Comission criticise dentist after woman suffers tooth infection for eight months
Photo:
123rf
A woman whose dental implant and bone-graft failed and who suffered an undiagnosed infection for eight months says she still has pain, headaches and brain fog four years on, and ended up losing her job as a result.
In a report released on Monday, the Health and Disability Commission has criticised the dentist for failing to adequately explain the risks of the procedure, and for poor record-keeping and medication management.
The complainant, known as "Ms A", had an implant supported crown placed in her upper left central incisor by a specialist periodontist in 2009.
However, after two years of problems with the implant starting in 2017, she consulted the dentist in July of 2019.
He suggested a treatment plan involving a bone graft to support a new implant and crown, which was approved by her insurance provider.
Ms A told HDC that in discussing risks, the dentist "mentioned only that infection was a possibility, but he said that he had performed the procedure many times and only one other person had had an infection, which had healed well".
She said he made the procedure sound very low risk and "all very fixable", and never mentioned anything about the possibility of it failing.
"I really didn't think I was going to have a problem and I trusted [the dentist]."
However, in the days following the procedure, she began feeling unwell and had "a burning sensation".
Between 4 and 19 December, the dentist saw Ms A four times to assess the healing.
He could see no sign of infection but prescribed antibiotics.
On 16 December, he reported there was slight puffiness at the site of the graft, but no pus or other evidence of infection.
At 6.55am on 19 December, Ms A texted the dentist asking him to call her.
He ended up seeing her after hours and removing the "membrane" (a special wound dressing made from the patient's own blood), at her request.
"He stated that he discussed the possible complications of re-opening the site, but she was very insistent that the membrane be removed. Dr B stated: 'In the end I abided by her wishes'.
"In response to the provisional opinion, Ms A told HDC: 'This is not correct … It was his only suggestion he gave me to remedy the issue.'."
On 20 December, Ms A went to a public hospital Emergency Department with swelling to her upper lip and left cheek, but an X-ray was normal and there was no sign of infection.
She went back to the dentist on 23 December, who reassured her the site was healing well.
He gave her a medical certificate.
The patient told the HDC she asked him to write out an insurance claim but he declined, saying she was "Okay [and there was] no need to do that."
"She said that she told him that she had no more sick leave and had started to use up her annual leave, but he did not seem to care and shrugged everything off, seemingly ignoring her.
"Dr B said that the process was that she should have downloaded and completed the relevant form, which he would then have countersigned."
She phoned the clinic again on Christmas Eve, and reception staff advised her to either go to the hospital or she could see another dentist at the practice on the following Friday.
On Boxing Day, she went to the ED again with pain in her face, and was given painkillers and discharged.
She texted the dentist, asking him to call her urgently.
He called her that afternoon and she said blood tests were normal but clinicians suspected inflammation as the probable cause.
On 27 December Ms A was seen by the dentist, who extended her medical certificate to 3 January 2020 and recorded that her gum looked "ok".
The sutures were removed on 13 January by another dentist, who noted there were no signs of infection.
On 20 January and again on 18 February, she was seen again by the dentist, who assured while the site looked normal and was healing well. Ms A was upset and worried that the infection was back.
On 15 May Ms A's general practitioner (GP) referred her to an oral and maxillofacial surgeon at a public hospital, querying whether Ms A had an infected dental cyst.
Meanwhile, she had several more appointments over 2020 with the dentist , who uncovered the implant and put a temporary crown in place.
"I felt like he wasn't listening, [and I was] at a loss to know what was happening to my body.'"
On 17 August 2020 Ms A was seen by the maxillofacial service at the public hospital. The specialist noted the presence of a soft tissue pocket, peri-implantitis and bone loss, and that there was "large force put on [the] implant due to incorrect crown/implant ratio".
She was referred to oral and maxillofacial surgeon, who removed both the implant and crown on 13 October 2020.
Ms A told HDC that when the infected implant and surrounding bone in her jaw was removed, it left her with gum and bone shrinkage and stained teeth.
She said the bacterial infection had been left undiagnosed for over eight months, and it had taken a toll on her health.
