A judge tells federal agencies they can't enforce anti-trans bias policies against Catholic groups
The ruling from U.S. District Judge Peter Welte, the chief federal judge in North Dakota, bars the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services from enforcing a health care rule it imposed in 2024 under Democratic President Joe Biden. The rule said that existing policies against sex discrimination covered discrimination based on gender identity, so that health care providers risked losing federal funds if they refused to provide gender-affirming care.
Welte also barred the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission from telling employers that a failure to have health plans cover gender-affirming care for their workers would represent discrimination based on sex that could lead to a lawsuit against them and penalties.
The judge rejected a request from an order of nuns, two Catholic homes and the Catholic Benefits Association, which represents employers, to impose similar bans on each agency covering abortion and fertility treatments Catholic organizations consider immoral. He said those claims were 'underdeveloped' and not ready for court review.
But he concluded that allowing the two agencies to enforce policies on gender-affirming care or health coverage for it would restrict employers' and health care providers' ability to live out their religious beliefs, violating a 1992 federal law meant to provide broad protections for religious freedoms. The HHS rule had a provision allowing the agency to make case-by-case exceptions based on religious beliefs, but Welte said that would be insufficient.
'The case-by-case exemption procedure leaves religious organizations unable to predict their legal exposure without furthering any compelling antidiscrimination interests,' wrote Welte, who is based in Fargo.
The two agencies did not immediately respond to email messages seeking comment Thursday.
The Catholic Benefits Association serves more than 9,000 employers and about 164,000 employees enrolled in member health plans, according to its website.
The group, founded in 2013, says it 'advocates for and litigates in defense of our members' First Amendment rights to provide employee benefits and a work environment that is consistent with the Catholic faith.' The First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution protects religious freedoms.
Association General Counsel Martin Nussbaum welcomed the ruling, saying the organization's members 'want to do the right thing in their health plan and in their medical services that they provide for those medical providers, and this gives them protection to doing that.'
And he said the judge's ruling suggests there are no mandates from the federal government on abortion or fertility treatments, so there is 'no need to provide protection.'
The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in 2020 that the Civil Rights Act's protections against discrimination based on sex also cover anti-LGBTQ+ bias in employment. The landmark 1964 act doesn't have specific provisions dealing with bias based on sexual orientation or gender identity.
But courts also have intervened to limit how far the federal government can go in combating anti-LGBTQ+ discrimination when religious organizations or employers with religious beliefs against LGBTQ+ rights are involved.
Both the HHS rule and the EEOC's policy on sex discrimination have their roots in efforts by President Barack Obama to protect LGBTQ+ rights in 2016, in his last year in office.
When President Donald Trump began his second term in January, he issued an order saying the federal government would not recognize transgender people's gender identities. In April, two employees said the EEOC was classifying all new gender identity-related discrimination cases as its lowest priority, essentially putting them on indefinite hold.
The 2024 HHS rule also covered bias based on 'pregnancy or related conditions," and the Catholic health care providers argued that they might face losing federal funds if they refused to perform abortions, in line with Catholic opposition to abortion. But HHS said the rule wouldn't have forced them to perform abortions or provide health coverage for abortions — only that it couldn't refuse to care for someone because they'd had one, according to Welte.
