logo
Trading Day: Inflation - calm before the storm?

Trading Day: Inflation - calm before the storm?

Yahoo15-05-2025

By Jamie McGeever
ORLANDO, Florida (Reuters) - TRADING DAY
Making sense of the forces driving global markets
By Jamie McGeever, Markets Columnist
Softer bond yields cushion stocks
Cooler inflation pressures in the shape of surprisingly soft U.S. economic data and a slide in oil prices helped bring down Treasury yields and support stocks on Thursday, although the recent surge on Wall Street does appear to be losing steam.
In my column today I look at how the decline in U.S. inflation - a healthy development, in most people's eyes - is coming with an unwelcome side effect - rising real yields. More on that below, but first, a roundup of the main market moves.
I'd love to hear from you, so please reach out to me with comments at jamie.mcgeever@thomsonreuters.com. You can also follow me at @ReutersJamie and @reutersjamie.bsky.social.
Trading Day is also sent by email every weekday morning. Think your friend or colleague should know about us? Forward this newsletter to them. They can also sign up here.
If you have more time to read, here are a few articles I recommend to help you make sense of what happened in markets today.
1. Trump promises to strengthen ties with United ArabEmirates on Gulf tour 2. Fed policymakers on hold to seek clarity from the data,but the data are not cooperating 3. APEC warns of stalling trade due to tariffs as China, USofficials meet 4. UK economy has a growth spurt before tax and tariffchallenges 5. Republicans embrace Trump's populist tax push withmidterms in mind
Today's Key Market Moves
* The Dow is the best performer of Wall Street's three mainindices, rising 0.65%. It's now right around the 200-day movingaverage of 42289 points. * The VIX volatility index closes at 17.81, its lowestclosing level since March 25. * Walmart shares fall as much as 5% after the retailerwarns on the outlook, but end the day only 0.5% lower. * Oil falls 2.5% on expectations for a U.S.-Iran nucleardeal, which could ease sanctions and free up more supply. * The yen is the big gainer in G10 FX, rising around 0.8%against the dollar ahead of Japan's Q1 GDP data on Friday. * South Korea's won rallies after a government official saysthe deputy finance minister met with a senior U.S. Treasuryofficial on May 5 to discuss the dollar/won market. * Gold hits a one-month low of $3,120/oz before reboundingto close at the day's high, up nearly 2% at $3,235/oz.
Inflation - calm before the storm?
A decline in European and U.S. bond yields provided the springboard for equity markets on Thursday. Or at least a cushion.
Thursday's U.S. bond market rally will also have come as relief to policymakers in Washington as yields pulled back sharply across the curve, but not before longer-dated yields hit fresh one-month highs. The 10-year yield hit 4.55% and the 30-year yield reached 5.00% before sliding back.
The recovery in global stock prices since the 'Liberation Day' tariff debacle early last month has been impressive, but understandably, that momentum is fading. For that momentum to be rekindled, a further decline in bond yields may be required.
Although figures this week showed U.S. consumer and producer inflation cooled in April, tariffs have yet to bite and price pressures are tilted to the upside.
Worries about the U.S. public finances are intensifying too. The Trump administration's plans to extend tax cuts, coupled with what many analysts consider to be a lack of commitment to reduce spending, will widen the budget deficit, perhaps to more than 7% of GDP.
Add to that the apparent desire among foreign investors to reduce their exposure to U.S. assets, and Treasuries' safe haven allure has been diminished. Just when the deficit is widening.
All of this means the 'term premium' - the extra compensation investors demand to hold longer maturity Treasuries rather than rolling over short-dated ones - is near the highest in over a decade. The yields on 10- and 30-year bonds are now not too far away from levels that were the norm before the Global Financial Crisis.
Previous spikes in the term premium have cheapened bond prices sufficiently to attract overseas money back into the market, especially the 7-10 year part of the Treasury curve, says Bank of New York's John Velis. But this hasn't happened this time around, suggesting yields may have further to rise.
It's notable that the 30-year yield fell only 5 basis points on Thursday, 3-4 basis points less than any other point on the curve.
Meanwhile, the main focus for investors in Asia on Friday will be Japan's first quarter GDP figures. Economists polled by Reuters expect an annualized contraction of 0.2%, which would be a significant drop from the 2.2% expansion the previous quarter and the first in a year.
These are backward-looking numbers but the immediate outlook is highly uncertain, at best - the tariff turbulence has put the yen back under pressure and has, according to many analysts, put the Bank of Japan's rate-hiking cycle on ice.
