Anheuser-Busch's ‘Game-Changing' New Energy Drink Has Officially Arrived
Anheuser-Busch has a new energy on the market.
Earlier this year, the iconic beverage company partnered with another Missouri-based brand, 1st Phorm, and Dana White. Now, six months into their agreement, the teams are ready to debut a "game-changing new energy drink," aptly named Phorm Energy.
Phorm Energy was born in part from a "vision to take The Lou's best-kept secret and transform it into a national powerhouse in the energy drink category," according to a May 28 press release, which also explained the drinks feature only natural flavors and caffeine from green tea, which is blended with electrolytes for hydration and ingredients aimed at supporting mental focus.
Related: New Alani Nu Energy Drink Flavor Declared 'the Best' by Fans
Phorm Energy is debuting in four varieties–Blue Blitz, Orange Fury, Screamin' Freedom and Grape Smash–all available in 16-ounce cans.
Its Screamin' Freedom is described as a "full of flavor" release with notes of blueberry, cherry and citrus. Blue Blitz is said to be a combination of blue raspberry and cotton candy, while Orange Fury mixes orange soda with candied orange flavors for "just the right tanginess." Finally, its Grape Smash is "grape candy and grape soda all in one."
Related:PepsiCo Confirms Limited-Edition Releases to Come From 'Powerhouse' New Partnership
"With the launch of Phorm Energy, we're bringing together two American companies based in St. Louis and Dana White – all united by a powerful commitment to brand-building, quality, innovation and meeting the evolving needs of consumers," Anheuser-Busch CEO Brendan Whitworth said in a statement.
"This partnership is strengthened by our complementary capabilities and expertise, but it's also driven by the amazing people and cultures that make our companies special," Whitworth continued, "I couldn't be more excited to take on the energy category with this partnership and product, and alongside our world-class distribution network and team, I can't wait to bring Phorm Energy to consumers across the country."
Phorm Energy is currently available online (must be 18+ to purchase) and will be heading to retailers nationwide in the coming weeks.
Next: Major Supermarket Chain's Drivers Vote 'Overwhelmingly' to Authorize Strike
Copyright 2025 The Arena Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
17 hours ago
- Yahoo
Trump joined TikTok a year ago as a candidate. Now he has a hand in the platform's future
President Donald Trump joined TikTok as a Republican presidential candidate a year ago, quickly gaining millions of followers, even though he tried to ban it in his first presidency. His debut video was taken alongside UFC president Dana White at a fight in Newark, New Jersey. "The President, is now on TikTok," White said. "It's my honor," Trump responded. The app is facing an upcoming deadline for a ban after President Joe Biden signed a law forcing the Chinese parent company ByteDance to spinoff the app. Trump had unsuccessfully tried to ban TikTok through executive action in 2020. But now he's trying to save it by facilitating a buyout deal. "I'd like to see it done," Trump previously said about the divestment, adding that he has a "little sweet spot" in his heart for TikTok, which he claims helped him win votes during the 2024 presidential election. "It'll be protected. It'll be very strongly protected. But if it needs an extension, I would be willing to give it an extension." More: No, Trump did not approve $1,200 for stay-at-home moms, despite viral TikTok videos If ByteDance does not divest TikTok by June 19, it could be banned in the U.S. again. However, Trump has stated that if a sale is not finalized in time, he will extend the deadline. Under federal legislation that put the ban in place, the president can implement a 90-day extension on the deadline to sell. But Trump didn't take this route in January or April, instead, he signed executive orders delaying the ban by 75 days. If Trump wishes to sign another executive order ahead of the June 19 deadline, he can. Ahead of the April 5 deadline, several buyers expressed interest in striking a deal to buy the app. A White House official previously told USA TODAY that a deal to spin off the platform to be operated in the U.S. had been reached, but it was derailed when tariffs were imposed on Chinese imports. China and the U.S. were in an escalating trade war until May 11, when they both walked back the steep tariffs for 90 days while they ironed out a trade deal. But the talks could be stalled as Trump accused China of violating the agreement in a May 30 Truth Social post. The White House did not comment on the latest update about the deal. Who put their hat in to buy TikTok? Amazon, Blackstone, OnlyFans founder among the bidders In January, TikTok went dark for a little more than 12 hours in the U.S. after the app was effectively banned under federal legislation. U.S. internet hosting services made TikTok unavailable to access, and app stores removed the app for download. This federal legislation was signed by Biden in 2024. The legislation gave ByteDance until Jan. 19, 2025 to divest TikTok or face a ban. Some politicians see TikTok as a national security threat, expressing concern that ByteDance may be sharing U.S. user data with the Chinese government. ByteDance has denied these claims, which remain unsubstantiated. During the short-lived January shutdown, Trump promised internet hosting services and app stores that they could restore TikTok and not face legal penalties. Under the federal legislation, companies could be fined $5,000 per user they help access TikTok. For companies like Google and Apple, this could mean a $5,000 fine for each user who downloads or updates TikTok. Internet hosting services like Oracle didn't waste time rebooting the app, but it wasn't until Feb. 13 that TikTok became available again in the Apple App Store and Google Play Store. Trump cited national security concerns when he signed an executive order in 2020 ordering ByteDance to sell or spin off its U.S. assets within 90 days. The executive order was challenged in court and never came to fruition, but Congress has overwhelmingly passed a law under the Biden administration that forced ByteDance to sell its U.S. operations within a year or else face a nationwide ban. Despite Trump's own efforts to ban the app, he has criticized Biden for doing the same, posting on Truth Social, "just so everyone knows, especially the young people, Crooked Joe Biden is responsible for banning TikTok." Trump's most-viewed TikToks are his first few, including a staged face-off with Logan Paul and a tribute to the man who died at Trump's first assassination attempt in Butler, Pennsylvania. Trump has not posted any TikToks since Election Day. Here are some of his other most popular videos on his TikToks: Contributing: Sarah Wire, Zac Anderson, Francesca Chambers, Sudiksha Kochi, Riley Beggin and Jessica Guynn, USA TODAY Kinsey Crowley is the Trump Connect reporter for the USA TODAY Network. Reach her at kcrowley@ Follow her on X and TikTok @kinseycrowley or Bluesky at @ This article originally appeared on Palm Beach Post: TikTok Trump ban? He joined a year ago and now wants to save it
USA Today
20 hours ago
- USA Today
Corporations won't save LGBTQ+ people. Take their money for Pride anyway.
