US accepts Boeing jet from Qatar for use as Air Force One
Qatar's offer of the jet -- which is valued in the hundreds of millions of dollars -- has raised huge constitutional and ethical questions, as well as security concerns about using an aircraft donated by a foreign power for use as the ultra-sensitive presidential plane.
"The Secretary of Defense has accepted a Boeing 747 from Qatar in accordance with all federal rules and regulations," Pentagon spokesman Sean Parnell said in a statement.
"The Department of Defense will work to ensure proper security measures and functional-mission requirements are considered for an aircraft used to transport the President of the United States," Parnell said, referring questions to the US Air Force.
The US Constitution prohibits government officials from accepting gifts "from any King, Prince or foreign State," in a section known as the Emoluments Clause.
But Trump has denied there are any ethical issues involved with accepting the plane, saying it would be "stupid" for the US government not to take the aircraft.
"It's a great gesture," the 78-year-old billionaire told reporters at the White House last week when asked if the oil-rich Gulf state would expect anything in exchange.
"I would never be one to turn down that kind of an offer. I mean, I could be a stupid person (and) say 'no we don't want a free, very expensive airplane.'"
The leader of the Democratic minority in the US Senate introduced legislation earlier this week that would block Trump from using the aircraft.
Chuck Schumer's Presidential Airlift Security Act would prohibit the Pentagon from using taxpayer funds to retrofit any plane previously owned by a foreign government for use as the presidential plane.
"Donald Trump has shown time and again he will sell out the American people and the presidency if it means filling his own pockets," Schumer said in a statement.
"Not only would it take billions of taxpayer dollars to even attempt to retrofit and secure this plane, but there's absolutely no amount of modifications that can guarantee it will be secure."
Although several Republicans have voiced concerns about the proposed gift, Senate Majority Leader John Thune -- a Trump loyalist -- is not obliged to bring the bill to the floor of Congress's upper chamber.
But Schumer plans to force a vote by offering it as an amendment to spending bills that Republicans will have to pass later in the year.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
LeMonde
2 hours ago
- LeMonde
Trump hails US-China tariff talks a 'total reset'
Senior US and Chinese officials met in Geneva on Saturday, May 10, in a bid to de-escalate a trade war sparked by President Donald Trump's sweeping tariff rollout and fueled by Beijing's strong retaliation. US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer conferred with Chinese Vice Premier He Lifeng in the first such talks between the world's two largest economies since Trump slapped steep new levies on China last month. Trump praised the "very good" discussions and deemed them "a total reset negotiated in a friendly, but constructive, manner." He said in a Truth Social post Saturday evening in Washington, We want to see, for the good of both China and the US, an opening up of China to American business." He added: "GREAT PROGRESS MADE!!!" The discussions are expected to continue Sunday in Geneva. Shortly after 9:30 am on Saturday morning, Bessent, Greer and around a dozen more US delegates marched through the lobby of Geneva's luxury Intercontinental hotel, ignoring journalists' requests for comment before ducking into waiting cars and speeding off. The Chinese delegation left from another five-star hotel, the President Wilson on the shores of Lake Geneva, with large police contingents escorting the two convoys through the city, blocking all other traffic on their routes. The talks were then held in the sumptuous 18 th -century "Villa Saladin" overlooking Lake Geneva. The former estate was bequeathed to the Swiss state in 1973, according to the Geneva government. Tariffs imposed on the Asian manufacturing giant since the start of the year currently total 145%, with cumulative US duties on some Chinese goods reaching a staggering 245%. In retaliation, China slapped 125% levies on US goods, cementing what appears to be a near trade embargo between the world's two largest economies. Trump signaled on Friday that he could lower the sky-high tariffs on Chinese imports, taking to social media to suggest that an "80% Tariff on China seems right!" "The president would like to work it out with China.... He would like to de-escalate the situation," US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick told Fox News on Friday. Trump's press secretary, Karoline Leavitt, clarified that the US would not lower tariffs unilaterally, adding that China would need to make concessions as well. In any case, a move to that level would be a symbolic gesture, since the tariffs would remain prohibitively steep. Beijing has insisted that the United States must lift tariffs first and vowed to defend its interests. Bessent has said the meetings in Switzerland would focus on "de-escalation" and not a "big trade deal." The head of the Geneva-based World Trade Organization, Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala, said on Friday she welcomed the talks, calling them a "positive and constructive step toward de-escalation." A commentary published by China's state news agency Xinhua also noted that "The contact in Switzerland is an important step in promoting the resolution of the issue."
