Maha Kumbh stampede death toll: Akhilesh Yadav says Uttar Pradesh Government lied; cites media report
Samajwadi Party president Akhilesh Yadav on Tuesday (June 10, 2025) accused the Uttar Pradesh Government of lying about the death toll in the January 29 Maha Kumbh stampede and said that those who provide "false statistics" are not worthy of public trust.
Mr. Yadav made the remarks in a post on X, citing a BBC report which claimed that 82 people died in the stampede. The toll is significantly higher than the official figure of 37.
तथ्य बनाम सत्य : 37 बनाम 82
सब देखें, सुनें, जानें-समझें और साझा करें। सत्य की केवल पड़ताल नहीं, उसका प्रसार भी उतना ही ज़रूरी होता है।
भाजपा आत्म-मंथन करे और भाजपाई भी और साथ ही उनके समर्थक भी कि जो लोग किसी की मृत्यु के लिए झूठ बोल सकते हैं, वो झूठ के किस पाताल-पर्वत पर चढ़कर… pic.twitter.com/7vMg0o8kEo — Akhilesh Yadav (@yadavakhilesh) June 10, 2025
"'Facts vs truth: 37 vs 82.' Everyone must watch, listen, understand and share. Investigating the truth is important but spreading it is equally essential," Mr. Yadav said.
He accused the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) of misleading the public and asked the party, its leaders and supporters to introspect. If someone can "lie about death", one must ask how far they will go to crown themselves rulers of a "false empire."
'Those who provide 'false statistics' are not worthy of public trust. The issue goes beyond number fudging, it also includes making false statements on the floor of the House,' Mr. Yadav said, alluding to Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath.
The SP chief also raised a series of questions over the process of compensating the stampede victims and their families.
"Why was compensation paid in cash? What was the source of the cash? Where did the undistributed cash go? Under which rule was cash distribution approved? Who authorised the cash payments? Is there any written order backing the disbursement?" the former Chief Minister asked.
He further asked, "Were there irregularities in cash handling? And who instructed the officials to alter the causes of death?"
"This report is not the conclusion. It marks the beginning of an inquiry into the deeper truths behind the deaths and monetary dealings at the Maha Kumbh. When the truth is revealed, layers of lies are exposed — no matter how well-managed the misinformation," Mr. Yadav said.
Dozens were injured in the pre-dawn stampede that occurred on the occasion of Mauni Amavasya, one of the most auspicious days of the Hindu calendar, as millions of pilgrims jostled for space to take a holy dip in the Sangam area.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Baij serves legal notice to Netam, BJP leaders over conversion remark
RAIPUR: Chhattisgarh Pradesh Congress Committee president Deepak Baij has issued legal notices to former Union Minister Arvind Netam, Chhattisgarh Forest Minister Kedar Kashyap, and BJP's Bastar MP Mahesh Kashyap, seeking clarification within 15 days regarding their recent remarks about Baij's alleged religious conversion. Sushil Anand Shukla, head of the Chhattisgarh Congress Communication Department, confirmed the development. The controversy arises from a press conference held in Raipur on June 7, during which Arvind Netam—who had recently attended an RSS event in Nagpur—reportedly questioned Baij's religious identity. Netam said, 'I want to ask Baij whether he has converted to Christianity. I suspect this when he speaks such things. I would also like to ask what the Congress policy is regarding religious conversion.' Baij considers this statement misleading and damaging to his public image. The legal notice , sent through Baij's counsel Sandeep Dubey, asserts that Netam's remark—'Main Deepak Baij se ek hi baat jaanna chahta hoon, kahin woh convert toh nahin hue hain, Isai dharm mein matantaran toh nahin hua hai' (I only want to know one thing from Deepak Baij—has he converted to Christianity?)—has defamed Baij and hurt his religious sentiments. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Keep Your Home Efficient with This Plug-In elecTrick - Save upto 80% on Power Bill Learn More Undo The notice further alleges that the statement is fabricated. In the legal notice, Baij, a former Bastar MP, reaffirms his deep faith in Budhadev, Mahadev, Maa Danteshwari, and all Hindu gods and goddesses. The notice states that Netam's comment constitutes a criminal offence under Sections 353 and 356 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS). Section 353 deals with 'statements conducing to public mischief,' and Section 356 pertains to 'defamation.' Similar legal notices have also been issued to Kedar Kashyap and Mahesh Kashyap under the same provisions. According to the notice, Forest Minister Kedar Kashyap had accused Baij of sheltering religious conversions in Bastar. Likewise, Mahesh Kashyap had reportedly emphasised the anti-conversion narrative in Bastar, indirectly challenging Baij's stance on religious freedom and conversion in tribal communities. Baij has demanded a public apology from all three leaders. The notice warns that if no response is received within 15 days, a criminal case will be filed, and further legal action will be pursued.
