logo
Critical minerals: India should bide its time and build strategic capacity

Critical minerals: India should bide its time and build strategic capacity

First Post23-07-2025
India currently produces only 1 per cent of global output in critical rare earth minerals even though it has 6 per cent of the reserves—but concrete steps are now underway to boost production and diversify supply sources read more
A worry about what to do with EV lithium batteries once their life is over, in about eight years, based on current technology, is being addressed. Instead of heaping them up without use, the batteries can be recycled to extract critical rare earth minerals. This process is faster and is at least 25 per cent cheaper than setting up greenfield mines and refining facilities, and it deals with some part of the waste material at the same time.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
India could even import expired EV batteries to recycle their rare earth minerals and magnets. It already runs some of the largest ship scrappage facilities in the world and attracts many large ships at the end of their useful life from all over the world.
China's trade war with America is based on the restricted sale and export of critical minerals/metals/magnets. But it also restricts such sales in general so that the requirements cannot be sourced from third countries not on the embargoed list. This has prompted most of the world to seek alternatives.
India and its fast-developing aatmanirbharta manufacturing programme has been hit hard as stockpiles of the rare earth magnets run out.
Besides recycling, several countries, including major consumers in the US and Europe, plan to increase the mining of their own resources and set up refining plants for end products.
So far, most countries that have been hit with Chinese embargoes were content to source them from China for its cost advantages and the fact that mining and refining rare earth minerals is a highly polluting business. Despite being a near monopoly on the part of China, the price of rare earth minerals, metals, and magnets has been falling, according to Australia. This may be another engineered tactic on the part of the Chinese to keep competition out.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
However, even as countries resolve to reduce this dependence on China, alternative facilities cannot sprout overnight. The sudden shortage is crippling the Electrical Vehicle (EV) production market. In addition, the renewable energy resources area, in which India has been making rapid strides, is also hampered. Likewise, the crucial defence manufacturing ventures that use sophisticated electronics as well. For the moment the leverage advantage is definitely with China.
India is not only planning to mine its own reserves of rare earth minerals but has also been active in setting up trade agreements with other countries in Africa and South America that have these resources. America has large reserves in-country as well and could well become a newly developed source.
So while China, because of its dominance and economies of scale in the field, can hamper and disrupt various activities for now, it is probably not for too protracted a period. Other supply chains are under development, with cooperation between nations without involving China. Explorations are ongoing in new countries like Oman, Vietnam, Sri Lanka, and Bangladesh. Thereafter, as this effort is up and running over the next few years, China may find itself in trouble trying to export these very monopolistic resources that it has spent so much time and money developing.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Meanwhile, India is already taking some concrete steps. It proposes to incentivise domestic production of rare earth minerals and magnets by Indian companies with an amount of Rs 1,345 crores. The key target sectors are electric vehicles, electronics, and defence. One item, for example, neodymium magnets, is crucial in EVs, wind energy systems, mobile phones, and defence equipment.
The early Indian initiative is designed to support the production of 1,500 tonnes of rare earth magnets. India currently produces only 1 per cent of global output in critical rare earth minerals even though it has 6 per cent of the global reserves. India is also exploring a partnership with Australia, which has at least 5 per cent and is selling it to Japan, which has managed to reduce its dependence on China to 60 per cent. However, Australia is highly dependent on China for its trade and investments and cannot go against Chinese wishes.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Therefore, India is also looking elsewhere for supplies. Presently, China controls 69 per cent of the rare earth minerals, metals, and magnets production and market. America contributes 12 per cent, Myanmar holds 11 per cent. Myanmar is under strong influence of China, which takes the joint tally to about 80 per cent. The manufacturing process combines light rare earth elements such as neodymium and praseodymium with traces of heavy rare earths such as dysprosium and terbium. Procuring all these elements is not easy. India currently produces the light rare earth items, some 2,900 tonnes worth, and none of the heavy earth minerals. Most of the product is found in coastal beach sands with low mineral content. Samarium-cobalt magnets are being developed in a pilot plant for the defence industry. Explorations are going on in different coastal and sand-rich interior states like Rajasthan.
It's lithium that has been discovered in Jammu and Kashmir, but that is another part of the EV jigsaw.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Efforts are also ongoing to develop sodium-ion batteries in countries like Japan and ever more efficient internal combustion engines with almost nil pollution in various developed economies. This will prolong and preserve their automotive fuel-based industries. Then, there is propulsion using hydrogen. India has made both buses and trains at the trial stage that can run on hydrogen and have nil pollutants. It also has hydrogen-producing factories. Other technological applications such as nuclear energy are also being explored to take a leaf out of nuclear-powered submarines, aircraft carriers, and some specialised ships.
For the moment, however, there is very little option but to persuade China to sell us rare earth minerals and magnets to keep various industries going. This will take negotiation and give and take. America, for example, which had put restrictions on high-end electronic chips from being sold to China, has been forced to lift them in exchange for the rare earth products.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
The writer is a Delhi-based political commentator. Views expressed in the above piece are personal and solely those of the author. They do not necessarily reflect Firstpost's views.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

