logo
What happened on last Starship flight? SpaceX releases report ahead of next test

What happened on last Starship flight? SpaceX releases report ahead of next test

Yahoo27-05-2025
SpaceX has released the findings of its investigation into the most recent explosion of the company's Starship as the massive launch vehicle prepares to get off the ground once again.
The previous flight test in March ended with the Starship's upper portion breaking apart in the sky in second consecutive fiery mishap for a vehicle due to play a large role in U.S. spaceflight in the years ahead. An ongoing investigation into the flight is what held up SpaceX from launching Starship again from South Texas.
But regulators decided earlier in May to allow billionaire Elon Musk's company to move forward with its next test mission, referred to as Flight 9, after determining that SpaceX met all licensing requirements. That included submitting to the Federal Aviation Administration a report on the Flight 8 mishap, which SpaceX said ultimately prompted mission teams to make several modifications to the vehicle for its next launch.
"Starship is designed to fundamentally change and enhance humanity's ability to reach space," SpaceX wrote on its website under a post titled, "Fly. Learn. Repeat." "This step change in capability won't happen overnight and progress towards that goal won't always come in leaps."
Here's what SpaceX determined caused the March explosion of Starship, as well as what to expect for the upcoming flight test.
Starship Flight 9: Here's what SpaceX is planning for the launch
SpaceX has announced that it is targeting Tuesday, May 27, for Starship's ninth flight test. Liftoff is scheduled for 7:30 p.m. ET from SpaceX's Starbase, the company's headquarters in Boca Chica about 23 miles from Brownsville near the U.S.-Mexico border.
The launch got the green light May 21 after the FAA determined that SpaceX met 'all of the rigorous safety, environmental and other licensing requirements.'
How to watch Starship: SpaceX to provide livestream of South Texas launch
The first two Starship tests of 2025 have been marred by explosions.
In the most recent launch March 6, flight operators lost contact with the upper portion of Starship, which exploded less than 10 minutes into the flight, creating debris visible from Florida to the Caribbean.
Despite the failure of the Starship vehicle, the spacecraft's rocket booster managed to navigate back to the launch pad for the second time in a row, and third time overall. The maneuver, first completed in October 2024, involves SpaceX catching the booster with giant mechanical arms known as chopsticks.
After the first Starship demonstration of 2025 also ended in an explosion, SpaceX later traced the culprit to a series of propellant leaks and fires in the aft section of the vehicle, commonly referred to as the attic.
But in the latest fiery mishap in March, it wasn't a fire in the attic, but rather a "flash" closer to the bottom section, SpaceX wrote May 22. Mission operators noticed the flash about five-and-a-half minutes into Starship's ascent burn, followed by what SpaceX called "an energetic event" that led to the loss of one of its Raptor engines.
Within about two minutes, the remaining five of the vehicle's six Raptor engines also subsequently shut down, causing the vehicle to veer out of control. This led to the communication breakdown and the vehicle to trigger its own self destruction, SpaceX concluded.
Starship eventually reentered Earth's atmosphere within its designated launch corridor and broke apart.
SpaceX identified "the most probably root cause" of the mishap as a hardware failure in one of the upper stage's Raptor engines "that resulted in inadvertent propellant mixing and ignition."
"Extensive ground testing has taken place since the flight test to better understand the failure, including more than 100 long-duration Raptor firings," SpaceX wrote.
The company has frequently stressed that its rapid and frequent testing are expected to sometimes lead to such explosive ends, but that even failed launches can provide data that helps engineers improve Starship's design.
After SpaceX submitted a mishap report to the FAA, the agency released a statement May 22 indicating it had "conducted a comprehensive safety review of the SpaceX Starship Flight 8 mishap."
After federal regulators determined that SpaceX "satisfactorily addressed the causes of the mishap," Starship was approved to return to flight.
For Starship's next launch, SpaceX released a flight plan that calls for attempting a few key objectives to prepare Starship for more frequent flights.
SpaceX will also take a third shot at a Starlink payload deployment test – a key capability for the vehicle in the future that was called off during both previous launches. The eight Starlink simulators, similar in size and weight to next-generation Starlink satellites, will be on the same suborbital trajectory as Starship and are expected to burn up on reentry.
SpaceX intends to reuse for the first time a Super Heavy booster rocket that has launched before. For that reason, the FAA also noted that it would expand the size of the hazard zones designating areas for aircraft to avoid.
SpaceX is developing Starship to be a fully reusable transportation system, meaning both the rocket and vehicle can return to the ground for additional missions. In the years ahead, Starship is intended to carry both cargo and humans to Earth's orbit and deeper into the cosmos.
NASA's lunar exploration plans, which appear to be in jeopardy under President Donald Trump's proposed budget, call for Artemis III astronauts aboard the Orion capsule to board the Starship while in orbit for a ride to the moon's surface.
But Musk is more preoccupied with Starship reaching Mars – potentially, he has claimed, by the end of 2026. Under his vision, human expeditions aboard the Starship could then follow in the years after the first uncrewed spacecraft reaches the Red Planet.
Starship is regarded as the world's largest and most powerful launch vehicle ever developed.
At more than 400 total feet in height, Starship towers over SpaceX's famous Falcon 9 rocket – one of the world's most active – which stands at nearly 230 feet.
The launch vehicle is composed of both a 232-foot Super Heavy rocket and the 171-foot upper stage spacecraft, or capsule or crew and cargo would ride.
Super Heavy alone is powered by 33 of SpaceX's Raptor engines that give the initial burst of thrust at liftoff. The upper section, also called Starship or Ship for short, is the upper stage powered by six Raptor engines that will ultimately travel in orbit.
Eric Lagatta is the Space Connect reporter for the USA TODAY Network. Reach him at elagatta@gannett.com
This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Why did Starship explode? SpaceX releases report ahead of next test
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

