'Kill switches' disguised as business: How BHP is selling out Australia's national security to a Chinese battery giant barred by the US for its alleged Beijing military ties
The country's largest company has chosen to align itself with CATL, a Chinese battery giant blacklisted by the Pentagon in January.
The ban targeted companies that actively support Beijing's military industry. CATL says that it has never engaged in any military-related business or activities.
And yet BHP presses ahead, as if none of it matters.
This isn't just another business deal.
Australia's mining sector is the backbone of its economy and a pillar of national sovereignty.
By allowing companies like CATL access to critical systems, Australia risks handing Beijing control over its most vital resource operations.
This is about dependency.
It's about surveillance.
It's about forfeiting sovereignty in exchange for short-term convenience.
For those rolling their eyes and brushing this off as overblown Sinophobia, take a closer look at what BHP has actually done.
They've invited an alleged Chinese military-linked contractor into the heart of Australia's most strategic economic sector.
CATL operates at the murky intersection of energy and surveillance.
In recent years, the company has expanded into smart battery systems, units that come embedded with advanced sensors, data collection tools, GPS modules, and remote connectivity features under the banner of efficiency and monitoring.
On the surface, it's marketed as innovation.
However, in practice, these features enable constant data harvesting—location tracking, usage patterns, and environmental metrics—all of which can be remotely accessed or transferred, often without oversight.
In other words, the technology powering your grid could also be watching it.
The timing makes this betrayal all the more unforgivable.
China has spent years weaponising trade against Australia, banning coal imports, slapping punitive tariffs on wine, and disrupting the barley market.
These were more than policy disagreements.
They were warnings.
Beijing made it clear: economic ties with China come with strings attached, and when pulled, they tighten into a noose.
Yet BHP has apparently learned nothing.
The following statement cannot be overstated: According to the Pentagon, CATL is a company operating under a military-civil fusion doctrine, where private industry exists to serve the state.
Western business models prioritise shareholders.
Chinese firms, especially ones like CATL, answer to Communist Party officials.
They don't see Australian resources as commodities.
They see them as leverage.
And that leverage is built into both software and hardware.
Very soon, unless the partnership is prohibited, Beijing could have a live map of Australia's mining activities: who's producing what, where the pressure points are, and when systems can be disrupted.
That type of intelligence is incredibly powerful.
In a future trade war - or worse, an armed conflict - China wouldn't need to fire a shot.
It could simply turn off the lights.
Battery-integrated infrastructure allows for remote interference: causing breakdowns, blackouts, or 'accidental' failures with plausible deniability.
BHP may be installing remote kill switches across Australia's most strategic sector, and pretending it's just business.
Australia's mining sector is a geopolitical asset.
It powers industries, allies and defense capabilities.
Once compromised, everything downstream is at risk: agriculture, transport, telecommunications, even defense manufacturing.
It won't stop with lithium.
It never does.
And where, I ask, is the outrage?
Intelligence agencies spend billions trying to keep foreign threats out of critical infrastructure.
Meanwhile, BHP is voluntarily rolling out the welcome mat for a firm flagged by the US Department of Defense as a security risk.
It's like hiring a burglar as your home security consultant, except the home is the nation.
The justification, as always, is economic.
CATL offers cheaper technology, supposedly more efficient systems, and bulk capacity.
But Australia doesn't lack domestic alternatives.
The lithium exists, as does the engineering talent. What is lacking is corporate courage.
BHP didn't choose CATL because it was the only option - it chose CATL because it was the cheapest.
This is the price of short-term thinking: a few dollars saved today, sovereignty possibly sold tomorrow.
Chinese companies don't underbid because they're efficient, they do it to drive competitors out, then control the market.
Once they've embedded themselves in your infrastructure, they own you.
BHP may have fallen for the oldest trick in the CCP's playbook.
Parliament should be demanding answers.
Who at BHP signed off on this deal?
Were Chinese officials involved, either directly or through back channels?
And what safeguards, if any, exist to stop data theft or cyber sabotage?
If US lawmakers won't trust these companies with their supply chains, why on earth should Australians?
Beijing doesn't seize control in one bold stroke.
It advances slowly, through trade partnerships, infrastructure deals, and quiet influence.
What begins as a battery contract ends as strategic dependence. BHP's executives seem to believe they can contain this risk, that Chinese access will stay neatly confined to technical specs and maintenance contracts.
