‘Defence investment is ethical' says Healey as he meets firms to drum up capital
The Defence Secretary has met with start-up investors in an effort to drum up support for 'ethical' investments in European defence.
John Healey spoke to venture capitalists at a meeting in central London on Wednesday as part of wider Government efforts to drive private capital into the sector.
With US support for Ukraine hanging in the balance under US President Donald Trump, both the UK and Europe have in recent weeks come under pressure to shore up the continent's security in the face of threats from Russia.
The UK Government has now committed to spending 2.5% of gross domestic product by April 2027, and 3% by the next parliament.
But calls have also been growing in Westminster for a private sector rethink on environmental, social and governance (ESG) investment requirements that often exclude defence firms as unethical.
Mr Healey said: 'We want to mobilise private investors to take a fresh look at defence, alongside the certainty of our Government's record long-term uplift in defence spending.
'With countries across Europe facing new threats stepping up to take more responsibility for our continent's defence is an ethical investment, and it's good to see increasing numbers of private investors recognising that.
'There is no more important investment than in our European security.
'As a Government we are determined to tackle any blockers which are preventing private finance from flowing into UK defence, which is why today's landmark meeting is so important.'
At the meeting, Mr Healey joined Khaled Helioui, co-founder of early-stage investment fund Plural and Grace Cassy, a non-executive director at Ten Eleven Ventures, who has supported the development of the Government's forthcoming strategic defence review.
The group discussed how to incentivise private investment into defence and deep technology, focusing on start-up and scale up firms.
The Defence Secretary also argued that the Government's defence spending hike – the largest sustained increase since the Cold War – as well as defence reforms will help to unlock private sector investment into high-growth British companies.
The Government's new direct expenditure target for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) will also help to give high-growth companies more certainty and sight of future investment, Mr Healey said.
Elsewhere, he cited Chancellor Rachel Reeves' announcement last week of a £400 million ringfenced budget for defence innovation and a government commitment to spend 10% of the defence equipment budget on novel technologies.
The Government said it comes as some VC firms look to renegotiate their agreements with limited partners – the investors who provide the capital for the fund to invest in high-growth firms – to better enable financial flows into defence.
Alongside the meeting, the Government confirmed it will invest up to £250 million with Roke, a Hampshire-based defence tech firm, under a six-year contract.
The partnership aims to support around 150 jobs and deliver analysis, trials and technology development against ballistic and hypersonic missile threats.
The Defence Secretary said the Government is bringing 'a clear mandate to bring innovative technology to the frontline at speed and enable the defence sector to create high-growth British success stories that deliver investor returns and national security'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Powys County Times
14 minutes ago
- Powys County Times
SNP calls on Labour to match Scottish Government action on poverty
Almost two million families would be lifted out of poverty if Labour matched Scottish Government action on the issue, the SNP has claimed. Ahead of the UK spending review, the SNP asked the House of Commons Library to produce an independent analysis on the number of British children in poverty and the impact that replicating Scottish Government policies across the UK would have. The research showed 1.83 million families would be lifted out of poverty if policies were matched, including abolishing the two-child benefit cap, scrapping the bedroom tax and raising the child element of Universal Credit to match the Scottish child payment, according to the SNP. Statistics showed a third of British children were anticipated to be living in poverty by 2029-30 unless action was taken. Sir Keir Starmer was urged to act on the figures ahead of the UK spending review on Wednesday amid warnings the number of British children living in poverty is expected to rise to a record 4.6 million by 2029-30. Over the past decade, the number of children living in poverty has risen from 3.7 million (27%) in 2013/14 to 4.5 million (31%) in 2023/24, the SNP said. The SNP said Scotland is the only part of the UK where child poverty is falling, due to 'bold' policies such as the Scottish child payment of £27.15 per child, per week, paid in addition to other benefits. Replicating it UK-wide, by raising the child element of Universal Credit by the same amount, would lift 732,000 families out of poverty, including a further 38,000 families in Scotland, analysis showed. The SNP said it has also mitigated the bedroom tax and is in the process of ending the two-child benefit cap in Scotland. It said replicating the policies would lift a further 609,000 British families out of poverty, with the combined impact of introducing all three policies lifting 1.83 million families out of poverty, including a further 75,000 in Scotland. The UK Government delayed its child poverty taskforce review to the autumn and last year Labour MPs voted against abolishing the two-child benefit cap, in a motion tabled by the SNP. The Chancellor has previously rejected proposals to abolish the bedroom tax. The SNP said the UK Government's own impact analysis showed planned cuts to disability benefits will push 250,000 more people into poverty, including 50,000 children, with families losing out on £4,500 a year on average as a result of the cuts, branding it 'shameful'. SNP work and pensions spokeswoman Kirsty Blackman MP said: 'The evidence shows Keir Starmer's Labour Government is keeping almost two million families in poverty by failing to match SNP action across the UK. 'It's shameful that UK child poverty is rising to record levels under the Labour Government, which has pushed thousands more children into deprivation by imposing punitive welfare cuts. 'It's vital that the Prime Minister finally listens to families struggling with the soaring cost of living – and takes the long-overdue action needed to end child poverty at the UK spending review this week. 