Elizabeth Warren won't back VA funding package, firing a warning shot to Republicans
The Massachusetts Democrat said in a statement Tuesday, shared first with POLITICO, that she would oppose all votes related to advancing the bundle of Senate Appropriations Committee-passed bills, citing the Trump administration's moves to cut and freeze funding for the Department of Veterans Affairs.
One of the spending measures expected to be included in the so-called minibus coming to the floor this week — with a vote to tee up consideration scheduled for later Tuesday afternoon — is legislation to fund the VA and certain military infrastructure programs. Warren is the ranking member on the Senate Armed Services subcommittee on personnel.
'The Trump administration's actions are disgraceful — freezing VA grants, cutting funds for veterans' suicide prevention, stripping support for veteran homelessness, firing VA workers, gutting programs to help veterans avoid foreclosure and get mental health support in times of crisis,' said Warren in the statement. 'Nothing in this bill puts a stop to those actions.'
Since January, about 17,000 jobs at VA have been vacated through a combination of retirements, resignations and department hiring freezes. Voluntary retirements and resignations are expected to further cull 30,000 VA employee positions by the end of September, the department announced earlier this month.
But Warren also went further in her statement, drawing a red line that other Democrats have started to put down, too: Republicans should not expect full Democratic cooperation in the larger government funding process if the GOP continues to support actions that undermine Congress' authority to direct federal spending decisions.
'I cannot in good conscience support this funding bill while the Trump administration illegally withholds funding for programs appropriated by Congress for veterans in need and Republicans unilaterally claw back bipartisan funding that Donald Trump doesn't like,' Warren said.
'Congress is a co-equal branch of government,' she continued. 'When we vote to protect our veterans, we need to stand by that vote. We swore an oath to the Constitution, not to a king. If Republicans want support for this bill, they can start by demonstrating they will uphold the law.'
Democrats are huddling for their weekly lunch Tuesday ahead of the first procedural vote on the appropriations package, which also could include bills funding Capitol operations, federal agriculture programs and the Food and Drug Administration. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer is expected to lead his caucus in a discussion about whether Democratic senators want to help Republicans shore up the 60 votes necessary to bring the minibus to the floor.
Warren's hard-line position could set a tone for the conversation about whether Democrats are prepared at this point to show Republicans they can't take their votes for granted.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
4 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Investors in Monolithic Power Systems (NASDAQ:MPWR) have seen strong returns of 180% over the past five years
When you buy a stock there is always a possibility that it could drop 100%. But on the bright side, you can make far more than 100% on a really good stock. Long term Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ:MPWR) shareholders would be well aware of this, since the stock is up 170% in five years. It's also good to see the share price up 22% over the last quarter. But this could be related to the strong market, which is up 16% in the last three months. So let's investigate and see if the longer term performance of the company has been in line with the underlying business' progress. Trump has pledged to "unleash" American oil and gas and these 15 US stocks have developments that are poised to benefit. To paraphrase Benjamin Graham: Over the short term the market is a voting machine, but over the long term it's a weighing machine. One way to examine how market sentiment has changed over time is to look at the interaction between a company's share price and its earnings per share (EPS). During five years of share price growth, Monolithic Power Systems achieved compound earnings per share (EPS) growth of 70% per year. This EPS growth is higher than the 22% average annual increase in the share price. So one could conclude that the broader market has become more cautious towards the stock. The company's earnings per share (over time) is depicted in the image below (click to see the exact numbers). We know that Monolithic Power Systems has improved its bottom line over the last three years, but what does the future have in store? Take a more thorough look at Monolithic Power Systems' financial health with this free report on its balance sheet. What About Dividends? It is important to consider the total shareholder return, as well as the share price return, for any given stock. The TSR is a return calculation that accounts for the value of cash dividends (assuming that any