logo
Elon Musk Slapped With Major New Complication

Elon Musk Slapped With Major New Complication

Gizmodo3 hours ago
The reigning king of controversy has just found himself saddled with one more expensive problem.
A U.S. District Court judge in Texas has ordered Elon Musk to continue a lawsuit filed by voters who gave up personal information in exchange for winning a $1 million daily cash prize from Musk's PAC, Reuters reports.
The case says the contest constitutes a form of illegal lottery or sweepstakes, which is prohibited under federal and state law, and misled people into sharing personal information through a fraudulent campaign.
Arizona resident Jacqueline McAferty is a defendant in the case and alleges that Musk and the PAC promised voters across seven key swing states a $1 million prize, and that those voters were then required to share their phone numbers, email addresses, physical addresses and names.
Musk's legal defense says that petition signers did not suffer tangible harm from providing personal details.
Musk created America PAC during the 2024 election cycle, saying he wanted it to help support the U.S. Constitution, Reuters reports. He says those $1 million payments were incentives for voters to 'earn' money and become spokespeople for the PAC.
Judge Robert Pitman in Austin disagreed with that position and ruled this week that the allegations by McAferty are plausible enough to take the case to trial. Pittman pointed to conflicting statements about whether any money was 'awarded' and that voters could 'win' the money through a sweepstakes-like plan.
In October 2024, a Philadelphia judge refused to end Musk's giveaway, saying that city's top prosecutor failed to show it was an illegal lottery. At the time, defendant Larry Krasner's attorney John Summers brought up a Musk tweet on X that dubbed Judge Angelo Foglietta a 'leftist judge,' shamed Musk for not attending the hearing, and called him 'cowardly and irresponsible.'
Musk's broader controversial engagement in political campaigns and his high-ranking role in the second Trump administration has made him a lightning rod for criticism.
The case also highlights how the use of social media and digital platforms in political fundraising and public outreach actually work and whether or not they are safe for consumers, the Washington Post reports. That opaque approach could mean little accountability and the use of potentially deceptive tactics to influence public opinion during key electoral moments.
Lawyers for America PAC and Musk did respond to a request for comment. The lawsuit was filed on Election Day, Nov. 5, 2024.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Paxton-O'Rourke Sparring Match Escalates With Emergency Court Request
Paxton-O'Rourke Sparring Match Escalates With Emergency Court Request

Yahoo

timea few seconds ago

  • Yahoo

Paxton-O'Rourke Sparring Match Escalates With Emergency Court Request

The legal sparring match between the Texas attorney general and the leader of a Democratic election organization continues, with AG Ken Paxton filing an emergency request on Wednesday to block an El Paso court from interfering with ongoing litigation. The move escalates a legal battle over alleged deceptive fundraising practices by Beto O'Rourke's organization, Powered by People. The dispute centers on dueling court orders from judges in El Paso and Tarrant County, raising questions about judicial authority and jurisdiction in Texas courts. Paxton's emergency application asks a Tarrant County District Court to protect its jurisdiction after an El Paso judge, Annabell Perez of the 41st Judicial District Court, issued a restraining order on August 19. The El Paso ruling attempts to prevent Paxton from revoking the corporate charter of Powered by People. O'Rourke announced Judge Perez's ruling on X: 'BREAKING: A DISTRICT COURT JUDGE ISSUED A RESTRAINING ORDER AGAINST THE CORRUPT, LYING, IMPEACHED, TWICE INDICTED ATTORNEY GENERAL.' 'We took the fight directly to Ken Paxton, and we won,' O'Rourke added. The attorney general had previously obtained a temporary restraining order in Tarrant County halting what he called a deceptive fundraising scheme. He also moved to revoke the organization's charter to operate in Texas. Powered by People has been financially supporting Texas Democratic lawmakers who fled to Illinois to protest the GOP's attempt to redraw congressional district maps that would give Republicans five more seats in the House. Their two-week absence prevented the Texas House from meeting the minimum number of present members required to conduct business. 'A biased El Paso judge is threatening to ignite a constitutional crisis in a desperate bid to protect Robert Francis [O'Rourke],' said Paxton. 'The court has no authority to give itself appellate jurisdiction over an independent court hundreds of miles away.' Paxton referenced O'Rourke's own words in the filing, noting that despite claiming 'there are no referees in this game, f*** the rules,' O'Rourke now seeks to change both the referee and rules in the Tarrant County proceedings. The attorney general alleges O'Rourke made this move because he is losing the case. 'Beto cannot switch referees nor invent new rules just because he is losing,' Paxton stated. 'I will fight to uphold the rule of law and to hold those accountable who violate our laws.' The competing court orders create an unusual jurisdictional conflict between two Texas district courts. The outcome could determine whether Powered by People maintains its ability to operate in the state. Solve the daily Crossword

Ex-GOP leader goes on CNN, immediately continues feud with Trump loyalist
Ex-GOP leader goes on CNN, immediately continues feud with Trump loyalist