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
BJP MLAs walk out of Bengal Assembly after Speaker rejects adjournment motion on Maheshtala, Murshidabad violence
Tensions flared in the West Bengal Assembly on Thursday after Speaker Biman Banerjee rejected an adjournment motion brought by BJP legislators over recent incidents of violence in Maheshtala and Murshidabad. Following the rejection, BJP MLAs, led by Leader of Opposition Suvendu Adhikari, staged a protest in the well of the House, raising slogans against the state government. Several BJP legislators carried saffron flags bearing religious symbols and accused the government of being 'anti-Hindu.' After protesting for over half an hour, BJP members staged a walkout. 'The matter is sub-judice, so it should not be discussed in the Assembly,' Speaker Banerjee said in his ruling. Proceedings in the House continued with TMC MLAs in attendance. Minister of State Chandrima Bhattacharya, while addressing the House, criticised the BJP for what she termed an attempt to 'instigate communal violence.' 'They entered the Assembly with the symbol of a particular religion. They can't do this,' she said. Meanwhile, Adhikari filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) in the Calcutta High Court on Thursday regarding the violence in Maheshtala, where a temple was reportedly vandalised. Senior advocate Billwadal Bhattacharyya, appearing for the petitioner, submitted before a division bench of Justices Soumen Sen and Smita Das De: 'Immediate deployment of Central Armed Forces in and around the said mandir premises situated in Ward No. 7, Maheshtala, adjacent to Rabindranagar Police Station, is required to restore peace, protect lives, and prevent further communal bloodshed.' He also urged the court to direct authorities to identify the miscreants and take swift, impartial action. 'This is about safeguarding the fundamental and constitutional rights of the Hindu community, including their right to life, property, faith, dignity, and security,' he told the court. The bench declined an urgent hearing but permitted the matter to be formally filed. Separately, Adhikari has sought permission from the Superintendent of Police, Diamond Harbour Police District, to meet families affected by Wednesday's violence in Maheshtala. According to BJP sources, if the request is denied, Adhikari's legal counsel is expected to move the Calcutta High Court seeking permission for the visit. Atri Mitra is a Special Correspondent of The Indian Express with more than 20 years of experience in reporting from West Bengal, Bihar and the North-East. He has been covering administration and political news for more than ten years and has a keen interest in political development in West Bengal. Atri holds a Master degree in Economics from Rabindrabharati University and Bachelor's degree from Calcutta University. He is also an alumnus of St. Xavier's, Kolkata and Ramakrishna Mission Asrama, Narendrapur. He started his career with leading vernacular daily the Anandabazar Patrika, and worked there for more than fifteen years. He worked as Bihar correspondent for more than three years for Anandabazar Patrika. He covered the 2009 Lok Sabha election and 2010 assembly elections. He also worked with News18-Bangla and covered the Bihar Lok Sabha election in 2019. ... Read More
Scroll.in
2 hours ago
- Scroll.in
Delhi University will not teach Manusmriti, says VC after text included in Sanskrit course
The Manusmriti will not be taught at Delhi University 'in any form', its vice chancellor told The Indian Express on Thursday. The statement came days after the text was reportedly included in the reading list of a new undergraduate Sanskrit course at the university. The Manusmriti is a Hindu scripture authored by a medieval ascetic named Manu. It has been widely criticised for its gender and caste-based provisions. 'We will not teach any part of Manusmriti in any form in the University of Delhi,' Yogesh Singh, the Delhi University vice chancellor, told the newspaper. 'This direction has been issued even earlier by the vice chancellor's office, and departments should adhere to it.' Singh added that the Sanskrit department should not have included the text in the reading list in the first place in view of the earlier directives. The department had listed the Manusmriti as one of the primary texts in the syllabus for a four-credit discipline-specific core course titled 'Dharmashastra Studies', according to The Indian Express. A discipline-specific core course refers to a mandatory subject within a particular academic field that provides foundational knowledge and skills. The reading list for the course also included Hindu religious texts such as the Ramayana, the Mahabharata, the Puranas and the Arthashastra, the newspaper reported. In July 2024, Delhi University had rejected a proposal to include the Manusmriti in its Bachelor of Laws syllabus. The Faculty of Law had proposed to introduce the literary works Manusmriti with the Manubhasya of Medhatithi by GN Jha and Commentary of Manu Smriti – Smritichandrika by T Kristnasawmi Iyer as suggested readings for undergraduate law students. The proposal had triggered an uproar, with the Social Democratic Teachers Front, a collective of university teachers, writing to Singh. They told the vice chancellor that the introduction of any section or part of the Manusmriti is against the basic structure and principles of the Constitution. Singh had later said that a committee headed by him did not find the proposal 'appropriate' and rejected it. 'There are many other texts to teach [the] Indian knowledge tradition and we should not rely on any one text,' the vice chancellor had said.
