Too Warm or Too Cold With MS
After 40 years of MS, I have to think about temperature constantly. If I let myself get too warm, my body stops working. If I wait too long to take off that sweater, I won't be physically able to do it.
Two of the three times MS has landed me in the emergency room, it was because of getting too warm and not being able to sit up. One time, the day started off cold, so I dressed in a few layers and went to see some art shows. When it got warm, I was too engrossed in the art to notice. When I noticed, I tried to take off a pullover I was wearing, but I could not lift my arms well enough to do it.
I should have asked a stranger to help me take off some layers, but I didn't want to bother them or to be embarrassed. I tried to tough it out. I wound up on the floor and got an unwanted ambulance ride to the hospital.
That was five years ago. Since then, my temperature sensitivity has gotten worse. Now, I'm also quite uncomfortable when I get too cold. My body hunches in on itself to keep warm, I start sneezing and coughing, and I can't wait to get home and warm up. But if I get too warm, it's worse. Then I need to get into bed, or everything falls apart.
I wish it were a question of finding a 'sweet spot' – not too hot and not too cold. But for me, there is no sweet spot. I can actually be too warm (weak) and too cold (uncomfortable) at the same time.
It's taken me a few years to realize just how important it is to take off layers when I start to get warm. Like right now, writing this, I had to take off a sweatshirt and just wear a T-shirt, because the day is warming up.
How does this work out in the world? Memorial Day weekend, I spent a delightful two days at San Francisco's Carnival celebration. So much dance, music, art, costumes, and food, all in one place. I love it and almost never miss it, but it's in the Mission District, on the warm side of town. It is difficult for me to spend hours there without getting into a temperature crisis.
This year, I was smart. I packed four layers: two T-shirts, a sweatshirt, and a sweater. I paid attention to the weather and how I was feeling and frequently changed between outfits so that I felt cool but not uncomfortably cold. It wasn't finding one right outfit; it was frequently changing to fit my body's needs at the moment.
I missed some moments of the parade, because I was busy putting on or taking off a sweater. It was a lot of hassle, and I'm sure a few people were wondering, 'What's up with him?' but it enabled me to enjoy the event and not collapse.
Temperature balance is important at home, too. My apartment, especially my work area, tends to get warm. If I'm busy writing, I might not notice until my fingers stop working and I can't type anymore.
Right now, I'm still warm, so I have turned on an electric fan that sits by my desk. I love that fan; at its low setting, it really does seem to put me in a sweet spot of not being too hot or too cold. Fans are great; they use way less energy than air conditioning, so they're better for the environment, and they work right away. They cool you without unnecessarily cooling the whole house.
So, there are a lot of tricks. To avoid heat, stay in the shade; if you're cold, get into the sun. Some people with MS wear cooling vests or neck wraps if they can't avoid being out in the heat, but San Francisco rarely gets that hot. Drinking lots of fluids, iced or not, helps control our temperature.
Like with a lot of other MS symptoms, there are many things we can try. For me, doing the right things means taking our time, paying close attention to our bodies, learning and trying new things, finding balance, and then doing what works. That process applies to mobility issues, doing tasks, enjoying life, and a long list of MS challenges, including heat sensitivity like mine.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBS News
12 minutes ago
- CBS News
California is seeing spike in tick-borne illness anaplasmosis, experts warn
Ticks carrying a disease called anaplasmosis are spreading quickly throughout California, experts say. The disease is mainly showing up in dogs. Since dogs spend more time outdoors, experts say rising cases in pets could signal that humans may soon be at greater risk. More than half of the state's counties are now considered "high risk," according to the nonprofit group Companion Animal Parasite Council's data. "There's not a lot of awareness in California because most people think it's primarily a disease of the Upper Midwest and Northeast," said Dr. Jane Sykes, a professor of veterinary medicine at UC Davis. The culprit is the same western black-legged tick that spreads Lyme disease. In dogs, anaplasmosis can cause fever, fatigue, loss of appetite, and weight loss. In some cases, dogs may also experience nosebleeds, neck pain, or even seizures. "They kind of look depressed, dull, they don't want to move," Sykes said. "They have a fever, and sometimes they can develop vomiting." Veterinarians say diagnosis can be difficult, especially if owners don't mention that their dogs are often in tick-prone areas, making awareness critical. The good news: the illness can be treated quickly with antibiotics. "It doesn't matter when you give the antibiotics, it just costs more to have your dog in the hospital, not feeling well, going back in and out of veterinary clinics before the right diagnosis is made," Sykes explained. According to the Companion Animal Parasite Council, between 2021 and 2024 the number of dogs testing positive for the illness nearly tripled. More than half of California's counties are now at "high risk," including Yolo, Placer, and El Dorado counties. Veterinarians say the best way to keep dogs safe is year-round tick and flea prevention, as well as examining pets after walks in grassy or wooded areas.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
A $101,000 knee replacement? Why some hospitals charge far more than others.
