logo
More than 13million Brits still rely on bank branches despite a whopping 6,000 of them closing over last decade

More than 13million Brits still rely on bank branches despite a whopping 6,000 of them closing over last decade

The Sun18-05-2025

MILLIONS of bank customers face being left stranded after a damning report revealed 6,000 branch closures over the past decade.
A whopping 13million customers used bank branches last year, according to the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA).
1
The data shows that most users remain "reliant on bank branches for essential services," despite the move toward online banking.
The FCA report revealed that an eye-watering 9.7million people visited a specific site at least once a month.
Experts fear that the trend of branch closures will leave customers stranded with around 3.3million account holders never banked online.
Around 63 per cent of those are over the age of 85, which raises further concern, according to the FCA.
The report also found that people from low-income households - as well as those with cancer, multiple sclerosis, or HIV — were less likely to engage with digital banking.
Caroline Abrahams, charity director at Age UK, said: "The disappearance of face-to-face banking risks cutting a significant minority of the older population out of an essential service, making it difficult if not impossible for them to maintain their independence."
The main reasons people avoided online banking were concerns about security and a preference for speaking to someone face-to-face.
A staggering 21 per cent of account holders surveyed said their regular bank branch had closed.
Consumer group, Which?, showed that more than 6,000 branches have shut in the past decade.
Jenny Ross, money editor at Which? said: "As the UK's bank branch network continues to be cut to the bone, more people are finding it difficult to access banking services."
Major high street bank axing key service
Former pensions minister Ros Altmann added: 'Millions of British citizens cannot and do not use online or mobile banking, and indeed don't even have a smartphone.
Despite the rising bank closures, Nationwide has committed to keeping all of its branches open until 2028.
The major bank has seen the number of customers rise by 4 per cent, which appears to be partly driven by other bank closures.
Which bank branches are closing in June?
Halifax:
Bitterne: 400/402 Bitterne Road SO18 5RS – June 9
Bournemouth: 335/337 Wimborne Road BH9 2EA – June 4
Felixstowe: 85 Hamilton Road IP11 7BQ – June 2
Fleetwood: 4 Poulton Street FY7 6LR – June 22
Gainsborough: 32 Lord Street DN21 2DQ – June 2
Launceston: 1 Southgate Street PL15 9DP – June 3
Leek: 16 Derby Street ST13 5AB – June 4
Letchworth: 1 Commerce Way SG6 3DN – June 3
Littlehampton: 68 High Street BN17 5EA – June 23
London (North West): 469 Kingsbury Road NW9 9ES – June 2
Bank of Scotland:
Bathgate: 50 Hopetoun Street EH48 4EU – June 30
Cowdenbeath: 349/351 High Street KY4 9QJ – June 24
Linlithgow: Regent Centre Blackness Road EH49 7HU – June 23
Lloyds:
Alcester: Stratford Road B49 5AX – June 25
Ashbourne: Compton DE6 1DY – June 24
Dorchester: 1-2 High West Street DT1 1UG – June 19
Launceston: 13 Broad Street PL15 8AG – June 3
Liverpool: 188-190 Breck Road L5 6PX – June 4
Over the rest of the year, another 40 branches are closing.
These include locations in Bristol, London, Bolton, Edinburgh and Coventry.
Here is the full list...
Halifax:
Barrow-in-Furness: 133-135 Dalton Road LA14 1HZ – September 10
Bexleyheath: 131 Broadway DA6 7HF – October 23
Blackpool: 283/287 Lytham Road FY4 1DP – October 29
Bolton: 23/27 Knowsley Street BL1 2DG – November 20
Brentwood: 12 High Street CM14 4AE – September 10
Bristol: 15 Kings Chase Shopping Centre BS15 8LP – October 8
Carmarthen: 121/122 Lammas Street SA31 3AE – October 6
Castleford: 68 Carlton Street WF10 1DB – September 8
Cirencester: 10/12 Cricklade Street GL7 1JH – September 25
Crewe: The Market Centre CW1 2HU – October 14
Derby: 39 East Street DE1 2BL – October 23
Epsom: 51-52 The Ashley Centre KT18 5DB – September 15
Erdington: 221 High Street B23 6SS – September 24