'That means abandoning the devastating austerity cuts to disabled families, matching the Scottish child payment UK-wide, abolishing the bedroom tax and scrapping the two-child limit and benefit cap. 'With 4.5 million children living in poverty in the UK, only bold and immediate action will do. 'The two-child benefit cap and bedroom tax must be abolished immediately, but that alone isn't enough to end child poverty. It's vital the Labour Government matches the Scottish child payment by raising the child element of Universal Credit across the UK. 'Scotland is the only part of the UK where child poverty is falling – and families receive the best cost-of-living help of anywhere in the UK. 'Westminster must match this action – or it will leave millions more children languishing in poverty.' A UK Government spokesperson said: 'We are determined to bring down child poverty and we have already expanded free breakfast clubs, increased the national minimum wage for those on the lowest incomes, uprated benefits in April and supported 700,000 of the poorest families by introducing a fair repayment rate on universal credit deductions. 'We will also publish an ambitious child poverty strategy later this year to ensure we deliver fully funded measures that tackle the structural and root causes of child poverty across the country.'
The Herald Scotland
24 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
Kate Forbes on Scottish business relationship and income tax
The Scottish Government's relationship with the business community was sharply in focus at that point and, while the spotlight on this is probably slightly less intense, it is still bright. Asked if she believed the overall relationship between the Scottish Government and business had improved over the last year, Ms Forbes replied: 'I think so. I mean, the first meetings I had when I became Economy Secretary was with all the business organisations one by one, to understand what their top asks were.' Ms Forbes declared the Scottish Government had since then worked through the first programme for government, then the Budget last December, and now the most recent programme for government 'to try and deliver against those asks'. She said: 'I think the business community understand that we can't do everything overnight, but we can either stop doing things that would otherwise have made the cost of business higher, or do things that lower the cost of business. The most recent programme for government led with economic growth and prosperity. So our sentiment, my sentiment is pro-economy, pro-prosperity, pro-business.' Of course, the greater income tax burden for higher earners in Scotland relative to the rest of the UK has been very much in focus over recent years. Ms Forbes said in the exclusive interview last June that this would be kept 'under review', taking into account 'how easy it is for taxpayers to shift'. These comments appeared at the time to be a signal of the stance of the then new leadership team on this crucial issue, and that turned out to be the case. Ms Forbes noted last week: 'The First Minister was very clear when he became leader that he didn't believe that you could continually raise income tax, and that we should provide certainty. And that's what last year's Budget delivered - the Budget announcement last year for this financial year. And the programme for government then built on that in May - being very clear that there wouldn't be further divergence from the rest of the UK on income tax for the remainder of this parliament. 'And the reasons for that is because certainty matters in a world that seems to be constantly in flux with lots of global headwinds and challenges of recruitment for businesses. The more certainty that we can provide, the better. And the only changes to income tax was essentially a small reduction for the basic and intermediate rate-payers because of the above-inflationary increase to the thresholds.' Income tax would appear to be one of the key issues when it comes to what some in the business community think of the Scottish Government. Asked about the reaction of business to the income tax stance, given this was an issue that had been highlighted previously, Ms Forbes replied: 'I think we have seen a lot of positive comments from the business community.' Taking the previous comments from people in business about Scottish income tax at face value, you would certainly have thought they would have been happy that there has been no further divergence when it comes to the burden on higher earners north of the Border. Read more Offering further thoughts on her perception of the reaction of business people to the stance on income tax since she took up her current roles and John Swinney became First Minister in May last year, Ms Forbes said: 'They have indicated that they feel the Scottish Government is listening, that they are taking any concern seriously and that we're on their side in navigating these choppy waters. Now, we obviously only…have limited powers over taxation.' The Deputy First Minister has been heavily critical of the UK Government's decision to raise employers' national insurance contributions. This move, announced by Chancellor Rachel Reeves in her Budget last October, is aimed at raising about £25 billion a year. Ms Forbes last week contrasted this national insurance move with the stance on income tax in the wake of the change at the top of the Scottish Government last year. She said of people in Scotland's business community: 'What's really hit them hard this year was the increase to employers' national insurance contributions, which is essentially a jobs tax, and it was, for many of them, a total surprise because it hadn't been flagged in Labour's manifesto. 'So I think in that context, the more that the Scottish Government can do to provide stability and certainty, the better, and the strong signals from the business community is they feel they are getting that now from the Scottish Government.' It will be interesting to watch how the relationship between the Scottish Government and business develops. Ms Forbes also highlighted the importance of restoring confidence in the Ferguson Marine shipyard at Port Glasgow, which has been owned by the Scottish Government since 2019. She said: 'I have been crystal clear that Ferguson Marine's future relies on them being able to competitively bid in the open market for new work.' And, in one of many attention-grabbing comments, Ms Forbes added: 'I would like to think that all parties in the Scottish Parliament want to see Ferguson Marine succeed and survive, which is why we need to build confidence, not knock it.'