People are usually savvy enough to check whether their hospital or doctor takes their insurance. But it's often a mystery how much a medical procedure or operation will cost, even with coverage. A new report from Trilliant Health, a health care analytics company, shows how much prices for the same medical service can vary at different hospitals and surgery centers. Want a total knee replacement? It can cost as little as $12,870 or as much $101,527. An ankle replacement? An Austin, Texas, hospital charges $22,011 while a New Jersey hospital billed more than $197,000 for the same operation. These wide price swings can leave insured consumers with big bills, loans and medical debt. Using claims data from two major health insurers, Trilliant Health analyzed inpatient and outpatient rates charged by nearly 2,700 hospitals and 3,500 surgery centers. The report found prices can vary as much as nine-fold for the same operation or procedure. And hospital prices within the same state varied more than three-fold, the report said. Trilliant also analyzed 10 hospitals listed on multiple best hospital lists and found no link between higher prices and improved health quality. Allison Oakes, chief research officer for Trilliant Health, said the report aims to inform consumers and employers on health care prices so they can better gauge the value of services they are purchasing. Oakes said health care prices − and the discounted rates negotiated by insurance companies − historically have been a "very well protected industry secret." "The fact that we now have information related to price, we can hopefully begin to rein in our spending," said Oakes. Hospital prices drive health spending higher Research shows such price variation is a key contributor to why health care costs so much more in the United States than any other nation. The U.S. spent $4.9 trillion in health care in 2023 − or $14,570 for every person. Despite spending more than any other nation, U.S. life expectancy is the lowest among large, wealthy nations, according to the Peterson-KFF Health System Tracker. Employers who pay for health insurance for working-age adults historically didn't have prices when deciding which hospitals and surgery centers to include in their workplace insurance plans' networks. Consumers with high-deductible health plans often pay thousands of dollars out of pocket before coverage kicks in. Or they often are charged coinsurance, which requires they pay a percentage of a medical bill. Over the past 25 years, the cost of employer health insurance premiums has nearly tripled the rate of workers pay raises, according to a 2024 study in peer reviewed Health Affairs. A major contributing factor: hospital prices. Under federal price transparency rules adopted earlier this decade, health insurance companies must disclose prices negotiated with hospitals and other health providers. Trilliant's analysis included prices negotiated by two national health insurers: UnitedHealth Group and Aetna. Will price transparency spur competition, lower prices? Researchers not involved in the Trilliant report have analyzed price transparency data and reached similar conclusions about widespread price differences. One study by Johns Hopkins University found prices of X-rays and CT scans varied more than 10-fold nationwide. The study found prices for the same scan in the same hospital nearly tripled based on different plans from the same insurance company, said Ge Bai, a Johns Hopkins University professor of accounting and health policy and management. Bai said the study underscores the lack of competition in health services. "We have a long way to go before we can reach a competitive market for health care prices," Bai said. Rice University's Baker Institute compared prices of three Houston hospitals and found large price differences negotiated by three health insurers: Blue Cross Blue Shield of Texas, United Health and Humana. The biggest price gap: an overnight stay covered by a Humana PPO plan ranged from an average of $17,628 to $57,898 at different Houston-area hospitals. Vivian Ho, a Rice University economist who has studied hospital pricing, said employers can use pricing information to tailor their health insurance offerings to workers. "There is a great deal of opportunity for employers to take this information and start restructuring their benefits," Ho said. A large New York labor union attempted to steer employees away from New York-Presbyterian to other hospitals as part of a cost-savings move. The union, Local 32BJ of the Service Employees International Union, requested the Justice Department investigate New York Presbyterian over claims that anti-competitive behavior kept hospital prices high. The Justice Department has launched an investigation into the high-profile hospital chain and its insurer contracting practices, according to a subpoena reviewed by the New York Times. A New York-Presbyterian spokesperson declined to comment. Another study of Massachusetts health plans that examined the use of tiered pricing that charged consumers higher copays if they chose more expensive hospitals. Consumers could choose copays of $250, $500 or $750, with the higher copays linked to more expensive hospitals. After three years, overall spending dropped by more than 8%, an indication consumers were willing to choose lower-cost copays and hospitals. Ho said the tiered copay approach is easier for consumers to understand health prices − and what steps they can take to lower their costs. "The average consumer doesn't understand the problem," Ho said. Consumers are quick to blame their insurer when health prices rise, Ho said. And while insurers have been scrutinized for practices such as prior authorization and service denials, the main driver of health insurance premiums are hospital charges for both inpatient and outpatient services, Ho said. "The hospitals and the consolidated health care systems are charging very high prices," Ho said. "And there's nothing in your health insurance benefit to stop you from going to the highest-priced providers." Email consumer health reporter Ken Alltucker at alltuck@ This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: A $101,000 knee replacement? Why hospital charges vary so much. Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Supporting athletes through fertility treatment ‘changes the trajectory' of women's sports, says tennis star Sloane Stephens