Folkestone: 70-72 Sandgate Road CT20 2AA – October 9
Hayes: 45/47 Station Road UB3 4HH – October 6
Hexham: 20 Priestpopple NE46 1XH – November 5
Hove: 86/87 George Street BN3 3YE – October 20
London (South East): 165/169 Eltham High Street SE9 1TT – October 29
London (South East): 9-13 Powis Street SE18 6HZ – October 1
London (South West): 6 St Johns Hill SW11 1RU – September 23
Bank of Scotland:
Edinburgh: 206 St John's Road EH12 8SH – October 29
Lloyds:
Biggleswade: 35 High Street SG18 0JD – November 5
Blandford: 6 Market Place DT11 7EE – November 10
Bristol: 16 Highridge Road BS13 8HA – November 6
Bury: 45 The Rock BL9 0JP – October 21
Chard: 27 Fore Street TA20 1PS – November 11
Coventry: 531 Foleshill Road CV6 5JN – November 4
Dunstable: 12 High Street North LU6 1JY – November 4
East Grinstead: 1/3 London Road RH19 1AH – November 12
Fakenham: 27 Norwich Street NR21 9AH – July 1
Falmouth: 11-12 Killigrew Street TR11 3RA – November 13
Feltham: 40 The Centre TW13 4AX – November 4
Ferndown: 84 Victoria Road BH22 9JB – November 17
Hexham: Priestpopple NE46 1PA – November 5
Kidderminster: 1 Vicar Street DY10 1DE – October 16
Leeds: 1 Cross Gates Centre LS15 8ET – August 20
Leeds: 52 Town Street LS12 3AE – September 8
Leominster: 9 Corn Square HR6 8LT – November 18
London (East): 180 - 182 High Street E17 7JH – October 22
London (South West): 12 Mitcham Road SW17 9ND – October 8
Loughton: 11 The Broadway IG10 3SW – November 12
Manchester: 64 Old Church Street M40 2JF – November 5
Since June 2022, Lloyds Banking Group has shut 537 bank branches across its three brands.
It has previously said all workers at the affected branches will be offered jobs elsewhere in the company.
UK banks and building societies have closed about 6,293 branches since January 2015, according to research by Which?.
This works out as almost two branches shutting every day for the past decade.
Barclays is the individual bank that has reduced its network the most, with 1,227 branch closures.
What to do if your local bank is set to close
If your nearest branch is closing, you should still be able to access banking services without going to another town.
For example you could check if there is a Post Office near you.
Here you'll be able to do basic banking tasks, although you won't be able to open a new bank account or take out personal loans or mortgages.
You can find your nearest Post Office branch by visiting postoffice.co.uk/branch-finder.
Many banks also offer a mobile banking service where they bring a bus to your area that offers services you can usually get at a physical branch.
Other banks use buildings such as village halls or libraries to offer mobile banking services.
You may want to contact your bank to see what mobile services they have available.
Another option is to check if there's a super ATM near you.
These have been rolled out across the UK where branch closures have left residents unable to access essential banking services.
These ATMs will allow customers to withdraw funds, access their balance, change PIN numbers and deposit cash.
Banking hubs are also being opened across the country with 250 set to be available by the end of 2025.
What services do banking hubs offer?
BANKING hubs offer a range of services to bridge the gap left by the closure of local branches.
Operated by the Post Office, these hubs allow customers to perform routine transactions such as deposits, withdrawals, and balance enquiries.
Each hub features private booths where customers can discuss more complex banking matters with staff from their respective banks.
Staff from different banks are available on a rotational basis, ensuring that customers have access to a wide range of banking services throughout the week.
Additionally, customers can receive advice and support on various financial products and services, including loans, mortgages, and savings accounts.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump sends Bessent and Lutnick to haggle with Chinese on tariff war after Xi chat
Trump sends Bessent and Lutnick to haggle with Chinese on tariff war after Xi chat

