China welcomes new US-Russia contact as Trump seeks end to Ukraine war
The remarks during a phone call between the two leaders on Friday come after the Kremlin said President Putin would meet US President Donald Trump in the coming days.
During the phone call, Xi said China would maintain its stance on the need for peace talks and a diplomatic solution to the Russia-Ukraine war, Chinese state broadcaster CCTV reported.
The Kremlin said Putin had called his Chinese counterpart to update him on the latest US-Russia talks, during which Xi expressed support for a 'long-term' solution to the Ukraine conflict.
The call between Xi and Putin was their second in less than two months. Putin is expected to visit China in September for events marking the 80th anniversary of the end of World War II.
The two countries have further bolstered their economic, trade and security cooperation since Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, which triggered a sharp deterioration in Moscow's relations with the West.
China has never denounced Russia's war nor called for it to withdraw its troops, and many of Ukraine's allies believe that Beijing has provided support to Moscow. Beijing insists it is a neutral party, regularly calling for an end to the fighting while also accusing Western countries of prolonging the conflict by arming Ukraine.
Trump has voiced growing frustration with Putin over the lack of progress towards peace in Ukraine and has threatened to impose heavy tariffs on countries that buy Russian oil, including China.
The US president on Wednesday said he could announce further tariffs on China similar to the 25 percent duties he has already imposed on India over its purchases of Russian oil.
In response to those remarks, a Chinese foreign ministry spokesperson said on Friday that Beijing's trade and energy cooperation with Russia was 'just and legitimate'.
'We will continue to take reasonable measures to ensure energy security based on our own national interests,' Guo Jiakun said in a statement.
Calls with other allies
Putin and Trump are set to hold talks, although no firm date or venue has been set. Both sides have confirmed preparations for a summit are under way and have suggested that a meeting could take place next week.
China has been mentioned in media reports as a possible venue for the Putin-Trump summit, with speculation that Trump could join Putin there in early September.
The Kremlin also said Putin had spoken to the leaders of Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan and briefed them on talks he held with US envoy Steve Witkoff on Wednesday.
Putin also discussed Ukraine in a phone call with Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko on Friday, the Belarusian state news agency BelTA reported.
Indian President Narendra Modi also held a phone call with Putin to discuss the situation in Ukraine and bilateral relations.
'Had a very good and detailed conversation with my friend President Putin. I thanked him for sharing the latest developments on Ukraine,' Modi said on X.
The Indian president added that he looked forward to hosting Putin in India later this year, without specifying the date.
Had a very good and detailed conversation with my friend President Putin. I thanked him for sharing the latest developments on Ukraine. We also reviewed the progress in our bilateral agenda, and reaffirmed our commitment to further deepen the India-Russia Special and Privileged…
— Narendra Modi (@narendramodi) August 8, 2025
Pause in conflict may be 'close'
The calls came amid rising hopes for a breakthrough in the Ukraine war, now in its fourth year. Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk said on Friday that a pause in the conflict could be close, after speaking to Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelenskyy.
Tusk said Zelenskyy was 'very cautious but optimistic' and that Ukraine was keen that Poland and other European countries play a role in planning for a ceasefire and an eventual peace settlement.
'There are certain signals, and we also have an intuition, that perhaps a freeze in the conflict – I don't want to say the end, but a freeze in the conflict – is closer than it is further away,' he told a news conference on Friday. 'There are hopes for this.'
Trump's efforts to pressure Putin into stopping the fighting have so far delivered little progress. Russia's bigger army is slowly advancing deeper into Ukraine while it relentlessly bombards Ukrainian cities. Russia and Ukraine are far apart on their terms for peace.
Almost two weeks ago, Trump moved up his ultimatum to impose additional sanctions on Russia, as well as introduce secondary tariffs targeting countries that buy Russian oil, if no Kremlin moves towards a settlement were forthcoming.