"Today I still have burning, swelling and discomfort around the area where the implant use to be. I suffer from headaches, brain fog and concentration issues. Coupled with very bad fatigue. I also couldn't go back to work and I ended up losing my employment.
"Four years on from then my life has never been the same."
In response to the HDC provisional opinion, the dentist said it was "unfortunate Ms A has had to go through this".
"No one likes to see a patient struggle and their treatment not go to plan."
Two other dentists, two hospital visits and two X-rays had not found any evidence of infection either, he said.
"It seems there was a low grade bone infection… We are all disappointed and sorry for [Ms A] that she got an infection and did not get the desired outcome."
Deputy Health and Disability Commissioner Vanessa Caldwell said from the time of the initial procedure on 4 December 2019, Ms A had "concerns".
She said while the dentist pointed out the infection was only detected in December 2020 - when the hospital specialist conducted a CBCT (cone beam CT scan) - Ms A's GP had been "sufficiently concerned in May 2020 to refer her to a maxillofacial specialist".
"And when Ms A was seen at the public hospital on 17 August the maxillofacial service identified a soft tissue pocket, peri-implantitis and bone loss.
"Further, on 19 December 2019, the dentist had recorded 'infection tissue removed'."
A dental expert who reviewed the clinical record for the HDC found the dentist "demonstrated considerable skill".
"Although the procedure failed, the treatment was within his scope."
Caldwell said however, the dentist failed to provide Ms A with the information she needed to make informed choices about her treatment, and his records were "incomplete in several respects".
Dr B stopped practising dentistry in June 2021 due to a medical condition, but he said after receiving the complaint, he and the dental practice reviewed all clinicians' note-taking, and consent forms were being reviewed and updated.
The HDC has recommended that the dentist apologise to Ms A for the criticisms in the report, and before returning to practice he undertake additional education on record-keeping, informed consent, person-centred care and effective communication with health consumers.
Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero
,
a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
5 hours ago
- RNZ News
Wood smoke, traffic fumes polluting Christchurch's air
Professor Simon Hales (left) says much of Christchurch's air pollution problem, particularly in winter, can be traced back to home heating. Photo: RNZ / Nate McKinnon Recently the air quality in parts of Canterbury has been rated 'unhealthy' using the air quality index (AQI), which measures high levels of particulate matter in the air. But what does poor air quality actually mean for our health? University of Otago environmental epidemiologist Professor Simon Hales told RNZ's Nights the source of the pollution, particularly in winter, is generally home heating. "The reason why it's a problem in winter is because in Christchurch there is a kind of, the city is somewhat bowl-shaped with the Port Hills on one side, and there tends to be sort of a very calm night with the temperature inversion, which is a bit like having a lid on the city. So all the smoke that comes out of people's chimneys is trapped, and that's what leads to the very high level." Hales said Christchurch's air quality had improved since he lived there 30 years ago, but still needed to improve further. "The World Health Organization (WHO) has a guideline level for the daily level of PM2.5 fine particle pollution, and that's 15 micrograms per cubic metre," he said. "About 15 percent of the days over the past five years have been over that guideline level. And in the last three months, about 43 days." That means, in the last three months, Christchurch's air has had over the WHO-recommended daily level of particle matter in its air about 47 percent of the time. "There is also an annual guideline which is five micrograms per cubic meter. And in fact the annual average PM 2.5 in Christchurch has been about nine micrograms per cubic meter, so nearly double the WHO guidelines," Hales said. While polluted air was unlikely to noticeably affect young and fit people, those with chronic diseases, particularly heart and lung related, might notice their symptoms getting worse temporarily. However, the short-term effects were only part of health impact, he said. "Over weeks and months of exposure, it's making people who are currently healthy gradually less healthy. So it's actually inducing disease or worsening disease in people who otherwise would would have been healthy. And this relates particularly to heart disease and lung disease, but there's an increasing number of different diseases that we're realising are related to air pollution exposure." And it's not just woodsmoke leading to the poor air quality. Nitrogen dioxide, which comes mainly from road traffic, is also a big issue, Hales said. "In fact, we recently did a study which suggested that the N-O-2 was actually more of a problem in terms of its overall health impact, causing over 2000 premature deaths per year." The same study, published in 2021, revealed about 1000 deaths relating to particles mainly from home heating. The main solution was to switch to cleaner fuels, Hales said. That should not be a problem