&w=3840&q=100)
Spain, UAE visit set to create over 14,000 jobs in state, says MP CM
Yadav stated that following the Madhya Pradesh Global Dialogue-2025, the state received investment proposals worth over Rs 11,119 crore.
In a post on X, CM Yadav stated, "With the motto 'Make in India-Make in Madhya Pradesh,' investment proposals worth over Rs 11,119 crore have been received in all major sectors under the 'Madhya Pradesh Global Dialogue-2025' concluded in UAE and Spain. These will create more than 14,000 new employment opportunities in the state. After the visit to both nations, I reached Bhopal today and shared information with journalist friends."
"In Madrid, Spain, the 'Invest in Madhya Pradesh - Business Forum' was held, where discussions took place with over 200 corporate and diplomatic representatives," he said.
"Addressed over 500 expatriate entrepreneurs at the 'Friends of MP' conference held during the Dubai visit. Conducted one-to-one strategic meetings with heads of more than 30 international and national companies during the visit," he added.
CM Yadav stated that, under the Madhya Pradesh Global Dialogue-2025, he signed MoUs and held productive talks with investors to promote the state's potential growth.
In a post on X on Saturday, CM Yadav said, "Under the Madhya Pradesh Global Dialogue-2025, during the Spain visit, I engaged in discussions with entrepreneurs, investors, and businesspersons, signed MoUs, observed global agri-models like Mercabarna, and also met with the Indian diaspora. This visit will strengthen the vision of a developed Madhya Pradesh on the global stage."
CM Yadav on Saturday said that his visit to Dubai and Spain is nearing its conclusion, highlighting the tour's focus on exploring opportunities for the state's progress and promoting employment, industries, and tourism.
Speaking from Barcelona, CM Yadav said, "We have reached the last leg of our Dubai and Spain visit. As we had set the objective of our tour, we were to explore all the areas for the progress of our state with our Indians connected to Madhya Pradesh, especially everything that provides employment. We also went to the industries and restaurants to promote tourism. Wherever there are Indian restaurants, we visited them.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
19 minutes ago
- Mint
Tiger Global-backed Progcap expands beyond lending, pilots tech platform for MSMEs
Progcap, a fintech company focused on small businesses, is setting up a new vertical that will digitise their supply chains and offer them on-the-spot credit. It is building a full-stack software-as-a-service (SaaS) platform for brands, distributors and retailers, expanding from pure-play lending into embedded finance as a second revenue source, co-founders Pallavi Shrivastava and Himanshu Chandra told Mint. 'Large corporates have access to platforms like Salesforce but the actual sales process on the ground was still very analog. If you can place the order on the spot and initiate the payment process immediately, it leads to better conversion. Smaller brands and distributors lacked access to such tech," said Chandra. Progcap's new vertical will digitise this supply chain end-to-end and is already live with over 40 companies. Progcap plans to scale up embedded credit on this platform. Embedded credit means getting a loan right where you're buying or selling something, without going to a bank. 'We want to be the operating system for these brand-distributor-retailer ecosystems," said Shrivastava. This comes as Indian businesses such as Zepto's Atom, Big Basket's BB Matrix and InsuranceDekho's Heph launch their SaaS verticals to diversify revenue streams. Currently, Progcap's SaaS vertical offers credit only through Progfin, its non-banking finance company. The company aims to onboard over 200 brands and will open the SaaS platform to other banks and financial institutions by year-end, the founders said. Revenue contribution from the SaaS and embedded credit vertical is expected to be 10-15% over the next two to three years as lending will continue to be the main business. 'It is significantly reducing our customer acquisition cost. If the transaction is initiated on our platform, there's a high likelihood that we'll also be chosen to finance it," said Chandra. He added that it is helping reduce feet-on-the-street sales teams. 'Sales teams of our partner brands essentially became our onboarding channels, and we didn't need to send field teams," said Chandra. Automating processes This comes as companies actively think of further automating their processes and reducing costs to become leaner and turn profitable. Progcap's revenue from operations almost doubled to ₹139 crore in FY24 from ₹71 crore in FY23, while it managed to narrow its loss to ₹46 crore from ₹49 crore. The company is yet to file its FY25 financials. Founded in 2017 by Srivastava and Chandra, the financial service company, last valued at over $600 million, gets 95% of its revenue from lending to micro and small businesses. Within the SaaS platform, direct monetisation will come from subscription-based fees charged to brands and distributors. In addition, the new vertical opens up international expansion possibilities for Progcap. 