5 Canadian Dividend Stocks I'd Buy Now and Hold for the Next 20 Years
If you want to build wealth over time, dividend stocks are a simple but powerful tool. They put money in your pocket regularly, no matter what the market is doing. And when you reinvest those dividends, they start to generate income of their own. This snowball effect, known as compounding, can quietly grow your portfolio over decades. So, if you're thinking long term, like the next 20 years, it makes sense to look for dependable, dividend-paying stocks. So, let's look at the top five to pick right now.
Freehold Royalties (TSX:FRU) is a great place to start. It earns income by collecting royalties on oil and gas production from lands it owns rather than operating wells itself. That keeps costs low and income steady. In the last 12 months, it brought in $326 million in revenue and $152 million in net income. It pays out $1.08 per share annually, giving it a strong yield of about 8.6% at current prices. That's a hefty income stream that can be reinvested or used elsewhere, and Freehold's model means it's well-positioned to keep paying over time.
Peyto Exploration & Development (TSX:PEY) is another dividend payer in the energy space, but this one is more hands-on. It drills and produces natural gas, and it's known for doing so efficiently. Peyto's most recent quarter showed earnings of $114 million and funds from operations of $225 million. About $66 million of that went right back to shareholders through dividends. It's also growing earnings fast, with a five-year average annual earnings growth rate of nearly 35%. It's one of those rare names that combines income and growth potential.
Headwater Exploration (TSX:HWX) rounds out this energy trio. Unlike some peers, it has a strong balance sheet and minimal debt. It's posted $541 million in revenue and $200 million in net income over the last year. Its latest quarterly earnings per share (EPS) came in at $0.21, right in line with expectations. It's currently paying a dividend of $0.10 per share quarterly, and with cash on hand exceeding $125 million, there's room to grow that over time. It's a smaller name but one with strong fundamentals and a track record of disciplined spending.
Switching sectors, Laurentian Bank (TSX:LB) offers exposure to Canadian financials. It's not as large as the Big Five banks, but that also means it trades at a discount. It recently reported revenue of $226 million, slightly down from the prior year, but beat expectations with earnings per share of $0.88. Its price-to-earnings ratio sits below 10, and it pays an annual dividend of $2.08 per share, yielding roughly 6.1%. It's the kind of solid, income-producing stock that rewards patient investors.
Finally, Brookfield Renewable Partners LP (TSX:BEP.UN) adds a renewable energy angle. While it reported a net loss last quarter, it grew funds from operations by 15% and secured new power contracts for 4,500 gigawatt-hours annually. It also maintains a strong liquidity position with $4.5 billion in available capital. BEP.UN currently pays $1.48 per unit annually, with a yield of about 6.2%. If you believe the future is green, this is a name to consider for the long haul.
Holding dividend stocks like these over 20 years is less about timing and more about consistency. You collect income. You reinvest. You watch your shares multiply over time. The ups and downs of the market matter less when the dividends keep flowing. Right now, in fact, you could earn a total of $985.92 each year!
COMPANY
RECENT PRICE
SHARES
DIVIDEND
TOTAL ANNUAL PAYOUT
FREQUENCY
INVESTMENT TOTAL
FRU.TO
$12.49
160
$1.08
$172.80
Monthly
$1,998.40
PEY.TO
$18.31
109
$1.32
$143.88
Monthly
$1,996.79
HWX.TO
$6.53
306
$1.32
$403.92
Monthly
$1,998.18
LB.TO
$30.13
66
$1.88
$124.08
Quarterly
$1,987.58
BEP.UN
$30.00
66
$2.14
$141.24
Quarterly
$1,980.00
Whether it's royalties, gas production, banking, or renewable energy, these five companies are in sectors that matter. And each one has shown a commitment to rewarding shareholders. For anyone building a portfolio designed to last, this is a strong foundation to start with or add to.
The post 5 Canadian Dividend Stocks I'd Buy Now and Hold for the Next 20 Years appeared first on The Motley Fool Canada.