France 24
2 hours ago
- France 24
French Senate to vote on regulating fast fashion
The bill is targeted at Chinese-founded e-commerce giant Shein, which has a reputation for selling lower quality clothes at a very low price. Easy to order and replace, fast fashion items are exported to France on a large scale, causing pollution and saturating markets. Adopted by the lower house National Assembly in March 2024, the bill will be voted on by the Senate later on Tuesday and is expected to pass, with backing from the government and widespread support in the chamber. The vote is not the final legislative hurdle: a joint committee of senators and lower house deputies is expected to meet from September to produce a joint text, prior to the final adoption of the law. The text plans to "reduce the environmental impact of the textile industry", said Anne-Cecile Violland, the centre-right member of parliament who proposed the bill. Fast fashion is a growing market in France and between 2010 and 2023, the value of advertised products grew from 2.3 billion euros to 3.2 billion euros. Around 48 clothing items per person are released into the French market each year, and 35 are thrown away every second in the country, according to the state environmental agency Ademe. Fast fashion poses a "triple threat", said the minister for ecological transition, Agnes Pannier-Runacher. "It promotes overconsumption, causes ecological disaster and threatens our businesses," she said. Slamming an "invasion" of products that "do not last", the minister expressed hope it would help change things in Europe. Once adopted in France, the European Commission will be notified to ensure it complies with European law according to Pannier-Runacher. Targeting fast fashion The Senate, dominated by the right, modified the bill to target "ultra" fast fashion companies, such as Asian websites Shein ou Temu. The Senate's amendments plan to leave out French and European brands that may be affected by the bill, such as Zara, H&M and Kiabi. The fashion giants will still be obliged to notify their customers about the environmental impact of their products, according to the new bill. "I have no intention of making French brands that contribute to our country's economic vitality pay a single euro,' said rapporteur Sylvie Valente Le Hir, member of the right-wing The Republicans party. The bill will impose stricter sanctions on fast fashion companies by scoring their "environmental communication". This "eco-score" will affect all fast fashion companies, Pannier-Runacher said. Those with the lowest scores will be taxed by the government up to 5 euros per product in 2025 and up to 10 euros by 2030. This tax cannot go beyond 50 percent of the price of the original product. Advertisement ban The bill would impose sanctions on influencers who promote such products and ban fast fashion advertisements. The regulation of the fast fashion industry will only succeed with a "collective effort", and not by targeting "a single actor," Shein spokesperson Quentin Ruffat told RTL radio on Monday. According to Ruffat, the law will add "a tax of 10 euros per sold item of clothing by 2030" and "impact the purchasing power" of French people. Environmental organisations are also worried that the law may be misinterpreted. Debates may amount to an interesting framework which still lacks substance, according to Green Senator Jacques Fernique. On Monday, the Textiles Industry Union (UIT) recognised the bill as "a first step" and hoped for its "rapid adoption ... even if the text does not entirely fit our expectations".
France 24
3 hours ago
- France 24
Los Angeles immigration protests: Five key points to know
Protests in Los Angeles against US President Donald Trump's administration crackdown on immigration first broke out on June 6 after federal immigration authorities arrested more than 40 migrants in the city. Trump responded by mobilising 4,000 National Guard troops along with 700 Marines over the last four days. What triggered the protests? Since Trump's return to the White House in January, his government has pledged to conduct the largest deportation operation in American history by expelling millions of immigrants in the country without legal status. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) has been arresting undocumented immigrants for weeks. Demonstrators protested against the deportation of mainly Latin American migrants from the city, which has a large diaspora from the region. First demonstrations and clashes Monday's demonstrations unfolded largely peacefully, however, after weekend protests triggered by dozens of arrests of people that authorities said were illegal migrants and gang members. Portions of the 101 Freeway were closed over the weekend as protesters occupied its southside lane impeding traffic, tear gas filled the air and rioters torched self-driving vehicles, the Washington Post reported. At least 56 people were arrested in two days, according to the Los Angeles Police Department. Reaction of the White House Trump responded by ordering the deployment of 2,000 National Guard troops on June 7 to California. Trump said on Truth Social, that "Los Angeles would have been completely obliterated", if he hadn't deployed the National Guard. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said late Saturday that the deployment of the troops aimed "to address the lawlessness that has been allowed to fester", blaming what she called California's "feckless" Democratic leaders. "These lawless riots only strengthen our resolve," Trump posted on his Truth Social platform early on Sunday. On Monday, the US president ordered the deployment of another 2,000 National Guard troops along with 700 Marines. Trump's speedy deployment in California of troops against those whom the president has alluded to as 'insurrectionists' on social media is a sharp contrast to his decision to issue no order or formal request for National Guard troops during the insurrection at the US Capitol on January 6, 2021, despite his repeated and false assertions that he had made such an offer. US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth said on his personal X account that he supported the deployment of troops to California, writing, 'We have an obligation to defend federal law enforcement officers – even if Gavin Newsom will not.' 'Deranged' California Governor Gavin Newsom slammed the move as 'deranged', posting on X that US Marines shouldn't be deployed against Americans to achieve the 'fantasy of a dictatorial president". The governor also criticised the announced mobilisation of 2,000 additional troops, claiming that the first to be sent in were reportedly given neither food nor water. 'Only approx. 300 are deployed – the rest are sitting, unused, in federal buildings without orders,' Newsom said on X. California officials sued the Trump administration Monday, with the state's attorney general, Rob Bonta, arguing that the deployment of troops 'trampled' on the state's sovereignty and pushing for a restraining order. The last time the National Guard was activated without a governor's permission was in 1965, when President Lyndon B. Johnson sent troops to protect a civil rights march in Alabama, according to the Brennan Center for Justice. Protests continue Demonstrators accuse the Republican president of stirring up trouble. "They're meant to be protecting us, but instead, they're like, being sent to attack us," Kelly Diemer, 47, told AFP. "This is not a democracy anymore. Additional protests against immigration raids continued into the evening Monday in several other cities including San Francisco and Santa Ana, California, and Dallas and Austin, Texas.
