Police probe claim pickup truck was racing before sideswiping motorcycle
KUALA LUMPUR: City police are looking into claims that the driver of a pick-up truck, which appeared in a viral video sideswiping a couple on a motorcycle in an expressway here, was racing with other pick-up trucks.
The driver allegedly fled the scene after causing the motorcycle to crash.
As a result, both the rider, 53, and pillion, 49, were injured, with the woman pillion still unconscious in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) of Sungai Buloh Hospital.
Another video footage, believed to be from the dash cam of another vehicle, had since gone viral showing the Nissan Navara chasing after another pick-up truck on the left lane of the North-South Expressway near the Duta Toll Plaza.
Seconds later, two other pick-up trucks, believed to be another Nissan Navara and a Mitsubishi Triton, were also seen speeding past the recording vehicle.
The video also shows the four vehicles weaving through the lanes as they overtook other vehicles.
City police chief Datuk Rusdi Mohd Isa said they were aware of the video footage.
"Efforts are being made to identify the other vehicle drivers who netizens claimed were driving recklessly as well.
"We urge anyone who has dashcam footage of these other vehicles to come forward immediately," he said.
Rusdi said the case was being investigated for reckless driving.
The offence is punishable by imprisonment of up to five years and a maximum fine of RM15,000 upon conviction, as well as a suspension of driving licence for at least two years.
Rusdi urged those with information on the other pickup trucks to contact the City Police Hotline at 03-2115 9999 or go to the nearest police station.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
an hour ago
- The Star
Court sets Aug 19 for decision in activist's appeal over challenge to online speech law
PUTRAJAYA: The Court of Appeal has fixed Aug 19 to deliver its decision in an appeal brought by an activist over the dismissal of her lawsuit that had challenged the validity of parts of a provision in the Communications and Multimedia Act 1998 that criminalises offensive online comments. A three-man bench consisting of Federal Court judge Datuk Lee Swee Seng and Court of Appeal judges Datuk Hashim Hamzah and Datuk Azman Abdullah set the decision date after parties completed their submissions earlier Wednesday (June 11). Heidy Quah Gaik Li, the founder of Refuge for Refugees is claiming the use of the words "offensive' and annoy' in Section 233 of the Act are invalid as it goes against two fundamental human rights protected by the Federal Constitution. Section 233(1)(a) states that it is an offence for a person to make, create or solicit, and initiate the transmission of any online comment which is "obscene, indecent, false, menacing or offensive' with "intent to annoy, abuse, threaten or harass another person. In September 2023, the Shah Alam High Court dismissed Quah's lawsuit, leading her to file an appeal in the Court of Appeal. The hearing today was a continuation of proceedings that had begun earlier. Justice Lee was serving as a Court of Appeal judge before being elevated to the Federal Court in May this year. During today's hearing, senior federal counsel Liew Horng Bin representing the Malaysian government submitted that speech involving expletives, profanity, crude references, hate speech or incitement to violence are not expressions protected under Article 10 (1) (a) of the Federal Constitution. He argued that the right to free speech should be used to disseminate truth, respect for human dignity and perform essential informing function. On the other hand, lawyer Datuk Malik Imtiaz Sarwar, representing Quah argued the words "offensive' or annoy contained in Section 233 is inconsistent with Article 10 and Article 8 of the Federal Constitution, namely the right to equality and freedom of speech. He argued that the two words in Section 233 are not a "permissible restriction' under public order as prescribed in the Federal Constitution. In July 2021, Quah, 31, was charged in the Kuala Lumpur Sessions Court for allegedly making "offensive' online comments in a Facebook post. In April the following year, the Sessions Court granted her a discharge not amounting to an acquittal (DNAA) due to the charge under section 233(1)(a) being defective. - Bernama
The Sun
an hour ago
- The Sun
Appeals Court set Aug 19 for decision in activist's appeal over challenge to online speech law
