UK retailers demand return of tax-free shopping in tourism plan
LONDON - UK retailers are renewing efforts to persuade Chancellor of the Exchequer Rachel Reeves to bring back tax-free shopping for tourists, as the government prepares to set out its plan to boost the so-called visitor economy.
Making purchases exempt from VAT could result in £3.65 billion (S$6.3 billion) of additional spending by visitors from the European Union, the Association of International Retail said in a submission to ministers published on July 22. That is on top of about £1.5 billion of spending by non-EU visitors the lobby group said was diverted from the UK when it scrapped tax-free shopping in 2021.
The report sent to the Department for Culture, Media and Sport is the latest salvo in a long tussle between retailers and the government. Then Chancellor of the Exchequer Rishi Sunak used the UK's exit from the EU as a chance to end a system that let travelers reclaim the 20 per cent VAT sales tax on their purchases.
Since then, Conservative and Labour governments – with the exception of the short-lived administration of former Prime Minister Liz Truss – agreed with Mr Sunak's assessment that the policy cost the Treasury more than it gained. Subsequent analysis by the Office for Budget Responsibility backed that view.
Ms Reeves faces a fiscal shortfall heading into this year's autumn budget, after expensive U-turns on welfare cuts and amid reduced prospects for growth. That makes any change to her stance on tax-free shopping less likely, even as she faces calls to help companies after she raised payroll taxes this year.
But British retailers argue they have lost out to countries like France and Spain that offer tax-free shopping to non-EU visitors, and have repeatedly put forward the argument that the Treasury is not taking into account the wider uplift in spending in considering the impact of the policy on the public coffers.
Hundreds of retailers including Mulberry Group Plc, Fortnum & Mason Plc and John Lewis signed an open letter to Ms Reeves last year calling for the government to reinstate the policy.
Top stories
Swipe. Select. Stay informed.
World Trump 'caught off guard' by Israel's strikes in Syria
Opinion Singapore's vaping crisis lays bare the drug addiction nightmare for parents
Singapore LTA seeks tailored solutions to improve Bukit Panjang LRT's maintenance inspections
World US not rushing trade deals ahead of August deadline, will talk with China, Bessent says
Multimedia 'It's very sad': She comforts loved ones turned away by inmates
Opinion Sumiko at 61: 7 facts about facial skin ageing, and skincare ingredients that actually work
Singapore Subsidies and grants for some 20,000 people miscalculated due to processing issue: MOH
Opinion With Shatec cutting back operations, what's next for Singapore's hospitality sector?
According to the Association of International Retail, the UK would become the only country in Europe offering VAT rebates to 450 million EU consumers. It also cited figures showing visitor spending in the UK was 92 per cent of 2019 levels last year, compared with 106 per cent in Spain and 110 per cent in France. BLOOMBERG
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
AsiaOne
an hour ago
- AsiaOne
Trump administration asks judges to release Epstein, Maxwell grand jury transcripts, World News
NEW YORK — Donald Trump's administration urged two judges on Tuesday (July 29) night to release testimony heard by the grand juries that indicted the late financier Jeffrey Epstein and British socialite Ghislaine Maxwell on sex trafficking charges as the president seeks to calm an uproar over his administration's handling of the matter. The Justice Department first sought court permission on July 18 to make public transcripts of the confidential testimony given by witnesses years ago in the two cases, but Manhattan-based US District Judges Richard Berman and Paul Engelmayer asked the government to flesh out the legal bases for the requests. In a pair of court filings just before midnight, prosecutors said unsealing the materials would be appropriate given the "abundant public interest" in the Epstein case and persistent scrutiny of how it was handled by federal law enforcement. The Epstein case has been at the centre of conspiracy theories for years. Trump has faced pressure in recent months to make public documents from the federal investigations into Epstein and Maxwell. Epstein hanged himself in jail in 2019, an autopsy concluded, while awaiting trial on sex trafficking charges brought by federal prosecutors. He had pleaded not guilty. Maxwell, Epstein's longtime girlfriend, was convicted in 2021 on sex trafficking charges and is serving a 20-year prison sentence in Florida. Maxwell had pleaded not guilty and is now asking the US Supreme Court to overturn her conviction. Trump said this month he had asked Attorney General Pam Bondi to seek the release of grand jury transcripts in the two cases. The president did so after the Justice Department said