New Texas Laws Open a Wild West for Corporate Governance
New Texas Laws Open a Wild West for Corporate Governance

New York Times

time3 hours ago

  • New York Times

New Texas Laws Open a Wild West for Corporate Governance

Elon Musk scored a major victory this month when Tesla awarded him $29 billion, a 'first step' in a long-promised payday. It was also a win for Texas, where Tesla is now incorporated. A new law in the state helped pave the way for Musk's pay package after it was initially blocked by a Delaware judge. Texas' low corporate tax rate and employer-friendly labor laws have long made it an attractive place for businesses, but most big companies — two-thirds of the Fortune 500 — still incorporate in Delaware. Corporate America's backlash to a string of decisions by Delaware courts, including the one voiding Musk's pay package, has heightened the opportunity for Texas to compete for corporate domicile. Some major companies, including SpaceX, Dropbox and TripAdvisor, have decided to leave (or rather, as the exodus from Delaware has been named, 'Dexit'). Over the past few months, the Texas Legislature has passed several bills that could help attract Delaware's defectors by shifting more power from shareholders to executives. Under the new laws: Businesses incorporated in Texas can ban lawsuits from all but their biggest owners. Companies have the power to pass a bylaw that mandates that shareholders own at least a 3 percent stake in order to sue. That effectively shields companies from shareholder lawsuits, since so few of them meet that criteria. Tesla was quick to take advantage of the new law, passing a bylaw in May that helped clear Musk's blockbuster payday. Corporations incorporated or headquartered in Texas can restrict shareholder proposals to only their largest shareholders. That covers those owning at least $1 million in stock or 3 percent of the company. That helps companies like Exxon Mobil, which is headquartered in Texas but incorporated in New Jersey, avoid activist shareholder proposals on issues like climate change. Last year, Exxon sued the investor groups Arjuna Capital and Follow This over shareholder proposals that pushed the company to limit its greenhouse gas emissions. Proxy advisers face hurdles to disagreeing with management. These firms, which make recommendations for how shareholders vote on company issues, must publicly disclose that they incorporated 'nonfinancial factors' and 'subordinated the financial interest of shareholders' if they take into account environmental, social or governance issues when advising clients to vote against a company. Because nearly all shareholder proposals touch on E.S.G. issues, the measure effectively blocks proxy advisers from siding against management on any shareholder proposal. The aim is to tell boards and executives in Delaware that 'Texas is open for business,' said Nathan Jensen, a government professor at the University of Texas-Austin. States have been competing for corporate charters since the late 1800s. The incentives are high: About 30 percent of Delaware's revenue in 2024 came from franchise taxes. Politicians often claim new charters as a political victory, framing Delaware's court decisions as examples of unnecessary interference. When Tesla reincorporated in Texas, Gov. Greg Abbott wrote on X: 'Congrats Elon on getting the pay you were promised and on your new incorporation in Texas.' Texas has succeeded in wooing Musk's Tesla and SpaceX, but it faces competition from Nevada, which offers similarly lax governance laws. In addition to Dropbox and TripAdvisor, the venture capital giant Andreessen Horowitz recently departed for Nevada, announcing its move in a blog post titled, 'We're Leaving Delaware, and We Think You Should Consider Leaving Too.' Want all of The Times? Subscribe.