The Herald Scotland
39 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
How the UK spending reviews will shape Scotland's finances
The UK Government has already trailed plans to increase defence spending, boost spending in the NHS, and reform social security. But it has said much less, so far, about day-to-day spending on public services. With limited headroom for new funding, any shift in priorities is likely to mean savings elsewhere. Read more: Spending decisions on reserved areas such as the industrial strategy, research and development, and defence procurement will all have an impact here in Scotland. But the Scottish Government's budget will also be impacted too. Even with recent tax devolution, the Barnett Formula remains the most significant contributor to the Scottish Government's budget. The formula ensures that any increase or decrease in Whitehall spending in devolved areas – for example, health or education – triggers a population-based adjustment to Scotland's budget. That means that what is announced in the spending review will not just matter for Whitehall departments, it will directly shape the financial envelope available to Holyrood. The onus then falls on the Scottish Government to set out its own spending priorities. June's medium-term financial strategy will likely give a high-level overview, but for greater detail we will need to wait for our the spending review in Scotland. The Cabinet Secretary for Finance has indicated that a timeline for that review will be published in June. The interaction between UK and Scottish Government fiscal policies does not stop with the Barnett Formula. Just last month, we were reminded of further – often subtle – interactions between developments in the UK and the Scottish budget. Read more: In publishing our updated five-year outlook at the Scottish Fiscal Commission, we highlighted how further fiscal pressures had emerged since the turn of the year. One such factor was the latest information on the Scottish Government's devolved tax and social security data, relative to the rest of the UK. Under Scotland's fiscal framework, the Scottish budget does not always benefit when its tax revenues rise. What matters is whether those revenues are growing faster than their counterparts in the rest of the UK. This is due to a core principle in the fiscal framework that seeks to protect the Scottish budget from shared UK-wide economic risks. But, on the other hand, this means that any divergence in performance between Scotland and the rest of the UK – the so-called net tax position – has a direct consequence on the level of funding available. In recent times, we have seen an improving performance – and outlook – for revenues in the rest of the UK that is not being fully matched in the data for Scotland, leading to knock-on implications for Scotland's budget. This is one of the lesser-known intricacies of our devolved fiscal setup: stronger tax growth in England can mean less money for Holyrood than planned, even if Scotland's own outlook is unchanged. Read more: A similar issue arises in social security. As more benefits are devolved – including disability and carer payments – what matters is not just how much is spent, but how that compares to the funding received. Scottish Ministers have made deliberate policy choices to expand eligibility and increase support, particularly in areas linked to child poverty and disability. Those choices have widened the gap between spending and funding. But the latest forecasts show that planned UK Government reforms to reduce spending in England and Wales – especially through tighter eligibility for benefits related to disability and ill-health – might make that gap larger by lowering the equivalent funding to Scotland. By 2029–30, we project that annual spending on devolved social security will exceed funding by £2 billion. Holyrood may have greater control over tax and spend decisions than in the past, but the budget remains integrated with decisions made in Westminster. Any meaningful strategy for Scotland's public finances – including in future spending reviews – must start with a clear understanding of that interdependence. Graeme Roy is professor of economics at the University of Glasgow's Adam Smith Business School.