it concluded that Epstein died by suicide and that there was no incriminating list of his clients. The Justice Department's announcement angered some of Trump's conservative supporters who believe the government is covering up Epstein's ties to the rich and powerful and that the financier was murdered in jail. Grand juries are convened by prosecutors and meet in secret to hear witness testimony and decide whether to indict people suspected of crimes. Records of their proceedings usually remain sealed. There are only limited circumstances under which such transcripts can be disclosed. Even if one or both of the judges allow the transcripts to be made public, it is not clear whether the public would learn anything new or noteworthy. Maxwell's four-week trial in 2021 included public testimony from alleged sex trafficking victims, associates of Epstein and Maxwell, and law enforcement officers. The transcripts also would not represent all the previously unreleased material in the government's possession. Investigators and prosecutors may pursue leads that they cannot substantiate or interview potential witnesses whom they do not ultimately call to testify before a grand jury. US District Judge Robin Rosenberg in Florida on July 23 denied the administration's request to unseal records from grand jury investigations in 2005 and 2007 in that state into Epstein. The judge found that the request did not fall into any of the limited exceptions that may allow for the release of such material. Epstein pleaded guilty in 2008 to a prostitution charge brought under Florida law and was given a 13-month sentence in a deal with prosecutors now widely regarded as too lenient. Deputy US Attorney General Todd Blanche, Trump's former personal lawyer, last week met with Maxwell for two days to see if she had any information about others who had committed crimes. Maxwell's lawyer David Markus and Blanche have not provided detailed accounts of their discussions. [[nid:720547]]
Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
‘Hashing things out': Japan, Vietnam, EU contest terms of US tariff deal behind the scenes
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox The devil lies in the nitty-gritty, and leaders from Asia and Europe have openly contradicted the US on the terms of agreement. – US President Donald Trump has chalked up a spate of headline-grabbing trade deals as the clock ticks down to his Aug 1 'reciprocal' tariffs deadline. But cracks are emerging over their precise terms amid confusion over their timing, implementation, and investment conditions. Critics have reportedly described the agreements as 'flimsy napkin deals'. The devil lies in the nitty-gritty , and leaders from Asia and Europe have openly contradicted the US on the terms of agreement. For Vietnam , The Straits Times understands that the proposed rates that were announced were not even what Hanoi had agreed on . Mr Trump touted a deal with Hanoi on July 2, proposing a 20 per cent 'reciprocal' tariff and a 40 per cent rate for transshipments. Unlike Japan and the EU, Vietnam believes it would be counterproductive to oppose Mr Trump publicly and directly, and both teams of negotiators are now hashing things out quietly. 'The strategy here is to work on the definition of goods that are deemed to be transshipped, not to change the headline number of 40 per cent itself,' a source with knowledge of Vietnam's ongoing trade talks with the Trump administration told ST. 'Ultimately, we hope to be able to persuade the White House that it is a fact that the Chinese are manufacturing products that form the bulk of the goods that we make. It is not fraud, but simply how the supply chains work,' the person added. For Japan, a deal was struck on July 22 for the US to lower the 'reciprocal' tariff rate from 25 per cent to 15 per cent, and car levies from 27.5 per cent to 15 per cent. As part of the deal, Mr Trump said Japan pledged US$550 billion (S$708 billion) in investments as a 'signing bonus', with the US to rake in 90 per cent of the profits. With the European Union, the US agreed on July 27 to halve tariff rates to 15 per cent, with the bloc committing an additional US$600 billion in investments in the US. For both agreements, there is no clear start date on their implementation. Politicians, economists and analysts are struggling to unmuddy the waters of what exactly had been agreed on. In the EU, where French and German leaders are among those to have soured on the deal, Bloomberg cited officials as saying that the announced agreement was but the first step in a long-drawn process for trade negotiators to iron out a legally binding text. For Japan, chief trade negotiator Ryosei Akazawa even said that Tokyo would forgo a formal legally binding document lest this holds up the deal's implementation. But the absence of any signed document and a different understanding with the US over what had been agreed on precisely is turning up the heat on embattled Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba. Mr