That's a fantasy.
There is no such thing as a benign deal with a company that allegedly reports to a hostile state.
This partnership should be terminated immediately, before a single bolt is installed.
Parliament must move to outlaw future contracts with blacklisted entities.
Australia is at a crossroads.
BHP has chosen profit.
It's up to the government to choose sovereignty - before it's too late.
This is a potential national security breach, disguised as commerce, enabled by cowardice, and paid for by every Australian who thought the people in charge were looking out for them.
Wake up, Australia.
Your mining giant may just have invited enemy surveillance into your most critical industry.
And no one in power seems willing to stop it.
John Mac Ghlionn is a researcher and essayist who writes on psychology and social relations. He has a keen interest in social dysfunction and media manipulation.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
West Australian
35 minutes ago
- West Australian
UK rejects rewarding Hamas after Prime Minister Keir Starmer said Britain would recognise Palestinian state
Britain rejects Israeli criticism that it is rewarding militant group Hamas by setting out plans to recognise a Palestinian state unless Israel takes steps to improve the situation in Gaza and bring about peace. Prime Minister Keir Starmer's ultimatum, setting a September deadline, prompted an immediate rebuke from Israel's Benjamin Netanyahu, who said it rewarded Hamas and punished the victims of the fighters' 2023 attack that triggered the war. US President Donald Trump also said he did not think Hamas 'should be rewarded' with recognition of Palestinian independence. But British Transport Minister Heidi Alexander - designated by the government to respond to media questions on Wednesday - said: 'This is not a reward for Hamas. 'Hamas is a vile terrorist organisation that has committed appalling atrocities. This is about the Palestinian people. It's about those children that we see in Gaza who are starving to death. 'We've got to ratchet up pressure on the Israeli government to lift the restrictions to get aid back into Gaza.' Mr Starmer's decision follows that of French President Emmanuel Macron, who announced last week that Paris would recognise Palestinian statehood in September, becoming the first major Western power to do so, because of the dire humanitarian conditions in the enclave. Previously, Britain and France, like other Western powers, had been committed to Palestinian independence, but as a goal that would best be achieved only at the conclusion of negotiations with Israel. In a televised address on Tuesday, Mr Starmer said it had become necessary to act because the prospect of such a two-state solution was under threat. Britain would make the move at the UN General Assembly in September unless Israel took substantive steps to allow more aid into Gaza, made clear it would not annex the West Bank and committed itself to a long-term peace process that delivered a two-state solution, Mr Starmer said. The Board of Deputies of British Jews, Britain's biggest Jewish advocacy group, raised concerns that similarly clear conditions had not been set out for Hamas, which is still holding 50 hostages it seized in its October 2023 attack. The Muslim Council of Britain, the country's largest Muslim umbrella organisation, said making recognition conditional contradicted the government's stated position that statehood was the inalienable right of the Palestinian people.
The Advertiser
2 hours ago
- The Advertiser
Surprise gas guzzlers identified in vehicle road tests
Some of the most popular vehicles in Australia are consuming significantly more petrol than advertised, tests have shown, and hybrid cars rank amongst the most unexpectedly thirsty models. Twenty-five of 30 vehicles tested on Australian roads failed to meet their laboratory test results, and 11 of the cars consumed 10 per cent or more fuel than expected. The Australian Automobile Association revealed the findings in its latest round of on-road vehicle testing, which also found six models produced more noxious emissions than allowed in Australia. The results come amid a greater focus on vehicle emissions, following the introduction of the New Vehicle Efficiency Standard in 2025 and after rising sales of hybrid cars. The association tested a wide range of vehicles in the latest round of its $14 million Real-World Testing Program, ranging from large SUVs and vans to small cars, a ute and people-mover. The vehicles are tested on a 93km route around Geelong in Victoria, with tailpipe emissions captured on urban streets, rural roads and motorways and compared to lab test results. Surprisingly, a small SUV registered the greatest gap in fuel consumption during recent tests, with the Hyundai Kona Hybrid using 33 per cent more fuel on the road than in the lab. Another small SUV, the Kia Stonic, used 26 per cent more fuel than expected, followed by the Hyundai i30 Hybrid (17 per cent), the