logo
China reshuffles soy trade to counter local glut and US tensions

China reshuffles soy trade to counter local glut and US tensions

Business Times6 days ago
[BEIJING] China has long worried about its shortage of soybeans, solidifying its status as the world's biggest buyer to the benefit of farmers from the US to Brazil. But as its economy slackens, the country is quietly reshaping trade in the oilseed's products.
The Asian nation is stepping up rare exports of soybean oil, as domestic consumers cut back on restaurant visits and rising global demand for biodiesel makes prices attractive enough to send it abroad. Meanwhile, China is testing deliveries of soybean meal from Argentina for the first time, a substitute for importing beans and crushing them into animal feed at home.
Both shifts, while modest in volume, mark a departure from longstanding trade flows. They also include a means for the country to chip away at its need for American soybeans if the trade war between Beijing and Washington persists.
China exported about 127,000 tonnes of soyoil in the first half of the year, exceeding full-year 2024 levels, according to customs data. The shipments are flowing to destinations including South Korea, Malaysia and India, where edible oil demand remains robust.
The trend 'reflects a global supply-demand rebalancing in the vegetable oil market', Fu Bo, a senior analyst at Guotai Junan Futures, said in a note. 'The rising exports are the result of China needing soybean meal while other countries need soybean oil,' he said.
Global soyoil markets remain supported by strong biofuel demand in the US, where about half of local production is used to produce renewable diesel. Meanwhile, domestic biofuel blending mandates and less competitive prices in South American nations such as Brazil and Argentina have limited additional supply.
BT in your inbox
Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox.
Sign Up
Sign Up
At home, China is grappling with the opposite problem: a glut. Commercial inventories of soyoil have surged 70 per cent since May to an elevated level of 1.12 million tonnes, according to Shanghai-based commodities consultancy Mysteel.
Chinese crushers have kept run rates high to ensure there's enough soymeal for livestock rations, creating the unusual arbitrage opportunity of exporting surplus oil from a country better known for its imports.
On the meal front, China is exploring a new supply channel from Argentina. Bunge Global recently sold at least two shipments of the high-protein feed ingredient to Chinese buyers.
Beijing approved Argentine soymeal back in 2019, during trade hostilities with the first Trump administration, but purchases didn't materialise until now. Argentina's move to reduce export tariffs has improved the competitiveness of its meal. But the shipments also suggest that Chinese buyers are keen to hedge against uncertainty in US supplies as Beijing and Washington joust over trade once again.
'China has plenty of crush capacity,' said Arlan Suderman, chief commodities economist at StoneX Financial. 'But its recent purchases of Argentine soymeal send a statement to the US that it's willing to sacrifice that capacity to avoid buying US soybeans if Brazil can't fully meet its needs.' BLOOMBERG
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump drops Ukraine ceasefire demand after Putin summit
Trump drops Ukraine ceasefire demand after Putin summit