Yahoo

timea few seconds ago

  • Yahoo

Ex-GOP leader goes on CNN, immediately continues feud with Trump loyalist

Former House Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R) still appears to be peeved with his past colleague. During an appearance on CNN, McCarthy took aim at California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) over a redistricting proposal that is expected to come to a vote in his state Legislature on Thursday. But he then, unprompted, directed sharp criticism at former Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-Fla.). Newsom announced last week that he would move ahead with his own plan to counter a Republican-led effort in Texas to add up to five winnable red seats ahead of the 2026 midterms. The Texas House approved a new map on Wednesday after a weeks-long battle with the state's Democratic Party, during which many lawmakers fled the state in an attempt to block a vote. McCarthy, who previously represented California in Congress, said that Democrats would be 'taking away' nine competitive seats in the state, pointing to how they have flipped between Republicans and Democrats while he was in office. 'I didn't lose my job because I worked across the aisle,' McCarthy said. 'I lost my job because one person slept with an underage woman, and I wasn't going to do something different when it came to the ethics committee. And I'd do that exact same thing today.' McCarthy appeared to reference Gaetz, who he has previously linked to his 2023 ouster as House speaker. Gaetz, his longtime nemesis, spearheaded an effort that ultimately force him to lose the gavel after less than nine months on the job. The Justice Department has previously investigated Gaetz for sex trafficking and claims that he had paid for sex, including whether he had sexual relations with a minor. While it was dropped in February 2023, the House Ethics Committee began its own probe over allegations of sexual misconduct and illicit drug use. The new investigation, though, was effectively ended after Gaetz resigned from Congress last year once he was nominated by then President-elect Donald Trump as attorney general. Shortly afterwards, Gaetz then withdrew his name from consideration amid increased scrutiny. He has repeatedly denied allegations of sexual misconduct. McCarthy has also backed Gaetz's Florida GOP primary challenger and has taken a series of jabs against the now former lawmaker. McCarthy continued: 'I'll stand for what's right, just like right now, I'm standing for the constitution of California.' If California Democrats successfully pass the measure along, it will appear on ballots during the state's special election in November. If approved, a new map, favoring blue seats, will be used until the 2030 census — but it is fully dependent on whether the plan in the Lone Star State comes to fruition. The move will ultimately sidestep California's independent commission that has created district maps since 2010 under the VOTERS FIRST Act. McCarthy said that Newsom is looking to amend his state's constitution for his 'own political belief.' 'We have a governor who spends more time on this instead of trying to encourage Bed Bath & Beyond to move back to California,' McCarthy said, referring to how the company recently announced it will not open any new retail stores in the Golden State. Newsom's press office had fired back on X: 'After their bankruptcy and closure of every store, like most Americans, we thought Bed, Bath & Beyond no longer existed. We wish them well in their efforts to become relevant again as they try to open a 2nd store.' Our journalism needs your support. Please subscribe today to

Tinley Park District 146 teachers union declares impasse over contract negotiations
Tinley Park District 146 teachers union declares impasse over contract negotiations

Yahoo

timea few seconds ago

  • Yahoo

Tinley Park District 146 teachers union declares impasse over contract negotiations

The union for Tinley Park Elementary District 146 teachers says it is at an impasse with district officials over negotiating an updated contract. While most of the contract's provisions are settled, the Tinley Council Teachers 146 of Local 604 is fighting for higher wage increases and improved retirement benefits than the district is offering. Negotiations began in February, and the most recently approved contract expired July 31. The district's most recent offer includes wage increases of 6% for each of the next two school years and 5% for the 2027-2028 school year. Keegan Kociss, a spokesperson for the district, said District 146 teachers are among the highest paid in the surrounding area, saying the district's proposal is 'generous and it's fair and it keeps our taxpayers in mind.' The teachers union countered with wage increases of 7% each year for the next three school years, which they say is important to counter inflation and struggles teachers faced during the COVID-19 pandemic as well as to attract good teachers amid a nationwide shortage. 'As always, our number one priority is ensuring our students get the high-quality education they deserve. To us, that means a stable district that is fully staffed. It means ensuring that the district can retain great teachers through their career, making them a long term part of the school community,' union President Eileen VonBorstel said in a statement. Kociss said the district is unwilling to match the union's 7% proposal because wage increases beyond 6% expose the district to financial penalties through the Illinois Teachers Retirement System. Under the district's proposed salary increase, teachers' starting salaries would be $52,570. Teachers with master's degrees would start at $67,284. The union said it allowed the district to choose between two financial proposals in April, one that the district pay teachers' TRS contribution, which is 9% of every teacher's salary, while providing lower raises, or that they provide higher raises. The district chose the higher salary increase, the union said. In its public posting of their offer, the teachers union said the school board has impeded progress of negotiations and spread inaccurate information about the union's proposal. The district and the union met twice with a mediator since May but do not have any scheduled negotiation sessions. 'The union has been forced to bargain against itself repeatedly in order to find a path to progress, revising our proposals over and over again, to only be met with the same 'no,'' the union said. District 146 board President Julie Berry said in a district news release that the board values its teachers and their contributions to the district, which includes Fierke Education Center, Kruse Education Center, Fulton School, Memorial School and Central Middle School. 'We have been fortunate enough to maintain small class sizes and student-teacher ratios, exceptional educational programming, and minimal unfilled vacancies,' Berry said. Superintendent Jeff Stawick, district said 'we remain focused on reaching a fair, sustainable agreement that honors educators, meets student needs, and protects the district's financial stability.' ostevens@ Solve the daily Crossword

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store