Providence will be the backdrop to upcoming hearing in federal funding freeze lawsuit
Attorneys offered a glimpse of what's to come in the federal lawsuit challenging the federal funding freeze during a virtual status conference in U.S. District Court in Rhode Island Thursday.
The 21-minute meeting was streamed via the court's YouTube page, an unusual move for a 'pedantic scheduling conference' typically only open to parties to the case, Chief Judge John McConnell Jr. said. However, McConnell said the court received multiple press inquiries asking the meeting to be open to the public.
The high–profile lawsuit was first filed in Providence on Jan. 28 by 23 Democratic attorneys general scrambling to block a federal funding freeze in the wake of a White House budget memo. The memo was later rescinded, but McConnell granted a temporary restraining order on Jan. 31, preventing President Donald Trump and the other federal cabinet heads named in the complaint from freezing funds until further notice.
The AGs still want a more permanent block via a preliminary injunction, which would prevent the federal government from barring states' access to critical federal grants and aid until a final judgment is made. The AGs have until Friday to submit additional, written arguments for the preliminary injunction.
The forthcoming filing will likely include more affidavits from state administrators whose agencies would be hurt by a freeze, Kate Sabatini, civil division chief for the Rhode Island Office of the Attorney General, told McConnell. However, the AGs don't plan on bringing in witnesses to testify in a trial-like proceeding known as an evidentiary hearing.
Daniel Schwei, the U.S. Department of Justice attorney representing Trump and federal cabinet heads, also said the defense does not plan to call for witness testimony.
'We share the desire for an expeditious resolution,' Schwei said.
The proposal for preliminary injunction will be argued in federal court in Providence on Feb. 21, though there will also be an option for remote participation. Ahead of the hearing, McConnell verbally indicated he will grant a 14-day extension to the existing temporary restraining order, ensuring there are no attempts to freeze access to federal funds. A written order was filed in court immediately following the hearing, according to court documents.
However, there appears to be confusion over what's included in his existing restraining order. Schwei, in a Monday, Feb. 3, filing, said he intended to confirm compliance with McConnell's restraining order, but also noted some 'ambiguous terms and provisions' in the judge's language.
Schwei wrote that the federal administration did not interpret the block to apply to Trump's executive orders, nor to actions by any of the federal agencies not named in the case.
Rabia Muqaddam, special counsel for federal initiatives with the Office of the New York State Attorney General, said Thursday that state agencies were still being blocked from accessing federal funds that support programs and payroll under this loophole.
McConnell punted further discussion on the issue to a future hearing, since the concerns did not relate to scheduling or administrative tasks.
'On something as serious as that or as big as that, we need to do it formally,' he said, adding that the existing restraining order was 'clear.'
Ahead of the upcoming hearing on Feb. 21, McConnell also promised to share a list of 'our finest restaurants' with out-of-towners.
On Monday, a federal judge in D.C. issued a temporary restraining order blocking the funding freeze in response to a separate lawsuit filed by nonprofit and business groups.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
a few seconds ago
- The Hill
Costco enters abortion pill discourse
Costco delved into the abortion debate last week when it announced it would not begin selling the abortion pill Mifepristone, citing a lack of demand among its customers. 'Our position at this time not to sell mifepristone, which has not changed, is based on the lack of demand from our members and other patients, who we understand generally have the drug dispensed by their medical providers,' a Costco spokesperson told The Hill. Although the announcement effectively amounted to the company changing nothing about its current business, anti-abortion groups like the conservative religious coalition Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF) took it as a victory and said they would look to turn up the pressure on other major retailers. ADF legal counsel Michael Ross said in a statement, 'We applaud Costco for doing the right thing by its shareholders and resisting activist calls to sell abortion drugs.' Susan B. Anthony Pro-Life America's Emily Erin Davis commended the move as a clear message that the wholesaler 'won't be complicit in the abortion industry's agenda to sell dangerous abortion drugs.' Democratic Sen. Patty Murray (Wash.) characterized Costco's announcement as giving in to far-right pressure. 'I am deeply alarmed by news reports that Costco is refusing to sell safe, effective, and legal medication for no other reason than to appease the politics of anti-abortion fanatics,' Murray said in a statement following the news. 'I refuse to stand by and allow far-right extremists to bully major corporations and dictate what medicine women can or cannot get access to,' added the senator. 'I am demanding that Costco immediately reverse course—follow the science and the facts, not the demands of far-right anti-abortion extremists.'