Toyota Fortuner (16 per cent), and the Kia Sportage Hybrid (14 per cent). Findings that one-third of the vehicles consumed more fuel on the road than in the lab indicated a widespread issue in the automotive industry, association managing director Michael Bradley said. "It's becoming clear that carmakers continue to optimise their vehicles' performance for lab testing, meaning new cars are too often overstating their improvements in fuel use and environmental performance," he said. "Some vehicles perform as advertised but most do not, and our program is seeking to reward carmakers that deliver genuine financial and environmental savings." In addition to fuel consumption, six of the 30 vehicles tested produced more noxious emissions than allowed under the Australian standard, including the Ford Ranger ute, Toyota Hi-Ace, and Toyota Fortuner. Five vehicles did buck the trend and use less fuel than expected, however, such as the Ford Transit van (nine per cent less), Lexus NX350h SUV (seven per cent less), and Mercedes-Benz GLC250 SUV (three per cent less). The program, funded by the federal government, has examined emissions from 114 vehicles since 2023 and found 88 models failed to meet their promised fuel consumption. The association will expand its tests to electric vehicles shortly, Mr Bradley said, and compare their on-road range to what consumers are promised. "Range anxiety continues to be a significant barrier to EV uptake," he said. Some of the most popular vehicles in Australia are consuming significantly more petrol than advertised, tests have shown, and hybrid cars rank amongst the most unexpectedly thirsty models. Twenty-five of 30 vehicles tested on Australian roads failed to meet their laboratory test results, and 11 of the cars consumed 10 per cent or more fuel than expected. The Australian Automobile Association revealed the findings in its latest round of on-road vehicle testing, which also found six models produced more noxious emissions than allowed in Australia. The results come amid a greater focus on vehicle emissions, following the introduction of the New Vehicle Efficiency Standard in 2025 and after rising sales of hybrid cars. The association tested a wide range of vehicles in the latest round of its $14 million Real-World Testing Program, ranging from large SUVs and vans to small cars, a ute and people-mover. The vehicles are tested on a 93km route around Geelong in Victoria, with tailpipe emissions captured on urban streets, rural roads and motorways and compared to lab test results. Surprisingly, a small SUV registered the greatest gap in fuel consumption during recent tests, with the Hyundai Kona Hybrid using 33 per cent more fuel on the road than in the lab. Another small SUV, the Kia Stonic, used 26 per cent more fuel than expected, followed by the Hyundai i30 Hybrid (17 per cent), the Toyota Fortuner (16 per cent), and the Kia Sportage Hybrid (14 per cent). Findings that one-third of the vehicles consumed more fuel on the road than in the lab indicated a widespread issue in the automotive industry, association managing director Michael Bradley said. "It's becoming clear that carmakers continue to optimise their vehicles' performance for lab testing, meaning new cars are too often overstating their improvements in fuel use and environmental performance," he said. "Some vehicles perform as advertised but most do not, and our program is seeking to reward carmakers that deliver genuine financial and environmental savings." In addition to fuel consumption, six of the 30 vehicles tested produced more noxious emissions than allowed under the Australian standard, including the Ford Ranger ute, Toyota Hi-Ace, and Toyota Fortuner. Five vehicles did buck the trend and use less fuel than expected, however, such as the Ford Transit van (nine per cent less), Lexus NX350h SUV (seven per cent less), and Mercedes-Benz GLC250 SUV (three per cent less). The program, funded by the federal government, has examined emissions from 114 vehicles since 2023 and found 88 models failed to meet their promised fuel consumption. The association will expand its tests to electric vehicles shortly, Mr Bradley said, and compare their on-road range to what consumers are promised. "Range anxiety continues to be a significant barrier to EV uptake," he said. Some of the most popular vehicles in Australia are consuming significantly more petrol than advertised, tests have shown, and hybrid cars rank amongst the most unexpectedly thirsty models. Twenty-five of 30 vehicles tested on Australian roads failed to meet their laboratory test results, and 11 of the cars consumed 10 per cent or more fuel than expected. The Australian Automobile Association revealed the findings in its latest round of on-road vehicle testing, which also found six models produced more noxious emissions than allowed in Australia. The results come amid a greater focus on vehicle emissions, following the introduction of the New Vehicle Efficiency Standard in 2025 and after rising