What does Trump's ‘America First Investment Policy' mean for China?
US President Donald Trump signed an
'America First Investment Policy' memorandum on Saturday, ordering the use of 'all necessary legal instruments' to curb Chinese-affiliated investments in critical sectors.
Advertisement
The order, issued hours after
Vice-Premier He Lifeng spoke with US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent , has sparked concerns among Chinese investors and heightened tensions between the two economic powers.
This explainer breaks down the policy's scope, its implications for Hong Kong and Macau, and the potential impacts on China.
What are the key areas the policy covers?
The memorandum said the administration would restrict China-affiliated people from investing in American technology, critical infrastructure, healthcare, agriculture, energy, raw materials and other strategic sectors, while also deterring Americans from investing in China's military-industrial sector.
The Trump administration also plans to review whether to suspend or terminate the 1984 tax treaty between the countries on the grounds that it, along with other factors, contributed 'to the deindustrialisation of the United States and the technological modernisation of the PRC military'.
The memorandum also considers new or expanded restrictions on US outbound investment in China 'in sectors such as semiconductors, artificial intelligence (AI), quantum, biotechnology, hypersonics, aerospace, advanced manufacturing, directed energy, and other areas implicated by [China's] national military-civil fusion strategy'.
Advertisement
'Economic security is national security,' the memorandum says, adding that China 'does not allow United States companies to take over their critical infrastructure, and the United States should not allow [China]to take over United States critical infrastructure'.
The memorandum does not provide a clear timeline of actions.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South China Morning Post
14 minutes ago
- South China Morning Post
Hong Kong to review letting more semi-private schools offer non-local curriculum
The Hong Kong government will review whether to allow more semi-private secondary schools to offer a non-local curriculum on a self-financing basis, the education minister has said. Advertisement Secretary for Education Christine Choi Yuk-lin on Wednesday also dismissed a call to let non-locals attend public primary and secondary schools amid a local student population decline, explaining that the language of instruction was Cantonese and the curriculum targeted Hongkongers. Choi revealed the syllabus plan in a reply to lawmaker Peter Douglas Koon Ho-ming, who asked whether authorities would let schools under the direct subsidy scheme (DSS) allocate more places to those studying a non-local curriculum. 'We now let international schools and DSS schools offer the International Baccalaureate (IB), but parents, particularly those coming from overseas, find the places to be insufficient ... will authorities increase the relevant places in DSS schools?' Koon said in a Legislative Council meeting. Choi said the government would only provide subsidies to public schools to offer the local curriculum. Advertisement The city's university entrance examination, the Diploma of Secondary Education (DSE), was for local students to pursue further studies, she noted. But Choi said that authorities 'in the long run' would review whether more DSS schools, which are semi-private, could be allowed to provide non-local curriculum on a self-financing basis as part of the institutions' 'two routes' of curriculum offer.
South China Morning Post
29 minutes ago
- South China Morning Post
Hey, Nato boss man, keep your hands off the Asia-Pacific region
The North Atlantic Treaty Organization has failed to deter or stop Russia from invading and annexing Ukrainian territories, yet it wants to expand into Asia-Pacific to take on China. Most of its European member states – Germany even has slight negative growth this year – is mired in economic slowdown, social malaise and political instability, yet they want to double, more or less, their national defence spending. Where will they find the money? That's why Nato chief Mark Rutte raised a few eyebrows among independent observers, especially those from Asia, when he told an audience in London this week that what happened in the Pacific was Nato's business too. It is? 'We cannot think that there is one theatre, which is the Euro-Atlantic theatre,' he said. 'We have to be conscious of the fact that this is all interconnected with what is happening in the Pacific.' He added, 'They are supporting, as we all know, Russia's war effort against Ukraine', thereby deliberately lumping China with Iran and North Korea. The latter two did offer materials and troops, not China. Well, since everything is connected in this world, Nato could argue the world is its oyster. Rutte is starting to sound like his predecessor Jens Stoltenberg, who had claimed a Nato mandate over the Indo-Pacific reaching the Middle East and Africa! Rutte also claimed that the West's partners in the region, including Japan, South Korea, Australia and New Zealand, were 'really worried about what's happening in the Pacific'. Worried enough to do a Cold War redux? That's not clear, especially with the Japanese and South Koreans. Has Rutte taken a poll?
The Standard
30 minutes ago
- The Standard
Trump says China will supply rare earths, US to allow students
U.S. President Donald Trump gestures during a rally in Fort Bragg, North Carolina, U.S., June 10, 2025. (Reuters)