US inflation progress stokes real yield problem
Few would find fault with the steady, gradual decline in U.S. inflation, but it has recently come with an unwelcome side effect: rising 'real' borrowing costs.
With the Federal Reserve's official policy rate on hold and the benchmark 10-year Treasury yield edging higher, inflation-adjusted interest rates – so-called real rates – are rising, effectively tightening monetary policy and financial conditions.
The real yield on the 10-year Treasury note is now approaching 2.20%, the highest in a decade, based on the April headline annual CPI inflation rate of 2.3%. And the real fed funds rate has risen from a low of 1.50% in January to eclipse 2.00%, the highest in more than six months.
While real borrowing costs are not at levels that will trigger alarm bells with Fed officials, CEOs or CIOs, the direction of travel is pretty clear, and is one more factor that could weigh on the activity of consumers, businesses, and investors in an environment already shrouded in a thick fog of uncertainty. Additionally, for policymakers, it shines a light on the constant struggle to determine the optimal interest rate at any given time.
In Fed Chair Jerome Powell's press conference earlier this month after the central bank left its fed funds target range on hold at 4.25-4.50%, he said no fewer than eight times that rates are "in a good place". Current policy is "somewhat" and "modestly or moderately" restrictive, he added.
The higher real rates grind, however, the tighter policy gets, unless the Fed resumes its easing cycle, which has been on pause following cuts of 100 basis points between last August and December. The tariff-fueled uncertainty and volatility of recent months has helped to extend that pause and, thus, enabled real rates to rise.
R-STAR, MAN
Real borrowing costs can send vastly different signals from their nominal equivalents. For example, Japan's official policy rate and long-dated bond yields are the highest in years, but the real policy rate is deeply negative and by far the lowest among the G4 central banks.
In the U.S., the signaling behind today's rate moves is far from clear. If real yields are rising because investors are demanding a risk premium to hold dollars and Treasuries, then it's a cause for concern. If the upward shift reflects strong growth expectations, then that's much more positive.
But, regardless, one thing is evident. The higher U.S. real rates grind, the further away they move from 'R-Star', the amorphous real rate of interest that neither stimulates nor crimps economic activity when the economy is at full employment.
Two closely watched R-Star models partly constructed by current New York Fed President John Williams suggest the optimum real interest rate at the end of December was 0.8% or 1.3%, both the lowest in years. These figures will be updated for the January-March quarter at the end of this month. Fed rate-setters' median projection for the natural real interest rate is around 1.0%, and this view will be updated next month.
These projections assume inflation at the Fed's 2% target, which it hasn't been for years. The R-Star concept has come under heavy criticism since the pandemic. Williams defended it in July last year, saying it is a fundamental part of all macroeconomic models and frameworks. "Pretending it doesn't exist or wishing it away does not change that."
But he also cautioned that R-Star should not be "overly" relied upon when setting appropriate monetary policy "at a given point in time" given the uncertainty surrounding it.
So as real rates move further away from this theoretical sweet spot, what, if anything, is the real-world impact?
Right now, financial conditions are loosening as markets calm after the market turmoil wrought by the 'Liberation Day' tariff tantrum last month. But if you exclude that uniquely volatile episode, conditions have been steadily tightening since September last year, Goldman Sachs's U.S. financial conditions index shows.
Further upside for real yields from here may be limited if inflation ticks higher in the coming months as Trump's tariffs kick in. But worries over U.S. debt and deficits are beginning to weigh on the long end of the bond market again.
As investors continue to monitor countless economic variables to determine where the U.S. economy is heading, elevated real yields are one they should watch closely.
What could move markets tomorrow?
* Japan GDP (Q1) * Bank of Japan policymaker Nakamura Toyoaki speaks * ECB board member Philip Lane speaks * University of Michigan consumer confidence, inflationexpectations (May) * Richmond Fed president Thomas Barkin speaks
Opinions expressed are those of the author. They do not reflect the views of Reuters News, which, under the Trust Principles, is committed to integrity, independence, and freedom from bias.
(By Jamie McGeever)

