Banned driver was nearly four times over limit on A41 in Bicester
A man who admitted being nearly four times over the drink drive limit has been banned from driving for two and a half years.Jonathan Turnbull, 21, was found to have 133 micrograms of alcohol in 100ml of breath while driving a white Fiat 500 on the A41 in Bicester, Oxfordshire, on 27 April. The legal limit is 35 micrograms.Turnbull, from Worcester, admitted drink driving at Oxford Magistrates' Court on 22 May.Magistrates fined him £708 and told him if he completes a course by 25 February 2027, his 30-month ban will be reduced by 30 weeks.
You can follow BBC Oxfordshire on Facebook, X (Twitter), or Instagram.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Press and Journal
7 minutes ago
- Press and Journal
Elgin locals share views on disposable vapes ban
On Sunday, July 1, a UK-wide disposable vape ban officially came into force. The new law bans all single-use vapes that cannot be refilled or recharged. We took to Elgin High Street to ask Moray locals their opinion on the legislation. Jackie Cowie from Peterhead shared her mixed thoughts on the change. She said: 'The disposable vapes are always handy for a one-off if somebody is stuck. 'I wouldn't use them but it's just a matter of choice.' Jackie quit smoking seven years ago, going cold-turkey before discovering vaping through a friend and becoming 'hooked'. She said: 'It is worse than smoking. Not everyone can afford £45-50 for a long-term vape. I do feel for them. 'I think its the same as cigarettes, they shouldn't hide them. If people are going to smoke then they'll smoke'. Others, like Julie Swinswood from Forres are supportive of the new vape ban, she said: 'It's a brilliant idea to ban the disposables. 'They're bad for the environment and too easy for children to get and then become hooked on nicotine'. The UK's disposable vape ban aims to protect young people and reduce environmental harm. Zero Waste Scotland estimates that between 21 and 26 million disposable vapes are used in Scotland each year. Following last year's MacMoray festival, volunteer litter pickers who cleaned up Cooper Park told The Press and Journal there were abandoned vapes left 'every couple of steps.' Many Moray locals echoed the health and environmental concerns and praised the government's disposable vape ban. Heather Lethaby from Forres said: 'Under 16s are handing these disposable vapes around. It's a good idea to ban it. I would ban cigarettes as well. 'I don't think there has been enough study on any of the vapes. I've seen how people's lungs have deteriorated from using vapes.' Elgin mum Dominique Bowditch said: 'I feel like the ban will be of benefit. 'You see vapes all over the ground and in the river. The reusable ones will be less rubbish and less pollution.' The Elgin mum also added that her teenage children have noticed the vapes are 'quite common in school' and that the ban 'will probably stop the sale of them to children'. Esther Strang, from Lhanbryde, also agreed with the environmental issues caused by the devices. She said: 'The ban sounds like a good idea, because if it's disposable, its probably going to end up on the floor or not going in the bin. It's adding to waste in the streets'. Health group Ash Scotland has raised concerns about rising e-cigarette use. Statistics show that between 2019 and 2022, regular use tripled in Scottish 16-24 year olds and doubled amongst 25-34 year olds. In just one year, regular and occasional vaping also doubled among 11-17 year olds.
Daily Mail
9 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Reform UK chairman hits out at his own MP's 'dumb' question on banning the burqa amid confusion over party's stance on face coverings
Reform UK's chairman today hit out at his own MP's 'dumb' question in the House of Commons about banning the burqa. Zia Yusuf questioned why Sarah Pochin, Reform's recently-elected MP for Runcorn and Helsby, had challenged the Prime Minister about the issue on Wednesday. During PMQs, Ms Pochin asked Sir Keir Starmer if he would support outlawing the burqa - which is worn by some Muslim women - 'in the interests of public safety'. But Reform officials sowed confusion by later revealing that banning the burqa is not the party's official policy. In a hint at an internal party row, Mr Yusuf posted on X: 'I do think it's dumb for a party to ask the PM if they would do something the party itself wouldn't do.' The Reform chairman said that Ms Pochin's question was 'nothing to do with me' as he was 'busy with other stuff'. 'Had no idea about the question nor that it wasn't policy,' he added. In another post, he wrote: 'Just to be clear, I learnt about the question and the party's position re it not being policy for the first time on my X feed. I'm busy with UK DOGE.' Earlier this week, Mr Yusuf announced the launch of Reform's first Elon Musk-style Department of Government Efficiency (Doge) unit. The party pledged this will look at 'wasteful spending' in local councils, in a mirror of Tesla boss Mr Musk's cost-cutting efforts in America under Donald Trump. Ms Pochin's question during PMQs on Wednesday triggered disquiet in the Commons and cries of 'shame' from other MPs. She asked Sir Keir: 'Given the PM's desire to strengthen strategic alignment with our European neighbours, will he in the interests of public safety follow the lead of France, Denmark, Belgium and others and ban the burqa?' The PM did not answer Ms Pochin's question but instead took the opportunity to attack Reform's economic plans - as set out by party leader Nigel Farage last week. After PMQs, Lee Anderson, one of Ms Pochin's fellow Reform MPs, also gave his public backing to a burqa ban. Yet, despite two out of the five Reform MPs supporting a ban, a party spokesman said it was 'not party policy' - although they added it was an issue that 'needs a national debate'. Mr Farage sowed further confusion over Reform's stance by using his GB News show to question the use of all face coverings in public places, saying the 'debate actually goes beyond the burqa'. 