
Rising drug prices are hammering patients, employers, and insurers. Is there any end in sight?
Related
:
Advertisement
Costs could rise further, however, if the Trump administration follows through on the president's
Efforts to contain drug spending have run up against the
'Demand for these drugs is quite dramatic,' said Rena Conti, associate professor at Boston University's Questrom School of Business. 'And I don't anticipate demand is going to fall in the near term.'
Advertisement
While health insurance covers the largest share of drug prices, Americans' out-of-pocket prescription drug spending averages $177 a year, according to Georgetown University's Health Policy Institute in Washington, D.C. It's much higher — about $456 annually — for those over 65, who also pay for a higher share of their drugs out of pocket.
The growing cost burden has caught the attention of state lawmakers, who passed a bill in the waning days of last year's legislative session that would
Related
:
Senator Cindy Friedman, the Senate chair of the Joint Committee on Health Care Financing, described the action as a 'first step.' Her panel is preparing legislation this year that would seek to contain the costs of a broader range of prescription medicines identified by the state Health Policy Commission, potentially including GLP-1s.
'There's a lot more that can be done,' said Friedman, a Democrat from Arlington. 'We can start looking at upper payment limits for the most essential drugs,' setting an effective ceiling on what Massachusetts health plans will pay.
Massachusetts got a wake-up call last month when the state Center for Health Information and Analysis reported that
Advertisement
Overwhelmed by demand for GLP-1 drugs such as Ozempic, Mounjaro, Wegovy, Zepbound, and Saxenda, used to treat diabetes and obesity, the state's two largest
While there is variation, the average monthly retail price of the new class of obesity medications is about $1,200 without insurance. And the price of branded drugs overall has risen dramatically over the past five years.
State officials have long complained the process of setting drug prices is opaque, involving a chain of actors that includes insurers, drug makers, pharmacies, and middlemen called pharmacy benefit managers, operating through transactions largely invisible to regulators.
Related
:
The bill passed in the Massachusetts Legislature last year aims to lift the curtain on drug pricing, creating a dedicated office within the state
'We want to have expert, objective information about where the money's going in this system, where are the opportunities [for savings], and where are the challenges,' said David Seltz, executive director of the Health Policy Commission, which is staffing up the Office of Pharmaceutical Policy and Analysis authorized under the new Massachusetts law.
It remains to be seen whether greater transparency or the selective price caps approved so far will moderate prices more broadly. Prices for prescription medicines in the United States, where most biopharma companies are based, are higher than in any other advanced country.
Advertisement
The federal government has had mixed success in restraining drug costs. Congress abandoned its longstanding hands-off posture toward drug pricing in 2022, when it empowered the agency that runs Medicare, the largest US health insurer, to negotiate prices with drug makers.
So far, negotiations have covered only 10 of the most expensive medicines — drugs such as Farxiga for chronic kidney disease and Eliquis for preventing strokes and blood clots — and the lower negotiated prices aren't set to take effect until next January.
Related
:
Medicare will include some of the most popular weight-loss drugs, including
Trump's executive order aims to expand Medicare drug price negotiations and streamline approval for lower-priced generic drugs and biosimilars. But it would also
Carolyn McGrath's diabetes medication sat on her kitchen table.
Suzanne Kreiter/Globe Staff
Meanwhile, drug makers continue raising their prices. The
Industry officials said the bigger driver of rising prescription drug spending is greater use of medicines such as the GLP-1s by patients whose weight loss could actually save money overall. Such weight loss, they said, results in improved health and less spending for other serious conditions such as strokes or heart attacks.
Advertisement
Stami Turk, director of state public affairs for the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America, a trade group, said reports like that of the Center for Health Information and Analysis in Massachusetts don't tell the whole story when they cite increased drug costs.
She said state officials also need to focus on the value of medicines. 'They need to look at how prescription drugs are being used,' Turk said. 'With the use of GLP-1s, you could save the health system tens of billions of dollars a year' by preventing other diseases.
Related
:
State officials, for their part, said they're looking for new ways to assess the value of drugs and wring savings out of the system. Officials at both Mass Health, the state's Medicaid program, and the Group Insurance Commission, the health plan for state employees, have been actively negotiating rebates from drug makers to keep premiums down.
