Providence will be the backdrop to upcoming hearing in federal funding freeze lawsuit
Providence serves as the setting for a hearing in a high–profile lawsuit filed by 23 Democratic attorneys general seeking to block a federal funding freeze. (Photo by Nicholas Millard/Providence Warwick Convention & Visitors Bureau)
Attorneys offered a glimpse of what's to come in the federal lawsuit challenging the federal funding freeze during a virtual status conference in U.S. District Court in Rhode Island Thursday.
The 21-minute meeting was streamed via the court's YouTube page, an unusual move for a 'pedantic scheduling conference' typically only open to parties to the case, Chief Judge John McConnell Jr. said. However, McConnell said the court received multiple press inquiries asking the meeting to be open to the public.
The high–profile lawsuit was first filed in Providence on Jan. 28 by 23 Democratic attorneys general scrambling to block a federal funding freeze in the wake of a White House budget memo. The memo was later rescinded, but McConnell granted a temporary restraining order on Jan. 31, preventing President Donald Trump and the other federal cabinet heads named in the complaint from freezing funds until further notice.
The AGs still want a more permanent block via a preliminary injunction, which would prevent the federal government from barring states' access to critical federal grants and aid until a final judgment is made. The AGs have until Friday to submit additional, written arguments for the preliminary injunction.
The forthcoming filing will likely include more affidavits from state administrators whose agencies would be hurt by a freeze, Kate Sabatini, civil division chief for the Rhode Island Office of the Attorney General, told McConnell. However, the AGs don't plan on bringing in witnesses to testify in a trial-like proceeding known as an evidentiary hearing.
Daniel Schwei, the U.S. Department of Justice attorney representing Trump and federal cabinet heads, also said the defense does not plan to call for witness testimony.
'We share the desire for an expeditious resolution,' Schwei said.
The proposal for preliminary injunction will be argued in federal court in Providence on Feb. 21, though there will also be an option for remote participation. Ahead of the hearing, McConnell verbally indicated he will grant a 14-day extension to the existing temporary restraining order, ensuring there are no attempts to freeze access to federal funds. A written order was filed in court immediately following the hearing, according to court documents.
However, there appears to be confusion over what's included in his existing restraining order. Schwei, in a Monday, Feb. 3, filing, said he intended to confirm compliance with McConnell's restraining order, but also noted some 'ambiguous terms and provisions' in the judge's language.
Schwei wrote that the federal administration did not interpret the block to apply to Trump's executive orders, nor to actions by any of the federal agencies not named in the case.
Rabia Muqaddam, special counsel for federal initiatives with the Office of the New York State Attorney General, said Thursday that state agencies were still being blocked from accessing federal funds that support programs and payroll under this loophole.
McConnell punted further discussion on the issue to a future hearing, since the concerns did not relate to scheduling or administrative tasks.
'On something as serious as that or as big as that, we need to do it formally,' he said, adding that the existing restraining order was 'clear.'
Ahead of the upcoming hearing on Feb. 21, McConnell also promised to share a list of 'our finest restaurants' with out-of-towners.
On Monday, a federal judge in D.C. issued a temporary restraining order blocking the funding freeze in response to a separate lawsuit filed by nonprofit and business groups.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
21 minutes ago
- USA Today
Trump border czar threatens LA arrests for anyone who may 'cross that line'
Trump border czar threatens LA arrests for anyone who may 'cross that line' When asked whether Newsom or Bass could be subject to arrest if they hinder operations, Tom Homan said, 'I'll say it about anybody. You cross that line, it's a felony.' Show Caption Hide Caption Trump orders troops to LA as agents, protesters clash over immigration President Trump ordered 2,000 National Guard troops to Los Angeles to combat violent protesters opposed to immigration enforcement. WASHINGTON - President Donald Trump's border czar Tom Homan said immigration enforcement will continue in Los Angeles and did not rule out arrests for California officials if they interfere with the administration's efforts. In an interview with NBC News on June 7, Homan said, 'I'm telling you what, we're going to keep enforcing law every day in L.A. Every day in L.A., we're going to enforce immigration law. I don't care if they like it or not.' Trump had deployed 2,000 National Guard troops to quell the protests in Los Angeles, a move that was criticized by California Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass. Both Newsom and Bass have argued it would only escalate tensions in the area. Homan has previously warned that anyone who stands in the way of Immigration and Customs Enforcement operations or harbors an undocumented immigrant would face consequences, such as arrest. When asked whether Newsom or Bass could be subject to arrest if they hinder operations on the ground, Homan said, 'I'll say it about anybody. You cross that line, it's a felony to knowingly harbor and conceal an illegal alien. It's a felony to impede law enforcement doing their job.' He added that he doesn't think Bass has 'crossed the line yet.' But if she does, he said, 'we'll ask DOJ to prosecute.' The Department of Homeland Security said ICE operations have resulted in the arrests of 118 undocumented immigrants last week in Los Angeles, including five alleged gang members and others with criminal records for smuggling, drug trafficking and assault.
