logo
Meta investigates stablecoins for payouts

Meta investigates stablecoins for payouts

Finextra12-05-2025

Years after being forced to abandon its crypto project, Meta is in talks with digital asset firms about integrating stablecoin payments into its platform, according to Fortune.
0
Citing sources, Fortune says Facebook has been talking to crypto infrastructure players about introducing stablecoins as a way of managing payouts. Stablecoins could prove useful in enabling payouts to individuals across different regions more efficiently and with lower fees than more traditional payment options.
No final decision has been made, but the Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp parent could take a multi-token approach and integrate support for the likes of Tether's USDt and Circle's USDC.
Meta has hired Ginger Baker, board member of the Stellar Development Foundation and a former Plaid exec, as a VP, product specialising in fintech and payments to help explore the possibilities, says Fortune.
Meta has largely steered clear of crypto since the collapse of its ambitions project to use a stablecoin, dubbed Diem, to back its own digital wallet called Novi. After years of work led by former PayPal boss David Marcus, Meta abandoned Novi and Diem amid fierce regulatory pushback.
However, recently the regulatory environment has changed significantly, thanks in large part to US President Donald Trump's crypto enthusiasm. Progress was stalled last week, when Democratic Senators blocked the Genius Stablecoin bill although both sides agree that regulation should be brought in.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘It is a better programmer than me': The harsh reality of being laid off because of AI
‘It is a better programmer than me': The harsh reality of being laid off because of AI

The Independent

time39 minutes ago

  • The Independent

‘It is a better programmer than me': The harsh reality of being laid off because of AI

The often-talked threat of artificial intelligence on jobs suddenly became very real and shocking to Jane, who asked to use a pseudonym for privacy reasons, when her human resources role became automated and she was laid off in January. She'd spent two years at her company managing benefits and was on track for a promotion. She'd noticed her boss building out AI infrastructure, but didn't think her position, which paid roughly $70,000 a year, would be affected. 'I thought that because I had put in so much time and been so good on the higher-level stuff, he would invest in me,' the 45-year-old Bay Area resident told The Independent about her former employer. 'Then, as soon as he had a way to automate it away, he did that. He just let go of me.' Making matters worse, current economic conditions made job hunting hard. In February, an AI system conducted one of her phone interviews. 'It was kind of like having an interview with an automated voicemail,' she said, adding that the 'robot' asked her questions about herself and responded with generic answers, leaving her unhopeful the technology would help her get to the next round. After several months unemployed, Jane obtained a government position in April, before starting a new gig in sales just a few weeks ago. 'What's happening is there's a huge white collar slowdown,' said Jane. 'I think jobs are going away.' Workers across the country are grappling with the same issue, as tech CEOs sound the alarm on a potential job market bloodbath in the coming years. In an Axios interview last month, Dario Amodei, the CEO of Anthropic, a leading artificial intelligence company, predicted AI could eliminate half of all entry-level white-collar jobs and increase unemployment to 10 to 20 percent within the next five years. The general public is 'unaware that this is about to happen,' he told the outlet. 'It sounds crazy, and people just don't believe it.' Perhaps no other sector has been hit harder than tech. Internet forums are flooded with workers relaying they've either been laid off or wondering when they might be. Software engineer Shawn K (his full last name is K) shared his experience on Substack of getting laid off as AI took over the company, in a now-viral post titled: The Great Displacement Is Already Well Underway. In March 2024, K, 42, was a full-stack engineer at His superiors encouraged employees to use ChatGPT and team productivity skyrocketed. A month later, he was laid off. He'd been in the industry for 21 years and was making $150,000. 'We had been reorienting the company towards AI, adding on AI features all throughout the software and trying to capitalize on AI to our customers, and then shortly after that kind of restructuring and strategizing...I got laid off,' he told The Independent. With two mortgages to cover, he started using Door Dash to do deliveries around his home in Central New York, just to make ends meet. After more than a year and nearly 800 applications, he finally landed a contract position earlier this month. 'I've tried a lot of stuff, like everything I can think of, I've lowered my standards over this past year of all the things I'm applying for and all the things I'm willing to consider,' he said. 'At some point, it gets to a situation where you need cash immediately to literally eat and pay your bills.' K believes AI will make some tech jobs obsolete — but the worker still has a place. 'AI is a better programmer than me, and that doesn't mean that I think that I have no value to offer anymore,' he said. 'I just think that means I can now do 100 times as much as what I was doing before, and solve harder problems that I wouldn't have even attempted before.' Now that his article has received so much attention, he wants people to take notice of the changes coming to the industry. 'I'm really convinced that anybody whose job is done on a computer all day is over. It's just a matter of time,' said K. Brian Ream, a 46-year-old high school and university tutor in Michigan, ran a medical transition business until AI caused demand to dry up. The business, which only generated a few thousand dollars a year, provided English translations for Portuguese medical journals. He started the business in 2014 after spending time in Brazil and learning the language but hasn't had an order in over a year. He knows most of his prior customers are now using Chat GPT and worries about the implications. 'When you're translating medical journal articles, this could have effects that are unintended,' said Ream, noting that some of his former clients could be translating articles with false medical information. Still, he acknowledges the technology could be useful and wants other educators to incorporate it into lessons. 'I wish that teachers were more connected to the tool and were able to teach students what it's capable of and what it's not capable of, so they don't try to use it for things that it can't do,' Ream said. 'The reality is, students are using this to write whole essays, and they're not learning how to do it themselves, so they don't know that the tool isn't capable of it.' As more employers require workers to use AI, he wants the next generation to be prepared — even if it destroyed his own business. 'You cannot stop this from happening,' Ream said.