The Hill
a few seconds ago
- The Hill
Gallego slams Democratic criticism of Mamdani: ‘Shrinking our tent as much as possible'
Sen. Ruben Gallego (D-Ariz.) pushed back against Democratic criticism of New York City mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani in an interview that aired Sunday. 'It seems like the center-left of the party is like, attacking him,' said Dennis Welch, a journalist with the local outlet Arizona's Family. 'Yeah, I don't know why they're — I don't know why they're attacking him. I think it's stupid when maybe we're not in 100 percent agreement, right? But he has some ideas that are clearly, you know, attracting people. It's OK to say, 'I disagree with this, this and this, but I agree with that,'' Gallego responded. 'But the idea that we're again, we're just going to throw out people that are really bringing in new ideas to the fold, exciting people just because they're slightly to the right or to the left of us, I think, is dumb,' he added. 'The problem with Democrats is that we have been shrinking our tent as much as possible to the point where there's not many people left, and that happens on the left side of our party, and also happens on the right side of the party. And we can't do that.' Mamdani, a democratic socialist, won his city's Democratic mayoral primary in June over political heavyweight and former New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo. The former governor has since launched a campaign against Mamdani as an independent. The Democratic mayoral nominee has been facing criticism from members of his own party as he has gained national attention, with New York Rep. Laura Gillen (D) distancing herself from Mamdani shortly after the primary. 'Socialist Zohran Mamdani is too extreme to lead New York City,' Gillen said in a previous statement. 'His entire campaign has been built on unachievable promises and higher taxes, which is the last thing New York needs.'
Washington Post
13 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Justice Department to begin giving Congress files from Jeffrey Epstein investigation, lawmaker says
WASHINGTON — The Justice Department has agreed to provide to Congress documents from the Jeffrey Epstein sex trafficking investigation , a key House lawmaker said Monday in announcing a move that appears to avert, at least temporarily, a potential separation of powers clash. The records are to be turned over starting Friday to the House Oversight Committee, which earlier this month issued a broad subpoena to the Justice Department about a criminal case that has long captivated public attention, recently roiled the top rungs of President Donald Trump's administration and been a consistent magnet for conspiracy theories. 'There are many records in DOJ's custody, and it will take the Department time to produce all the records and ensure the identification of victims and any child sexual abuse material are redacted,' Kentucky Rep. James Comer, the Republican committee chair, said in a statement. 'I appreciate the Trump Administration's commitment to transparency and efforts to provide the American people with information about this matter. A wealthy and well-connected financier, Epstein was found dead in his New York jail cell weeks after his 2019 arrest in what investigators ruled a suicide. Maxwell was convicted in 2021 of helping lure teenage girls to be sexually abused by Epstein and is serving a 20-year prison sentence. The committee's subpoena sought all documents and communications from the case files of Epstein and his former girlfriend Ghislaine Maxwell . It also demanded records about communications between Democratic President Joe Biden's administration and the Justice Department regarding Epstein, as well as documents related to an earlier federal investigation into Epstein in Florida that resulted in a non-prosecution agreement in 2007. It was not clear exactly which or how many documents might be produced or whether the cooperation with Congress reflected a broader change in posture since last month, when the FBI and Justice Department abruptly announced that they would not be releasing any additional records from the Epstein investigation after determining that no 'further disclosure would be appropriate or warranted.' That announcement put the Trump administration on the defensive, with officials since then scrambling both to tamp down angry questions from the president's base and also laboring to appear transparent. Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche interviewed Maxwell at a Florida courthouse over two days last month — though no records from those conversations have been made public — and the Justice Department has also sought to unseal grand jury transcripts in the Epstein and Maxwell cases, though so far those requests have been denied. A Justice Department spokesperson declined to comment Monday. The panel separately issued subpoenas to eight former law enforcement leaders as well as former Democratic President Bill Clinton and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. Bill Clinton was among a number of luminaries acquainted with Epstein , a wealthy financier, before the criminal investigation against him in Florida became public two decades ago. Clinton has never been accused of wrongdoing by any of the women who say Epstein abused them. _____ Associated Press writer Alanna Durkin Richer in Washington contributed to this report.