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The spectacular end of Elon Musk and Donald Trump's bromance
The spectacular end of Elon Musk and Donald Trump's bromance

Yahoo

time16 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

The spectacular end of Elon Musk and Donald Trump's bromance

During a press conference in the Oval Office last week, President Trump praised Elon Musk, his adviser and the outgoing head of the president's Department of Government Efficiency, for waging war on the federal workforce. 'Elon has worked tirelessly to lead the most sweeping and consequential government reform program in generations,' Trump said alongside Musk, who wore a black DOGE hat and 'DOGEfather' T-shirt while standing next to the president. For nearly an hour, Trump heaped effusive praise on the billionaire Tesla chief executive, SpaceX founder and owner of X, the social media platform formerly known as Twitter, whose stint as a special government employee had come to an end. 'Elon's really not leaving,' the president added. 'He's gonna be back and forth I think.' What a difference a week makes. Trump and Musk's unlikely bromance unraveled in spectacular fashion on Thursday, with the president telling reporters in the Oval Office that he was 'very disappointed' with Musk's criticism of his 'one big beautiful' spending bill, and Musk railing at Trump in real time on X. "I'm very disappointed in Elon," Trump said before a bilateral meeting with German Chancellor Friedrich Merz. "I've helped Elon a lot." The president suggested that Musk, like many others before him, had become 'hostile' upon leaving his administration. "I'll be honest, I think he misses the place," Trump said. 'People leave my administration, and they love us, and then at some point they miss it so badly, and some of them embrace it, and some of them actually become hostile." "They leave, and they wake up in the morning, and the glamour is gone," the president added. "The whole world is different, and they become hostile. I don't know what it is." Trump also suggested that Musk was upset that the Republican-backed reconciliation bill did not include an electric vehicle mandate, which would have benefited EV manufacturers, including Tesla. 'He knew the inner workings of the bill better than anybody sitting here. He had no problem with it. All of a sudden he had a problem and he only developed the problem when he found out we were going to cut the EV mandate." "False, this bill was never shown to me even once and was passed in the dead of night so fast that almost no one in Congress could even read it!" Musk wrote on X. 'Whatever,' Musk continued. 'Keep the EV/solar incentive cuts in the bill, even though no oil & gas subsidies are touched (very unfair!!), but ditch the MOUNTAIN of DISGUSTING PORK in the bill.' 'In the entire history of civilization, there has never been legislation that [is] both big and beautiful. Everyone knows this!' Musk added. 'Either you get a big and ugly bill or a slim and beautiful bill. Slim and beautiful is the way.' Musk, who was one of Trump's most fervent and visible supporters during the 2024 campaign, wasn't done. "Without me, Trump would have lost the election, Dems would control the House and the Republicans would be 51-49 in the Senate," Musk wrote. "Such ingratitude." Trump wasn't done either. 'Elon was 'wearing thin,'' Trump wrote on Truth Social. 'I asked him to leave, I took away his EV Mandate that forced everyone to buy Electric Cars that nobody else wanted (that he knew for months I was going to do!), and he just went CRAZY!" 'The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts,' Trump added. 'I was always surprised that Biden didn't do it!' Musk tried to get the last word in, suggesting Trump's name is in unreleased FBI files on Jeffrey Epstein, the late financier and convicted sex offender. "Time to drop the really big bomb," Musk wrote. "@realDonaldTrump is in the Epstein files. That is the real reason they have not been made public. Have a nice day, DJT!" "Mark this post for the future," Musk added moments later. "The truth will come out." On Thursday night, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said in a statement that 'this is an unfortunate episode from Elon, who is unhappy with the 'One Big Beautiful Bill' because it does not include the policies he wanted." She added "The president is focused on passing this historic piece of legislation and making our country great again.' The split capped a longtime partnership for the pair, with Musk stumping for Trump on the campaign trail, and the president, after installing Musk as the head of DOGE, boosting Tesla amid criticism of Musk with an unusual event at the White House. ("Trump turns the White House lawn into a Tesla showroom," NBC News proclaimed.) But in the last few months, there had been reports that Trump was privately growing tired of Musk. On May 27, three days before Musk's farewell press conference in the Oval Office, CBS aired a clip that showed him expressing disappointment that Trump's signature spending bill would undermine his DOGE work. Then on Tuesday, Musk went full blast on the spending package. "I'm sorry, but I just can't stand it anymore," he wrote on X. "This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination. Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it." "Call your Senator, Call your Congressman," Musk wrote on Wednesday. "Bankrupting America is NOT ok! KILL the BILL." That brought us to Thursday, when Trump was asked about Musk's attacks during his Oval Office meeting with Merz. "Elon and I had a great relationship," Trump told reporters. "I don't know if we will anymore." In a phone interview with CNN on Friday morning, Trump said he was "not even thinking about" Musk and would not be speaking with him anytime soon. 'I'm not even thinking about Elon. He's got a problem. The poor guy's got a problem,' Trump said, adding: "I won't be speaking to him for a while I guess, but I wish him well.'