___
Hanna reported from Topeka, Kansas.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Boston Globe
20 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Veterans' voices shape a report on the Afghanistan War's lessons and impact
Advertisement 'What can we learn from the Afghanistan War?' asked an Aug. 12 discussion session with four of the commission's 16 members. What they got was two straight hours of dozens of veterans' personal stories — not one glowingly positive, and most saturated in frustration and disappointment. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up 'I think the best way to describe that experience was awful,' said Marine veteran Brittany Dymond, who served in Afghanistan in 2012. Navy veteran Florence Welch said the 2021 withdrawal made her ashamed she ever served there. 'It turned us into a Vietnam, a Vietnam that none of us worked for,' she said. Members of Congress, some driven by having served in the war, created the independent commission several months after the withdrawal, after an assessment by the Democratic administration of then-president Joe Biden faulted the actions of President Donald Trump's first administration for constraining US options. A Republican review, in turn, blamed Biden. Views of the events remain divided, and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth ordered yet another review this spring. Advertisement The commission wants to understand the bigger picture of a conflict that spanned four presidential administrations and cost more than 2,400 American lives, said cochair Dr. Colin Jackson. 'So we're interested in looking hard at the end of US engagement in Afghanistan, but we're equally interested in understanding the beginning, the middle, and the end,' he said in an interview in Columbus. Cochair Shamila Chaudhary said the panel is also exploring more sweeping questions. 'So our work is not just about what the US did in Afghanistan but what the US should be doing in any country where it deems it has a national security interest,' she said. 'And not just should it be there, but how it should behave, what values does it guide itself by, and how does it engage with individuals who are very different from themselves.' Jackson said one of the commission's priorities is making sure the final report, due in August 2026, isn't 'unrecognizable to any veteran of the Afghanistan conflict.' 'The nature of the report should be representative of every soldier, sailor, airman, Marine experience,' he said. Dymond told commissioners a big problem was the mission. 'You cannot exert a democratic agenda, which is our foreign policy, you cannot do that on a culture of people who are not bought into your ideology,' she said. 'What else do we expect the outcome to be? And so we had two decades of service members lost and maimed because we're trying to change an ideology that they didn't ask for.' Advertisement The experience left eight-year Army veteran Steve Orf demoralized. He said he didn't go there 'to beat a bad guy.' 'Those of us who served generally wanted to believe that we were helping to improve the world, and we carried with us the hopes, values, and principles of the United States — values and principles that also seem to have been casualties of this war," he told commissioners. 'For many of us, faith with our leaders is broken and trust in our country is broken.' Tuesday's report identifies emerging themes of the review to include strategic drift, interagency incoherence, and whether the war inside Afghanistan and the counterterrorism war beyond were pursuing the same aims or at cross purposes. It also details difficulties the commission has encountered getting key documents. According to the report, the Biden administration initially denied the commission's requests for White House materials on the implementation of the February 2020 peace agreement Trump signed with the Taliban, called the Doha Agreement, and on the handling of the withdrawal, citing executive confidentiality concerns. The transition to Trump's second term brought further delays and complications, but since the commission has pressed the urgency of its mission with the new administration, critical intelligence and documents have now begun to flow, the report says.
New York Post
20 minutes ago
- New York Post
Pro-Adams PAC phones NYC voters to call Cuomo a 'sore loser'
A Super PAC backing the re-election of Mayor Eric Adams is phoning tens of thousands of voters to tell them rival ex-Gov. Andrew Cuomo is a 'sore loser' and that only Hizzoner can beat socialist Zohran Mamdani. 'Andrew Cuomo is not only a loser — he is a sore loser — which is worse, and nobody likes a sore loser, the public-safety advocacy group Protect the Protectors says in its calls to 75,000 Big Apple voters. 'He lost badly to the dangerous Mamdani in the primary, and Mamdani knows how to and will beat him again,' says the Super PAC, launched by veteran campaign strategist Hank Sheinkopf. Advertisement 3 Super PAC Protect the Protectors is supporting Mayor Eric Adams for re-election in the upcoming general election for mayor of New York City. William Farrington 'He lost his governorship and had to resign because of sexual harassment, which shows his disrespect for decent family values,' the group insists of Cuomo, who has denied the allegations against him. 