California avocados at risk due to lack of USDA inspectors, report says
'This move, made in response to cartel violence, shifted critical U.S. agricultural oversight to foreign control, undermining decades of bipartisan efforts to protect U.S. agriculture,' the CAC said in a press release.
The report, titled 'The Growing Threat to California Avocados: Why USDA Must Reinstate Inspection Protocols in Mexico,' states that in 1997, CAC officials and their federal counterparts negotiated an agreement with the Mexican government that allowed the importation of fresh Hass avocados into the United States.
The agreement lifted a ban that had been in place since 1914 to prevent a range of pests from entering American orchards.
LADWP says substance causing 'earthy odor' in drinking water is not harmful
According to the report, the choice to remove USDA's physical presence from Mexican avocado orchards in 2024 was made without public announcement, congressional notification or input from American avocado growers. In fact, the CAC claimed that they themselves learned of the decision, which they say is 'a breach of [the 1997] agreement,' through foreign media outlets.
'This system worked for nearly three decades…[and] functioned with exceptional effectiveness, keeping invasive pests like seed weevils and fruit-boring moths out of California [while] maintaining the state's pristine pest-free certification,' the report reads. 'With no need for chemical interventions against these exotic pests, growers benefited from lower production costs, clean environmental compliance and the ability to export to countries with strict phytosanitary barriers.'
'Mexican inspections alone cannot be trusted to meet the phytosanitary standards the U.S. has long required,' the report continues. 'As a result, fruit carrying dangerous pests is now being certified and shipped with reduced oversight, increasing the probability of pest introduction into California's avocado-growing regions.'
Since the pests have never established themselves in California (which CAC says is thanks to nearly three decades of strict pre-export enforcement by the USDA), the state's avocado industry, which is a '$1.5 billion economic engine' that supports more than 3,000 family-owned farms, is 'fundamentally different' from global competitors because of its cleanliness standards.
California itself is one of the last remaining major avocado-producing regions in the world that remains free of the crop's main pests — avocado seed weevils and fruit-feeding moths – which allows local growers to thrive with 'minimal chemical intervention, high export viability and strong consumer confidence,' according to the report.
Unhealthy air quality predicted for parts of SoCal
'If [these pests] gain a foothold in California orchards, the result would be devastating – biologically, economically and environmentally,' the report says.
According to agriculture officials, the pests may have already started making their way into California; since inspectors were withdrawn, more than 150 pest interceptions were reported between Oct. 30, 2024, and Mar. 11, 2025, the CAC report states. USDA data cited in the report indicates that between Jan. 1 and Oct. 17, 2024, there were no pest interceptions in Mexican warehouses.
Overall, the CAC says that the main solution to the problem is to reinstate inspection protocols in Mexico as per the 1997 agreement. Keeping in mind inspector safety, CAC recommends that security personnel be deployed and inspectors stationed in secure convoys, especially in high-risk regions like the Mexican state of Michoacán, where most avocados are grown.
Additionally, CAC wants direct engagement from the Trump administration to ensure that 'criminal cartels [don't] dictate the terms of our food safety' and the ability to suspend Mexican imports if conditions are not met. According to the report, 80% of Mexico's avocado imports come to the U.S.
Hannah Kobayashi breaks silence on disappearance, father's death
Lastly, the CAC wants to spread public awareness of the issue as not just an agricultural problem, but a national security concern.
'The threat facing California's avocado industry is not theoretical, it is happening now. Since the withdrawal of USDA inspectors from Mexico in late 2024, dangerous avocado seed pests have been repeatedly detected in Mexican orchards and packinghouses,' the report concludes. 'These pests, long excluded by strict inspection protocols, now pose a growing risk of crossing into California's pest-free growing regions…Once established, they cannot be eradicated, [and] the consequences would be severe: billions in economic losses, the collapse of generational family farms, and the loss of one of America's most successful, clean, and sustainable agricultural commodities.'
'This crisis was preventable,' the report's conclusion adds. 'It is still reversible.'