Corporations won't save LGBTQ+ people. Take their money for Pride anyway. | Opinion Every large company, regardless of its position on DEI, operates within systems that perpetuate harm in one way or another. This is not a time to stand on principle. Take the money. Show Caption Hide Caption San Francisco Pride faces shortfall as corporate sponsors pull out Several major companies have opted out of donating to San Francisco Pride this year, such as Anheuser-Busch, Diageo, Nissan, and Comcast. Corporations are not our friends. Despite their diverse casting in advertisements, the rainbow trinkets they proudly sell for $2, press releases on innovative DEI initiatives or how "brave" their hot takes on social issues are – corporations will not save us. They exist to sell us things. They exist to advertise their brand. They exist to maximize their profits. And our job as queer leaders is not to be the morality police of who can or cannot sponsor pride or donate toward LGBTQ+ events and causes; our job is to grab that money and use it to support a community on the brink of being pummeled. This is not a normal year. Federal funding for nonprofits supporting LGBTQ+, immigrant, people of color and other intersecting communities are under attack, as are our tax-exempt statuses. Economists are predicting massive layoffs. Libraries, museums, cultural spaces and health programs (which employ and serve countless LGBTQ+ individuals) are being defunded. Trump administration has waged war on trans people Our federal government has waged an egregious war on our trans family, and the Supreme Court recently heard a case that could dismantle all preventative care coverage, including access to PrEP (pre-exposure prophylaxis medicine that can help prevent the spread of HIV). Here is the hard truth we have to reckon with in 2025: Every dollar counts more than ever if we want to keep LGBTQ+ people informed, healthy and alive. There's a commendable vision within the LGBTQ+ community to return to a time when we relied on mutual aid instead of corporate dollars. But like everything, it has a cost. In 2025, that cost is asking a community of people who are losing access to meds, about to lose their jobs and constantly under political attack to give even more. Your Turn: Do you celebrate pride? Are you worried about Trump's impacts on it? Tell us. The quiet truth is it would financially decimate our community if we were expected to take the already small amount of resources that we have and use them to replace hundreds of millions dollars in lost sponsorships, research and health care. Most people can't afford to donate to every fundraiser providing continuous access to gender-affirming care, send money to replace funding for the local trans services that lost their federal grant, give to all the GoFundMe's for everyone getting laid off this year, donate to support some research project still happening and still manage to support the normal fundraising needs our community has on whatever is left in their pockets between paydays. We become stronger by bringing more resources into the fold, not recycling what we have over and over. Pride events must take every dollar from any corporation The truth is, no corporation is ever clean. There is no ethical consumption under capitalism. Every large company ‒ regardless of its position on diversity, equity and inclusion ‒ operates within systems that perpetuate harm in one way or another. How is DEI the deal breaker for who can sponsor pride, but we'll turn a blind eye to a health insurance conglomerate with questionable tactics, companies that destroy the environment or banks supporting genocide? In any other year, I would be asking you to throw them all out. Today I'm asking you to take all of their money. Opinion: With Trump's ban on trans troops in effect, US tests lawful discrimination This is my ask, if you're running a pride festival or charity event, determine the minimum amount you need to make your event a reality, and build a regranting program to get excess funds to community resources under attack this year. This includes your local HIV clinic or programs providing gender-affirming care. If your nonprofit receives corporate gifts or grants, continue to accept the gifts that keep your doors open. But here's the key: Promise corporations the bare minimum in return for their sponsorships. Brainstorm with your team to reexamine what you offer your partners. Are there promotional aspects that could be tweaked, or partnerships toned down, so you are still offering something of value to the partner but it's more authentic to the organization? A little wiggle room leads to big gains. It's time to fight for our survival, not stand on principle If these companies are willing to give us the bare minimum, in the form of a tax-deductible donation, we can afford to give them the bare minimum in return to keep our community stable. Use them to build our own mutual aid bank. Take that dollar. Because in six months or a year, we probably won't have it. Our nonprofits might be starting to shut down. Services will likely be more strained or cut off completely. This is not a time to stand on principle about which funding sources are 'pure.' It's a time