malaysia, South Korea, Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), Singapore, and others. While some of the agreements were comprehensive in scope, covering trade in goods and services and investments, others related to preferential trade agreements with limited concessions on both sides. Agreements with both developed and middle-income countries to the east of India were aimed at enhancing India's participation in global value chains, lowering tariff and non-tariff barriers in rapidly growing markets, and building strategic partnerships beyond trade. For example, the ASEAN-India Trade in Goods Agreement came into force on 1 January 2010, followed by the ASEAN-India Trade in Services Agreement and the ASEAN-India Investment Agreement, both signed in November 2014. These pacts solidified India's 'Look East' policy, which was later upgraded to the 'Act East' policy. At the same time, many rounds of discussions were held, including with the EU, Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC), Australia, and New Zealand, which did not yield outcomes and were shelved. Thus, there was a gap of several years before India revisited its FTA policy (Kumar 2025). India's trade performance with major partners This gap arose as data on existing agreements revealed that India's imports from its FTA partners rose at a faster pace than its exports, leading to growing trade deficits with these countries (Srivastava 2025). Over a longer term, it has been found that the compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of India's imports and exports for the period 2009-10 to 2023-24 has varied greatly, and within this, trade with FTA partners has been relatively subdued as compared to trade with other major partners. Table 1. India's imports and exports with select economies, 2009-10 and 2023-24, in US$ million Imports Exports Country/Region 2009-10 2023-24 CAGR % 2009-10 2023-24 CAGR % EU 34 61.5 4.3 29.9 75.9 6.9 ^ EFTA 15.6 22 2.5 0.8 1.9 6.2 UK* 4.5 8.4 4.6 6.2 13 5.4 US 17 42.2 6.7 19.5 77.5 10.4 ^ Australia* 12.4 16.2 1.9 1.3 7.9 13.3 ^ ASEAN # 25.8 79.7 8.4 18.1 41.2 6.1 Indonesia # 8.7 23.4 7.4 3.1 6 4.9 Malaysia # 5.2 12.8 6.7 2.8 7.2 7 ^ Singapore # 6.5 21.2 8.9 7.6 14.4 4.7 Thailand # 2.9 9.9 9.1 1.7 5 7.9 ^ Vietnam # 0.5 9.3 22.9 1.8 5.5 8.1 ^ GCC 53.5 105.5 5 30.8 56.3 4.5 China 30.8 101.7 8.9 11.6 16.7 2.6 Japan # 6.7 17.7 7.1 3.6 5.2 2.5 South Korea # 8.6 21.1 6.7 3.4 6.4 4.6 SAARC 1.7 5.2 8.5 8.4 25.6 8.3 ^ India's Total 288.4 678.2 6.3 178.8 437.1 6.6 Source: Author's calculations based on data from the Department of Commerce, Government of India. Note: * denotes countries with recent agreements # denotes countries/regions with which FTAs have been in place for several years ^ denotes countries with which India has a higher export CAGR than its overall export CAGR India's export CAGR for 2009-10 to 2023-24 was 6.6%. In Table 1, it may be seen that the pace of India's exports has been particularly brisk for countries/regions with which India does not yet have an FTA. For example, exports to the US grew by over 10% CAGR during the period 2009-10 to 2023-24. In Australia, where the FTA was not implemented until the end of December 2022, the CAGR stood at over 13%. A significant concern is the poor growth in exports to Japan and South Korea at a rate of just 2.5% and 4.6% respectively, far below India's overall CAGR. Despite a comprehensive agreement in place with South Korea since 2010 and with Japan since 2011, exports to these countries have been slow to grow, even for goods where India has a comparative advantage, such as garments and pharmaceuticals. However, both countries have preferred the investment route in economic engagement with India and have seen high success in manufacturing in India across sectors such as consumer durables and automobiles. Storied brands operating in the country, including Suzuki, Toyota, Samsung and LG, among many others, have also built significant exports from India. Trade with SAARC (South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation) countries, where the South Asian Free Trade Agreement (SAFTA) is in place, expanded significantly faster than India's overall trade, for both exports and imports, although the trade balance is overwhelmingly in India's favour. As a large economy of the region, it should attempt to build and diversify its imports from these countries to address the trade imbalance as well as to build its own regional value chains with its friendly neighbours. The fact that the CAGR for India's imports is a little higher than the CAGR for exports to these countries is encouraging, with Bangladesh seeing a CAGR of 15% and Sri Lanka at close to 10%, although the value is below US$ 2 billion for each. On the import side, India's imports from its FTA partners have certainly grown faster than its exports to these countries and also faster than its total imports. The five large ASEAN economies were particularly successful in addressing the Indian market, especially Vietnam, from where imports increased almost 18 times during the period. The non-FTA partner countries with which imports grew faster than total imports include China and the US. Barriers to trade and the way forward India is currently reviewing the older FTAs with its Act East partners, ASEAN, Japan and South Korea. However, the negotiations have not concluded even after several years of discussions. In most cases, the non-tariff barriers that India faces vis-à-vis these partners relate to standards and certifications which apply to their imports from all their source partners, and it is unlikely that these would be scaled down for India. In addition, some of the countries export primary or intermediate goods to India, which are needed for its manufacturing sector. Further, India's tariffs were higher at the outset than the tariffs prevalent in these partner countries, and hence the concessions were deeper, encouraging faster growth in imports from these countries. The discussions with the US and the EU, which are keenly eyeing the large and growing Indian market, are also posing