New York Post
32 minutes ago
- New York Post
Sanders doesn't want to try to woo ‘right-wing extremist' Musk back to Democratic Party
Sen. Bernie Sanders doesn't think Democrats should even bother trying to woo back onetime party supporter Elon Musk after he went berserk on President Trump last week. Musk has openly admitted to backing Democrats in the past, and some party bigs believe the opportunity is ripe to now win back the tech mogul given his public mega-rift with the GOP prez — but Sanders said Sunday he has major doubts. 'I think Musk has evolved over the years,' Sanders (I-Vt.) told CNN's 'State of the Union.' 'My understanding is, he actually voted for Obama, I think, in 2008. But over the years, he has developed into a right-wing extremist. 3 Sen. Bernie Sanders doesn't see an opportunity for Democrats to win Elon Musk back. Getty Images 'This is a fight between oligarchs. It's a fight among power among the few,' he said of Musk and Trump. 'And it's really an embarrassment to those of us who believe in democracy and the rule of law.' Musk and Trump's feud exploded last week when the billionaire X founder ripped the president's proposed One Big Beautiful Bill Act as 'pork-filled' and a 'disgusting abomination.' 3 Musk exploded on President Trump last week, days after his chummy send-off from the Oval Office. Molly Riley/White House / SWNS He then contended that the president won the White House in large part because of Musk's backing and accused the administration of withholding infamous pedophile Jeffrey Epstein's investigation files to protect the president — online accusations he later deleted. Democrats roundly cheered as the world's richest man battling the most powerful man in the world, watching their two most pronounced political adversaries go at it. Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.), whose district is nestled in Silicon Valley, suggested that Democrats should make overtures to Musk. 'If Biden had a big supporter criticize him, Trump would have hugged him the next day. When we refused to meet with@RobertKennedyJr, Trump embraced him & won. We can be the party of sanctimonious lectures, or the party of FDR that knows how to win & build a progressive majority,' Khanna argued. Liberal comedian Bill Maher similarly suggested Democrats should try to win Musk back over to their camp. 3 Democratic California Rep. Ro Khanna has pushed Democrats to open their arms to Musk. AP Sen. Cory Booker (D-NJ) appeared to agree that Democrats should be open to working with Musk but was adamant that he wouldn't accept campaign contributions from the billionaire. 'This is not about right or left, it's about right or wrong,' Booker told NBC's 'Meet the Press' on Sunday. 'I welcome Elon Musk, not to my campaign. I welcome him right now, not to sit back and just fire off tweets, to get involved right now in a more substantive way.' Trump has publicly warned Musk there would be 'consequences' if he helped boost Democrats in the 2026 midterm elections. But while eager to see Musk and Trump go at it, Democrats appear unsure of the best strategy to take amid the feud. Democratic strategist Brad Bannon, who hosts the progressive podcast 'Deadline DC,' told The Post he doubts Musk will enter the Dem fold again. 'I don't see much potential in that happening,' Bannon said. 'Honestly, I don't think there's much Democrats can find in common with Musk. He's the guy who has some pretty rigid, quasi fascist political beliefs. 'I don't see how they can support him, find accommodation with him, but I think they can take advantage of this big battle.'
Politico
34 minutes ago
- Politico
ABC correspondent suspended after post condemning Trump
ABC News suspended Terry Moran, a longtime correspondent at the network, after a post appeared on his social media account overnight panning President Donald Trump and Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller. 'ABC News stands for objectivity and impartiality in its news coverage and does not condone subjective personal attacks on others. The post does not reflect the views of ABC News and violated our standards — as a result, Terry Moran has been suspended pending further evaluation,' a network spokesperson told POLITICO in a statement Sunday afternoon. The post was deleted, and Moran hasn't posted on X since the message was taken down. 'Trump is a world-class hater,' read the post on Moran's X account. 'But his hatred only a means to an end, and that end his his own glorification. That's his spiritual nourishment.' Trump's allies in the White House have seized on the since-deleted post as further proof of the mainstream media's bias. And they've demanded consequences. 'We have reached out to @ABC to inquire about how they plan to hold Terry accountable,' White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said in a post on X. The president isn't afraid to tussle with newsrooms he sees as unfair. Trump is suing CBS to the tune of $20 billion, accusing the network's '60 Minutes' program of deceptively editing an interview with Trump's 2024 Democratic opponent, Kamala Harris, during last year's campaign. And last December, ABC News and anchor George Stephanopoulos settled with Trump after he sued for libel. Moran joined ABC News in 1997. He interviewed Trump in an April sit-down that marked the first 100 days of the president's second term. Miller has been a top adviser to the president since Trump's first term, and is a major driver in the administration's sweeping immigration agenda. In May, he indicated the White House was weighing the suspension of habeas corpus to streamline its deportation program. The post on Moran's account read that Miller 'is richly endowed with the capacity for hatred' and that 'he eats his hate.' 'The most important fact about Terry's full public meltdown is what it shows about the corporate press in America,' Miller wrote on X. 'For decades, the privileged anchors and reporters narrating and gatekeeping our society have been radicals adopting a journalist's pose. Terry pulled off his mask.'