China to ban Nvidia over H20 chips safety risks? Here are latest updates
China to ban Nvidia over H20 chips safety risks? Here are latest updates

Time of India

timean hour ago

  • Time of India

China to ban Nvidia over H20 chips safety risks? Here are latest updates

China's cyberspace regulators on Thursday summoned Nvidia over security concerns that its H20 chips can be tracked and turned off remotely, the Cyberspace Administration of China said on its website. In the meeting, Chinese regulators demanded that the U.S. chip company provide explanations on 'backdoor safety risks' of its H20 chips to be sold in China and submit relevant materials, the office said. 'Cybersecurity is critically important to us. NVIDIA does not have 'backdoors' in our chips that would give anyone a remote way to access or control them,' an Nvidia spokesperson said in a statement to AP. Explore courses from Top Institutes in Please select course: Select a Course Category Degree Data Science Operations Management Design Thinking Healthcare MBA Artificial Intelligence Leadership Technology Project Management MCA Management Data Science Finance Cybersecurity Product Management healthcare Others Public Policy others PGDM Data Analytics Digital Marketing CXO Skills you'll gain: Data-Driven Decision-Making Strategic Leadership and Transformation Global Business Acumen Comprehensive Business Expertise Duration: 2 Years University of Western Australia UWA Global MBA Starts on Jun 28, 2024 Get Details It came just about two weeks after the Trump administration lifted the block on the computing chips and allowed Nvidia to resume sales of H20 chips to the Chinese market. Jensen Huang, chief executive of Nvidia, made the announcement with fanfare when he was in Beijing earlier this month. The latest episode appears to be another turbulence in the tech rivalry between the United States and China, which have left businesses in both countries tussling with governments over market access and national security concerns. Any safety concern by Beijing could jeopardize the sale of H20 chips in China. Citing unnamed U.S. AI experts, the Chinese regulators said Nvidia has developed mature technology to track, locate and remotely disable its computing chips. The regulators summoned Nvidia to 'safeguard the cybersecurity and data security of Chinese users,' in accordance with Chinese laws, the statement said. Live Events The statement also referred to a call by U.S. lawmakers to require tracking and locating capabilities on U.S. advanced chips sold overseas. In May, Rep. Bill Huizenga, R.-Michigan, and Rep. Bill Foster, D.-Illinois, introduced the Chip Security Act that would require high-end chips to be equipped with 'security mechanisms' to detect 'smuggling or exploitation.' The bill has not moved through Congress since its introduction. Foster, a trained physicist, then said, 'I know that we have the technical tools to prevent powerful AI technology from getting into the wrong hands.' The U.S. still bans the sale to China of the most advanced chips, which are necessary for developing artificial intelligence. Both countries aim to lead in the artificial intelligence race. The Trump administration in April blocked the sales of H20 chips, which Nvidia developed to specifically comply with U.S. restrictions for exports of AI chips to China. But the easing of the ban has raised eyebrows on Capitol Hill. On Monday, a group of top Democratic senators, including Minority Leader Sen. Chuck Schumer, wrote to Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick to express their 'grave concerns". While chips like the H20 have differing capabilities than the most advanced chips such as Nvidia's H100, 'they give (China) capabilities that its domestically-developed chipsets cannot,' the senators wrote. Shortly after the ban was lifted, Rep. John Moolenaar, R.-Michigan, who chairs the House Select Committee on China, objected. 'The Commerce Department made the right call in banning the H20. Now it must hold the line,' Moolenaar wrote in a letter to Lutnick. 'We can't let the CCP use American chips to train AI models that will power its military, censor its people, and undercut American innovation," Moolenaar wrote, referring to the Chinese Communist Party by its acronym. FAQs Q1. What is status on Nvidia H20 Chips? A1. The U.S. still bans the sale to China of the most advanced chips, which are necessary for developing artificial intelligence. Both countries aim to lead in the artificial intelligence race. The Trump administration in April blocked the sales of H20 chips, which Nvidia developed to specifically comply with U.S. restrictions for exports of AI chips to China. But the easing of the ban has raised eyebrows on Capitol Hill. On Monday, a group of top Democratic senators, including Minority Leader Sen. Chuck Schumer, wrote to Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick to express their 'grave concerns". Q2. What is comparison between H20 and H100? A2. Chips like the H20 have differing capabilities than the most advanced chips such as Nvidia's H100.