dividend received was reinvested) and the calculated value of any discounted capital raisings and spin-offs. Arguably, the TSR gives a more comprehensive picture of the return generated by a stock. As it happens, Monolithic Power Systems' TSR for the last 5 years was 180%, which exceeds the share price return mentioned earlier. This is largely a result of its dividend payments! A Different Perspective While the broader market gained around 19% in the last year, Monolithic Power Systems shareholders lost 12% (even including dividends). Even the share prices of good stocks drop sometimes, but we want to see improvements in the fundamental metrics of a business, before getting too interested. On the bright side, long term shareholders have made money, with a gain of 23% per year over half a decade. It could be that the recent sell-off is an opportunity, so it may be worth checking the fundamental data for signs of a long term growth trend. While it is well worth considering the different impacts that market conditions can have on the share price, there are other factors that are even more important. Even so, be aware that Monolithic Power Systems is showing 3 warning signs in our investment analysis , and 2 of those don't sit too well with us... We will like Monolithic Power Systems better if we see some big insider buys. While we wait, check out this free list of undervalued stocks (mostly small caps) with considerable, recent, insider buying. Please note, the market returns quoted in this article reflect the market weighted average returns of stocks that currently trade on American exchanges. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
Yahoo
4 minutes ago
- Yahoo
I Asked ChatGTP What Trump's China Deal Means for the Middle Class — Here's What It Said
Rapidly shifting pieces have been synonymous with President Trump's trade policy — China included, according to AP News. Chinese producers sell more than $400 billion worth of goods in the U.S. annually, per Reuters. In order to help orient ourselves within all the changes right now, here's what ChatGTP said President Trump's latest deal with China means for middle-class finances. Check Out: For You: Tariff Reductions Are Partial, Short-Term Relief Tariffs aren't gone, but middle-class households face partial relief because of tariff reductions. A deal slashed U.S. tariffs on Chinese goods from 145% to 30%, according to Time Magazine. However, an average American family would still face a net hike of $2,300 to $2,800 a year in additional tariff-related costs. Trending Now: Consumer Prices Are Still Elevated Consumers continue to pay higher for everyday items, including electronics, clothing and appliances due to residual tariff burdens. Tariffs work like regressive taxes with those in the middle-class paying a larger share of income, per Bloomberg. Inflation and Reduced Purchasing Power Consumer Price Index (CPI) increases tied to tariffs could hit 1.3% to 2.3%, depending on whether all planned tariffs take effect, per Barron's. This is equivalent to a loss of $1,900 to $3,800 in real purchasing power per household annually. Uncertainty Hinders Business and Hiring Amidst pronounced uncertainty, businesses and consumers alike may be less inclined to make big changes or commitment. 'The stop-start nature of tariff implementation slows corporate investment, especially in manufacturing — limiting job growth and wage pressure. Consumer confidence can waver amid this uncertainty,' ChatGPT said. Risk of Retaliation and Spillover Any potential repercussions don't end just because tariffs end. Chinese retaliatory tariffs on U.S. exports could hit middle-class related industries, including autos, agriculture and manufacturing, leading to layoffs or price hikes. 'Ongoing tit-for-tat risks mean future prices and employment could shift again,' ChatGPT explained. So, What Are Your Next Moves? ChatGPT had four suggestions for what to do right now: Budget for inflation in your essential expenses, including groceries, clothes and electronics. Lock in rates for mortgage and loans sooner rather than later as uncertainty may affect financial markets. Track CPI and Fed signals. These reflect tariff-driven inflation trends. Diversify income streams to guard against local job or wage hits. Editor's note on political coverage: GOBankingRates is nonpartisan and strives to cover all aspects of the economy objectively and present balanced reports on politically focused finance stories. You can find more coverage of this topic on More From GOBankingRates Mark Cuban Warns of 'Red Rural Recession' -- 4 States That Could Get Hit Hard 7 Tax Loopholes the Rich Use To Pay Less and Build More Wealth 5 Cities You Need To Consider If You're Retiring in 2025 This article originally appeared on I Asked ChatGTP What Trump's China Deal Means for the Middle Class — Here's What It Said Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
4 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump Fired Off A Sexist Trope At A Faith Luncheon. It Shows He's An ‘Unhappy Man,' Expert Says.