Ishiba is fighting for his political survival after his ruling coalition was routed in consecutive polls, losing its majority in both the Lower and Upper House of the Diet. On July 28, he again reiterated that he would not resign as a political vacuum would only jeopardise an agreement that 'serves both countries' national interests, while protecting what we should protect'. One day later, he announced a task force to oversee the proper implementation of the deal. Among its members was Economy Minister Yoji Muto, who said at a regular news conference: 'With the deadline in mind, we urge the US to take necessary measures such as by issuing a presidential order to reduce the tariffs, as soon as possible.' There is, however, a fair share of critics, even within the ruling Liberal Democratic Party, over the lack of clarity and how the agreement was struck. Former economic security minister Sanae Takaichi, who is gunning to replace Mr Ishiba in the top job, wrote on X: 'In the absence of any written agreement, we don't know exactly what has been guaranteed.' She went on to highlight the discrepancies in both countries' statements . For example, while Mr Trump boasted that Japan agreed to 'buy billions of dollars worth of military and other equipment', such a commitment was nowhere in a Japanese fact sheet on July 25 of what was agreed on. But the biggest minefield stemmed from the supposed US$550 billion in investments, to be made across nine strategic sectors such as chips, pharmaceuticals, steel and shipbuilding. 'What Japan did is they brought down their tariffs. They gave us US$550 billion upfront, 100 per cent. We get 90 per cent, they get 10 per cent,' Mr Trump had said. US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick described Japan as 'the banker', with a White House fact sheet saying that Japan would invest as 'directed by the United States to rebuild and expand core American industries'. The Japanese document instead said Japan pledged 'up to' US$550 billion – and not the precise figure. The US would be assured 90 per cent of profits and Japan, 10 per cent, 'proportionate to their respective financing contributions and risk burdens'. And rather than Japan taking orders from the US, Mr Akazawa stressed that the government-linked Japan Bank for International Cooperation would strictly review the projects that it would finance. He added that between 1 and 2 per cent would be actual investment, with the remainder funded by loans or loan guarantees. Further, while US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has threatened that Japan's 'reciprocal' tariff rate would boomerang back to 25 per cent if its deal was not followed faithfully, Mr Akazawa denied that any punitive measures were ever discussed. 'The uncertainty is only growing,' Ms Takaichi said. A source privy to the trade talks told ST that Japan was girding for even more turbulence ahead, given that 'there are voices within the US administration that it had been too lenient on Japan'. Geoeconomics expert Saori Katada of the University of Southern California told ST: 'Although the vibes after the Japan-US deal last week seem to be that it was a 'massive' agreement and an absolute success, I fully doubt so.' She observed that the US would have been in a hurry to land a good deal with Japan, a sizeable economy and an Indo-Pacific security ally whose political climate is increasingly volatile. As Mr Trump turned up the heat on Japan over alleged market barriers in cars and rice , the US could score headlines by playing up Japan's compromises. Japan agreed to allow US cars to be imported without the need for additional safety tests, and review subsidies to promote electric vehicles. It also promised to buy more US rice within the tariff-free import quota of 770,000 tonnes. The deal gave Mr Ishiba a policy victory, as he had long described the tariffs as a 'national crisis'. While the 15 per cent rate was still markedly higher than before Mr Trump announced sweeping 'Liberation Day' tariffs, the glass-half-full view of the July 22 deal was how low it was compared with other countries, with Mr Trump unlikely to exempt any country or region from these 'reciprocal' tariffs. 'It sounds like a public relations ploy on both sides, especially in the US,' Dr Katada said, adding: 'I think the global uncertainty will not end with the current series of 'trade deals', especially when Trump sees that others can be pushed around.' Meanwhile, criticism continues to swirl over the purported US$550 billion investment pledge, which main opposition leader Yoshihiko Noda warned would be a 'minefield'. Nomura Research Institute executive economist Takahide Kiuchi, a former Bank of Japan policy board member, said the statements from the US make the deal feel 'as though Japan's sovereignty is being infringed upon'. Dr Stefan Angrick, head of Japan and frontier markets at Moody's Analytics, added: 'The deal is unlikely to be the final chapter in a saga that has bruised Japan's economy.'
Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
Trump administration asks judges to release Epstein, Maxwell grand jury transcripts
FILE PHOTO: Jeffrey Epstein associate Ghislaine Maxwell stands at the podium to address Judge Alison Nathan during her sentencing in a courtroom sketch in New York City, U.S. June 28, 2022. REUTERS/Jane Rosenberg/File Photo NEW YORK - Donald Trump's administration urged two judges on Tuesday night to release testimony heard by the grand juries that indicted the late financier Jeffrey Epstein and British socialite Ghislaine Maxwell on sex trafficking charges as the president seeks to calm an uproar over his administration's handling of the matter. The Justice Department first sought court permission on July 18 to make public transcripts of the confidential testimony given by witnesses years ago in the two cases, but Manhattan-based U.S. District Judges Richard Berman and Paul Engelmayer asked the government to flesh out the legal bases for the requests. In a pair of court filings just before midnight, prosecutors said unsealing the materials would be appropriate given the "abundant public interest" in the Epstein case and persistent scrutiny of how it was handled by federal law enforcement. The Epstein case has been at the center of conspiracy theories for years. Trump has faced pressure in recent months to make public documents from the federal investigations into Epstein and Maxwell. Epstein hanged himself in jail in 2019, an autopsy concluded, while awaiting trial on sex trafficking charges brought by federal prosecutors. He had pleaded not guilty. Maxwell, Epstein's longtime girlfriend, was convicted in 2021 on sex trafficking charges and is serving a 20-year prison sentence in Florida. Maxwell had pleaded not guilty and is now asking the U.S. Supreme Court to overturn her conviction. Trump said this month he had asked Attorney General Pam Bondi to seek the release of grand jury transcripts in the two cases. The president did so after the Justice Department said it concluded that Epstein died by suicide and that there was no incriminating list of his clients. The Justice Department's announcement angered some of Trump's conservative supporters who believe the government is covering up Epstein's ties to the rich and powerful and that the financier was murdered in jail. Grand juries are convened by prosecutors and meet in secret to hear witness testimony and decide whether to indict people suspected of crimes. Records of their proceedings usually remain sealed. There are only limited circumstances under which such transcripts can be disclosed. Even if one or both of the judges allow the transcripts to be made public, it is not clear whether the public would learn anything new or noteworthy. Maxwell's four-week trial in 2021 included public testimony from alleged sex trafficking victims, associates of Epstein and Maxwell, and law enforcement officers. The transcripts also would not represent all the previously unreleased material in the government's possession. Investigators and prosecutors may pursue leads that they cannot substantiate or interview potential witnesses whom they do not ultimately call to testify before a grand jury. U.S. District Judge Robin Rosenberg in Florida on July 23 denied the administration's request to unseal records from grand jury investigations in 2005 and 2007 in that state into Epstein. The judge found that the request did not fall into any of the limited exceptions that may allow for the release of such material. Epstein pleaded guilty in 2008 to a prostitution charge brought under Florida law and was given a 13-month sentence in a deal with prosecutors now widely regarded as too lenient. Deputy U.S. Attorney General Todd Blanche, Trump's former personal lawyer, last week met with Maxwell for two days to see if she had any information about others who had committed crimes. Maxwell's lawyer David Markus and Blanche have not provided detailed accounts of their discussions. REUTERS