The deadline expired on Friday. It was unclear what steps Trump intended to take as a consequence.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Jazeera
22 minutes ago
- Al Jazeera
Trump offers UCLA $1bn settlement amid pro-Palestine protest standoff
The administration of United States President Donald Trump has requested that the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), submit to a $1bn settlement to resolve accusations stemming from the school's handling of pro-Palestine protests. A White House official and the University of California system both confirmed the proposed settlement to news agencies on Friday. The settlement proposal is notable for the massive sum requested, as the Trump administration seeks to pressure top schools into compliance with its policies. The $1bn price tag would far exceed the payouts inked in previous agreements reached with Columbia University and Brown University last month. Columbia agreed to pay a fine of about $221m, and Brown confirmed it would pay $50m to a state workforce development programme. 'The University of California just received a document from the Department of Justice and is reviewing it,' University of California President James Milliken said in a statement. He added that the institution had offered to have talks with the government earlier this week. UCLA, which boasts the largest student body in the University of California system, had also announced this week that the Trump administration suspended $584m in federal grants to the school. The Department of Justice's Civil Rights Division explained that the funding would be frozen as a result of civil rights violations connected to pro-Palestinian protests since 2023. The school had acted 'with deliberate indifference in creating a hostile educational environment for Jewish and Israeli students', it said. Free-speech advocates, however, have accused the Trump administration of willfully conflating pro-Palestine and antiwar advocacy with anti-Semitism in order to silence protesters. Last month, UCLA reached a $6m settlement with three Jewish students and a Jewish professor who claimed their civil rights were violated by pro-Palestinian protesters blocking their access to class and other areas on campus during a 2024 protest encampment. It was not immediately clear why the $1bn settlement sought by the Trump administration was so high. UCLA is also the first publicly funded university to face a potential grant freeze from the Trump administration. In his statement, Milliken said the payment would have wide-ranging consequences. 'As a public university, we are stewards of taxpayer resources, and a payment of this scale would completely devastate our country's greatest public university system as well as inflict great harm on our students and all Californians,' he said. Civil liberties organisations have also underscored that students at publicly funded universities are typically afforded wider constitutional protections while on campus. That stands in contrast to private institutions, where students are generally subject to whatever restrictions on speech are outlined by administrators in their enrollment agreement. The First Amendment of the US Constitution restricts the government's ability to limit free speech. Any future agreement between the University of California system and the Trump administration might face a legal challenge, should it be perceived to trample on free-speech rights. Speaking on Thursday, California Governor Gavin Newsom, who has been one of Trump's most vocal Democratic opponents, urged the state's university officials not to kowtow to the administration's demands. 'We're not Brown, we're not Columbia, and I'm not going to be governor if we act like that,' Newsom said, according to the Los Angeles Times. 'Period. Full stop. I will fight like hell to make sure that doesn't happen.'
Al Jazeera
an hour ago
- Al Jazeera
Azerbaijan and Armenia sign accord overseen by Trump at the White House
United States President Donald Trump has hosted his Azerbaijani counterpart Ilham Aliyev and Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan at the White House for the signing of a peace treaty between the two longtime rivals. The US president said during a ceremony on Friday that he believed the two men would have a 'great relationship' and that the agreement would bring peace and new economic opportunities to the region. 'I want to congratulate these two great people, Prime Minister Pashinyan and President Aliyev, for coming to Washington to sign this momentous joint declaration,' Trump said. 'The countries of Armenia and Azerbaijan are committing to stop all fighting forever; open up commerce, travel and diplomatic relations; and respect each other's sovereignty and territorial integrity.' The agreement will create a transportation corridor between the two countries, which have fought over territorial disputes since the disintegration of the Soviet Union more than three decades ago. Those wars were largely fought over the disputed territory of Nagorno-Karabakh, which is within Azerbaijan's borders but was previously populated by ethnic Armenians. They were ultimately expelled en masse during an Azerbaijani offensive in 2023. The deal grants the US exclusive developmental rights to the transport corridor, which will be dubbed the 'Trump Route for International Peace and Prosperity'. 'We anticipate significant infrastructure development by American companies. They're very anxious to go in to these two countries,' Trump said. He added that the US was also signing bilateral agreements with both countries to increase cooperation in areas like energy, trade and technology, including artificial intelligence. The deals would also lift previous restrictions on security coordination with Azerbaijan, which has faced scrutiny over its human rights record. 'I'm very grateful to the president that he lifted the restrictions that had been imposed on Azerbaijan back in 1992,' said Aliyev. While Trump has hailed the agreement as a diplomatic breakthrough and an opportunity for economic engagement, it is viewed with bitterness by many Armenians. During Azerbaijan's 2023 military campaign, the country sought to bring Nagorno Karabakh under its control. But that military offensive involved a brutal siege that rights groups say amounted to the restriction of food as a weapon of war. The conflict culminated in the forcible expulsion of the territory's ethnic Armenian population. Images of displaced Armenians fleeing with their possessions recalled painful memories of the Armenian Genocide, which took place from 1915 to 1923. Azerbaijan maintains that the campaign was necessary to restore order in a territory within its borders and that Armenians could have stayed in their homes. 'Erasing Nagorno Karabakh is not peace,' Aram Hamparian, executive director of the Armenian National Committee of America, said in a statement on Thursday, saying the agreement had been reached 'at gunpoint'. 'Normalising ethnic cleansing is not peace.'