'There are many, many, many countries in the world that are banning the burqa,' Mr Farage said. 'But I think it goes further than that. 'I was in Aberdeen Monday, there was a mob there to meet me, an organisation called 'Antifa', and half of them had complete face coverings on so they would be unidentifiable. 'I don't think face coverings in public places make sense, and I think we do deserve debate about that, which I see the burqa as being a part. 'It's a tough one. It is a very difficult debate, but it's a debate. The Quran does not say anything about wearing a burqa 'It does say they want women to dress modestly. And actually, if you go to Morocco or Egypt or the UAE - Muslim countries - you won't see a single woman in a burqa. It's a relatively new thing. 'There is another social point: People do feel uncomfortable, actually, around people whose faces are covered. And I think it's a very difficult thing. 'Certainly, I think masked protesters who can turn up and demonstrate and, in some cases use violence, should not be able to get away with it.' At the 2010 general election, Mr Farage stood for UKIP - his former party - on a manifesto that called for a ban on both the burqa and niqab. But he later disowned UKIP's 2010 manifesto as 'drivel' when he returned as the party's leader after the contest. In his reply to Ms Pochin in the Commons on Wednesday, Sir Keir told the recently-elected MP: 'Can I welcome her to her place, but I'm not going to follow her down that line. 'But now she is here and safely in her place, perhaps she could tell her new party leader [Mr Farage] that his latest plan to bet £80billion of unfunded tax cuts, with no idea how he's going to pay for it, is Liz Truss all over again. 'Although considering I think (Ms Pochin) was a Conservative member when Liz Truss was leader, she probably won't.' Sir Keir's response drew criticism from Tory former foreign secretary James Cleverly, who posted on social media afterwards: 'After failing to answer any of Kemi's (Badenoch) questions, he basically said to Sarah Pochin that he didn't like her question, so 'wasn't going to engage with it'. 'Refusing to answer MPs' questions isn't an option as a government minister.' Mr Anderson later shared a social media video of Ms Pochin speaking at PMQs, adding: 'Ban the burqa? Yes we should. No one should be allowed to hide their identity in public.' Tory MP Chris Philp, the shadow home secretary, said he did not support a ban on burqas in Britain. 'Fundamentally I do believe in freedom and I believe that people should have the choice to to wear whatever they want,' he told GB News. 'I wouldn't like to tell you what to wear. But I do also think it's important to make sure that women are not in any way coerced into doing something that they don't want to do. 'So I think it is very important to make sure that women are not being coerced and are able to make their own free choices.' Then-French president Nicolas Sarkozy introduced a ban on burqas in France in 2010. Anyone found wearing the covering in a public space can face a fine of 150 euros (£125). It has since been unsuccessfully challenged in the European courts. Belgium brought in a similar ban a year later, and other countries including Denmark and Austria have got similar laws. Switzerland was the latest European country to introduce a prohibition, which started on January 1 this year.
Daily Mail
9 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Tommy Robinson pleads not guilty to harassment causing fear of violence against two Mail journalists and opts for a jury trial
Tommy Robinson today appeared in court charged with harassment causing fear of violence against two Mail journalists. The activist, whose real name is Stephen Yaxley-Lennon, entered pleas of not guilty and elected to have his trial heard by a jury at a crown court. He was bailed to appear at London 's Southwark Crown Court on July 3 for a preliminary hearing. Robinson entered the dock of Westminster Magistrates' Court shortly after 10am for the 17-minute hearing. Wearing blue jeans, a beige Stone Island jacket and a cross-body bag, he gave his name as Stephen Lennon, saying it is not Yaxley-Lennon. He is charged with two offences between August 5 and 7 last year. After a clerk read out the charges, Robinson, 42, replied 'not guilty' to both of them. Outlining the case, Ben Holt, for the Crown Prosecution Service, told the court: 'It is alleged this defendant has harassed two journalists and their family members through the use of a Twitter or X account.' Mr Holt said the charges related to alleged multiple posts by Robinson about the journalists on X and calls, over three days, following a news report in the Mail making various allegations about Robinson on August 4 last year. Mr Holt said: 'Those articles prompted social media posts and calls which are the subject of the two charges in this case. 'None of the posts contained direct threats of violence. The prosecution's case is premised on the conduct of this defendant and others that has caused them to fear violence and the defendant knew or ought to have known that was the case.' Senior District Judge Paul Goldspring said: 'Mr Lennon, as you know, I have decided that, if you wanted, you could have your trial at this court, but you have exercised your right to have your trial before a jury, so you will do. 'Your trial has been sent to the crown court at Southwark where you will appear for a plea and trial preparation hearing on 3 July. 'I am going to grant you conditional bail.' The bail conditions are that he must not contact any prosecution witness directly or indirectly and must not post anything online which would identify them. He must also 'not publish any comment relating to current proceedings that may prejudice either parties to proceedings or proceedings themselves other than those permitted by the Crime and Disorder Act'. Robinson was represented by barrister Alex Di Francesco at the brief hearing. He arrived and left court surrounded by security guards in high-vis jackets as supporters and photographers crowded around him.