More reading
Made in Canada: 5 Homegrown Stocks Ready for the 'Buy Local' Revolution [PREMIUM PICKS]
Market Volatility Toolkit
Best Canadian Stocks to Buy in 2025
Beginner Investors: 4 Top Canadian Stocks to Buy for 2025
5 Years From Now, You'll Probably Wish You Grabbed These Stocks
Subscribe to Motley Fool Canada on YouTube
Fool contributor Amy Legate-Wolfe has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool recommends Brookfield Renewable Partners, Freehold Royalties, and Laurentian Bank Of Canada. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
2025
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
The two ways Trump's tariffs on Canada could collapse — despite his fight to keep them
WASHINGTON, D.C. — Time's up. On Friday, U.S. President Donald Trump raised the tariff rate on Canadian goods not covered under the Canada-United States-Mexico Agreement (CUSMA) from 25 to 35 per cent, saying they 'have to pay a fair rate.' The White House claims it's because of Canada's failure to curb the 'ongoing flood of fentanyl and other illicit drugs.' U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) data, however, show that fentanyl seizures from Canada make up less than 0.1 per cent of total U.S. seizures of the drug; most smuggling comes across the Mexican border. But the future of Trump's policy also rests on shaky ground, and the tariffs could come crashing down even if Canada can't reach a deal at some point. Imposed through a controversially declared 'national emergency' under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), the tariffs come with essentially three paths for relief to Canadian exporters and their American customers: the courts and the economy. And there's always the wildcard: that the president changes his mind. Without relying on that, National Post looks at two very possible ways out of all this: The courts: There is a big question hanging over whether Trump's tariffs are even legal under the U.S. Constitution, which gives Congress powers over trade. Trump has bypassed that by claiming he's using presidential IEEPA emergency powers. On Thursday, the Washington, D.C.-based Federal Circuit Court of Appeals convened an en banc hearing for oral arguments in challenges to Trump's use of IEEPA. The 11 judges questioned whether the law meant for sanctioning adversaries or freezing assets during emergencies grants Trump the power to impose tariffs, with one judge noting, 'IEEPA doesn't even mention the word 'tariffs.'' The White House, meanwhile, says the law grants the president 'broad and flexible' emergency powers, including the ability to regulate imports. 'Based on the tenor and questions of the arguments, it appears that the challengers have the better odds of prevailing,' Thomas Berry, the CATO Institute's director of the Robert A. Levy Center for Constitutional Studies, said in a statement. 'Several judges peppered the government's attorney with skeptical questions about why a broad term in IEEPA like 'regulate importation' should be read to allow the president to unilaterally impose tariffs.' Trump's lawyers claim his executive order provides the justifications for the tariffs — in Canada's case, fentanyl. But Berry said 'those justifications would not matter if IEEPA simply does not authorize tariffs in the first place. That is the cleanest and simplest way to resolve this case, and it appears that the Federal Circuit may be leaning toward that result.' A decision is expected this month, and if it's a resounding push back from the judges' panel, said Andrew Hale, a senior policy analyst at Heritage Foundation, the Supreme Court may not even take up the case. If so, he says, 'these Liberation Day tariffs and everything that's been imposed under emergency legislation, IEEPA, that all evaporates.' At that point, the White House would not be able to declare across-the-board tariffs against countries. Instead, it would have to rely on laws allowing tariffs to be imposed on specific products that are found to threaten U.S. national security, like those currently imposed on Canadian steel and lumber. The economy: The other path to tariff relief is through economic pressure. If Americans start to see higher prices and economic uncertainty, and push back at the ballot box — or threaten to do so — it could force Trump to reverse course. The most recent figures show that U.S. inflation, based on the Consumer Price Index, hit around 2.7 per cent in July. That's a slight rise, fuelled by rising prices for food, transportation and used cars. But it's still close to the Federal Reserve target of two per cent. U.S. unemployment rose slightly to 4.2 per cent in July, while far fewer jobs were created than expected, and consumer confidence rose two points but is still several points lower than it was in January. Overall, most economists agree that risks of a U.S. recession over the next 12 months are relatively low, but skepticism over growth remains high. 'Our outlook is for slower growth in the U.S., but no recession,' said Gus Faucher, chief economist of The PNC Financial Services Group. He notes that the 'tariffs are going to be a drag' because they are a tax increase on imports. Economists have said price inflation from tariffs is not yet being felt in the U.S. but believe it's inevitable. 'Trump's tariff madness adds a great deal to the risks of a recession,' said Steven Hanke, professor of applied economics at Johns Hopkins University who served on President Ronald Reagan's Council of Economic Advisors. 'With tariffs, Americans are going to be paying a big new beautiful sales tax on goods and services imported into the U.S., and taxes slow things down. Taxes don't stimulate.' It is surprising that higher U.S. prices haven't happened yet, said Jonathan Gruber, chairman of the economics department at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. But he explained that it's likely a reflection of the duration of contracts and the fact that import sellers haven't yet put up prices — 'because they were hoping it wouldn't be real, like they'd wake up from this nightmare.' 'I think we start to see the effect on prices by the end of the year,' said Gruber. The trouble for Canada, however, is that the Canadian economy is starting from a much weaker position, with higher unemployment, lower consumer confidence, and a slowing GDP, on top of the trade tensions. So, trying to wait things out for the U.S. to feel the pinch will be even more painful for Canadians. And any American downturn will also reverberate north. 'As Uncle Sam goes, so goes Canada,' said Hanke. Gruber agrees with that, but with a caveat. 'It's all bad in the short run and good in the long run,' he says. He believes the U.S. is 'weak and getting weaker' and that Canada should start taking advantage of how the U.S. is making opportunities for other countries to invest in themselves. 'We're not investing in our future. We're killing our education. We're killing our research. We're not allowing in immigrants,' he said, explaining the weakening of the U.S. economy. 'We're basically setting the stage for long-run economic slower growth.' Meanwhile, China is doubling down on investment, research and other longer-term policies. 'Canada and other countries need to do the same,' Gruber said. And as for when a backlash could lead to a reversal in the U.S., Gruber points to two factors. 'It's got to be high inflation, and Trump's opponents need to make sure that the voters understand that's Trump's fault.' National Post tmoran@ Former U.S. ambassador on Canada negotiating with Trump: 'You may not have the best hand' Carney 'disappointed' after Trump hits Canada with higher tariffs Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark and sign up for our newsletters here.