Straits Times

time2 hours ago

  • Straits Times

Trump drops Ukraine ceasefire demand after Putin summit

Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox US President Donald Trump dropped his push for a ceasefire in Ukraine in favour of pursuing a full peace accord, following his summit with Russian leader Vladimir Putin. WASHINGTON - US President Donald Trump on Aug 16 dropped his push for a ceasefire in Ukraine in favour of pursuing a full peace accord – a major shift announced hours after his summit with Russian leader Vladimir Putin yielded no clear breakthrough. Prior to the high-stakes meeting in Alaska , securing an immediate cessation of hostilities had been a core demand of Mr Trump – who had threatened 'severe consequences' on Russia – and European leaders, including Ukraine's Volodymyr Zelensky, who will now visit Washington on Aug 18. The shift away from ceasefire would seem to favour Mr Putin, who has long argued for negotiations on a final peace deal – a strategy that Ukraine and its European allies have criticised as a way to buy time and press Russia's battlefield advances. Mr Trump spoke with Mr Zelensky and European leaders on his flight back to Washington, saying afterwards that 'it was determined by all that the best way to end the horrific war between Russia and Ukraine is to go directly to a peace agreement which would end the war'. Ceasefire agreements 'often times do not hold up', Mr Trump added on his Truth Social platform. This new development 'complicates the situation', Mr Zelensky said on Aug 16. If Moscow lacks 'the will to carry out a simple order to stop the strikes, it may take a lot of effort to get Russia to have the will to implement far greater – peaceful coexistence with its neighbours for decades,' he said on social media. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore I want to divorce my husband and be a single mother: More victims speaking up on emotional abuse Singapore Buying hope: Inside S'pore's love affair with the lottery Singapore She won big in Genting, but getting $240k winnings back to Singapore was dicey Opinion Confessions of a born-again Singaporean Business Manage your household finances like a business for clarity, say entrepreneurs Business Silence does not work when dealing with job loss blues Singapore Singapore congratulates Indonesia on 80th Independence Day 'Harsh reality' In the call, Mr Trump expressed support for a proposal by Mr Putin to take full control of two largely Russian-held Ukrainian regions in exchange for freezing the frontline in two others, an official briefed on the talks told AFP. Mr Putin 'de facto demands that Ukraine leave Donbas', an area consisting of the Donetsk and Lugansk regions in eastern Ukraine, the source said. In exchange, Russian forces would halt their offensive in the Black Sea port region of Kherson and Zaporizhzhia in southern Ukraine, where the main cities are still under Ukrainian control. Several months into its full-scale invasion of Ukraine, Russia in September 2022 claimed to have annexed all four Ukrainian regions even though its troops still do not fully control any of them. 'The Ukrainian president refused to leave Donbas,' the source said. Mr Trump notably also said the US was prepared to provide Ukraine security guarantees, an assurance German Chancellor Friedrich Merz hailed as 'significant progress'. But there was a scathing assessment of the summit outcome from the European Union's top diplomat Kaja Kallas, who accused Mr Putin of seeking to 'drag out negotiations' with no commitment to end the bloodshed. 'The harsh reality is that Russia has no intention of ending this war any time soon,' Ms Kallas said. Zelensky back in White House The main diplomatic focus now switches to Mr Zelensky's talks at the White House on Aug 18. An EU source told AFP that a number of European leaders had also been invited to attend. The Ukrainian president's last Oval Office visit in February ended in an extraordinary shouting match, with Mr Trump and US Vice-President J.D. Vance publicly berating Mr Zelensky for not showing enough gratitude for US aid. Mr Zelensky said on Aug 16 after a 'substantive' conversation with Mr Trump about the Alaska summit that he looked forward to his Washington visit and discussing 'all of the details regarding ending the killing and the war'. In an interview with broadcaster Fox News after his sit-down with Mr Putin, Mr Trump had suggested that the onus was now on Mr Zelensky to secure a peace deal as they work towards an eventual trilateral summit with the Russian leader. 'It's really up to President Zelensky to get it done,' Mr Trump said. European pressure The leaders of France, Britain and Germany are due to host a video call on Aug 17 for their so-called 'coalition of the willing' to discuss the way forward. In an earlier statement, they welcomed the plan for a Trump-Putin-Zelensky summit but added that they would maintain pressure on Russia in the absence of a ceasefire. Meanwhile, the conflict in Ukraine raged on, with Kyiv announcing on Aug 16 that Russia had launched 85 attack drones and a ballistic missile during the night. Back in Moscow, Mr Putin said his summit talks with Mr Trump had been 'timely' and 'very useful'. In his post-summit statement in Alaska, Mr Putin had warned Ukraine and European countries not to engage in any 'behind-the-scenes intrigues' that could disrupt what he called 'this emerging progress'. AFP

Outline emerges of Putin's offer to end his war in Ukraine
Outline emerges of Putin's offer to end his war in Ukraine