sales of hybrid cars. The association tested a wide range of vehicles in the latest round of its $14 million Real-World Testing Program, ranging from large SUVs and vans to small cars, a ute and people-mover. The vehicles are tested on a 93km route around Geelong in Victoria, with tailpipe emissions captured on urban streets, rural roads and motorways and compared to lab test results. Surprisingly, a small SUV registered the greatest gap in fuel consumption during recent tests, with the Hyundai Kona Hybrid using 33 per cent more fuel on the road than in the lab. Another small SUV, the Kia Stonic, used 26 per cent more fuel than expected, followed by the Hyundai i30 Hybrid (17 per cent), the Toyota Fortuner (16 per cent), and the Kia Sportage Hybrid (14 per cent). Findings that one-third of the vehicles consumed more fuel on the road than in the lab indicated a widespread issue in the automotive industry, association managing director Michael Bradley said. "It's becoming clear that carmakers continue to optimise their vehicles' performance for lab testing, meaning new cars are too often overstating their improvements in fuel use and environmental performance," he said. "Some vehicles perform as advertised but most do not, and our program is seeking to reward carmakers that deliver genuine financial and environmental savings." In addition to fuel consumption, six of the 30 vehicles tested produced more noxious emissions than allowed under the Australian standard, including the Ford Ranger ute, Toyota Hi-Ace, and Toyota Fortuner. Five vehicles did buck the trend and use less fuel than expected, however, such as the Ford Transit van (nine per cent less), Lexus NX350h SUV (seven per cent less), and Mercedes-Benz GLC250 SUV (three per cent less). The program, funded by the federal government, has examined emissions from 114 vehicles since 2023 and found 88 models failed to meet their promised fuel consumption. The association will expand its tests to electric vehicles shortly, Mr Bradley said, and compare their on-road range to what consumers are promised. "Range anxiety continues to be a significant barrier to EV uptake," he said. Some of the most popular vehicles in Australia are consuming significantly more petrol than advertised, tests have shown, and hybrid cars rank amongst the most unexpectedly thirsty models. Twenty-five of 30 vehicles tested on Australian roads failed to meet their laboratory test results, and 11 of the cars consumed 10 per cent or more fuel than expected. The Australian Automobile Association revealed the findings in its latest round of on-road vehicle testing, which also found six models produced more noxious emissions than allowed in Australia. The results come amid a greater focus on vehicle emissions, following the introduction of the New Vehicle Efficiency Standard in 2025 and after rising sales of hybrid cars. The association tested a wide range of vehicles in the latest round of its $14 million Real-World Testing Program, ranging from large SUVs and vans to small cars, a ute and people-mover. The vehicles are tested on a 93km route around Geelong in Victoria, with tailpipe emissions captured on urban streets, rural roads and motorways and compared to lab test results. Surprisingly, a small SUV registered the greatest gap in fuel consumption during recent tests, with the Hyundai Kona Hybrid using 33 per cent more fuel on the road than in the lab. Another small SUV, the Kia Stonic, used 26 per cent more fuel than expected, followed by the Hyundai i30 Hybrid (17 per cent), the Toyota Fortuner (16 per cent), and the Kia Sportage Hybrid (14 per cent). Findings that one-third of the vehicles consumed more fuel on the road than in the lab indicated a widespread issue in the automotive industry, association managing director Michael Bradley said. "It's becoming clear that carmakers continue to optimise their vehicles' performance for lab testing, meaning new cars are too often overstating their improvements in fuel use and environmental performance," he said. "Some vehicles perform as advertised but most do not, and our program is seeking to reward carmakers that deliver genuine financial and environmental savings." In addition to fuel consumption, six of the 30 vehicles tested produced more noxious emissions than allowed under the Australian standard, including the Ford Ranger ute, Toyota Hi-Ace, and Toyota Fortuner. Five vehicles did buck the trend and use less fuel than expected, however, such as the Ford Transit van (nine per cent less), Lexus NX350h SUV (seven per cent less), and Mercedes-Benz GLC250 SUV (three per cent less). The program, funded by the federal government, has examined emissions from 114 vehicles since 2023 and found 88 models failed to meet their promised fuel consumption. The association will expand its tests to electric vehicles shortly, Mr Bradley said, and compare their on-road range to what consumers are promised. "Range anxiety continues to be a significant barrier to EV uptake," he said.