Power bills in California have jumped nearly 50% in four years. Democrats think they have solutions
Power bills in California have jumped nearly 50% in four years. Democrats think they have solutions

The Hill

time18 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Power bills in California have jumped nearly 50% in four years. Democrats think they have solutions

SACRAMENTO, Calif. (AP) — California lawmakers this week advanced several efforts aimed at reining in utility profits and slashing electricity bills as part of their agenda to tackle the sky-high costs of living. The proposals would make sweeping changes to how utilities fund expensive infrastructure projects like putting power lines underground to guard against wildfires. They also would add more oversight around wildfire mitigation spending and put new requirements on utility requests to increase rates. Supporters said the goal is to make the big investor-owned utilities start sharing some of the costs to fight wildfires and build new transmission infrastructure. 'This is not a set of modest tweaks that will make minor improvements at the edges of a problem without offending anyone,' said Democratic State Sen. Josh Becker, the bill's author. 'This is a big deal.' One of the bills is part of the state Senate's package to address affordability amid growing concern about the high costs of everything from gas to groceries. Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom signed an executive order last year urging lawmakers to do something to address skyrocketing electricity rates, which rose 47% on average for residential customers between 2019 and 2023, according to the nonpartisan Legislative Analysts Office. But Republicans, who are in the minority in both chambers, say Democrats are not meaningfully addressing high prices. They did not support the energy reform bills, saying it wouldn't lower costs, and they unsuccessfully tried to force a vote on a proposal to limit utilities from raising power rates above the rate of inflation. Utility rate increases in recent years have been approved by state regulators in part to help investor-owned utilities bury power lines aimed at stopping wildfires. Some of the deadliest and most destructive fires in recent years have been sparked by power equipment. Pacific Gas & Electric, whose equipment sparked a 2018 wildfire that killed 85 people in 2024, raised its rates six times to help cover the costs of putting power lines underground and other improvement projects. While one in every five ratepayers can't pay their power bills, utilities like PG&E raked in record-breaking profits last year, according to The Utility Reform Network, a ratepayer advocacy group. The group supports Becker's measure and has sponsored a similar effort in the Assembly. 'There are no limits to how much the utilities can ask for in rate increases. There are no limits to how many times a year they can ask,' said Mark Toney, the group's executive director. 'You can't blame them for asking for the sky.' Under Becker's proposal, utilities would be required to use public financing to fund the first $15 billion spent on capital investment projects. The option would allow utilities to access funding with lower interest rates, and utilities also would be prohibited from collecting a return on that investment for shareholders. That would save customers $8.8 billion over the next 10 years, Becker said. The bill would also set up a state-backed fund to reimburse utilities for wildfire projects, among other things. But the state may not have money to pay for that this year. The bill would also increase oversight of utility budgets and their wildfire spending. Utilities would have to include at least one rate increase proposal that doesn't exceed the rate of inflation in their requests. The proposal also calls for $60 billion worth of credits to apply on bills over the years during the summer months when usage is often at its peak. Senate Democrats overwhelmingly advanced Becker's measure this week. But Republicans, utilities and the California Chamber of Commerce said it would only drive up more costs. The legislation 'moves today's utility costs around without eliminating them,' the chamber said in a letter in opposition. New regulations around rate increase and shareholder returns also could halt utilities' investment in preventing wildfires or enhancing the grid, the letter said. Republican State senators said rising power bills are caused by Democrats' policies and push for more electric vehicles and less reliance on fossil fuels. In the Assembly, meanwhile, Republicans have called for permitting reforms to make it faster and cheaper to build better utility infrastructure. 'The regulation regime that we have in this state is oppressive and definitely drives prices,' said Sen. Roger Niello, a Republican. 'Your package of affordability is rather modest in number, but it is even more modest in its potential impact.' Lawmakers also advanced a slew of other measures aiming to provide relief to ratepayers, including one that would prohibit utilities from using rates to pay for lobbying efforts and one that would allow California to join a regional energy market with other Western states to help increase grid reliability.

