
Critical Metals: What if Europe Imposed the Chinese Method on Beijing?
Local content rules, EU-majority joint ventures, and visa limits for engineers... France's Institut Montaigne think tank unveils bold proposals to cut Europe's reliance on China.
What if, for once, the European Union was as combative as China or the United States? By adopting Beijing's or Washington's methods, Europe could reduce its heavy dependence on China for critical metals essential to climate change technologies. The key to this revolution is 'local content,' argues Joseph Dellatte, an expert at the Institut Montaigne think tank. Brussels could 'impose 50% local content on energy transition products sold in Europe,' such as solar panels, wind turbines, electrolyzers, batteries and electric vehicles.
This threshold would enable 'a significant proportion of the critical components of an electric vehicle,' for example, to be manufactured in Europe, according to Dellatte, a specialist in energy, the environment and Asia, in a report that puts forward nine recommendations for reducing Europe's dependence on China in green technologies.
Imposing more than just assembly in European factories
In sectors where it lags significantly behind, such as LFP (lithium iron phosphate) batteries, Europe must require Chinese companies…
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Le Figaro
42 minutes ago
- Le Figaro
To Fight Sexual Violence, Teenagers Advocate for Limits on Social Media Access
The French Commission on Incest and Sexual Violence Against Children (Ciivise) has formed a 'mirror group' of 15 teenagers, aged 14 to 17, to suggest measures to combat sexual violence, based on their own experiences. 'Protect us on social media!' This is no longer just a measure promoted by experts and politicians. Teenagers themselves are calling for the introduction of an age limit — between 13 and 15 — for accessing digital platforms. This is one of the key recommendations made by a group of fifteen young people aged 14 to 17 from Paris, the suburbs, the provinces, and overseas territories, who were brought together by Ciivise to discuss measures to combat sexual violence against minors. With one in ten children falling victim to this type of violence, 'this is the first time that adults have decided to give teenagers a voice on this issue,' says Léonie, 17, from Brittany. 'Until now, we haven't really been involved in public policy, even though we have ideas based on our experiences as teenagers.' Publicité While minors are overwhelmingly on Snapchat, TikTok, and Instagram, digital prevention has been a 'major topic' of discussion for this Ciivise 'mirror' group, which has worked for a year and produced a report with 23 recommendations. 'There were heated debates about the minimum age for accessing social media,' says Sven, 15. 'We hesitated between 13 and 15. We didn't decide. We're letting the public debate run its course.' The public debate is in full swing, with Emmanuel Macron stating in June that France should ban social media for children under 15 within 'a few months" if this is not done at the European level. A law to this effect was passed in 2023 but has so far remained a dead letter. While some young people are less convinced than others about the effectiveness of a ban 'that will probably be circumvented,' they have nevertheless decided in favor of an age limit. 'It's an important signal. There can be no education without prohibition, just as there can be no prohibition without education,' says Sven. 'These are really two measures that work together, even if education can prevent many more dangers.' Margot, for her part, favored the age limit of 15, her own age. 'In middle school, we're pretty immature and we're not necessarily aware of what's right or wrong on social media,' she says. Since the subject is rarely discussed with parents, 'we're thrown in at the deep end without any explanation and we find ourselves facing dangers.' The teenager cited the case of friends whose photos were misused on Instagram, even modified by artificial intelligence. 'Social media is what will define relationships in the future. We need to learn how to use it properly,' says Sven, who is more in favor of a 13-year-old age limit. But still, '7-year-olds posting photos on social media is not acceptable!' he says. Publicité 'TikTok is hot.' Almost everyone has received messages, videos, photos, or solicitations of a sexual nature from strangers, often at a very young age. 'At the age of 9,' estimates Léonie. And on streaming sites, sexual pop-ups are rampant. 'TikTok is hot,' says Gabin, 18, who is concerned that even private videos are fed into the overwhelming algorithm of the Chinese social network, which is currently under scrutiny by a parliamentary committee. On X (formerly Twitter), there are 'videos of murders and rapes without any censorship, it's mind-boggling,' says Alice. The problem is that not being on social media 'excludes you from the group,' says Prune. To protect the youngest users, this 'mirror' group of Ciivise also recommends that private messages should only be possible 'from the age of 13' and only between people who are mutual followers. Platforms that meet certain quality and safety criteria could also be awarded a label allowing them to be open to minors. Mistrust toward the police and the justice system The other major finding of this working group is that young people are the first to be confronted with the testimonies of victims of sexual violence and incest. In the group, everyone has at some point been the confidant of these difficult-to-bear secrets. This role encourages them to want to develop peer support, i.e., mutual aid between people of the same age or facing the same problems. This measure was unanimously agreed upon. 'Young people no longer necessarily trust the police and the justice system. That bond has been broken,' says Margot. 'We tend to turn to other young people, to our friends. But someone who hears these secrets doesn't necessarily know how to react. It's a heavy burden. We feel lost when faced with these revelations that are entrusted to us." Should one talk about it or keep it secret? Should one turn to a teacher or a nurse? To better equip teenagers, the mirror group proposes the introduction of a peer support permit, obtained at school and adapted to each class. This 'training' would aim to ensure that every child knows how to receive and respond to testimonies and how to refer victims. 'We tend to teach young people to speak up, but we don't tell them anything about how to receive what they say,' says Samuel Comblez, deputy director general of the e-Enfance Association, who was one of the supervisors of this working group. Publicité The procedures to be followed in the event of disclosures could also be communicated as part of the new emotional, relational, and sexuality education program (EVARS), the teenagers suggest. All these ideas were presented to Sarah El Haïry, High Commissioner for Children, and Clara Chappaz, Minister Delegate for Digital Affairs. This material could be invaluable in legitimizing new measures.