The Hill
4 hours ago
- The Hill
Canadian trade minister sees ‘great deal of common ground' with US
Canadian Minister for U.S.-Canada Trade Dominic LeBlanc expressed optimism on Sunday about the prospects of a trade deal between the two countries — even as President Trump announced he would impose 35 percent tariffs on goods from the neighboring country. 'We were obviously, obviously disappointed by that decision. We believe there's a great deal of common ground between the United States and Canada in terms of building two strong economies that work well together,' LeBlanc said in an interview on CBS News's 'Face the Nation.' LeBlanc spent last week in Washington, D.C. trying to hammer out a trade deal. He left without a resolution, after Trump announced new tariffs on Canadian goods not covered by the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement that Trump negotiated in his first term. But LeBlanc praised his counterparts, U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer and Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, for their efforts, saying they 'engaged with us in constructive, cordial conversations, so we're prepared to stick around and do the work needed.' 'But we remain very optimistic,' he added. LeBlanc said he expects Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney to speak with Trump in the coming days. 'I would expect the Prime Minister will have a conversation with the President over the next number of days. That's certainly my plan, again with Secretary Lutnick, recognizing that we think there is an option of striking a deal that will bring down some of these tariffs, provide greater certainty to investment,' he said in the interview. LeBlanc noted that Canada passed a similar bill to the U.S. president's agenda-setting 'one big, beautiful bill,' which Trump signed into law one month ago. LeBlanc said the Canadian bill is projected to unlock up to $500 billion in investments in Canada, which would 'offer huge opportunities to American businesses as well.' 'So, we think there's a great deal- a great deal to work on together,' he added.
Business Insider
4 hours ago
- Business Insider
More Europeans are flying to Canada than ever before, aviation data shows
Travel between Canada and Europe is booming — as both sides turn away from the US. According to data from the aviation analytics firm Cirium, a record-breaking 4,276 flights are scheduled between Canada and Europe this month. That's up 5% since the same period last year, 14% since before the pandemic, and more than 40% over the past decade. The rise has been backed by flag carrier Air Canada, which added an extra 112 flights, or 34,500 seats, this month. It opened five new transatlantic routes, including Edinburgh, Scotland, and Naples, Italy, to Montreal. Flights between the US and Europe have been growing too, but not as quickly. Cirium data shows a rise of 4% between August 2024 and August 2025, and one-third between August 2015 and August 2025. Airlines have raised concerns that fewer people are interested in visiting the US since Donald Trump began his second presidency in January. For July and August, airlines cut capacity by 3.5% on routes between the US and Canada, OAG reported in March. "This sharp drop suggests that travelers are holding off on making reservations, likely due to ongoing uncertainty surrounding the broader trade dispute," said John Grant, the travel data firm's chief analyst. While political tensions also saw bookings drop from Europe, price cuts helped encourage a rebound in May, Nicholas Smith, holidays digital director at Thomas Cook and eSky Group, told Business Insider's Thibault Spirlet in June. Nonetheless, it may be that more Europeans are now choosing Canada instead of the US for a transatlantic vacation. In April, the CEO of hotel giant Accor told Bloomberg that forward bookings for Europeans visiting the US this summer have fallen by a quarter. He added that they were instead looking at destinations like Canada and South America. And while many Americans are still enjoying their " Euro Summers," the post-pandemic explosion of such trips may start to wane. The dollar is about 11% weaker against the euro compared to the start of the year, when it was at near parity. That means traveling to Europe is more expensive than before. Meanwhile, the Canadian dollar has dropped too, versus the euro, but only by 6%.