certain challenges, which are present in the India-UK FTA as well. First, the FTAs necessitate deeper tariff cuts from India as the tariff rates in these economies are already quite low (before the US reciprocal tariffs take effect). Two, India faces stringent non-tariff measures and non-trade-related issues in these countries. For instance, India has stressed that the EU's carbon border adjustment mechanism (CBAM) and Deforestation Regulation (EUDR) go beyond trade, and if the EU continues to insist on these issues, an FTA would be difficult to finalise. Three, sectors such as dairy products, agricultural goods, automobiles, and alcohol are also sticking points in these negotiations. Again, the India-UK FTA will set a precedent in these sectors. Finally, the Western countries are keen to include issues such as labour, intellectual property, sustainability, and data management, among others, that could be onerous for India to meet (Kumar 2025). Carbon tax, immigration, and investment regulations were issues of fervent discussions with the UK, and several of the chapters included in the agreement such as government procurement, anti-corruption, and gender equity are a first for India. The extent to which India cedes policy space in these areas will be known only after the legal texts are finalised. Thus, there could be a repeat of the earlier experience of FTAs with low utilisation rates by Indian exporters (Choudhury 2023). Following the US tariff shock, there may be a softening of stance in these partners as well as in India's position. However, the new FTAs are likely to be more complex and demanding for India, and their optimal utilisation will depend largely on India's own internal reforms. While India intensifies its FTA negotiations with Western countries, its Act East policy must also remain proactive to enhance the country's strategic presence in its proximate neighborhood. Among the Asian economies, Japan and South Korea have been staunch partners for India's growth, and other economies continue to grow rapidly and deepen their integration into global value chains. As global trade shifts, India needs to be strongly linked to these value chains. Deeper economic engagement with these countries will help strengthen the gains of the decades-long policy. In a changing global trade regime, India must tread with care to balance the markets to its West and East and align its geopolitical and geo-economic objectives. Sharmila Kantha is an industrial policy specialist with Confederation of Indian Industry (CII). Associated with Indian industry for over 20 years, she has worked extensively on issues relating to economic policy and India's international economic engagement. She is the author of three books on Indian business history and her articles have been published on several websites. This article was originally published on Ideas for India. Make a contribution to Independent Journalism Related News India's Little-Known Role in African Slave Trade The World's 'Fourth Largest Economy' and its Deepest Divide Has India Really Become the World's Fourth-Largest Economy? India Rejects Claim That Trump's Trade Threat Averted War With Pakistan 'Trade Offer Averted India-Pakistan War': Trump Administration Tells US Court Watch | India Overtakes Japan as the Fourth-Largest Economy: Is the Excitement Justified? FTA: UK to Remove 99% of Tariffs on Indian Goods; India to Cut Duties on Whiskey, Autos India and China: Two Contrasting Models of Dealing With Trump's US India Out of Work: Unemployed Youth Become 'Discouraged Workers' View in Desktop Mode About Us Contact Us Support Us © Copyright. All Rights Reserved.
Hans India
17 minutes ago
- Hans India
Old vs new: Row over Telangana Thalli statue
Jangaon:The installation of the Telangana Thalli statue in Palakurthi snowballed into a major controversy with both the BRS and the Congress cadres hellbent on installing the earlier and the new version of the statue of Telangana Thalli. It may be recalled here that the Revanth Reddy Government unveiled a newly designed Telangana Thalli statue, replacing the previous one that the BRS Government designed. The Congress cadre removed the old Telugu Thalli statue and installed the newly designed statue, despite stern opposition from the BRS cadre. Congress cadre added more fuel to the controversy by throwing the old statue into nearby thorny bushes. In this regard, BRS leader Errabelli Usha Dayakar Rao, wife of former minister Errabelli Dayakar Rao, who represented the Palakurthi constituency thrice before losing in the 2023 election, led a rally with the cadre to the police station on Sunday. But the police stopped their rally and tried to disperse the BRS workers. Fury over the development, Usha Dayakar Rao found fault with the police for giving undue importance to Jhansi Reddy, the mother-in-law of local MLA Yashaswini Reddy. 'Even though Jhansi Reddy didn't have Indian citizenship, the police were giving high priority. Jhansi is behaving like a de facto MLA. Why aren't the police allowing me to the police station to register a complaint against the Congress workers' attacks on BRS cadre?' Usha Dayakar Rao questioned. Referring to the illegal arrests and attacks on BRS workers, she said that they have been counting the mistakes of the police and will pay back after returning to power.
India Today
21 minutes ago
- India Today
Terror has no place in our countries: Indian delegation in US on Colorado attack
Members of the Indian all-party delegation visiting the United States to brief officials on Operation Sindoor condemned the targeted terrorist attack in Colorado, where a man threw firebombs at a Jewish gathering, injuring at least six delegation affirmed that "terror has no place in our countries", said Congress leader Shashi Tharoor, who is heading the delegation."Members of the Indian MPs' delegation learned with concern about the terror attack in Boulder, Colorado today. We are relieved there was no loss of life. We all share Secretary of State Marco Rubio's view that 'terror has no place' in our countries," he tweeted. advertisement