'Lending is heavily regulated and requires deep market understanding. SaaS, however, is globally scalable," said Chandra. 'Some large brands are already asking us if we can deploy this in Bangladesh or Indonesia. So, once we prove the product in India, we will consider expanding it internationally." Though still at an early revenue stage, the SaaS platform is expected to be spun off as a separate entity company in two to three years as Progcomm, said Shrivastava. Co-founder Chandra leads this vertical fulltime, she added. Funding in the works Progcap is also preparing to raise a fresh round of equity capital to fund growth. The new round will include a secondary component to provide partial exits to early investors, the founders said. 'We haven't hit the market yet," said Shrivastava. 'But we're looking at capital to expand geographically, grow the team, scale the lending book, and double down on SaaS plus embedded credit. A portion may go into secured lending pilots as well." The company has been diversifying revenue outside of unsecured lending, an area that's come under greater scrutiny of the banking regulator. So far, Progcap has raised about $110 million across four funding rounds from marquee investors such as Tiger Global, Sequoia Capital India and Google. 'The valuation will depend on timing and market conditions. We're not chasing vanity milestones," Shrivastava said. Progcap aims to grow its assets under management to ₹3,000 crore by the end of FY26, riding on strong demand for formalised credit in India's underserved micro, small and medium enterprise sector.
Indian Express
21 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Govt dreaming of building concrete cities and urban jungles over fertile land: KMM
Farmers and labourers under the banner of the Kisan Mazdoor Morcha (KMM) submitted memorandums at the deputy commissioner (DC) offices across the state, demanding the Punjab government 'repeal its ambitious land pooling policy'. Addressing the media, KMM coordinator Sarwan Singh Pandher said, 'Following the central government's model, the state government is trying to benefit corporate interests by dreaming of building concrete cities and urban jungles over Punjab's fertile land, a move that will be firmly resisted.' Questioning the government's 'intention,' Pandher said, 'There is no data on demand for housing colonies, yet Chief Minister Bhagwant Mann-led state government, under pressure from Delhi-based lobbies, is aggressively pursuing a policy that threatens to displace entire villages.' 'Government representatives cite examples from Dubai and other countries, but those nations built structures on barren land, and not on fertile lands that produce three to four crops a year,' Pandher said. Pandher emphasised that the policy 'isn't just harmful to farmers, but it would also affect farm labourers, small shopkeepers, commission agents (arhtiyas), and middle-class traders'. Terming the government's claim that 'land won't be forcibly acquired false, Pandher read out a clause in the policy, purportedly reading 'if landowners on both sides of a plot agree to pooling, the landowner in between could lose his land even without consent under the 2013 Land Acquisition Act'. Criticising the 'cost-sharing clause' in the land pooling policy, Pandher said, 'The policy mandates landowners to bear 60 per cent of the development cost, while the development authority pays 40 per cent.' Referring to Cabinet Minister for Revenue, Rehabilitation and Disaster Management, Water Supply & Sanitation and Housing and Urban Development Hardeep Mundian's remarks that 'land with bank loans will have the debt transferred to the allotted plots,' Pandher questioned, 'If the farmer no longer owns cultivable land, how will they repay those loans?' The KMM coordinator accused the government of 'trying to grab land under the guise of generous offers like Rs 1 lakh annual lease payments', calling it 'unrealistic'. 