'Mayor Adams has grown in his job and is a proven winner as a police captain, a borough president and now mayor,' the PAC adds. Advertisement Cuomo was shockingly trounced by Mamdani, a far-left Queens state assemblyman, in the mayoral Democratic primary race in June. The Democratic Adams has been running for re-election as an independent, so he dodged the primary match-up. But the ex-gov has refused to bow out of the general election Nov. 4 despite getting slammed by Mamdani, opting to now run as an independent alongside Adams. 3 The organization has called out ex-Gov. Andrew Cuomo, calling him a 'sore loser.' Matthew McDermott Advertisement The Dems face GOP candidate Curtis Sliwa. The Super PAC says Adams — whose popularity has plummeted amid corruption probes — will win with a 'comeback campaign, which New Yorkers love, and beat the dangerous Mamdani which Cuomo the sore loser can never do.' The live calls are being made to voters in state Assembly districts where Cuomo fared well in the Democratic primary, though he lost overall to Mamdani. Advertisement In a separate script, Protect the Protectors seeks to soften up Republicans to back Adams instead of Sliwa, too. The group praises Sliwa, the Guardian Angels founder and GOP mayoral nominee, as a 'great New Yorker' who cares about the city. But it says President Trump, the titular head of the Republican Party, 'doesn't want an empty moral victory' with Sliwa, whose votes will only fracture the anti-Mamdani crowd and assure the socialist becomes mayor. 3 The group's campaign strategist, Hank Sheinkop, mentioned that Cuomo losing to Zohran Mamdani in the Democratic primary shows that he is very beatable. Stefano Giovannini 'The president would love to see Republicans send a real message of winning and help defeat the dangerous Mamdani by getting behind the only candidate who can win, Mayor Adams,' the voters are told. 'The president knows that he and the mayor don't always agree. He also knows Mayor Adams will do the right thing for New York and will be responsible to work with.' 'Cuomo is a loser who Mamdani already beat badly. Please remember the president grew up here and loves New York, and when Mayor Adams wins, we all know the president would want to do great things for New York!' Sheinkopf told The Post said Cuomo can't sell himself as the law-and-order alternative to Mamdani because he approved the state's unpopular cashless bail law as governor while his appointees on the parole board have let loose convicted cop-killers. Advertisement A third series of phone calls will be made by an issue-oriented affiliated group that stops short of saying who to vote or against. The first run of live calls will cost about $75,000 and could double to $150,000 as more donations come in, Sheinkopf said. The Cuomo campaign dismissed Adams as the real loser saying his voter support is in the single digits in the latest poll. 'Is anyone really surprised that the mayor, who is polling in the single digits, and his band of unindicted co-conspirators are playing gutter politics?' said Cuomo campaign spokesman Richard Azzopardi. Advertisement A Gotham poll released Tuesday found Mamdani the mayoral frontrunner with 41.8% support from voters for the Nov. 4 general election, followed by Cuomo with 23.4%, Sliwa 16.5% and Adams 8.8%. In a statement, the Sliwa campaign said, 'Eric Adams' campaign is a mess. 'Just look at the latest polls — Curtis Sliwa is trouncing him. Desperate candidates do desperate things. Advertisement 'While Adams flails, Curtis is focused on how he will be the best mayor this city has seen in a generation. Adams should try doing the same.' Sheinkopf, who has close ties to law-enforcement unions, said his ultimate goal is to make 2 million pro-Adams calls and knock on 2 million household doors by Election Day, which would require millions of dollars in donations. He briefly worked for a pro-Cuomo group during the Democratic primary.
Politico
21 minutes ago
- Politico
Gabbard revokes security clearances of 37 former intelligence officials
The move comes as her office has placed escalating scrutiny on Obama administration officials involved in a review of Russian election interference. Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard arrives at a White House event on Thursday, August 7. | Mark Schiefelbein/AP Photo By Jacob Wendler 08/19/2025 04:52 PM EDT Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard revoked the security clearances of 37 former intelligence officials, the Trump administration's latest move against Obama-era officials whom the White House accuses of undermining the Trump administration. In a memo she posted Tuesday on social media, Gabbard directed the heads of several national security agencies to immediately revoke the clearances of the officials, at the direction of the president, alleging they politicized or weaponized intelligence for personal or partisan gain. 'All personnel are reminded that holding a clearance is a privilege, not a right, and this privilege is contingent upon continued adherence to the principles and responsibilities of our profession,' Gabbard wrote in the memo. 'Any betrayal of these standards compromises not only our mission, but also the safety and security of the American people.'