PUTRAJAYA: The Court of Appeal has fixed August 19 to deliver its decision in an appeal brought by an activist over the dismissal of her lawsuit that had challenged the validity of parts of a provision in the Communications and Multimedia Act 1998 that criminalises offensive online comments. A three-man bench consisting of Federal Court judge Datuk Lee Swee Seng and Court of Appeal judges Datuk Hashim Hamzah and Datuk Azman Abdullah set the decision date after parties completed their submissions earlier today. Heidy Quah Gaik Li, the founder of Refuge for Refugees is claiming the use of the words 'offensive' and annoy' in Section 233 of the Act are invalid as it goes against two fundamental human rights protected by the Federal Constitution. Section 233(1)(a) states that it is an offence for a person to make, create or solicit, and initiate the transmission of any online comment which is 'obscene, indecent, false, menacing or offensive' with 'intent to annoy, abuse, threaten or harass another person. In Sept 2023, the Shah Alam High Court dismissed Quah's lawsuit, leading her to file an appeal in the Court of Appeal. The hearing today was a continuation of proceedings that had begun earlier. Justice Lee was serving as a Court of Appeal judge before being elevated to the Federal Court in May this year. During today's hearing, senior federal counsel Liew Horng Bin representing the Malaysian government submitted that speech involving expletives, profanity, crude references, hate speech or incitement to violence are not expressions protected under Article 10 (1) (a) of the Federal Constitution. He argued that the right to free speech should be used to disseminate truth, respect for human dignity and perform essential informing function. On the other hand, lawyer Datuk Malik Imtiaz Sarwar, representing Quah argued the words 'offensive' or annoy contained in Section 233 is inconsistent with Article 10 and Article 8 of the Federal Constitution, namely the right to equality and freedom of speech. He argued that the two words in Section 233 are not a 'permissible restriction' under public order as prescribed in the Federal Constitution. In July 2021, Quah, 31, was charged in the Kuala Lumpur Sessions Court for allegedly making 'offensive' online comments in a Facebook post. In April the following year, the Sessions Court granted her a discharge not amounting to an acquittal (DNAA) due to the charge under section 233(1)(a) being defective.
The Sun
an hour ago
- The Sun
RM3,000 aid for families of UPSI students killed in crash
KUALA TERENGGANU: The Terengganu government will provide financial assistance of RM3,000 to each family of the 15 Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris (UPSI) students who perished in a bus crash on the East-West Highway (JRTB) near Tasik Banding, Gerik, Perak. Menteri Besar Datuk Seri Dr Ahmad Samsuri Mokhtar said RM1,000 of the amount had already been disbursed to the affected families. He said a separate RM1,000 in aid will also be channelled to each of the 33 individuals who were injured in the crash. 'The state government is deeply saddened by this tragedy and remains committed to assisting those impacted. We also call on all Terengganu residents to continue praying for the victims and for their families to be granted strength during this difficult time,' he said in a statement today. On Monday, 15 UPSI students were killed when the chartered bus they were travelling in from Jertih to the university's main campus in Tanjung Malim, Perak overturned after colliding with a Perodua Alza on the JRTB. The crash also left 33 others injured, including the bus driver and attendant, as well as the driver and three passengers of the Perodua Alza. Speaking to reporters, Ahmad Samsuri said he would personally hand over the financial aid to the victims' families next Tuesday. He said the state government would also cover all medical and hospital-related expenses, including surgery costs, and provide counselling sessions for victims and their families. 'The role of communities under the JPKK (Village Development and Security Committees) is also vital, and they have stepped up to offer extra comfort to affected families,' he said after presenting certificates of appointment to the president, vice-president, council members and honorary commissioners of the Terengganu Scouts at Wisma Darul Iman today. Meanwhile, Ahmad Samsuri urged all relevant quarters, including ministries, to conduct audits covering all aspects, such as law enforcement, road safety and bus operations, to prevent similar incidents. 'If a comprehensive audit cannot be carried out all at once, it can be done in phases, focusing first on high-risk locations,' he said.