'How will a government struggling financially afford Rs 650 crore annually for 65,000 acres?' he asked. Referring to the statements of the Punjab CM and other Cabinet ministers that the Opposition was 'misleading farmers,' Pandher said, 'We are not illiterates…the time has changed now and everyone can read the policy and understand its pros and cons… farmers know what is good or bad for them. Rather, the government is misleading the public.' Pandher also questioned the August 4 deadline provided to landowners to file objections, and warned, 'There is no clear recourse whether the farmers' objections will be rejected during the hearings.' Calling upon the farmer and labourer organisations in Punjab to set aside differences and fight the land pooling policy unitedly, Pandher announced full support for the Samyukta Kisan Morcha's (SKM) tractor march on July 30, and appealed to the public to actively support all such united efforts. BKU (Krantikari) president Surjit Singh Phool said, 'The promise of 'affordable housing' is hollow. At the current government rate, a five marla plot will cost Rs 45 to Rs 50 lakh, making it unaffordable even for the middle class. So, who will buy plots in these government-developed colonies? The real motive behind the policy is to seize land and lease it to corporate houses for large-scale corporate farming on the pretext of urban development. That's why the policy targets highly fertile land close to highways.' BKU (Azad) president Jaswinder Singh Longowal said, 'Thousands of colonies already exist around New Chandigarh, Ludhiana, Jalandhar, Amritsar, Mohali and Phagwara. Why don't the government regularise those colonies first instead of setting up new colonies?' Leaders who submitted the memorandums at various locations are Sukhwinder Singh Sabhra (Kisan Mazdoor Sangharsh Committee), Omkar Singh Bhangala (Kisan Mazdoor Hitkari Sabha), Malkeet Singh Gulamiwala (Kisan Mazdoor Morcha, Punjab), Dilbag Singh Gill (Bhartiya Kisan Mazdoor Union), Manjeet Singh Rai (BKU, Doaba), Jang Singh Bhateri (BKU, Bhateri), Balwant Singh Behramke and Guramneet Singh Mangat (BKU, Behramke), and several others. The major demands in the memorandums included, among others, compensation for property and items lost during the forced dismantling of protest sites at the Shambhu and Khanauri borders; complete waiver of farmers' and labourers' loans; the passage of a Minimum Support Price (MSP) Guarantee Act in the Punjab Assembly and pressing the central government to implement it and few other demands.
Indian Express
21 minutes ago
- Indian Express
With Aug 1 deadline looming, India's faces a trade predicament: to accommodate Trump's hardball tactics while maintaining tariff advantage
With less than a couple of days left for the August 1 deadline that the Donald Trump administration set itself to thrash out deals with its trading partners, the American President said he is planning tariffs for 'the rest of the world' at 'somewhere in the 15 to 20 per cent range'. That would mean a significant increase on the 10 per cent 'baseline' tariff that currently applies to most trading partners. India's talks with the US for an interim deal are in a limbo of sorts, given the lack of a significant breakthrough so far. As things stand, three things are clear: the US is pushing for zero duty access to the Indian markets, like the deals it has got with Vietnam and Indonesia. That would, however, be a tough demand for India to accommodate. Secondly, from its perspective, New Delhi is pushing for a headline tariff number of around 15 per cent for its goods going into the US, like what was offered by the Americans to the EU and Japan, with the comparative tariff advantage starting to diminish if the tariff starts to go over figure and inch up closer towards the 20 per cent mark, or even higher. Also, going by the deals signed by the US so far, the tariff scenario for each country seems to be dependent on multiple external factors as well. This includes investment commitments and promises on directional shifts in trade in goods that America is keen to peddle. The Trump administration is learnt to be pushing for India to commit to specific purchases and investments, of the sort that it got the EU and Japan to sign up for. The commitment for purchases should not be a big issue for India, given that Trump is ostensibly focused on extracting a big figure that runs into billions of dollars, without even bothering to specify the time-frame for achieving these targets. The full texts of the deals for both Japan and the EU are not out, and are unlikely to be out anytime soon. India has comminated its openness to purchasing three big-ticket items from America: defence equipment, natural gas imports and nuclear reactors. Cobbling together a big number might not be a difficult task. Agri and dairy, two contentious issues, are likely off the table for now, which is positive for New Delhi. Also, with the UK deals, India has shown a willingness to be flexible on segments such as opening up public procurement. That gives some headroom for Indian negotiators for the final push. Indications are that a sixth round of talks between the two negotiating teams is expected to take discussions forward mid next month. What could be instructive is the limited takeaway from