for a wealthy country like New Zealand, which had abundant hydropower resources, he said. A similar shift was needed in regards to transport. "We need to change the modes by which we get about mostly. "We still use personal cars, mostly fossil fuel-powered cars, and we need to switch both to clean vehicles, EVs for example, but also we need to switch the mode so that people are not relying so much on personal cars, but also using public transport and active transport, so walking and cycling." New Zealand had mixed results when it came to the WHO's guidelines, Hales said. "If you look in global terms, then New Zealand is doing pretty well. We're not meeting all of the guidelines all of the time, but we are getting close and in many places we do meet the guidelines for most of the time, so that's something that many countries can't say. "On the other hand, I think we need to be doing more. We need to have more incentives for the kind of policies that I was suggesting before." Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
RNZ News
9 hours ago
- RNZ News
Aged Care Association says ward for medically discharged shows need for funding
The 20-bed ward was created in May for people who were effectively medically discharged but did not have anywhere to go for lower level care. Photo: rafaelbenari/123RF The Aged Care Association says the the additional ward at North Shore Hospital demonstrates a need for Te Whatu Ora Health New Zealand (HNZ) to start paying care homes to support people who are not yet ready to return home. The 20-bed ward, known as ward six, was created in May for people who were effectively medically discharged but did not have anywhere to go for lower level care, because of their specific needs. RNZ understands they are not under the direct care of doctors, but being looked after by nurses and allied health staff such as physiotherapists and social workers. HNZ's Waitematā operations director Brad Healey said they had started the dedicated ward to help boost capacity in the busy winter period. But Aged Care Association chief executive Tracey Martin told Checkpoint there had been an underfunding of the residential care sector for some time, and the government needed to work out a way to compensate aged care facilities for taking in people in similar situations to those in ward six. "The shortage is not new. The fact that we've got an ageing population and so more people will need residential care, or somewhere secondary to recover ... rather than taking up an acute bed in a hospital is not new," she said. Care homes had the facilities to support people in their rehabilitation and transition out of hospital, but HNZ needed to review how those beds were paid for, she said. "Our sector has got registered nurses, enrolled nurses, nurse practitioners, we have GPs ... they have healthcare assistance ... Those with hospital level care have got all of the equipment. "They're there and they are capable of actually taking in individuals ... and working with them so that they are ready to go home, and are unlikely to then have to be readmitted to hospital because they have been released too soon." The challenge was that there was not a proper funding model to pay for a person receiving that kind of care, she said. "Because that person is not entering residential care it will require a contract between Health New Zealand and the facility, and the provider, to pay a certain price per day to actually provide the care and the support that person needs." Currently the model provided by HNZ put forward had "no evidence base" and did not match the cost of providing that care, she said. There was a shortage of some 12,000 beds compared to what was needed now and what would be needed in the future, and businesses needed to be compensated by the government for any work they did to pick up the slack, she said. "Te Whatu Ora themselves said that these individuals need a very high level of care. And if they're not prepared to pay a private business for them, then that business is going to make a loss. "Really, it's the government's responsibility to look after its citizens if they need clinical care," Martin said. Despite the wide capabilities of care homes in New Zealand, Martin said she was unsure whether the individuals in ward six could be placed under the care of an aged care facility as she did not know their conditions. HNZ apparently thought there was no aged care home in the country that could look after them for them, she said. "I guess they'll just have to stay in hospital if that's the case. "I think it's unusual," she said. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
RNZ News
11 hours ago
- RNZ News
Hospital ward full of patients with no medical need to be there
A ward of people at Northshore Hospital that have no medical reason to be there, but can't be discharged because they have nowhere to go for further care is the tip of the iceberg, according the Aged Care Association. The 20-bed ward was created in May for patients and RNZ understands the people there were not under the direct care of doctors, but were looked after by nurses and allied health staff such as physiotherapists and social workers. There is effectively nowhere for them to be discharged to further care, like an aged care facility. Chief executive of the Aged Care Association, Tracey Martin. To embed this content on your own webpage, cut and paste the following: See terms of use.