The Advertiser
2 hours ago
- The Advertiser
All eyes on top bank official as rate-cut hopes inflate
A fireside chat starring a top Reserve Bank of Australia official will be closely watched as mortgage holders look for more signs confirming another interest rate cut. RBA deputy governor Andrew Hauser will speak at an economic forum hosted by investment bank Barrenjoey on Thursday. The event comes less than 24 hours after the Australian Bureau of Statistics revealed the Reserve Bank's preferred measure of inflation, the trimmed mean, eased to 2.7 per cent in the June quarter. The result was slightly softer than economists had expected and was widely interpreted as consistent with the RBA board lowering the cash rate to 3.6 per cent at its next meeting in August. Money markets are fully pricing in a 25 basis point cut and have upped the odds of a back-to-back cut in September to about 40 per cent, said Chief CommSec economist Ryan Felsman. But Mr Hauser could "offer some push-back about the need for rapid easing" at the Barrenjoey event in Sydney. The RBA stunned analysts by leaving rates on hold in July, with governor Michele Bullock telling an event last week that the board preferred a "measured and gradual" approach to easing interest rates. While less pivotal than inflation or jobs data, retail sales figures released by the ABS on Thursday will provide an update on the vitality of the Australian consumer. The recovery in household spending has been softer than the RBA had expected, the board said in minutes from its last meeting. But sales are expected to rebound to the highest level since the beginning of 2024, following a run of softer months. The retail print is the last the bureau will produce before it switches over to a more comprehensive measure of consumption, the monthly household spending indicator. As the government prepares for an economic roundtable aimed at fixing Australia's productivity woes, fault lines have opened up between businesses and unions on artificial intelligence. Peak union body the ACTU has called for tougher regulations to ensure AI does not lead to job losses, while business groups have warned against regulation that could stifle adoption of the technology. Independent MP Zali Steggall has called for the government to appoint a special envoy for AI and the future of work to drive adoption of the technology while addressing growing public distrust. "I am concerned it's going to be unions trying to put a lid on it," Ms Steggall told AAP. "Look, I am supportive of guardrails. It has to be done safely, but to suggest that you can put the genie back in the bottle is unrealistic." The former Winter Olympian on Thursday launched her economic plan to re-energise the economy while speeding the transition to net zero, by encouraging clean energy investment and reducing the cost of housing. A fireside chat starring a top Reserve Bank of Australia official will be closely watched as mortgage holders look for more signs confirming another interest rate cut. RBA deputy governor Andrew Hauser will speak at an economic forum hosted by investment bank Barrenjoey on Thursday. The event comes less than 24 hours after the Australian Bureau of Statistics revealed the Reserve Bank's preferred measure of inflation, the trimmed mean, eased to 2.7 per cent in the June quarter. The result was slightly softer than economists had expected and was widely interpreted as consistent with the RBA board lowering the cash rate to 3.6 per cent at its next meeting in August. Money markets are fully pricing in a 25 basis point cut and have upped the odds of a back-to-back cut in September to about 40 per cent, said Chief CommSec economist Ryan Felsman. But Mr Hauser could "offer some push-back about the need for rapid easing" at the Barrenjoey event in Sydney. The RBA stunned analysts by leaving rates on hold in July, with governor Michele Bullock telling an event last week that the board preferred a "measured and gradual" approach to easing interest rates. While less pivotal than inflation or jobs data, retail sales figures released by the ABS on Thursday will provide an update on the vitality of the Australian consumer. The recovery in household spending has been softer than the RBA had expected, the board said in minutes from its last meeting. But sales are expected to rebound to the highest level since the beginning of 2024, following a run of softer months. The retail print is the last the bureau will produce before it switches over to a more comprehensive measure of consumption, the monthly household spending indicator. As the government prepares for an economic roundtable aimed at fixing Australia's productivity woes, fault lines have opened up between businesses and unions on artificial intelligence. Peak union body the ACTU has called for tougher regulations to ensure AI does not lead to job losses, while business groups have warned against regulation that could stifle adoption of the technology. Independent MP Zali Steggall has called for the government to appoint a special envoy for AI and the future of work to drive adoption of the technology while addressing growing public distrust. "I am concerned it's going to be unions trying to put a lid on it," Ms Steggall told AAP. "Look, I am supportive of guardrails. It has to be done safely, but to suggest that you can put the genie back in the bottle is unrealistic." The former Winter Olympian on Thursday launched her economic plan to re-energise the economy while speeding the transition to net zero, by encouraging clean