As she approached 30, American tennis player Sloane Stephens was faced with a dilemma. She wanted to continue with her career – to win titles and climb up the rankings – but also hoped to start a family at some point in the future. Rather than retire early or take an extended break from the sport, Stephens decided to freeze her eggs on two occasions. For her peers, that made her something of a trailblazer. 'I'm always the one that they come to to be like, 'What happened? What did you do? Who did you use?'' Stephens told CNN Sports' Amanda Davies. 'I think the conversations have now become even more open, which is amazing. 'Everyone's speaking about it, everyone's sharing their journeys because it's helping all of us understand what everyone's gone through so we can make the best-informed decisions.' A landmark initiative introduced by the WTA Tour and fully funded by Saudi Arabia's Public Investment Fund (PIF) has made the topic of fertility more relevant in women's tennis than ever before. As part of the initiative, players can receive grants for egg and embryo freezing and IVF treatment, as well as paid maternity and parental support. The Tour has also introduced ranking protection for those undergoing egg or embryo freezing, another layer of support for players returning to competitions after such procedures. Stephens, the 2017 US Open champion, believes that widening the conversations around fertility treatment will enable players to start thinking about family planning much earlier in their careers. 'If I'd known, I probably would have done it when I was 22 and my eggs were all good and fluffy and ready and all of that,' she said. 'It definitely makes a difference for the younger players now who can start thinking about it at 25 instead of 32 or 30, or even thinking about it at 20 and can make the decision by 28,' she added. 'Those years all matter. … That younger generation of girls now will feel more comfortable talking about it, doing it; they feel supported with the ranking. It really does change the trajectory of how women in sports are making decisions for their futures.' Stephens wasn't aware of any other tennis players before her who had frozen their eggs, but thought it was 'the most proactive' she could be about starting a family while continuing to pursue her career. The process wasn't straightforward. On the first occasion, she said that she 'gained 15 pounds – not a great experience – and came back to competition way too early and was just not very happy.' That prompted her to try it a second time, which she described as a 'complete different experience – both times I got what I wanted out of it, but first time was very stressful, the second time, totally fine.' The 32-year-old has since become a sounding board for other players and advocated for greater support around family planning during her time on the WTA Players' Council. 'Everyone's bodies take differently to different medications, different drugs, different procedures, all of the above,' she said. 'I really wanted to make sure that the players had the opportunity to go at their own speed, their own pace, and have their own opportunity to decide when they wanted to return to play and how much they wanted to take off – not to have to rush back and get another injury because they weren't ready to play.' Stephens' compatriot, world No. 4 Jessica Pegula, told CNN en Español earlier this year that she has explored the possibility of freezing her eggs with women's health specialists on the WTA Tour. 'Not a lot of people know how that process works and a lot of us play into our 30s and maybe there's not a time to have kids,' said Pegula. 'You don't really know how it works and you're looking into it. 'Myself, I'm 31 so that's something that interested me. I don't know what I'm going to do, but the window of having a kid kind of gets smaller and smaller as you get older. Being an athlete, it can be really, really stressful wanting to pick when or if you want that to happen.' Tennis, the first sport to facilitate fertility treatment for athletes in this way, is no stranger to having mothers on tour, including four-time grand slam winner Naomi Osaka, world No. 13 Elina Svitolina and No. 19 Belinda Bencic. For eight-time WTA Tour winner Stephens, supporting mothers and mothers-to-be is 'very much long overdue' in women's sports. Now, she wants to see this area better resourced – both in tennis and also across the board. 'Every female sport should be following the same narrative of advancing players, advancing players' futures, advancing their rights to have families and their decisions, all of that,' said Stephens. 'It's cool that tennis is one of the sports to do it and in this type of way, but there's so much more to be done. … It could eventually change our whole tour in 20 years.'
