Do Kwon may plead guilty in US case over US$40 billion Terraform collapse
US District judge Paul Engelmayer in New York scheduled a change of plea hearing for Tuesday (Aug 12). The judge said in an order on Monday that Kwon should be ready to explain how he violated the law if he pleads guilty.
Kwon, 33, pleaded not guilty in January following a two-year extradition battle over whether he would first face prosecution in the US or his native South Korea. A call to Kwon's lawyer was not immediately returned.
Kwon was charged in both countries in connection with the implosion of Singapore-based Terraform's TerraUSD, which shook the crypto world in the spring of 2022. The downturn that followed played a role in the collapse of cryptocurrency exchange FTX.
Kwon had been a fugitive from South Korean charges for months when he and Terraform's former chief financial officer were caught trying to board a Dubai-bound private jet at the airport in Montenegro's capital, Podgorica, with fake passports in March 2023.
Kwon, who owned 92 per cent of Terraform, was held in Montenegro for months as officials in the Balkan nation spent most of two years battling over whether he should be extradited to the US or South Korea.
Meanwhile, Terraform and Kwon were found liable for civil fraud in a 2024 suit by the US Securities and Exchange Commission. A jury in New York, at the end of a two-week trial, determined that Kwon and Terraform misled investors.
Jurors found that Terraform and Kwon falsely claimed that Chai, a popular Korean payment application, was using Terraform's blockchain technology to make transactions. The jurors also found investors were misled about the stability of the UST stablecoin, which Kwon and Terraform claimed was algorithmically pegged to the US dollar.
Terraform and Kwon later agreed to pay the US US$4.47 billion to resolve the case. The deal required Kwon to wind down the business and use any remaining assets to pay off the company's creditors. BLOOMBERG
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Independent Singapore
31 minutes ago
- Independent Singapore
‘So why so many Sinkies complaining about too much work and no rest?' — S'poreans ask after ‘SG got ranked top in Asia for work-life balance'
Depositphotos/photousvp77 Featured News Jobs Lifestyle SINGAPORE: When you think of work-life balance, you probably imagine long weekends, leisurely lunches, and logging off before sunset. But according to 2025 Global Life-Work Balance Index — reported by AsiaOne — Singapore is apparently smashing it in Asia. Out of 60 countries studied, Singapore ranked 25th worldwide with a score of 57.85, putting us ahead of Malaysia, Japan, Taiwan, South Korea, and Indonesia in the region. Globally, New Zealand (86.87), Ireland (81.17), and Belgium (75.91) took the top spots. The study, launched in 2023, looked at factors like statutory annual leave, healthcare access, public safety, and average working hours. says it deliberately calls it life-work balance to 'put life before work.' Singapore ranks no 1 in Asia for work life balance byu/Rosanjinz inSingaporeRaw For Singapore, the good news is: Healthcare: Public insurance and statutory sick pay between 80 and 100% of salary. Public insurance and statutory sick pay between 80 and 100% of salary. Safety: A solid 1.34 on the Global Peace Index (lower is better). The not-so-great news is: Working hours: 42.6 hours a week — more than New Zealand (33), Japan (36.6), and South Korea (37.9). 42.6 hours a week — more than New Zealand (33), Japan (36.6), and South Korea (37.9). Leave days: Just 18 statutory annual leave days, compared to the UAE's 44, Ireland's 32, and South Korea's 30. Just 18 statutory annual leave days, compared to the UAE's 44, Ireland's 32, and South Korea's 30. Happiness: 6.57/10, which isn't exactly champagne-popping territory. And Singaporeans online aren't exactly uncorking the bubbly either. On Redditor deadpanned: 'More hours worked and fewer leaves = greater work-life balance. Wow 🤯' Another declared: 'Non-existential work life balance.' One particularly cynical commenter warned: 'Please don't put such studies out. Employers are now going to think Singaporeans are lazy, so they need to hire more foreigners who are willing to work late for lower pay.' Others questioned the reality check — or lack of it. 'Utter nonsense! Singapore should be the worst,' wrote one, while another said: 'I laughed so hard I choked in the office at 7 pm.' Some tried to rationalise the ranking: 'Among Asia countries, SG could be slightly better… after all, we are comparing against some of the craziest countries like China, Japan, and Korea. But SG FIRST? That's unbelievable!' See also Generals who can't hold a candle to a Corporal Still, the most piercing comment cut straight to the chase: 'So why so many Sinkies complaining about too much work and no rest?' Whether the ranking is a morale booster or just corporate fluff depends on who you ask. But if you're reading this in the office after hours, then maybe you've already answered your own question. In other news, if clocking long hours doesn't drain you, office politics just might. One Singaporean is spilling the tea on toxic workplaces in Singapore and asking the million-dollar question: 'Is Singapore's toxic work culture the same everywhere?' — Singaporean asks, 'Why can't people just focus on doing their jobs instead of office politics?' () => { const trigger = if ('IntersectionObserver' in window && trigger) { const observer = new IntersectionObserver((entries, observer) => { => { if ( { lazyLoader(); // You should define lazyLoader() elsewhere or inline here // Run once } }); }, { rootMargin: '800px', threshold: 0.1 }); } else { // Fallback setTimeout(lazyLoader, 3000); } });
Independent Singapore
32 minutes ago
- Independent Singapore
‘I know I can't overstep but...' — Woman anxious after BF's parents ask for large sum of money while he's still studying