Al Jazeera
3 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
Trump administration subpoenas New York Attorney General Letitia James
The United States Department of Justice has subpoenaed New York Attorney General Letitia James, who had successfully filed a civil lawsuit against US President Donald Trump for alleged fraud in his business dealings. Friday's subpoenas come as the department convenes a grand jury to investigate whether James, a Democrat, violated the civil rights of President Donald Trump and other Republican-affiliated entities. Anonymous sources with knowledge of the subpoenas confirmed their existence to The Associated Press and other news agencies. According to the media reports, the grand jury will not only probe whether Trump's rights were violated by the fraud lawsuit, but the subpoenas will also seek information about a second lawsuit James launched against the National Rifle Association (NRA), an influential gun lobby group. A spokesperson for James's office did not confirm the subpoenas but rejected any wrongdoing. 'Any weaponisation of the justice system should disturb every American,' the statement said. 'We stand strongly behind our successful litigation against the Trump Organization and the National Rifle Association, and we will continue to stand up for New Yorkers' rights.' James's personal lawyer, Abbe Lowell, also said in a statement that her legal team was 'ready and waiting with the facts and the law'. 'Investigating the fraud case Attorney General James won against President Trump and his businesses has to be the most blatant and desperate example of this administration carrying out the president's political retribution campaign,' Lowell said. A history of in-court clashes The reports on Friday revealing the subpoenas have fuelled criticism that Trump is increasingly weaponising the Justice Department to settle scores. Trump faced numerous legal challenges, both civil and criminal, during his period out of the White House from January 2021 to January 2025. He is the first US president to not only face criminal charges but to be convicted. James, meanwhile, was among the officials who spearheaded civil proceedings against him. She took office in January 2019 and has since filed several lawsuits against Trump and his policies. But one of the most high-profile has been the 2022 case in which she accused Trump of inflating the value of his assets — including his real estate properties and golf clubs — to defraud banks and lenders. In February 2024, Trump and his sons were ordered to pay $454m in the case, though the president continues to appeal that ruling. Trump has argued his financial statements actually under-valued his assets. Separately, James successfully filed a lawsuit against the NRA and its founder, Wayne LaPierre, for misusing millions in funding for the group. Trump maintains close ties to the anti-gun control lobby group. Revenge on political adversaries? For years, Trump has alleged that he is the subject of a political 'witch hunt'. Those who prosecuted him, he argues, have abused their office for political gain, in an alleged effort to dampen his popularity among voters. Trump has expressed particular ire towards James, calling her a 'horrible person' and a 'total crook' in May. That month, the Justice Department, under his authority, opened an investigation into James's real estate holdings, alleging she misrepresented her property records to obtain more favourable loans. Trump has also argued that statements James made on the campaign trail indicate her political bias against him. While running for office in 2018, for instance, James called Trump 'illegitimate', 'incompetent' and 'ill-equipped to serve in the highest office of this land'. Friday's subpoenas come on the heels of other investigations that critics perceive as retribution from Trump against his political adversaries. Just this week, the Department of Justice also announced it would open an investigation into members of the administration of former President Barack Obama, a longtime target of Trump's criticisms. The probe centres on intelligence community reports examining whether Russia interfered with the 2016 presidential election, which Trump won. The reports concluded that Russia sought to sway the election through disinformation, though no votes were tampered with. They also suggested that Russia favoured Trump over his Democratic rival, something Trump has since described as an effort to delegitimise his victory. Trump has since accused Obama of 'treason', although no evidence has emerged of wrongdoing. The Department of Justice has also recently sought to purge career employees who worked on two federal criminal cases filed against Trump after he left office in 2021. The first related to classified documents Trump took from the White House after his 2020 election defeat. The second was connected to Trump's efforts to overturn the results of the 2020 election.