Treasury Sec Issues Shock September Fed Prediction After Surprise U.S. Bitcoin Reveal Triggered Wild Price Swings
Treasury Sec Issues Shock September Fed Prediction After Surprise U.S. Bitcoin Reveal Triggered Wild Price Swings

Forbes

time5 hours ago

  • Forbes

Treasury Sec Issues Shock September Fed Prediction After Surprise U.S. Bitcoin Reveal Triggered Wild Price Swings

08/16 update below. This post was originally published on August 15 Bitcoin has plummeted after soaring to a fresh all-time high this week, with the combined crypto market losing well over $100 billion despite Elon Musk quietly signalling his support. Sign up now for CryptoCodex—A free newsletter for the crypto-curious The bitcoin price, which has doubled since this time last year, fell by 5% as traders brace for a September shock following U.S. president Donald Trump dropping a $12.2 trillion bombshell. Bitcoin's bearish reversal comes as U.S. Treasury secretary Scott Bessent revealed the U.S. holds far fewer bitcoin than previously thought, putting the value of the U.S. government's at "$15 billion to $20 billion"—well below estimates of more than $23 billion. Sign up now for the free CryptoCodex—A daily five-minute newsletter for traders, investors and the crypto-curious that will get you up to date and keep you ahead of the bitcoin and crypto market bull run The figure was used as Bessent appeared to rule out the U.S. buying additional bitcoin for the bitcoin strategic reserve promised by president Donald Trump during what seemed to be off-the-cuff remarks during an interview with Fox Business. "We've also started—to get into the 21st Century—a bitcoin strategic reserve. We're not going to be buying that, but we are going to use confiscated assets and continue to build that up. We're going to stop selling that," Bessent said, following a question about the U.S. gold reserves, adding: 'I believe that bitcoin reserve is at today's prices somewhere between $15 and $20 billion.' Estimates for how much bitcoin the U.S. government holds have been put at around $23 billion by various sources, including Arkham Intelligence, which reckons the U.S. is sitting on almost 200,000 bitcoin. Following the interview, Bessent sought to clarify his comments on X, saying, "Treasury is committed to exploring budget-neutral pathways to acquire more bitcoin to expand the reserve, and to execute on the president's promise to make the United States the 'bitcoin superpower of the world,'" and calling the 'bitcoin that has been finally forfeited to the federal government ... the foundation of the strategic bitcoin reserve that president Trump established in his March executive order.' 08/16 update: Treasury secretary Scott Bessent has said the Federal Reserve could cut interest rates by 50 basis points in September, mirroring a surprise 2024 interest rate cut that powered a bitcoin price boom into the November election. "If we'd seen those numbers in May, in June, I suspect we could have had rate cuts in June and July. So that tells me that there's a very good chance of a 50 basis-point rate cut," in September," Bessent told Bloomberg. "Rates are too constrictive. We should probably be 150 to 175 basis points lower," Bessent said, adding to U.S. president Donald Trump's war of words against the Fed and chair Jerome Powell. The crypto market surged this week after the latest U.S. inflation data gave the Federal Reserve a green light to cut interest rates in September, with markets now pricing in a 92% likelihood of a 25 basis cut, according to CME's FedWatch. A higher than expected producer price index reading wasn't enough to discourage traders from betting on an interest rate cut in September—with the resumption of the Fed's interest rate cutting cycle after a tariff-induced pause widely expected to support risk assets like bitcoin and cryptocurrencies. 'Adding momentum, macro conditions remain highly supportive, with U.S. equities hovering near record highs and the Federal Reserve expected to begin rate cuts in September,' Thomas Perfumo, global economist at the bitcoin and crypto exchange Kraken, said in emailed comments. White House crypto czar David Sacks has said Bessent and Commerce secretary Howard Lutnick, an outspoken bitcoin bull, will have final say on whether to purchase additional bitcoin via 'budget-neutral' methods, such as selling off other government reserve assets such as gold. The bitcoin reserve and a broader crypto stockpile were ordered by Trump this year following a campaign promise first made during the Bitcoin 2024 conference. Trump's order instructed his crypto task force to explore how the reserve and stockpile would be funded, though a hotly anticipated report earlier this month failed to present any ideas, with the report's primary author Bo Hines, who headed Trump's council of advisers on digital assets, leaving his post shortly after publication. Bitcoin and crypto supporting senator Cynthia Lummis has said the Trump administration's priority is for the now passed Genius Act stablecoin bill and a crypto market structure bill that's still making its way though Congress, with the White House not going to look to the bitcoin reserve until they've both been passed. Sign up now for CryptoCodex—A free newsletter for the crypto-curious Earlier this year, the bitcoin price and crypto market was spooked by reports the U.S. could hold just 30,000 bitcoin—something Bessent's comments seem to refute. The U.S. Marshals Service was revealed in July to hold fewer bitcoin than previously thought, according to a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request filed by pseudonymous crypto journalist L0la L33tz, raising questions over how much bitcoin the U.S. government holds and whether some of the bitcoin was quietly sold off. "I'm alarmed by reports that the U.S. has sold off over 80% of its bitcoin reserves—leaving just ~29,000 coins," senator Cynthia Lummis, a bitcoin supporter who has championed the creation of a U.S. strategic bitcoin reserve, posted to X. 'If true, this is a total strategic blunder and sets the United States back years in the bitcoin race.' If the U.S. does only hold less than 30,000 bitcoin, it would bump it down to fourth in the global rankings, behind China (194,000 bitcoin), the U.K. (61,000), Ukraine (46,000) and ahead of Bhutan with 13,000 bitcoin.

