Government ‘feckless' with public money, Social Democrats claim in budget row
Government
has been 'reckless and feckless' with public money and is following a 'cynical giveaway
budget
' last year by now 'moralising' on fiscal responsibility, a
Social Democrats
TD has claimed.
Tánaiste
Simon Harris
however accused
Jennifer Whitmore
of 'hypocrisy' and asked which one-off payment from Budget 2025 the Social Democrats would have cut from double child benefit payments, carer's allowance or fuel allowance.
But Ms Whitmore said her party had called for 'targeted' supports last year and would not have spent €100 million on energy credits for holiday homes as she accused the Government of being 'epic wasters'.
During testy exchanges on the last day of the
Dáil
before the summer recess, the budget and the
cost of living
dominated Leaders' Questions for the third day this week.
READ MORE
Sinn Féin
finance spokesman
Pearse Doherty
insisted there had to be a cost-of-living package as he pointed to a 63,000 increase in the past four months in the number of people in arrears on their electricity bills.
The energy regulator issued figures showing more than 300,000 people are behind on their electricity and a further 175,000 are in arrears on their gas bill.
Irish consumers are paying 'far and above' what other European Union countries are paying for energy.
Families 'simply can't absorb this type of shock to their finances' and the Government plan is to 'cancel the energy credits they so desperately need and relied on', Mr Doherty said, accusing the Government of having 'all the wrong priorities'.
The Tánaiste insisted the Government is helping households 'in the here and now', retaining the 9 per cent
VAT
rate on gas and electricity, expanding the fuel allowance to thousands more people, reducing childcare costs, providing free school meals, books and footwear allowances and increasing public-sector pay.
[
Irish Times poll: Support for Government parties holds steady as Sinn Féin slumps
Opens in new window
]
He also claimed there had been an 'air of unreality' to Sinn Féin's contributions. Mr Harris said Mr Doherty spent a lot of time saying to the Government ''You don't understand. You're out of touch'' but he said he knows 'who owns
SuperValu
' and it was not an American multinational.
He was referring to
comments Mr Doherty made
during a cost-of-living debate when he said the supermarket chain was owned by a US company United Foods.
Mr Harris said: 'You'd have to go back a very long time to find a summer recess in which we have seen a moment of greater economic uncertainty.'
He claimed Sinn Féin did not want to talk about trade or tariffs or the '48,000 people who work in pharma in this country' and global uncertainty.
'You've never seen something you don't want to spend more money on. But we have to be honest with the Irish people. We can't just keep saying 'spend, spend, spend'.'
Mr Doherty said the cost-of-living crisis had widened significantly and 'prices across the board are pushing households to the brink'.
He added 'it's not lost' on families 'being hammered by rip-off prices' that the energy companies are recording bumper profits, with the
ESB
recording profits of more than €1 billion in 2023 and 2024, while
SSE Airtricity
made 'hundreds of millions' in the past two years.
Ms Whitmore told the Tánaiste that 'having splashed the cash in an attempt to buy votes last year, your message suddenly changed. Now that an election is no longer on the cards, one-off payments are a bad idea.'
But Mr Harris said the one-off measures served a purpose 'at a time of extraordinarily high inflation'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RTÉ News
11 minutes ago
- RTÉ News
Tánaiste holds talks over Lebanon peacekeeping renewal
Tánaiste Simon Harris has held talks with UN and EU counterparts about the vital need to renew the mandate of the UN peacekeeping force in southern Lebanon. Next month at the UN headquarters in New York, the mandate of the UN Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL) will be up for discussion at the Security Council. There is concern that the 12-month roll-over of the UNIFIL mandate could be in jeopardy given strong criticism of the blue helmet operation by Israel and the fact that its ally, the United States, could pull support from the mission. The Tánaiste spoke with his counterparts in Italy and Lebanon, as well as the UN peacekeeping chief Jean-Pierre LaCroix. The discussion with Italian Foreign Minister Antonio Tajani is particularly important given the recent appointment of an Italian Major General as the UNIFIL Force Commander. Later Mr Harris will hold further talks, including with the French foreign minister whose country is leading the bid to ensure the UNIFIL mandate continues. Earlier this week, Poland gave its full backing to the renewal of the UNIFIL mission - a country that works hand-in-hand with Irish peacekeepers in southern Lebanon. The Tánaiste also told Cabinet on Tuesday that the UNIFIL mission is vital for the morale of Irish troops, and most importantly, Ireland's unwavering commitment to international peace and security. In his call with Lebanese foreign minister, Mr Harris also raised the case of Private Seán Rooney, who was killed while out on patrol in southern Lebanon in December 2022. The Irish Government has expressed concern at the length of time it is taking for a trial to proceed and continues to liaise with the late Private Rooney's family.
