&w=3840&q=100)
India, Belgium discuss ways to boost bilateral trade, investments
Press Trust of India New Delhi
India and Belgium have discussed ways to increase boost bilateral trade, foster industrial collaboration, and deepening investments in strategic sectors such as semiconductors, clean energy, defence production, and pharma, an official statement said on Sunday.
The two sides also reviewed progress in EU-India Free Trade Agreement (FTA) negotiations, with both parties recognising the need to address tariff and non-tariff barriers to enhance market access.
These deliberations were held during the visit of Commerce and Industry Minister Piyush Goyal with Belgian Minister of Defence and Foreign Trade Theo Francken and Minister-President of the Flanders region Matthias Diependaele in Brussels on May 2.
"The discussions highlighted growing economic synergies and focused on scaling bilateral trade, fostering industrial collaboration, and deepening investments in strategic sectors such as semiconductors, clean energy, defence production, and pharmaceuticals," the commerce ministry said.
Belgium is India's fifth-largest trading partner within the EU, with bilateral trade reaching $15.07 billion in 2023-24.
Belgian FDI in India has totalled $3.94 billion during April 2000 to September 2024, including a 39 per cent growth ($1.1 billion) in the past year alone.
(Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Economic Times
15 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Canadians readying for a major battle with Trump's USA, ready for hardship over humiliation in showdown over trade war
Canadians rally behind tough trade stance as tariffs bite; public backs PM Carney's defiance despite growing economic toll A growing majority of Canadians are willing to suffer economically to stand firm against US President Donald Trump's escalating trade war, according to a new poll that underscores rising frustration north of the a survey released by the Angus Reid Institute, 69 percent of Canadians say they want their government to take a 'hard approach' in trade negotiations with the United States, even if it worsens relations or causes financial poll comes just days after Trump slapped 35 percent tariffs on a range of Canadian exports. While the UK, EU, and Japan opted to strike last-minute trade deals with Washington, each making steep economic concessions, Canada is choosing defiance.'Canadians aren't flinching,' Angus Reid said in its analysis. Just weeks ago, only 63 percent supported the hardline stance. That number has since climbed, and support for retaliatory tariffs is even more dramatic, 76 percent say they'd back Canadian tariffs even if it causes household financial hardship. Prime Minister Mark Carney, who took office earlier this year after an unexpected election win, has called for patience and unity, saying Canada won't be bullied. 95 percent of those polled say they would still support Carney even if Trump retaliates with even higher tariffs. Trump further inflamed tensions after warning it would be harder to negotiate with Canada following Ottawa's decision, along with the UK and France, to formally recognize a Palestinian state. That move, however, also appears to have wide public backing as 63 percent of Canadians say they support recognition of Palestine, even if it complicates US impact on everyday life is already visible. Canadian tourism to the US dropped by 33 percent in June compared to the same month last year, according to Forbes, marking six consecutive months of decline. Businesses are feeling the squeeze. Air Canada's profits fell sharply, and US retailers in border towns are bracing for deeper losses.
Fibre2Fashion
an hour ago
- Fibre2Fashion
UK manufacturing downturn eases slightly in July, but risks remain
The UK manufacturing sector showed tentative signs of stabilisation at the start of Q3, with the S&P Global UK Manufacturing PMI inching up to 48.0 in July from 47.7 in June—a six-month high. While the index remained below the neutral 50 mark, indicating contraction for the tenth consecutive month, the rate of decline in output was the mildest since the current downturn began. Business optimism improved to a five-month high, driven by expectations of a future recovery, new product launches and internal improvements. Nonetheless, sentiment stayed below the long-run average, weighed down by weak demand, policy uncertainty, and global trade challenges, S&P Global said in a press release. Output shrank for the ninth month in a row, but contraction was notably softer. Consumer and intermediate goods producers returned to growth after prolonged declines, though investment goods output worsened. New orders fell at a quicker pace, extending a ten-month slide, with firms citing low client confidence and tighter budgets—partly influenced by recent government decisions on the National Minimum Wage (NMW) and employer National Insurance Contributions (NICs). UK manufacturing showed tentative stabilisation in July, with the PMI rising to a six-month high of 48.0, though still in contraction for the tenth month. Output declined at the slowest pace in the current downturn, and business optimism improved. However, weak domestic and export demand, rising costs, job cuts, and policy uncertainty continued to weigh heavily on the sector's overall performance. Export orders declined for the 42nd straight month, reflecting global tariff concerns, Brexit-related frictions, and rising foreign competition. Weaker demand was reported from key markets including North America, the EU, India, and China. Employment in the sector continued to shrink, with July marking the ninth consecutive month of job losses. Hiring freezes and layoffs were reportedly used to offset cost pressures stemming from wage and tax reforms. Backlogs fell further despite reduced capacity, indicating under-utilisation of resources. Stocks of finished goods declined for a sixth month, while purchasing activity and input inventories were also cut to align with softer demand. Although cost pressures remained stable overall, firms noted rising transport, shipping, and supplier charges. Despite glimmers of hope, the data underscores a sector still under stress, with subdued domestic and international conditions tempering any immediate recovery. Rob Dobson, director at S&P Global Market Intelligence , said: 'The UK manufacturing sector is starting to send some tentatively encouraging signals, with the downturn moderating in July as factory output came close to stabilising and future output expectations hit the highest since February. However, it's clear that there's no assured path back to strong growth. Clients in the home market often remain unwilling to spend due to cost factors such as higher minimum wages and employer NICs, while export markets are being buffeted by geopolitical stresses and trade and tariff uncertainties. 'The biggest concern remains the labour market, with the rate of job cutting through much of 2025 among the steepest since the pandemic year of 2020. With the Autumn budget only a few months away, manufacturers will likely remain cautious and focussed on stabilisation while waiting to see if future budget announcements provide much needed support or further challenges to overcome." Fibre2Fashion News Desk (KD)