to rally, strategize and fight for survival. Every dollar we take and redirect to our community is a necessary, and perhaps fleeting, lifeline – using the advertising capital of a festival or a one-time event, to protect the health, safety and knowledge of our community. To nonprofit leaders and community organizers reading this: Take the money. All of it. Use it to get more medicine, more stability and more resources into your communities. Raise it now so we have it tomorrow. Ask for more, too. We're not just fighting for the present; we're fighting to preserve a future for LGBTQ+ communities everywhere. And that fight requires every dollar we can muster. Missy Spears is the executive director of Queer Kentucky, the GLAAD-nominated media nonprofit that uses the power of storytelling to impact LGBTQ+ culture and health. In addition to her work with Queer Kentucky, Spears serves as the Board of Directors co-president for the Kentucky Civic Engagement Table, the cofounder of the COVunity Free Fridge Program, and sits on Community Advisory Boards for the Cincinnati Art Museum, media outlet WCPO, and University of Kentucky's Center for Clinical and Translational Science. This column originally appeared in the Louisville Courier Journal.
USA Today
a day ago
- USA Today
Manager fired after wearing religious T-shirts to oppose Pride Month gets settlement
Manager fired after wearing religious T-shirts to oppose Pride Month gets settlement Show Caption Hide Caption San Francisco Pride faces shortfall as corporate sponsors pull out Several major companies have opted out of donating to San Francisco Pride this year, such as Anheuser-Busch, Diageo, Nissan, and Comcast. An Iowa man reached a settlement with Eaton Corp., the company that fired him after he wore Christian-themed T-shirts during Pride Month. The lawsuit claimed the shirts were in response to the company's promotion of Pride Month and expressed the employee's religious beliefs. The company argued the firing was based on legitimate business reasons and not discriminatory. An Iowa man has reached an out-of-court settlement with the former employer he accused of firing him for wearing Christian-themed T-shirts to work in response to the company's endorsement of Pride Month. In June 2024, Cosby 'Corey' Cunningham sued Eaton Corp., a global power management company with an office in Davenport, in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Iowa, alleging violations of his civil rights. Cunningham, a self-described born-again, churchgoing Christian, was hired by Eaton in 2019 as a quality manager with responsibilities for product development related to military and aerospace activity. According to his lawsuit, Eaton initiated a Pride Month ceremony on June 2, 2023, by raising a pride flag in front of its main building and encouraging employees to wear specific colors in support of the effort. Management also sent emails to the staff offering pride-themed T-shirts for workers to purchase, the lawsuit claims. That day, Cunningham alleges, he began wearing T-shirts at work that displayed or referred to Bible verses. According to the lawsuit, he wanted to 'express his sincerely held religious belief in Jesus Christ and the Bible.' Over the next eight weeks, Eaton managers allegedly held a series of meetings with Cunningham to express their concern that his actions were perceived by others as inflammatory and that they might violate company policy. According to the lawsuit, management refused Cunningham's requests for a religious accommodation to wear the T-shirts, threatened him with dismissal, and sent him home on at least two occasions for refusing to stop wearing the shirts. On Aug. 23, 2023, the company fired Cunningham, the lawsuit alleges. Conservative institute provides legal representation In his lawsuit, Cunningham stated that he believes 'homosexual conduct is sinful' and that he had been called upon to share the gospel of Jesus Christ with others. Doing so, he claimed, required him to share with others even those biblical teachings that are offensive to those who don't share such beliefs. In its response to those claims, lawyers for the Eaton Corp. argued Cunningham was not entitled to any damages because any actions taken by the company against him 'were legitimate and non-discriminatory and non-retaliatory,' and were based on legitimate business reasons. Representing Cunningham in his lawsuit was Robert Anderson of Atlantic, Iowa, an attorney for the Pacific Justice Institute, a conservative organization that said it works to promote religious freedom and parental rights. The Southern Poverty Law Center has characterized the Pacific Justice Institute as 'an anti-LGBT hate group' whose founder has 'compared legalized gay marriage to Hitler and the Nazis' ascent in Germany.' Anderson said on May 22 that he's not at liberty to comment on the specifics of the settlement that was reached in April. Attorneys for Eaton Corp. did not respond immediately to requests for comment. Find this story at The Des Moines Register, part of the USA TODAY Network and at Iowa Capital Dispatch, which is part of States Newsroom, a network of news bureaus supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity.