President Donald Trump fired off a sexist trope about women when he rambled on and on about his so-called Big Beautiful Bill during a faith luncheon at the White House earlier in July. During Trump's speech at the White House Faith Office luncheon with business leaders, he went on a tangent about the giant bill he'd signed into law, which favors the wealthy and is expected to cause millions of people to lose their health insurance. The president complained about the Republicans who'd initially pushed back on the legislation and claimed the bill would 'perhaps' prevent an economic depression that, he bizarrely reasoned, wouldn't be good for 'unattractive' men married to women. 'You people, so rich, so beautiful, so nice to look at, will be totally busted,' he said. 'And let's see how long your wife stays with you ... she'll stay with you for about three weeks and she'll say, 'Darling, I can't take it anymore. I can't take it anymore, darling, I'm leaving you.'' 'I said to one guy — he's a very, very unattractive man — but he's smart and he's rich, and I said, 'You better hope we get this thing passed because your wife will be gone within about two minutes,'' Trump continued. 'He said, 'You're right.'' The crowd erupted in laughter. Trump has made a few public quips about women marrying for money in recent months. Back in May — again making an assumption about his audience — the president inexplicably warned graduating cadets about 'trophy wives' in a commencement address at the United States Military Academy at West Point. He said that trophy wives often don't 'work out' as he told the story of the late real estate developer William Levitt and his eventual professional downfall. Geralyn Fortney, a licensed professional counselor and regional clinic director with Thriveworks who specializes in women's issues, previously told HuffPost that narratives about women marrying men for financial benefits is a 'long-standing sexist trope.' 'It dismisses the fact that everyone, even women who marry men of privilege, is capable of marrying for love,' she said. 'This is a long-standing sexist trope that discredits women as incapable of love without strings attached, and also makes us believe that women are unable to have success on their own!' As it relates to Trump's speech on Monday, Kari J. Winter, a professor of American studies at the University at Buffalo, said that the president — in addition to 'incessantly sexualizing women' — seems to 'have a core belief that women marry only for money.' 'Like a crude, cliched commercial that uses women's bodies to sell cars or booze or whatever, Trump conjures absurd, non-sequitur images of patriarchal marriage to sell his disastrous economic policies,' she told HuffPost in an email. 'He is literally telling men that they need his economics to keep their marriages afloat.' Trump's worldview is 'transactional and misogynistic' — and he's unhappy, Winter says. Winter, whose expertise includes gender, feminism, race and class, doesn't think Trump is consciously pushing a trope — she believes his 'worldview is fundamentally transactional and misogynistic.' 'In these remarks, he is addressing men despite the presence of women in the audience, and he assumes that they share his belief that wealth is the only way to attract and keep women,' she said. 'In his repetitive use of the 'trophy wife' trope, we can see that underneath his arrogance and delusions of grandeur is an unhappy man who does not believe that he is worthy of love.' 'Maybe he doesn't even believe that love is a thing,' she continued. Winter admitted that she laughed out loud when she first heard Trump's remarks at the faith luncheon — but not because his speech was funny. She laughed because his comments were 'spectacularly awkward, inarticulate and idiotic.' 'We expect incoherent word salads from Trump, but the rambling offensiveness of his remarks continues to exceed expectations,' she said. When asked to share her thoughts about the audible laughs Trump received from business leaders in attendance at the luncheon, Winter said: 'Some wealthy people will pander to anything as long as they get tax breaks at the expense of the poor and middle class.' 'The enormous economic violence encoded in Trump's big, b*shit bill shows how morally bankrupt his rich supporters are,' she wrote before later adding, 'History bears witness to the fact that many people cloak themselves in the garbs of religion in order to provide cover and permission for their most hateful, violent impulses.' 'They should be ashamed of themselves, but they appear incapable of shame so we as a society need to find a way to hold them accountable,' Winter added. Related... Trump Mocked For Claiming 'Big Beautiful Bill' Helps Ugly Rich Guys Stay Married 'South Park' Goes Scorched-Earth On Trump In Shockingly NSFW Season Premiere Stephen Colbert Absolutely Torches Corporate Bosses Amid New Trump Settlement Claim