Straits Times

time6 hours ago

  • Straits Times

Outline emerges of Putin's offer to end his war in Ukraine

Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox FILE PHOTO: A serviceman of 152nd Separate Jaeger Brigade of the Ukrainian Armed Forces checks the sky to look out for Russian combat drones, amid Russia's attack on Ukraine, near the town of Pokrovsk in Donetsk region, Ukraine August 5, 2025. REUTERS/Stringer/File Photo LONDON - Russia would relinquish tiny pockets of occupied Ukraine and Kyiv would cede swathes of its eastern land which Moscow has been unable to capture, under peace proposals discussed by Russia's Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump at their Alaska summit, sources briefed on Moscow's thinking said. The account emerged the day after Trump and Putin met at an airforce base in Alaska, the first encounter between a U.S. president and the Kremlin chief since before the start of the Ukraine conflict. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy is due to travel to Washington on Monday to discuss with Trump a possible settlement of the full-scale war, which Putin launched in February 2022. Although the summit failed to secure the ceasefire he said he had wanted, Trump said in an interview with Fox News' Sean Hannity that he and Putin had discussed land transfers and security guarantees for Ukraine, and had "largely agreed". "I think we're pretty close to a deal," he said, adding: "Ukraine has to agree to it. Maybe they'll say 'no'." The two sources, who requested anonymity to discuss sensitive matters, said their knowledge of Putin's proposals was mostly based on discussions between leaders in Europe, the U.S. and Ukraine, and noted it was not complete. Trump briefed Zelenskiy and European leaders on his summit discussions early on Saturday. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore Over 280 vapes seized, more than 640 people checked by police, HSA in anti-vape raids at nightspots Singapore SPLRT disruption: 28km of cables to be tested during off-service hours; works to end by Aug 23 Singapore First-half GDP boost likely temporary; Republic must stay relevant amid challenges: Chan Chun Sing Life Six-figure sales each durian season: Why S'pore durian sellers are now live selling on TikTok Singapore Airport-bound public bus to be fitted with luggage rack in 3-month trial: LTA Asia Australian universities slash staff, courses as rising wages and foreign student curbs bite Life Meet the tutors who take O-level exams every year to create a 'war mate' bond with their students Life Pivot or perish: How Singapore restaurants are giving diners what they want It was not immediately clear if the proposals by Putin were an opening gambit to serve as a starting point for negotiations or more like a final offer that was not subject to discussion. UKRAINIAN LAND FOR PEACE At face value, at least some of the demands would present huge challenges for Ukraine's leadership to accept. Putin's offer ruled out a ceasefire until a comprehensive deal is reached, blocking a key demand of Zelenskiy, whose country is hit daily by Russian drones and ballistic missiles. Under the proposed Russian deal, Kyiv would fully withdraw from the eastern Donetsk and Luhansk regions in return for a Russian pledge to freeze the front lines in the southern regions of Kherson and Zaporizhzhia, the sources said. Ukraine has already rejected any retreat from Ukrainian land such as the Donetsk region, where its troops are dug in and which Kyiv says serves as a crucial defensive structure to prevent Russian attacks deeper into its territory. Russia would be prepared to return comparatively small tracts of Ukrainian land it has occupied in the northern Sumy and northeastern Kharkiv regions, the sources said. Russia holds pockets of the Sumy and Kharkiv regions that total around 440 square km, according to Ukraine's Deep State battlefield mapping project. Ukraine controls around 6,600 square km of Donbas, which comprises the Donetsk and Luhansk regions and is claimed by Russia. Although the Americans have not spelled this out, the sources said they knew Russia's leader was also seeking - at the very least - formal recognition of Russian sovereignty over Crimea, which Moscow seized from Ukraine in 2014. It was not clear if that meant recognition by the U.S. government or, for instance, all Western powers and Ukraine. Kyiv and its European allies reject formal recognition of Moscow's rule in the peninsula. They said Putin would also expect the lifting of at least some of the array of sanctions on Russia. However, they could not say if this applied to U.S. as well as European sanctions. Trump said on Friday he did not immediately need to consider retaliatory tariffs on countries such as China for buying Russian oil - which is subject to a range of Western sanctions - but might have to "in two or three weeks." Ukraine would also be barred from joining the NATO military alliance, though Putin seemed to be open to Ukraine receiving some kind of security guarantees, the sources said. However, they added that it was unclear what this meant in practice. European leaders said Trump had discussed security guarantees for Ukraine during their conversation on Saturday and also broached an idea for an "Article 5"-style guarantee outside the NATO military alliance. NATO regards any attack launched on one of its 32 members as an attack on all under its Article 5 clause. Joining the Atlantic alliance is a strategic objective for Kyiv that is enshrined in the country's constitution. Russia would also demand official status for the Russian language inside parts of, or across, Ukraine, as well as the right of the Russian Orthodox Church to operate freely, the sources said. Ukraine's security agency accuses the Moscow-linked church of abetting Russia's war on Ukraine by spreading pro-Russian propaganda and housing spies, something denied by the church which says it has cut canonical ties with Moscow. Ukraine has passed a law banning Russia-linked religious organisations, of which it considers the church to be one. However, it has not yet started enforcing the ban. REUTERS

Silence does not work when dealing with job loss blues
Silence does not work when dealing with job loss blues