The Independent

time23 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Trump sends Bessent and Lutnick to haggle with Chinese on tariff war after Xi chat

Three members of Donald Trump's cabinet will meet with Chinese officials in London on Monday in an effort to deescalate or resolve the unprovoked trade war which Trump started with Beijing two months ago. In a post on Truth Social, Trump said he was 'pleased to announce' that Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Commerce Secretary Lutnick would travel to London along with U.S. Trade Representative Jameson Greer for a sit-down with 'Representatives of China, with reference to the Trade Deal.' He added: 'The meeting should go very well. Thank you for your attention to this matter!'

Labour spends £35k on pub beer mats to boast about minimum wage rise
Labour spends £35k on pub beer mats to boast about minimum wage rise

Telegraph

time23 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Labour spends £35k on pub beer mats to boast about minimum wage rise

Labour spent more than £35,000 of taxpayer cash on beer mats in pubs advertising the increase to the national minimum wage, a minister has admitted. The Government sent out promotional material to pubs across the country to tell workers that the minimum wage and national living wage were going up. Justin Madders, the employment minister, rationalised the £35,580 expense as he said the beer mats offered a 'unique opportunity to engage audiences in a social, high-dwell environment where financial conversations naturally occur'. The red and pale blue beer mats were government-branded and said: 'Millions got a pay rise.' 'National minimum and living wages went up on 1st April', it added, and displayed a barcode for customers to scan for details on how to 'make sure you're getting paid correctly'. The employment minister responded to a written question by Richard Holden, the shadow paymaster general, about the cost of the drink mats. He said: 'The cost to advertise in pubs using beer mats was £35,580, which was approved at official level.' He confirmed that the advertising push was approved by the Cabinet Office, and came out of the 2025 National Minimum Wage and National Living Wage campaign budget of £650,000. He added: 'The 2024 campaign saw an increase in reach to eligible workers. However, recognition remained low, reinforcing the need for bolder, more engaging formats for the 2025 campaign, which expected to deliver an estimated 3.2 million impressions. 'It offered a unique opportunity to engage audiences in a social, high-dwell environment where financial conversations naturally occur. 'This setting encourages discussion and word-of-mouth sharing about rate changes and offers an effective nudge for audiences to 'check their pay'.' 'We will be ruthless' Sir Keir Starmer and Rachel Reeves have both pledged a war on waste in Whitehall, with the Government having taken such moves as freezing government credit cards and abolishing NHS England. The Prime Minister said in October: 'We will also be ruthless in clamping down on government waste, just as we will be ruthless on clamping down on tax avoidance ', emphasising the intention to show so the British people that 'every penny counts'. He added: 'Every single person in this country had to do that during the cost-of-living crisis and government must be no different.' The national living wage for those aged 21 and over rose from £11.44 per hour to £12.21 per hour, an increase of 6.7 per cent. The national minimum wage for those between 18 and 20 went up from £8.60 to £10 per hour, a 16.3 per cent boost. The Government has also begun to name and shame firms that do not pay their workers the appropriate wages, demanding they pay back what they owe and in some instances a further financial penalty.