What does the Trump-Musk feud mean for Tesla stock? Experts weigh in.

time18 minutes ago

What does the Trump-Musk feud mean for Tesla stock? Experts weigh in.

A feud between President Donald Trump and Tesla CEO Elon Musk hammered shares of the electric carmaker on Thursday, before a lull in the acrimony on Friday prompted a recovery of some losses. Still, as of midday Friday, shares had dropped nearly 10%, wiping out tens of billions of dollars in company value. The falling out between Trump and Musk raises serious concern for Tesla, threatening crucial regulatory approvals and government subsidies, while risking ire from conservative car buyers who may otherwise have eased sales woes suffered as liberals turned elsewhere, some industry analysts told ABC News. The outcome remains unclear, however, leaving open the possibility the two sides may patch up the relationship or Tesla could navigate fraught ties with the White House, they added. The feud 'puts massive pressure on Tesla shares with fears that Trump will turn from friend to foe and create a tough regulatory environment for Musk in the Beltway,' Dan Ives, a managing director of equity research at the investment firm Wedbush and a longtime Tesla bull, said in a memo to clients on Friday. The president and the world's richest person volleyed tit-for-tat barbs on rival social media platforms Thursday in a public clash that Ives described as 'one of the strangest Twilight Zone days we have seen.' Tesla shares sank as much as 18% on Thursday, before closing down 14%. In early trading on Friday, Tesla climbed nearly 6% as tensions appeared to thaw. Overall, the stock is down nearly a third from an all-time high in December, which resulted from a sharp rise after the election of Trump. Tesla remains a top electric carmaker but the company faces growing competition, especially from Chinese firms such as BYD. Tesla's profits fell 71% over the first three months of this year, a company earnings release in April showed. The decline coincided with a sales slump at Tesla and came amid worldwide protests against Musk over his role in Trump's administration. As car sales slowed, Musk touted a future autonomous car service, dubbed robotaxis, as a growth area for the business. The company plans to roll out its robotaxi test program in Austin, Texas, later this month. Trump could threaten those aspirations, however, if he pressures federal regulators to deny necessary approvals for the company's autonomous driving program or renews investigations into the safety of the company's full self-driving software, analysts said. 'If full self-driving were to be invalidated, that would be a huge hit to Tesla stock and to Musk,' Gordon Johnson, CEO and founder of data firm GLJ Research, who is bearish on Tesla, told ABC News. Tesla also generates significant revenue from the sale of carbon emissions credits to other car manufacturers, which helps the firms comply with environmental standards set by a range of government entities. Tesla earned nearly $2.8 billion last year on the collection of such government subsidies while incurring few costs in this area of its business, the firm said in its 2024 annual report. In theory, Trump could seek to erode state-level emissions standards in a manner that alleviates much of the need for rival carmakers to purchase them. If California were to do away with its emissions credit system, it could cost Tesla roughly $2 billion, a JPMorgan report last month found. 'I can't stress enough the risk of these credits going away,' Johnson said. For now, the outcome of the fallout remains unknown and could prove minimal, some analysts told ABC News. They pointed to the likelihood of at least partial reconciliation between Trump and Musk, who as recently as last week exchanged effusive praise in the Oval Office. All-out government attacks on Tesla would incite a prolonged, combative relationship, analysts said, which may not benefit either side. The company still offers longstanding, affordable EV models and an extensive battery-charging network. Observers who focus on the headlines and stock gyrations risk overstating Trump's role in the fortunes of Tesla anyway, Seth Goldstein, an analyst at research firm Morningstar who studies the EV sector, told ABC News. 'While political fallout and potential retribution will move the stock, I don't think this is as big an event as Tesla's other events coming up this year,' Goldstein said, pointing to the robotaxi testing. Ives, of Wedbush, voiced similar optimism about the possibility of moving past the feud. 'We believe cooler heads will prevail today and into the weekend,' Ives said. 'Hopefully.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store