Trump administration pulls US out of Unesco again
The state department said Unesco's "globalist, ideological agenda for international development" was "at odds with our America First foreign policy".It also described the inclusion of the Palestinians in Unesco in 2011, as "highly problematic, contrary to US policy, and contributed to the proliferation of anti-Israel rhetoric within the organization". Those claims "contradict the reality of Unesco's efforts, particularly in the field of Holocaust education and the fight against antisemitism," the organisation's head Audrey Azoulay said."This decision contradicts the fundamental principles of multilateralism, and may affect first and foremost our many partners in the United States of America— communities seeking site inscription on the World Heritage List, Creative City status, and University Chairs," she added.The Unesco head said the agency had been preparing for Washington's move, diversifying its sources of funding. Currently, she said, Unesco was getting about 8% of its budget from the US.In 2017, during his first presidency, Trump pulled the US out of Unesco but the decision was later reversed under Joe Biden's administration.The Paris-based UN agency was set up in November 1945 - shortly after World War Two - to promote peace and security through global co-operation in education, arts, sciences and culture.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
17 minutes ago
- The Independent
US and Russia suggest ‘West Bank-style occupation of Ukraine,' report says
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging. At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story. The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it. Your support makes all the difference.
Daily Mirror
17 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
Keir Starmer says Ukraine ceasefire 'viable' and makes Donald Trump claim
Keir Starmer has said a "viable" chance of reaching a ceasefire in the Ukraine war now exists because of Donald Trump's work. The Prime Minister said Britain stands ready to "increase pressure" on Russia if necessary ahead of high stakes in-person talks between Mr Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska on Friday. Opening a meeting with the Coalition of the Willing, Mr Starmer said: "As I've said personally to President Trump, for three and a bit years this conflict has been going on and we haven't got anywhere near the prospect of actually a viable solution, a viable way, of bringing it to a ceasefire. And now we do have that chance because of the work that the President has put in." It comes after the Kremlin warned of nuclear war after unleashing another night of hell on Ukraine. The PM also thanked the countries in the Coalition of the Willing who have contributed to military plans "which are now ready in a form, which can be used if we do get to that ceasefire". After the talks, Volodymyr Zelensky said Mr Trump supports providing security guarantees for Ukraine if there is a peace agreement. He said: 'There should be security guarantees. President Trump said that he supports this and about America's readiness to take part.' Elsewhere, the wartime leader accused Putin of 'bluffing' ahead of Russia-US talks. The Ukrainian President said the situation at the frontline on the battlefield was discussed during the calls, adding: 'I told the US President and all our European allies that Putin is bluffing. He's trying to push forward along the whole front. And Putin is also bluffing, saying he doesn't care about the sanctions and that they're not working. In reality, the sanctions are very effective and they're hurting the Russian military economy.' Downing Street said European leaders thanked President Trump 'for his efforts in bringing Putin to the table in pursuit of a ceasefire to end to the ongoing bloodshed.' 'The Prime Minister was clear that our support for Ukraine is unwavering - international borders must not be changed by force and Ukraine must have robust and credible security guarantees to defend its territorial integrity as part of any deal,' No10 said. "Europe stands ready to support this and will continue to work alongside President Trump and President Zelenskyy for a just and lasting peace in Ukraine, they added. They looked forward to speaking again following the meeting in Alaska on Friday.' Participants of the call included the leaders of the United States, Ukraine, France, Germany, Italy, Poland, Finland, NATO and the European Union. The calls took place ahead of the US President's face-to-face meeting with Vladimir Putin in Alaska. The Russian tyrant and Mr Trump are expected to discuss the future of the Kremlin's brutal invasion of Ukraine at the high-stakes meeting on Friday. Russia, which began its full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, this week launched a major offensive on Ukraine's eastern front - days before the Kremlin-US peace summit. There are fears that Putin will try to hoodwink Mr Trump into believing Ukraine does not want a peace deal - with concerns that a plan might be negotiated without Kyiv's involvement. President Zelensky, who joined German Chancellor Friedrich Merz in Berlin today for the virtual talks, earlier today said: "This war must be ended. Pressure must be exerted on Russia for the sake of a just peace. Ukraine's and our partners' experience must be used to prevent deception by Russia. "At present, there is no sign that the Russians are preparing to end the war. Our coordinated efforts and joint actions – of Ukraine, the United States, Europe, and all countries that seek peace – can definitely compel Russia to make peace. I thank everyone who is helping." Intelligence assessments yesterday revealed Russian troops had quickly swept north in a two pronged attack, unusually gaining almost seven miles. Their aim is to land-grab the entire industrial heartland of Ukraine's Donetsk region so they can claim this in forthcoming negotiations. We'll be bringing you the latest updates on this Breaking Politics News story. Please check back regularly for updates on this developing story HERE. Get email updates on the day's biggest stories straight to your inbox by signing up for our newsletters. Get all the big headlines, pictures, analysis, opinion and video on the stories that matter to you by following The Mirror every time you see our name.