Sam Altman Is Going After Elon Musk's Empire, One Company At A Time
Sam Altman Is Going After Elon Musk's Empire, One Company At A Time

Forbes

time5 hours ago

  • Forbes

Sam Altman Is Going After Elon Musk's Empire, One Company At A Time

O ver the last year, the feud between Silicon Valley heavyweights Sam Altman and Elon Musk has devolved into personal attacks, social media swipes, and lawsuits. Musk calls his foe Scam Altman and Swindly Sam. Altman has said that Musk 'can't be a happy person" and that his "whole life is from a position of insecurity." Just this week, after Musk announced he plans to sue Apple for allegedly promoting Altman's OpenAI on the app store over his own startup xAI, Altman called out Musk for manipulating X to 'benefit himself and his own companies.' Musk responded by calling Altman a liar. The two men famously co-founded OpenAI as a non-profit in 2015 before Musk left the organization's board three years later following a failed power grab. After OpenAI released ChatGPT to public acclaim in late 2022, Musk founded xAI in March 2023 and promoted it as the 'anti-woke' alternative. Last year, Musk sued Altman to stop him from turning OpenAI into a for-profit entity. Altman countersued, claiming Musk has worked "nonstop" to torpedo OpenAI. But the rivalry between OpenAI and xAI is now just one front in the larger war between Altman and Musk. Altman has been making moves, both through OpenAI and with his own expansive investment portfolio, to develop products and technologies that target several of Musk's businesses. Altman is backing a new brain-computer interface startup called Merge Labs, which will directly compete with Musk's own brain-computer interface outfit Neuralink, the Financial Times reported this week. Altman is a cofounder of the new venture, which is seeking to raise capital at a $850 million valuation. (Weirdly, Altman is also a small investor in Neuralink). Musk cofounded Neuralink (recent valuation: $9 billion) in 2016, and is its largest individual shareholder. Meanwhile, Altman is positioning OpenAI to compete directly with Musk's X, the social media platform formerly known as Twitter. OpenAI is working to build a social media arm that would be an 'X-like social network,' according to The Verge , which first reported on those plans in April. OpenAI's push into social networking could potentially pose a big threat to X. At last count, X has around 600 million monthly users (per Statista). OpenAI says ChatGPT is more popular, with 700 million weekly users. And Altman is coming after Tesla too. Compared to a year earlier, sales of Tesla vehicles plummeted 13.5% in the second quarter of 2025, leading Mush to pivot to self-driving taxis as a potential future area of growth for his electric vehicle maker. 'My prediction is by the end of next year, we'll have hundreds of thousands if not over a million Teslas doing self-driving in the U.S,' Musk said in May on CNBC . Maybe. But there is little evidence to support Musk's claim, given that no Tesla vehicles are currently approved for full self-driving. In June, OpenAI announced it had partnered with self-driving software maker Applied Intuition (recent valuation: $15 billion) to 'advance next-generation, AI-powered experiences in vehicles worldwide.' Altman then hailed OpenAI's progress in developing self-driving tech, while also obliquely dissing Tesla's progress: 'We have some new technology that could just do self-driving for standard cars way better than any current approach has worked,' Altman claimed his brother's podcast, Uncapped with Jack Altman. Altman has also backed the company Longshot Space, which dreams of taking on Musk's SpaceX with a gigantic gun that shoots satellites into orbit (seriously). He has also invested in Glydways, another robocar startup that could one day compete with Tesla's self-driving robotaxis. Neither Musk or Altman responded to Forbes' requests for comment for this article. Musk, 54, and Altman, 40, weren't always at odds. The two men first met in the