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Politico
19 minutes ago
- Politico
NATO secretary-general optimistic about Trump meeting with Putin
'I do believe that, Donald Trump, the president, wants to end this,' Rutte told Karl. 'He wants to end the terrible loss of life. He wants to end the terrible damage being done to the infrastructure in Ukraine. So many people losing their lives. So much damage being done.' Rutte, a former prime minister of the Netherlands, added: 'We have seen President Trump putting incredible pressure on Russia.' Trump has faced criticism for setting up a meeting with Putin without Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, though there have been suggestions that Zelenskyy might still be invited. The president has also been assailed — including by former Trump national security adviser John Bolton later on the same ABC program — for bringing Putin on to American soil and for stating that Ukraine might need to yield some of its territory. 'I think Trump has made some mistakes already,' Bolton said, 'No. 1, in holding this meeting on American soil, legitimizing a pariah leader of a rogue state. Second, he's allowed Putin to get first mover advantage by putting his peace plan on the table first.' Speaking to Karl, Rutte said he saw the Alaskan meeting as a valid starting point, but agreed no deal was possible without Ukraine, or without considering Ukraine's long-term security and independence. 'It will be about territory,' Rutte said of whatever deal ends up ending the war. 'It will be, of course, about security guarantees, but also about the absolute need to acknowledge that Ukraine decides its own future, that Ukraine has to be a sovereign nation, deciding on its own geopolitical future, of course having no limitations to its own military troop levels, and for NATO to have no limitations on our presence on the eastern flank in countries like Latvia, Estonia and Finland.'
Politico
an hour ago
- Politico
Florida's universities face research overhaul courtesy of Trump and DeSantis
Part of an effort to 'reduce pollution and increase community climate resilience,' the grant was meant to help extend water service to 50 multifamily complexes still dealing with the aftermath of Hurricane Milton. These facilities are running on well water and septic systems that may be contaminated due to polluted stormwater ponds, according to the university. The agency advised USF to tweak the grant proposal by scrapping words like 'disadvantaged,' 'climate change' and 'minority,' yet it was still terminated by the EPA for not being part of the agency's new priorities. The school is appealing and searching for private industry partnerships to keep the project going. 'If that's not your priority, then what is your priority?' said Christian Wells, a professor and director of the Center for Brownfields Research & Redevelopment at USF who is leading the project. At Florida A&M University, the Department of Agriculture canceled a $4.9 million grant to help expand the markets for 'climate-smart' industrial hemp throughout Alabama and Louisiana. In canceling these grants, part of a $3 billion Biden-era program, the USDA argued not enough of the funding was reaching farmers. 'Secretary [Brooke] Rollins has made it clear that all USDA programs, including our research programs, will now put American farmers and ranchers first instead of promoting woke DEI initiatives or far-left climate programs,' a USDA spokesperson said in a statement. FAMU has also been fighting to keep other projects, such as a $16.3 million pharmacy grant targeted by NIH. School leaders are optimistic some grants can be salvaged after they were able to protect some student scholarships that were initially on the termination list. 'We've taken it in stride,' G. Dale Wesson, interim dean and associate vice president for research with the FAMU College of Agriculture & Food Sciences, said about the changes in federal priorities. 'We do the best we can to solve problems they're interested in solving.' Across the country, there is a labyrinth of legal battles playing out in opposition of the federal research changes, including a lawsuit brought by 16 Democrat-led states fighting the NSF. Officials and researchers are challenging the grant terminations, as well as other Trump policies like a proposed cap on research overhead costs shelled out by the federal government. In certain cases, like a California lawsuit and the overhead costs challenge, opponents have been successful in blocking the Trump administration and recouping grant dollars, at least for now. A recent ruling, however, allows the NSF to continue withholding research funds as the lawsuit from Democrats in states like New York, Hawaii, California, Colorado and Connecticut plays out. Conversely, Florida, under DeSantis, is majorly supportive of the federal efforts to reshape education, many of which mirror the state's conservative policies. In at least one instance, Florida's own DOGE team recommended a grant to NSF for cancelation at the University of West Florida. This grant went toward scholarships for teachers completing projects on water quality sampling methods and aspirin synthesis, according to school officials, but got singled out due to 'social justice' language UWF contends was not incorporated.