Straits Times

time7 hours ago

  • Straits Times

Silence does not work when dealing with job loss blues

Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox Retrenchment is viewed differently now. Just look at the LinkedIn networking platform, which is peppered with posts on job losses, says the writer. SINGAPORE - Growing up, I was obsessed with collecting toys that came with Happy Meals. Whenever my parents took me to a McDonald's outlet, I looked forward to going home with a Hello Kitty plushie or a Transformers autobot. For what I thought was a blissful period, my dad started adding a new toy to my collection almost every day. I learnt only recently that I had got it completely wrong. He had been retrenched. Not wanting to worry my mum, he continued to leave home as usual and spent the day at the library, often having lunch at McDonald's, until he found a new job. Unbeknownst to him, my mum knew about the ruse. She had tried to reach him in the office and was inadvertently told that he had lost his job. I did not understand why my parents, who had a loving relationship, found it difficult to talk about retrenchment, until earlier this year. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore Over 280 vapes seized, more than 640 people checked by police, HSA in anti-vape raids at nightspots Singapore SPLRT disruption: 28km of cables to be tested during off-service hours; works to end by Aug 23 Singapore First-half GDP boost likely temporary; Republic must stay relevant amid challenges: Chan Chun Sing Life Six-figure sales each durian season: Why S'pore durian sellers are now live selling on TikTok Singapore Airport-bound public bus to be fitted with luggage rack in 3-month trial: LTA Asia Australian universities slash staff, courses as rising wages and foreign student curbs bite Life Meet the tutors who take O-level exams every year to create a 'war mate' bond with their students Life Pivot or perish: How Singapore restaurants are giving diners what they want That was when my then employer, an international media outlet, closed most of the roles in my Singapore-based division. My colleagues and I were encouraged to apply for new positions that were made available under a restructuring process. I had dialled into the meeting because I was on annual leave and thousands of miles away from home. Towards the end, we were asked if we had any questions. I found myself with a jumble of thoughts and nothing to say. I wandered around a museum and watched a ballet performance. All while feeling like I was going through the five stages of grief. I kept it from my mum, not wanting to worry her. In other conversations, I said I was feeling okay. I was determined to focus on the positives. I would not feel the impact immediately, as I was expected at work for several more months. I also had the opportunity to apply for roles within the company, and I knew I had a decent chance at them. Finally, I did not have large financial commitments. I did not have a mortgage or children. Then the insecurities crept in, and these were much harder to talk about. I felt shame, even though we were told the restructuring was not based on performance. I questioned if I was employable in an industry that I had spent a decade in. I stacked myself up against my colleagues, many of whom were trying for roles in the restructuring, and external applicants. I contended with how I would feel if I failed to get a role, and as importantly, how that would look. The optics bothered me and there was nothing I could do but sit with uncomfortable feelings. I can only imagine what was running through my dad's mind in the late 1990s, when retrenchment was a taboo subject. He was the sole breadwinner supporting a mortgage, my mum and I, and with more at stake than existential thoughts and a bruised ego. Retrenchment is viewed differently now. Just look at the LinkedIn networking platform, which is peppered with posts on job losses. The responses are overwhelmingly positive, offering comfort and, more often than not, connections to a new gig. As one retrenched worker put it: 'The response from you all has been so supportive and genuinely encouraging that it almost makes a girl want to get laid off more often! Emphasis on the almost...' In the current economic climate, with companies from Microsoft to the Bumble dating app announcing layoffs, people are using the platform to talk about the grief associated with losing a job. I have benefited from this, as it reminds me that retrenchment is a relatively common experience. But I could not find the words for a post, and having to engage in a public space felt like too much of a burden. Grief, however, had a way of reminding me that it needed some place to go. I was hypersensitive and erratic, and I knew I needed to accept that things would not be the same. With the restructuring, I lost a job that I loved, which came with a range of functions. I lost colleagues, many of whom had become friends. In choosing to leave the company, despite being offered roles, I gave up the prestige that comes with working for a global organisation. Giving grief an airing looks like this to me. In the immediate aftermath of the restructuring, my colleagues and I spoke a lot, sharing our worries, encouragement and practical resources. This grounded me during a challenging time when I was often working the early shift, and spending the afternoons and evenings at interviews. I am seeing a counsellor, which was a benefit offered to affected staff. She has helped me to balance my identity as a journalist with the other things I value. I told my loved ones about my struggles. I put aside thoughts of whether my feelings were valid and focused on what I knew I was carrying. Somewhere along the way, I told my mum. 'Never mind,' she said. 'Remember to eat well or else you will have no energy.' I learnt a big lesson. The stigma of retrenchment is nowhere as strong as my dad's experience, but it still carries a sting. During the process, I felt most comfortable keeping silent, thinking it was the best way to figure out the next steps. That silence magnified my inner turmoil. In crises, we are often our harshest judges. We live in a world that I hope has become kinder to downturns, failures and messy feelings. I don't think I have grown more comfortable with putting my thoughts online. But I did not have to look far for support, with people who were willing to see me through a difficult season.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store