BBC examining plans that could lead to US consumers paying for its journalism
BBC examining plans that could lead to US consumers paying for its journalism

The Guardian

timean hour ago

  • The Guardian

BBC examining plans that could lead to US consumers paying for its journalism

Senior BBC figures are examining plans that would lead to American consumers paying to access its journalism, as the broadcaster looks to the US to boost its fragile finances. The corporation, which is facing fierce competition from streamers and falling licence fee income, has been targeting US audiences as it attempts to increase its commercial revenues outside the UK. Executives believe the perceived polarisation of the US media, especially during Donald Trump's second term, may have created an opportunity for the BBC's brand of impartial coverage. The US is considered to be a prime target for the BBC to increase its overseas income, which has become an urgent task as the value of the licence fee has fallen significantly in real terms since 2010. Last year, the number of people paying it also fell by half a million as audiences were drawn to alternatives like Netflix and YouTube. The licence fee is now £174.50 a year. While the corporation has already relaunched its website and news app in the US, American consumers of its content are not asked to make any kind of financial contribution to the BBC's output. The Guardian understands that senior figures are keen to increase revenues coming from the country, including examining the idea of asking users to pay for access in some form. Some US broadcasters, such as the free-to-air TV network Public Broadcasting Service (PBS), already ask for donations from supporters. It is one of the potential areas of reform being considered by BBC bosses as talks over the renewal of its royal charter begin in earnest. The charter expires in 2027, with the corporation's leadership adamant that their red lines are any move to a subscription or advertising model in the UK. However, they are also under pressure to show they are attempting to increase all other areas of income. Tim Davie, the BBC's director general, is keen to increase the corporation's non-licence fee income. He is the former boss of BBC Studios, which oversees the broadcaster's commercial operations. He has said he is willing to embrace reforms that make its finances 'fairer, more modern and more sustainable'. BBC Studios has already been selling ads on its content in the US, including the website and app. The corporation's website in the US was relaunched at the end of 2023, followed by an overhaul of the corporation's app last year. The US is the BBC's largest English-speaking market and its second-largest overall, behind India. Its focus on North America has led to its digital newsroom there doubling in size, with an expansion in live broadcast programming from its Washington DC bureau. Internal figures suggest since relaunching, has had double-digit growth for nine consecutive months. The website reaches 130 million people globally, with 67 million of those in North America. Despite the focus on increasing its income, the BBC's revenues actually fell by 12% last year to £1.84bn, though it has increased significantly over the last five years. The fall last year was blamed on a slump in a post-Covid pandemic fall in TV production and commissioning, as well as investments made in

Shooter game loved by 10 MILLION is closing in days – fans warned they'll have to pay for an upgrade to keep playing
Shooter game loved by 10 MILLION is closing in days – fans warned they'll have to pay for an upgrade to keep playing

The Sun

time2 hours ago

  • The Sun

Shooter game loved by 10 MILLION is closing in days – fans warned they'll have to pay for an upgrade to keep playing

AN ONLINE shooter game played by 10million at its peak will disappear from two popular consoles in a matter of days. Developers behind the title want to focus on newer platforms, meaning it will shut down on some older devices. 2 2 As such, affected players will have to bite the bullet and pay to upgrade their console if they desperately wish to continue playing. The game in question is The First Descendant a free-to-play multiplayer online role-playing looter shooter. It first burst onto the scene last July on Windows PC, PlayStation 5, PlayStation 4, Xbox Series X/S and Xbox One. But almost one year on, and Xbox One and PS4 owners will be shut out. Producer Beom-Jun Lee said the move was going ahead with "much reluctance". But studio Nexon says it was needed to make the game even better with its next "mega season update". There is one reassuring bit of news to come out of the shake-up. Affected players can carry over their account details to any of other platform, so they need not lose everything. The all-important date all users need to note is June 19 for the switch off. Gamers have had mixed feelings about the upcoming overhaul. "This game came out in July last year, why the hell did they even bother with a PS4 version to begin with if it wasn't even going to make it a year?" one commented on Reddit. "They shouldn't have even bothered with PS4 support to begin with then," another wrote. A third added: "I feel sad for PS4 players but its a 12 year old machine its time to jump on ps5, last generation is hold this current generation of games back." WHY DO GAMES NEED TO CLOSE DOWN? By Jamie Harris, Assistant Technology and Science Editor at The Sun With most games online these days, tech companies need to maintain quite hefty servers to manage everything. It's no cheap business to operate with millions of gamers across the world. Naturally, people move on, leaving older games behind in the process. There comes a point where it's no longer viable to continue offering server access so studios shut them down. For some games that are entirely online this can render it completely useless. But others may have a way for you to continue playing solo still. You should usually see a prominent notification in the game warning you with instructions on what to do - provided you're still playing the game of course.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store