Indianapolis Star
3 hours ago
- Indianapolis Star
Trump's immigration raids normalize cruelty toward fellow humans
Americans are still firmly behind President Donald Trump's immigration crackdown, but it appears that at least some of them are getting cold feet as his brutal tactics come into view. The spectacle of masked agents smashing car windows, detaining folks with no court hearings and deporting some of them to dangerous countries like El Salvador and South Sudan is starting to splinter public support. The reality is jarring, and for a growing number of Americans, it's becoming too much to stomach. I just wish more of them would see it now before more people get swept under Trump's indiscriminate campaign against migrants – legal or not. Let's start with the numbers. A recent Wall Street Journal poll found that 62% of voters still support deporting undocumented immigrants, and just over half approve of Trump's overall handling of immigration. But beneath that top-line support is mounting discomfort. Nearly 6 in 10 Americans opposed deporting people without court hearings or legal review. Independents, a key voting bloc, are especially critical. Most say the administration has gone too far, specifically when it comes to detaining and deporting individuals who've never had a chance to see a judge. The policy of offloading migrants to third-world countries – even countries that they are not from – should strike many more as not just impractical, but also fundamentally un-American. Hicks: Indiana shuns immigrants at its own peril This tells us something important and gives me a bit of hope. Americans want stronger border security, but enough of them aren't ready to abandon due process. They might have begun to reject the spectacle of lawlessness cloaked in the language of 'law and order.' Yet, cheers persist, which is why we must never stop speaking up. The slow public reaction and the applause for harsh enforcement reveal a darker side of the American psyche – a creeping comfort with dehumanization, a willingness to look away from suffering as long as it happens to 'others,' in this case, to migrants whom MAGA wants out of the United States at any cost. Nobody denies that the United States has the right and responsibility to protect its borders and deport those living here illegally. Trump didn't invent mass deportations. Every president before him has done it. Democrat Barack Obama, for instance, deported more than 3 million during his presidency. But Trump has done something different – he's normalized cruelty, weaponized it and stripped away even the pretense of procedural justice. Hicks: Immigration is the only hope for Indiana's dying small towns What's more disturbing is how far federal agents have gone under Trump's orders. Americans have watched as Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents in full tactical gear raid workplaces, pull people from their cars and drag individuals off the streets. Even a sitting U.S. senator, Alex Padilla of California, was tackled to the ground on national television simply for demanding answers. Legal residents and even U.S. citizens are being swept up, too. Due process isn't just being denied – it's being erased. Arizona Democratic U.S. Reps. Greg Stanton and Yassamin Ansari are sounding the alarm about inhumane conditions in immigration detention centers. But even as elected officials, they've been barred from inspecting facilities like the Eloy Detention Center in Florence, Arizona, where horror stories are emerging. One of those cases involves a green cardholder who has lived in the U.S. for two decades and is now battling leukemia while detained, according to Ansari. Opinion: Trump's $600 'rebate checks' from tariffs are just voter bribes Ansari told reporters that the woman has lost 55 pounds, is in severe pain and is not receiving adequate – or any – pain medication. If they can do this to a legal resident with cancer, and keep members of Congress from even entering the facility, what can't they do? And where is the collective outrage? Why isn't the public speaking louder and showing more than slow discomfort in recent polling? Blame that in part on the fragmented media landscape. The country is not just divided politically, but it's divided informationally, too. Many Trump supporters tune in to outlets and influencers that amplify the administration's narrative – painting ICE raids as righteous missions to capture "the worst of the worst.' The reality on the ground tells a different story. When they see that reality, they begin to wonder. Like Trump supporter Joe Rogan, who is finally questioning Trump's immigration crackdown. Briggs: Remember Jim Banks' tariff cheerleading when the economy tanks "It's insane,' the podcaster recently said. "Not cartel members, not gang members, not drug dealers – just construction workers. ... Gardeners.' "Like, really?' Rogan asked. That shifting narrative in the MAGA media landscape – from a one-dimensional tale of criminals to the undeniable truth of working-class migrants being ripped from their families – just might be starting to enter the national consciousness. I bet if more Americans like Rogan pay attention and speak up about what's really happening under Trump, the cheers will stop.