early 2010s when Altman was president of startup incubator Y Combinator and Musk was working to build out SpaceX and Tesla. The two men bonded over their shared concern about the dangers of artificial intelligence, and they cofounded OpenAI in 2015 as a nonprofit with the mission of developing AI in a responsible manner. Musk was the organization's largest individual backer, donating $44 million in 2016 and 2017. Elon Musk and Sam Altman speak onstage at the Vanity Fair New Establishment Summit on October 6, 2015 in San Francisco, California, back when they were still friends. (Photo byfor Vanity Fair) Getty Images for Vanity Fair Musk left OpenAI's board in 2018 after he allegedly tried and failed to merge the entity into Tesla, but even then, the two men seemingly remained on good terms. In 2019, during a difficult time for Tesla, Altman railed against those who 'root against' the EV maker and warned that 'betting against Elon is historically a mistake.' When OpenAI launched its ChatGPT product to the public in November 2022, Musk praised the chatbot as 'scary good' and scolded the New York Times for not sufficiently writing about ChatGPT. The vibes started souring in 2023, as Musk was laying the seeds of xAI. Musk posted a meme that February that claimed ChatGPT had usurped the mainstream media as 'the captain of propaganda.' The following month, Musk expressed concern that Microsoft had 'exclusive access to the entire OpenAI codebase' as part of its $13 billion investment in the startup. Still, the two men were at least publicly friendly with one another, trading jokes and philosophical observations. 'We live in the most interesting of times,' Musk said in October 2023, in response to Altman's musings about being alive in today's day and age. One month later, Musk was mocking ChatGPT as 'insufferable' and using Grok (xAI's chatbot) to generate disses of the chatbot. 'The woke mind virus, which is fundamentally anti-human, has been deeply ingrained into ChatGPT!' Musk railed in one tweet. After a short-lived coup which briefly saw Altman ousted as OpenAI's CEO, Musk warned that the organization needed 'directors who deeply understand AI and will stand up to Sam' and that 'human civilization is at stake.' Musk accelerated the conflict in early 2024 when he made a $97.4 billion bid for OpenAI's assets (despite them not being for sale) and then sued OpenAI, Altman and fellow cofounder Greg Brockman in California, alleging that their plans to convert OpenAI into a for-profit enterprise violated the nonprofit's founding contract. Musk withdrew his lawsuit before a state judge could rule on whether to dismiss it, but then filed a similar lawsuit in federal court. This April, OpenAI countersued Musk, alleging that he engaged in a 'yearslong harassment campaign' against OpenAI in court and social media posts, and that his $97.4 billion offer was a 'sham bid' designed to hurt OpenAI. The judge has denied Musk's request to block OpenAI's restructuring plans, tossed out some of Musk's claims and permitted OpenAI's counterclaim to proceed. A jury trial is scheduled for next year. As the ill-will between the men deepens, many in Silicon Valley are getting their popcorn out and enjoying the show. Vinod Khosla, the legendary billionaire investor who has warned of AI's potential dangers, says that ultimately, the pair's rivalry will be good for the ecosystem as a whole. 'More competition is always good,' he told Forbes via email. Good luck convincing Musk or Altman of that. More from Forbes Forbes Google And Pollster Scott Rasmussen Will Use AI To Survey Americans' Political Views By Richard Nieva Forbes Inside The Richest Presidential Cabinet Ever By Kyle Khan-Mullins Forbes Zuckerberg Squandered His AI Talent. Now He's Spending Billions To Replace It. By Rashi Shrivastava Forbes Longer Leash On Life: Inside The Dog Longevity Startup By Amy Feldman Forbes As Meme Stocks Make A Comeback, Beware This Tax Trap By Kelly Phillips Erb

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store