SINGAPORE: A woman has taken to Reddit to share that she's been feeling increasingly anxious about her relationship after her boyfriend's parents unexpectedly asked him for a large sum of money. On Sunday (Aug 10), the woman wrote on the asksg forum that her boyfriend, an international student on a scholarship, had been unable to save much since coming to Singapore. So when he landed an internship this year and began receiving a steady income, she thought 'things were finally looking up.' Unfortunately, that sense of relief was short-lived. Out of the blue, she said his parents, whose business is failing and who have a five-figure debt, contacted him with an urgent request for financial help. 'His parents asked for a large sum (four figures) from what he painstakingly managed to save. They were in urgent need of money. I was upset because I felt like they shouldn't be taking from him while he's still a student,' she wrote. 'I'm naturally anxious, and this has really stressed me out. I reflect and know I haven't been supportive, as I keep adding additional stress on him about my worry. He understands and has now set boundaries with his parents, but I don't know if those boundaries will hold in the future. I don't know what to do,' she added. For context, the woman shared that before the internship, her boyfriend worked multiple ad hoc jobs since the scholarship allowance he receives isn't enough to pay for all his needs and rent. 'He literally survived from paycheck to paycheck,' she said, adding that over the course of their two-year relationship, they consistently split the bill evenly and often opted for simple, budget-friendly dates at hawker centres instead of more expensive venues. Seeking advice, she asked online users: 'For anyone who's been in a similar situation, how do you handle financial issues like this in a relationship? It's not my money, and I know I cannot overstep. But we both want to build a future together. He plans to apply for PR here once he graduates, can't go NS anymore.' 'Once you marry him, you basically marry his whole family of debt.' In the comments, several users tried to reassure her that she had little reason to worry. 'It's natural to be anxious when it comes to financial uncertainties, but from what you've said, it doesn't seem like he's financially dependent on you for his family's issues?' one person wrote. 'He's still pulling his weight in the relationship by paying for his share financially (since it's still 50/50), so if he can maintain that going into a marriage, there should be no issue.' Another advised, 'There's nothing much you can actively do for now but to just wait and see, observe your boyfriend's actions and see if he's strong enough to deny his parents' ridiculous requests. That's how you know the boundaries will not be compromised in the future!' Others, however, were far less sympathetic. Some told her outright to reconsider the relationship, warning that family obligations have a way of creeping back no matter what boundaries are in place. One said, 'Major red flag, bail before it is too late. Once you marry him, you basically marry his whole family of debt. If he cannot cut ties now, he also cannot do it in future, so please stop dreaming. 5-digit debt and still holding on to a failing business? That sounds like no amount of money can bail them out.' In other news, a domestic helper has turned to social media to share her frustration over an elderly employer who, she claims, criticises her 'no matter what she does.' Posting in the Direct Hire Transfer Singapore Maid/Domestic Helper Facebook group, the helper said that her employer 'puts her down' almost every day, with the harshest comments often directed at her cooking. Read more: Maid says elderly employer criticises her 'no matter what she does,' asks for advice on social media
Independent Singapore
32 minutes ago
- Independent Singapore
2 SG-registered cars nabbed for reportedly offering illegal ride-hailing services at JB's Legoland
SINGAPORE: According to an Aug 9 (Saturday) report in the Malaysian daily China Press, the drivers of two vehicles registered in Singapore were apprehended in Johor Bahru after they allegedly offered illegal ride-hailing services at Legoland. This occurred around 12:00 noon that day. Photos of officials rounding up the errant drivers were posted on the Facebook group page 柔新关卡 Both Checkpoint 分享站 shortly after the incident, but the post has since been taken down. The pictures, taken outside Legoland, showed cars from Johor's Road Transport Department. 'You catch me, I catch you, we hurt each other and see who will hurt the most: Singapore dollar or Malaysian ringgit car price,' the post's caption read. One of the multi-purpose vehicles (MPVs) whose drivers allegedly offered illegal transport services, a black Toyota Alphard, was shown to have a license plate from Singapore. China Press quoted a man it identified as Mr Chen as saying two vehicles registered in Singapore were going to bring individuals back from Legoland to Singapore when the Malaysian enforcement officers arrived on the scene, and the drivers were apprehended. The report added that there have been complaints to the authorities from the public regarding the provision of such offers of illegal transport. When China Press went to Legoland the following day, no large group of Singapore-registered vehicles was seen waiting, although there were some vehicles that had private-hire stickers issued by Singapore's Land Transport Authority (LTA). A Legoland hotel staff member said that he saw JPJ officers briefly in the morning. On its part, the LTA has also stepped up efforts to apprehend drivers who provide illegal point-to-point services. In June, in a joint enforcement operation with the Singapore Tourism Board, it announced that eight such drivers had been caught. These drivers had been ferrying passengers to the Buddha Tooth Relic Temple and Museum in Chinatown, as well as to Gardens by the Bay at Marina Gardens Drive. Their foreign-registered vehicles have been impounded. Upon inspection, the drivers were cleared of providing unlicensed tourist guiding activities, the authority added at the time. 'LTA will continue to act against drivers who provide illegal point-to-point services using vehicles without public service vehicle licences. Offenders face a fine of up to $3,000 and/or six months' jail. Their vehicles may also be forfeited,' wrote LTA. The authority also warned the public against using illegal point-to-point services, because as these vehicles do not have proper licensing and insurance, they pose serious risks to the people who ride in them, particularly if an accident takes place. /TISG Read also: Young driver of SG-registered Maserati attacked with helmets after he made illegal U-turn on Second Link, killing motorcyclist