energy investment and reducing the cost of housing. A fireside chat starring a top Reserve Bank of Australia official will be closely watched as mortgage holders look for more signs confirming another interest rate cut. RBA deputy governor Andrew Hauser will speak at an economic forum hosted by investment bank Barrenjoey on Thursday. The event comes less than 24 hours after the Australian Bureau of Statistics revealed the Reserve Bank's preferred measure of inflation, the trimmed mean, eased to 2.7 per cent in the June quarter. The result was slightly softer than economists had expected and was widely interpreted as consistent with the RBA board lowering the cash rate to 3.6 per cent at its next meeting in August. Money markets are fully pricing in a 25 basis point cut and have upped the odds of a back-to-back cut in September to about 40 per cent, said Chief CommSec economist Ryan Felsman. But Mr Hauser could "offer some push-back about the need for rapid easing" at the Barrenjoey event in Sydney. The RBA stunned analysts by leaving rates on hold in July, with governor Michele Bullock telling an event last week that the board preferred a "measured and gradual" approach to easing interest rates. While less pivotal than inflation or jobs data, retail sales figures released by the ABS on Thursday will provide an update on the vitality of the Australian consumer. The recovery in household spending has been softer than the RBA had expected, the board said in minutes from its last meeting. But sales are expected to rebound to the highest level since the beginning of 2024, following a run of softer months. The retail print is the last the bureau will produce before it switches over to a more comprehensive measure of consumption, the monthly household spending indicator. As the government prepares for an economic roundtable aimed at fixing Australia's productivity woes, fault lines have opened up between businesses and unions on artificial intelligence. Peak union body the ACTU has called for tougher regulations to ensure AI does not lead to job losses, while business groups have warned against regulation that could stifle adoption of the technology. Independent MP Zali Steggall has called for the government to appoint a special envoy for AI and the future of work to drive adoption of the technology while addressing growing public distrust. "I am concerned it's going to be unions trying to put a lid on it," Ms Steggall told AAP. "Look, I am supportive of guardrails. It has to be done safely, but to suggest that you can put the genie back in the bottle is unrealistic." The former Winter Olympian on Thursday launched her economic plan to re-energise the economy while speeding the transition to net zero, by encouraging clean energy investment and reducing the cost of housing. A fireside chat starring a top Reserve Bank of Australia official will be closely watched as mortgage holders look for more signs confirming another interest rate cut. RBA deputy governor Andrew Hauser will speak at an economic forum hosted by investment bank Barrenjoey on Thursday. The event comes less than 24 hours after the Australian Bureau of Statistics revealed the Reserve Bank's preferred measure of inflation, the trimmed mean, eased to 2.7 per cent in the June quarter. The result was slightly softer than economists had expected and was widely interpreted as consistent with the RBA board lowering the cash rate to 3.6 per cent at its next meeting in August. Money markets are fully pricing in a 25 basis point cut and have upped the odds of a back-to-back cut in September to about 40 per cent, said Chief CommSec economist Ryan Felsman. But Mr Hauser could "offer some push-back about the need for rapid easing" at the Barrenjoey event in Sydney. The RBA stunned analysts by leaving rates on hold in July, with governor Michele Bullock telling an event last week that the board preferred a "measured and gradual" approach to easing interest rates. While less pivotal than inflation or jobs data, retail sales figures released by the ABS on Thursday will provide an update on the vitality of the Australian consumer. The recovery in household spending has been softer than the RBA had expected, the board said in minutes from its last meeting. But sales are expected to rebound to the highest level since the beginning of 2024, following a run of softer months. The retail print is the last the bureau will produce before it switches over to a more comprehensive measure of consumption, the monthly household spending indicator. As the government prepares for an economic roundtable aimed at fixing Australia's productivity woes, fault lines have opened up between businesses and unions on artificial intelligence. Peak union body the ACTU has called for tougher regulations to ensure AI does not lead to job losses, while business groups have warned against regulation that could stifle adoption of the technology. Independent MP Zali Steggall has called for the government to appoint a special envoy for AI and the future of work to drive adoption of the technology while addressing growing public distrust. "I am concerned it's going to be unions trying to put a lid on it," Ms Steggall told AAP. "Look, I am supportive of guardrails. It has to be done safely, but to suggest that you can put the genie back in the bottle is unrealistic." The former Winter Olympian on Thursday launched her economic plan to re-energise the economy while speeding the transition to net zero, by encouraging clean energy investment and reducing the cost of housing.