Despite rebates, selective price caps, and other steps, Seltz at the Health Policy Commission sees 'increased pricing on existing drugs and high launch prices on new drugs' continuing to push up health spending in Massachusetts. He cited data from a state report showing the average price of a branded drug has increased 69 percent since 2019.
'When I look at the last couple of years,' he said, 'I see an upward trajectory.'
Patients are grateful for treatments that weren't available to past generations, helping to prolong their lives. As they live longer, however, the cost of drugs becomes more of a burden.
Advertisement
'It keeps me alive,' McGrath, the community college professor, said of her insulin. 'But the drug companies are profiting from my condition. And there's nothing I can do about it.'
Robert Weisman can be reached at
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Epoch Times
6 minutes ago
- Epoch Times
Cataracts: Leading Cause of Blindness—Here Are Its Early Signs
More than 20 million Americans aged 40 and older are affected by cataracts in one or both eyes. By age 75, nearly half of all Americans will develop the condition. Cataracts are a gradual clouding of the eye's natural lens—like looking through a foggy window that slowly becomes more blurred over time. This cloudiness blocks light from reaching the back of the eye, which is why vision becomes less clear.

Epoch Times
11 minutes ago
- Epoch Times
FDA Advises Americans Against ‘Mousse' Sunscreens, Warns 5 Manufacturers
Americans should 'beware' of sunscreen products in mousse form as they may not be effective, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) said in an Aug. 12 X post, with the agency sending warning letters to five companies marketing sunscreen products. The letters were sent on Aug. 6 to Texas-based Supergoop, Pennsylvania-based Fallien Cosmeceuticals Ltd., Israel-based K & Care Organics, Sweden-based Kalani AB, and Florida-based Vacation Inc.
Yahoo
32 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Elevance Health (NYSE:ELV) Is Reinvesting At Lower Rates Of Return
If we want to find a stock that could multiply over the long term, what are the underlying trends we should look for? Amongst other things, we'll want to see two things; firstly, a growing return on capital employed (ROCE) and secondly, an expansion in the company's amount of capital employed. If you see this, it typically means it's a company with a great business model and plenty of profitable reinvestment opportunities. Having said that, from a first glance at Elevance Health (NYSE:ELV) we aren't jumping out of our chairs at how returns are trending, but let's have a deeper look. Trump has pledged to "unleash" American oil and gas and these 15 US stocks have developments that are poised to benefit. What Is Return On Capital Employed (ROCE)? For those who don't know, ROCE is a measure of a company's yearly pre-tax profit (its return), relative to the capital employed in the business. To calculate this metric for Elevance Health, this is the formula: Return on Capital Employed = Earnings Before Interest and Tax (EBIT) ÷ (Total Assets - Current Liabilities) 0.11 = US$8.7b ÷ (US$122b - US$44b) (Based on the trailing twelve months to June 2025). So, Elevance Health has an ROCE of 11%. By itself that's a normal return on capital and it's in line with the industry's average returns of 11%. See our latest analysis for Elevance Health In the above chart we have measured Elevance Health's prior ROCE against its prior performance, but the future is arguably more important. If you'd like, you can check out the forecasts from the analysts covering Elevance Health for free. What Does the ROCE Trend For Elevance Health Tell Us? In terms of Elevance Health's historical ROCE movements, the trend isn't fantastic. Around five years ago the returns on capital were 14%, but since then they've fallen to 11%. Although, given both revenue and the amount of assets employed in the business have increased, it could suggest the company is investing in growth, and the extra capital has led to a short-term reduction in ROCE. And if the increased capital generates additional returns, the business, and thus shareholders, will benefit in the long run. The Bottom Line While returns have fallen for Elevance Health in recent times, we're encouraged to see that sales are growing and that the business is reinvesting in its operations. These trends are starting to be recognized by investors since the stock has delivered a 16% gain to shareholders who've held over the last five years. Therefore we'd recommend looking further into this stock to confirm if it has the makings of a good investment. Elevance Health could be trading at an attractive price in other respects, so you might find our on our platform quite valuable. For those who like to invest in solid companies, check out this free list of companies with solid balance sheets and high returns on equity. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data