the Japan deal: how the Japanese negotiators managed to upstage their American counterparts by getting an immensely favourable deal on automobiles, even as they dangled the agri market access concessions and Tokyo's investment pledges as distraction the entire time. While India's trade deal with the US is likely to be less focused on sectors and more focused on the headline number unlike its UK deal, New Delhi is likely to push for market access in labour-intensive sectors, while trying to ensure a significant tariff differential compared to its Asian peers. Now, if the final headline tariff offered to India by Washington DC is between 10 per cent and 15 per cent, the tariff points offered to the UK and Japan, New Delhi should have reasons to be satisfied. The advantage starts to taper off once the tariff goes over 15 per cent and inches up closer to 20 per cent, as was offered by the US to Vietnam. A transshipment clause, of the kind slapped on Vietnam, could be a problem for India, given that a lot of Indian exports have inputs and intermediate goods in sectors such as pharma, engineering goods and electronics coming in from outside, including China. Also, clarity on the final American duty offer on China is a number that negotiators will be looking at, given the implicit assumption in New Delhi that the Trump administration will maintain a tariff differential. For Indian negotiators, other tariffs, over and above the baseline tariffs and the sectoral ones on steel and aluminum, is an added complication. Sectoral tariffs such as the 50 per cent on steel, aluminum and copper are already impacting India's exports to the US, and Trump's threat of steep tariffs on BRICS countries over them buying Russian oil is a looming concern. Will that be neutralised in the agreement is a question. Another question for New Delhi is: in the absence of any kind of interim deal, should it brace for an eventuality where there may not just be 26 per cent reciprocal tariffs, plus a 10 per cent additional BRICS tariff as well? That's perhaps the absolute worst case scenario, till an agreement is achieved. A tariff in the 15-20 per cent range would mean India still compares reasonably well with Indonesia (19 per cent), Vietnam (20-40 per cent) and has an advantage against China (30-34 per cent) and Bangladesh (35 per cent), without the additional BRICS tariff being factored in. Meanwhile, as the uncertainty continues, India's exporters are struggling to navigate the way forward because the buyers are not clear as to what the final tariff is going to be, and are consequently holding back on placing orders. The higher tariffs that the US has imposed on China means a number of Chinese manufacturers are now rerouting shipments to Europe at throwaway prices, which is impacting India's exports to the EU as well. India, like other countries, had frontloaded a lot of shipments ahead of the reciprocal tariff deadline for the ongoing Spring-Summer season, but a big question mark looms over the Fall-Winter season spanning October-March. Once the official level discussions wrap up by mid next month, there is a sense that a final call on the deal could come down to a conversation between the two leaders, Prime Minister Narendra Modi and President Trump. This is especially so since the American President is the trade negotiator-in-chief in this entire tariff rationalisation exercise. A firm commitment from India to purchasing American defence equipment, natural gas and nuclear reactors, alongside some kind of guidance on India cutting its purchases of fossil fuels from Russia could be part of the final offer from New Delhi. Trump needs to be convinced of a deal that he can hard sell as a victory to his base. The best case scenario for India would be to get a deal of some sort now, and then build on that in the future negotiations that could run into 2026. For Trump, another growing consideration could be the fact that higher tariffs are making it nearly certain that American households will pay higher prices for the everyday goods that are made overseas and imported into the US. Inflation is a looming reality. A Yale estimate from July 23 found that the tariffs will result in as much as $2,700 in 'lost annual income' per household, though the taxes collected would potentially help narrow the long-running federal deficit. The tariffs that have kicked in so far are bringing in some money into the US Treasury, with tariff revenue pegged at $27.2 billion in June and $22.8 billion in May, according to the Treasury Department's monthly statements, a sharp increase from earlier years. Anil Sasi is National Business Editor with the Indian Express and writes on business and finance issues. He has worked with The Hindu Business Line and Business Standard and is an alumnus of Delhi University. ... Read More