Irish Times
11 minutes ago
- Irish Times
Supreme Court is still changing society, says Attorney General
The Supreme Court has made 'as many' declarations of unconstitutionality in the last 15 years as happened during the court's life in the 1960s and 1970s, Attorney General Rossa Fanning has said. 'The perception that constitutional litigation has dried up and that there are no new rights is not statistically borne out,' he told the Patrick MacGill Summer School in Glenties, Co Donegal. During the same debate, Labour leader Ivana Bacik had argued that the high point for Supreme Court intervention came more than 50 years ago under Mr Justice Brian Walsh and Cearbhall Ó Dálaigh, when new rights were discovered in court judgments. 'There are as many declarations of unconstitutionality now in the last decade and a half as there ever were in the 1960s and 1970s,' said Mr Fanning, 'it is not the case that there was a whole load of declarations of unconstitutionality 50 years ago and now there are none.' However, he said the Irish Constitution is 'a mature instrument', no longer subject to 'low-hanging fruit' changes as happened 50 years ago when the Supreme Court established that everyone facing trial is entitled to legal representation. [ State urged to target five or six 'crucial' infrastructure projects Opens in new window ] 'That kind of seminal decision is unlikely to be happening as frequently now under a mature instrument. But that's not necessarily a bad thing,' Mr Fanning said in a debate on the Constitution, chaired by Ruadhán MacCormaic , editor of The Irish Times. Contrasting the Irish and US supreme courts, Mr Fanning said: 'The Constitution doesn't mean whatever the judge thinks it should mean when he gets out of bed. 'The Constitution is not a subjective document. There must be objective principles that govern its interpretation. The meaning must be found from within the document itself.' The Supreme Court rejected an application by Katherine Zappone, who later became a minister, to have her Canadian same-sex marriage recognised in Ireland, but this left the way open for a successful referendum later, he said. 'I personally think it's very difficult to disagree with the proposition that the way we did bring it about has an awful lot more democratic legitimacy, and consequently popular and public acceptance,' the Attorney General said. 'Quite literally, the proposition was put to the people and the people decided, not unelected judges arriving at a very strained and artificial interpretation of a Constitution written in 1937.' [ Better-off families 'sailing away from the have-nots', warns Ombudsman Opens in new window ] The Irish experience can be contrasted with the US, where its 'constitution is almost impossible to amend' and where president Donald Trump could boast that one of his most significant achievements was the appointment of three conservative judges. '[They] are called upon to decide all of these important moral issues, whether it be same-sex marriage or abortion or many other things. They've become almost more important than any legislator in America, with Secret Service protection following them around.' Contrasting the Walsh/Ó Dálaigh Supreme Court with the court in later years, Ms Bacik, a legal academic and barrister who has appeared before the Supreme Court, argued: 'In the 1960s and the early 1970s, we saw an expansive approach to judicial lawmaking. Then that completely slowed down. 'There was then a rolling back and judges were much more deferential to the executive and the Oireachtas, leading to charges that the era of judicial lawmaking was over.' However, there has been a change since 2017 where 'some judges on the Supreme Court are clearly looking to be more expansive again', drawing inspiration from the European Convention on Human Rights, among other sources. 'It's no longer unusual to see quite a number of different judgments [from Supreme Court justices],' she told the summer school, adding, 'some are clearly pushing the boundaries a little'. Referring to the Irish unification debate, the Labour leader urged the creation of an Oireachtas joint committee that would consider 'the language and text' of the Constitution in advance of a unity referendum. Unlike the situation now facing the US, most, if not all, of the Irish Supreme Court judges are not known by the public, Prof David Kenny, Professor in Law and Fellow and head of Trinity College Dublin's law school. 'Almost no one in the room could identify one Supreme Court judge as being on the left or on the right, as opposed to the US where you can almost predict decision by decision how judges will come down,' he said.
Irish Times
41 minutes ago
- Irish Times
Hundreds of potentially unsafe baby products removed by top online retailers after consumer protection sweep
A co-ordinated sweep of some of the world's biggest online retailers – including Amazon , Temu and Shein – by consumer groups across Europe has led to hundreds of potentially unsafe baby products being taken off the market. The authorities, including the State's Competition and Consumer Protection Commission (CCPC), examined 1,741 items as part of exercise examining baby products for sale on online marketplaces. It followed the introduction of new product safety legislation last December. Following the sweeps, conducted in April and May, 252 takedown orders were sent to the online marketplaces regarding listings that failed to meet minimum safety and compliance information requirements or featured products that had already been recalled from the market. CCPC safety officers issued 72 of the European Union's 252 takedown orders, targeting baby carriers, slings and walkers. All 72 listings were removed from Amazon, Shein, Etsy, eBay , Fruugo and Joom following the requests. READ MORE Officers analysed the listings for compliance with minimum product safety information rules, which require clear details of the manufacturer and EU responsible person to be displayed. This information is crucial for the protection of babies and children from dangerous or faulty products. 'Many parents turn to online marketplaces for convenience when buying baby products and they deserve to know that the item is safe,' CCPC chairman Brian McHugh said. 'Our product-safety officers issue recalls for tens of thousands of items every year and traceability is critically important. Online marketplaces have a duty to be transparent about what they're selling and provide contact details in the event a product is unsafe.' He said the CCPC was 'pleased that the online marketplaces co-operated when we contacted them and the listings were taken down promptly'. 'The work of our officers in collaboration with colleagues across EU has stopped hundreds of potentially unsafe products being offered for sale to Irish consumers,' Mr McHugh said.