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
an hour ago
- Business Standard
US penalty risk on Russian oil may add ₹9-11 bn to India's import bill
India's annual oil import bill could rise by $9-11 billion if the country is compelled to move away from Russian crude in response to US threats of additional tariffs or penalties on Indian exports, analysts said. India, the world's third-largest oil consumer and importer, has reaped significant benefits by swiftly substituting market-priced oil with discounted Russian crude following Western sanctions on Moscow after its invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. Russian oil, which accounted for less than 0.2 per cent of India's imports before the war, now makes up 35-40 per cent of the country's crude intake, helping reduce overall energy import costs, keep retail fuel prices in check, and contain inflation. The influx of discounted Russian crude also enabled India to refine the oil and export petroleum products, including to countries that have imposed sanctions on direct imports from Russia. The twin strategy of Indian oil companies is posting record profits. This is, however, now under threat after US President Donald Trump announced a 25 per cent tariff on Indian goods plus an unspecified penalty for buying Russian oil and weapons. The 25 per cent tariff has since been notified but the penalty is yet to be specified. Coming within days of the European Union banning imports of refined products derived from Russian-origin crude, this presents a double whammy for Indian refiners. Sumit Ritolia, Lead Research Analyst (Refining & Modeling) at global real-time data and analytics provider Kpler termed this as "a squeeze from both ends". EU sanctions - effective from January 2026 - may force Indian refiners to segment crude intake on one side, and on the other, the US tariff threat raises the possibility of secondary sanctions that would directly hit the shipping, insurance, and financing lifelines underpinning India's Russian oil trade. "Together, these measures sharply curtail India's crude procurement flexibility, raise compliance risk, and introduce significant cost uncertainty," he said. Last fiscal, India spent over USD 137 billion on import of crude oil, which is refined into fuels like petrol and diesel. For refiners like Reliance Industries Ltd and Nayara Energy - who collectively account for a bulk (more than 50 per cent in 2025) of the 1.72.0 million barrels per day (bpd) of Russian crude imports into India - the challenge is acute. While Nayara is backed by Russian oil giant Rosneft and has been sanctioned by the EU last month, Reliance has been a big fuel exporter to Europe. As one of the world's largest diesel exporters - and with total refined product exports to Europe averaging around 200,000 bpd in 2024 and 185,000 bpd so far in 2025 - Reliance has extensively utilised discounted Russian crude to boost refining margins over the past two years, according to Kpler. "The introduction of strict origin-tracking requirements now compels Reliance to either curtail its intake of Russian feedstock, potentially affecting cost competitiveness, or reroute Russian-linked products to non-EU markets," Ritolia said. However, Reliance's dual-refinery structure - a domestic-focused unit and an export-oriented complex - offers strategic flexibility. It can allocate non-Russian crude to its export-oriented refinery and continue meeting EU compliance standards, while processing Russian barrels at the domestic unit for other markets. Although redirecting diesel exports to Southeast Asia, Africa, or Latin America is operationally feasible, such a shift would involve narrower margins, longer voyage times, and increased demand variability, making it commercially less optimal, he said. Kpler data shows a notable decline in India's Russian crude imports in July (1.8 million bpd versus 2.1 million bpd in June), aligning with seasonal refinery maintenance and weaker monsoon-driven demand. However, the drop is more pronounced among state-run refiners, likely reflecting heightened compliance sensitivity amid mounting geopolitical risk. Private refiners, who account for over 50 per cent of Russian crude intake, have also begun reducing exposure, with fresh procurement diversification underway this week as concerns over US sanctions intensify. Ritolia said replacing Russian crude isn't plug-and-play. The Middle East is the logical fallback, but has constraints - contractual lock-in, pricing rigidity, and a mismatch in crude quality that affects product yield and refinery configuration. "The risk here is not just supply but profitability. Refiners will face higher feedstock costs, and in the case of complex units optimized for (Russian) Urals-like blends, even margins will be under pressure," he said. On the future course, Kpler believes India's complex private refiners - backed by robust trading arms and flexible configurations - are expected to pivot toward non-Russian barrels from the Middle East, West Africa, Latin America, or even the US, where economics permits. This shift, while operationally feasible, will be gradual and strategically aligned with evolving regulatory frameworks, contract structures, and margin dynamics. However, replacing Russian barrels in full is no easy feat - logistically daunting, economically painful, and geopolitically fraught. Supply substitution may be feasible on paper, but remains fraught in practice. "Financially, the implications are massive. Assuming a USD 5 per barrel discount lost across 1.8 million bpd, India could see its import bill swell by USD 911 billion annually. If global flat prices rise further due to reduced Russian availability, the cost could be higher," it said. This would increase fiscal strain, particularly if the government steps in to stabilize retail fuel prices. The cascading impact on inflation, currency, and monetary policy would be difficult to ignore. (Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)