Spectator
an hour ago
- Spectator
The US is right to warn Britain about its free speech record
Every year the US State Department is required to produce a report on the human rights situation in every country in the world. The report card for the UK came out yesterday. While otherwise fairly anodyne, the US was painfully scathing about our record on free speech. Unsurprisingly, the State Department was unhappy about the Online Safety Act's long-arm provisions affecting US websites, our abortion protest laws and our strict contempt rules (which last year forced the New Yorker to take the drastic step of geoblocking an important and informative article about the Lucy Letby case). It was particularly caustic about the fallout from Southport, where it did not mince its words. It stated, citing widespread arrests and prosecutions for online comments, that 'censorship of ordinary Britons was increasingly routine, often targeted at political speech'. Ouch. Admittedly this appraisal bears strong marks of a Trump administration finger discreetly placed on the scale. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has long seen State Department bureaucracy as too woke and progressive in its approach to human rights abroad: reportedly the order has gone out to backpedal equality and diversity issues and emphasise traditional freedoms instead. Furthermore, the Trump government's own free speech record at home is far from spotless: witness its fairly heavy-handed attempts to browbeat universities, broadcasters and others to toe its line. Nevertheless, this is something we'd be very foolish to ignore. The first point is that, biased or not, the State Department is correct. Britain, or at least the establishment in charge of it, shows worrying signs of seeing free speech as a distraction to be sidelined rather than a value to be pursued. True, the whirlwind state descent on social media following Southport, and the stern warnings from police and others to avoid controversial comment, may not have been secretly ordered from Downing Street in the manner of some Central American dictatorship. But an unprecedented and vicious clampdown it still was, even if it reflected no more than tacit agreement among the great, the good and the courts that something drastic had to be done to stop people speaking out of turn. There were plenty of other things that could have been highlighted in the report, and which would have been an entirely fair cop. Even if the total suppression by injunction of discussion over the Afghan refugee crisis came too late, there were always the 30-plus people a day arrested for social media posts, regular police interventions to silence speakers who might cause offence, and so on. Secondly, it's important that we should take note of how others see us. The slow but steady erosion since about 1990 of our right to speak our mind without state interference has passed many by in the UK who are not free speech enthusiasts. And not entirely surprisingly: gradual political change often presents itself as a fait accompli to a population when it is too late to do much about it. But all this has not escaped foreigners. We should be worried that this country, once seen as a beacon of free speech in an increasingly authoritarian Europe, should now be seen as a serious backslider. Particularly so where this is by the US, a country which retains an instinctive affection for us arising out of shared history and culture. No doubt Uncle Sam would, in its own interests, like to discreetly detach us diplomatically from Europe; nevertheless, we ignore this at our peril. Thirdly, all this should remind us that it is in our interest to keep the free speech issue from hurting our international reputation further. At the moment we are not doing this. We do not endear ourselves to an increasingly online world community when we place large swathes of the internet off-limits to those without VPNs as a result of the Online Safety Act. The government's stern orders earlier this week to websites to preserve online free speech or else will deceive no one and will be seen as the reputation management measure it is. Still less will we win friends when Ofcom, a UK government agency, writes threatening letters on official notepaper to US websites with no connection with the UK at all such as 4Chan, and Kiwifarms. Earlier this year it did just this, demanding promises to comply with UK law and to fill in all sorts of Ofcom paperwork, and menacing them with enormous fines if they did not. (They politely told it to go fish, but by then the damage was done.) Every instinct of this government will be to face down the State Department and carry on referring to keeping the UK internet safe. But it would do well to bear in mind that foreigners can sometimes be right and that taking steps to keep them onside, even at the cost of a little pride, can reap big dividends. This is one such occasion.