Le Figaro
42 minutes ago
- Le Figaro
Donald Trump and His Messy Version of Montesquieu's 'Doux Commerce'
Réservé aux abonnés The president of the United States has once again changed the rules of the game when it comes to dealing with Europe. 'We now find ourselves in the situation of a player who realizes with astonishment that his partner's hand is giving him face cards he has never seen before and that the rules of the game are changing with each move.' Nearly a century after these lines were written by French poet and philosopher Paul Valéry in Regards sur le monde actuel ('Reflections on the World Today'), Europe is once again experiencing this feeling of disorientation. With each of his moves, Donald Trump seems to be changing the rules of the trade negotiation game. On July 12 — three days after the fateful July 9 deadline, which had already been extended by 90 days, and on which nothing happened in the end — the U.S. president sent a letter to European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, announcing the increase in customs duties on exports from the Old Continent to 30%, starting Aug. 1. [A new agreement, reached on July 27, includes establishing a 15% tariff on European exports to the U.S. EU steel and aluminium…


Euronews
an hour ago
- Euronews
European dockworkers demand halt to arms shipments to Israel
European dockworkers are calling on EU governments to halt arms shipments and withdraw diplomatic support for Israel. They stress that international treaties state that weapons should not be exported to war zones where human rights are violated. 'Over the past two years, we've seen an increase in the movement of weapons through civilian ports,' says Josè Nivoi, a key figure in the Genoese dockworkers' movement. 'We've filed a number of legal complaints. An excuse they often use is that they frame it as a private transaction rather than a state-to-state arms transfer — as if they were trading bananas.' For years Nivoi has collected evidence about arms cargo loads in the port as a union manager. Dockworkers accuse authorities of deliberately keeping silent about controversial shipments. 'In Italy, Law no. 185 of 1990 in principle prohibits the transit and shipment of weapons to countries at war. We are calling for civilian ports not to be used to move arms.' In 2024, Italy announced that it had suspended shipments of military equipment to Israel, while honouring contracts signed before 7 October 2023. This translates into over €6 million in weapons, ammunition, maintenance and spare parts. Facts and figures on Israel's weapons' imports Israel imports almost 70% of its arsenal from the US, the world's largest arms exporter. Germany is Israel's second supplier. Since 7 October 2023, it has exported 485 million euros worth of weapons. Italy ranks third, supplying less than 1%. The UN Arms Trade Treaty and the European Common Position state that human rights violations and war crimes should prevent such sales. The EU Council Common Position is legally binding but it lacks enforcement. Member states can interpret it differently. Following the Israel-Hamas war in Gaza, Italy, Spain, Belgium and the Netherlands have halted or restricted exports. There's little scrutiny over Hamas' weapons, mostly from Iran, which has not signed the UN arms trade treaty. Why does Israel receive military support from EU countries? The EU recently found that Israel is breaching its human rights obligations in Gaza. So why does Israel still receive military support from European countries? Giorgio Beretta, one of the most authoritative Italian analysts on the arms trade and a long-standing voice of the Italian Peace and Disarmament Network, explains that treaties are voluntary and then each country must commit to them. 'The regulations are sound. The problem lies in their enforcement, because there is always a wide margin of discretion,' says Giorgio Beretta of the Permanent Observatory on Small Arms, OPAL. Beretta says the information provided to national governments, which are responsible for ensuring weapons are not used to commit human rights violations, is often too vague. 'A general category might be indicated, such as 'aircraft' or 'naval vessels', but there's a big difference between aircraft used for ground attacks and aircraft used for rescue. By the time a parliament reviews exports, the weapons have often already been delivered.' In May, the EU announced a review of the EU-Israel Association Agreement after finding Israel in breach of the trade deal's human rights clause, citing violations in Gaza and the West Bank. By July, the EU had postponed any actions, let alone any sanctions, including a possible arms embargo — yet again exposing its deep-rooted divisions over Israel.