‘Spiteful' boss cut pregnant accountant's hours after she told him she had morning sickness
‘Spiteful' boss cut pregnant accountant's hours after she told him she had morning sickness

The Independent

timean hour ago

  • The Independent

‘Spiteful' boss cut pregnant accountant's hours after she told him she had morning sickness

A 'spiteful' boss cut his pregnant employee's work hours after she told him she had morning sickness, and then fired her when her maternity leave was due to start, a tribunal has heard. Sadia Shakil had worked as an accountant and bookkeeper at the property development firm Samsons in Bedford since October 2020, and became pregnant early the following year. But after Ms Shakil phoned her boss Mohammed Saleem on 30 March 2021 to inform him that she was experiencing morning sickness due to her pregnancy, he then proceeded to tell her in an email the following day that he was cutting her working hours. In the email seen by the tribunal, Mr Saleem wrote: 'Considering that I am unable to give you extra work as I am abroad and in view that you are feeling unwell during your pregnancy it would be best if you only come into work for 2 days per week.' The tribunal ruled that this was a 'fundamental' breach of Ms Shakil's employment contract, which caused her to experience 'stress, anxiety and panic' while questioning how she and her husband would be able to afford essential items for their baby now that their main source of income had been unilaterally reduced. During this period, Ms Shakil suffered sleepless nights and panic attacks while being 'plagued by worrisome thoughts', including 'doubts about whether she had done the right thing to have a baby at all when she was not financially stable'. After informing her boss that she needed to resign, Ms Shakil managed to secure a second full-time job in May, but she continued to work at Samsons in her spare time in the hope she would be able to resume her full-time role at the firm after her maternity leave. In the months that followed, Mr Saleem ignored multiple emails from Ms Shakil about her upcoming maternity leave, 'which caused her further stress and worry', at a time when she also suffered complications, being admitted to hospital on two occasions. By the end of September, blood tests had revealed a potentially serious condition which Ms Shakil was told put her baby at risk of still birth, resulting in the hospital booking her in to have her baby induced on 17 October. Two days after Ms Shakil's final email on 27 September, informing Mr Saleem that her leave would now commence on 1 October, he finally responded – referring to a letter she had not received 'putting her role at risk of redundancy '. Ms Shakil was dismissed with effect from 1 October 2021, when she began maternity leave, the tribunal noted. After her son was born on 18 October, the family were forced to move back in with Ms Shakil's parents 'due to the financial pressure that [her] loss of employment and lack of maternity pay had created'. Ms Shakil's subsequent claim to the Department for Work and Pensions for maternity allowance was then rejected on the grounds that her employer was responsible for paying it. 'The claimant's early weeks and months with her new baby were marred by the need to devote time to trying to resolve her financial predicament and bringing the employment tribunal proceedings,' the tribunal found. After an initial tribunal in Birmingham in April 2023, Ms Shakil was awarded £5,000 in damages for maternity discrimination and Samsons ordered to pay her for income lost while on reduced hours. In an email sent in June 2023 in which he asked Ms Shakil to provide her bank details so that he could pay her the sum awarded by the tribunal, Mr Saleem wrote 'I hope that you have a wonderful time utilising the monies gained from me', adding that the loss of money 'will make no difference to me'. A further appeal hearing in March 2025 found that Ms Shakil 'was horrified' by the email – which she described as 'disturbing and 'nasty' – and 'was shocked that Mr Saleem could be so spiteful to her'. Ms Shakil's appeal that the sum awarded to her had been too low was accepted, and the judge ordered Samsons to pay her a total of £31,860. Finding it to be a 'serious case of discrimination', the tribunal found: 'The discrimination took place at a time in the claimant's life which she had hoped and planned would be exciting and happy – the pregnancy, birth and early life of her first child. 'Instead, she suffered physical and emotional symptoms of anxiety and distress. These included sleepless nights, panic attacks, intrusive anxious thoughts and tearfulness. There was evidence that the claimant's confidence and self-esteem were damaged by the discrimination. 'These symptoms persisted from the time she was told that her hours had been cut to two days per week, until her baby was born. The symptoms did not stop then, however, because of the claimants' ongoing financial struggles.' It added: 'The effects of the discriminatory dismissal were ongoing at the time of the hearing, four years later, because the claimant is still worried that she might have a similar experience with her new employer if she decides to have another baby.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store