India must build a stronger framework for scientific talent
India must build a stronger framework for scientific talent

The Hindu

timean hour ago

  • The Hindu

India must build a stronger framework for scientific talent

Last December, China unveiled images of its prototype sixth-generation fighter jets, sending ripples across global defence circles. Weeks later, its home-grown DeepSeek AI matched OpenAI's GPT-4 on international benchmarks. These milestones are not isolated achievements. They represent the momentum of a country that has been investing deeply and consistently in scientific talent and ecosystems. Among the early accelerators of this momentum was its 'Thousand Talents Plan', launched in 2008 to bring leading global researchers into Chinese institutions, though it later drew scrutiny, particularly from the West on issues of transparency and intellectual property. However, it demonstrated how talent strategies, when backed by long-term vision, can influence a nation's scientific trajectory. China's progress is also the result of parallel investments in research infrastructure and coordinated doctoral training. Its leading universities now routinely appear higher in global rankings. India, too, has reason for confidence. Its scientists are globally respected. Our institutions have trained generations of high-impact researchers, many of whom now lead labs, departments, and innovation hubs across the world. National missions in artificial intelligence, quantum technologies, and biotechnology reflect India's growing strategic focus on frontier science. Yet to translate this momentum into long-term leadership, the country needs a sharper framework for scientific talent, one that helps India not just retain but also actively attract and integrate the world's best minds. This cannot be achieved through incremental initiatives or those in silos. It calls for distributed ambition and the ability to act decisively, across institutions, disciplines, and borders. Talent zones A good starting point could be to designate select cities such as Delhi, Mumbai, Bengaluru, Pune, Hyderabad, and Kolkata, having a high density of research and industrial institutions, as science talent zones. Within these zones, participating universities and research centres could be enabled to hire global faculty, initiate joint labs, and offer co-supervised Ph.D.s with international partners, using fast-track, peer-reviewed processes. Institutions such as Nanyang Technological University in Singapore and Seoul National University in South Korea have demonstrated how institutional agility and targeted hiring can rapidly elevate research output and visibility. India needs to rethink how long-term scientific careers are structured. Institutions should be encouraged to establish global tenure tracks, open to both Indian-origin and international scientists. These could be evaluated through international peer review and tied to performance in research, mentorship, or innovation. Models such as Tel Aviv University's diaspora-led faculty recruitment drive could be looked for inspiration. Talent relocation, particularly at the mid-career or senior level, depends on much more than funding. Institutions would need to be supported through outcome-linked incentives to build their own onboarding systems for housing, schooling, lab infrastructure, and spousal employment. This is essential to encourage relocation. To sustain momentum, the existing national missions could go further by embedding convergence science tracks within their architecture. The future of innovation lies at the interface of disciplines. AI for new materials, quantum sensing for climate resilience, or genomics for agricultural adaptation all require teams that span traditional departments and even institutions. Internationally, convergence institutes are being created that assemble such teams by design. India's missions can support similar efforts by enabling proposals that cross scientific domains and are reviewed by interdisciplinary panels. The private sector could also be encouraged to jointly co-invest in specific projects, with the incentive architectures built-in for them to also reap benefits. India must also streamline entry. A global science residency card, tied to institutional affiliation and academic review, could offer five-year residency with the option of permanent settlement. Authorised institutions, especially those participating in national missions, could be given the discretion to fast-track eligible candidates and remove procedural delays. Finally, engagement with India's vast scientific diaspora must evolve from episodic outreach to structured collaboration. Peer networks, virtual sabbaticals, co-supervised doctoral programmes, and shared research infrastructure can keep overseas scientists meaningfully connected to India's knowledge ecosystem, without necessarily requiring relocation. Countries such as Israel have shown how alumni-driven platforms can support returning researchers with professional and personal transitions, building long-term loyalty and exchange. None of these steps require large new structures. What they demand is coordination, clarity, and a shift in posture, specifically institutional empowerment. India already has the raw ingredients, including good scientists, increasingly capable universities, and national missions aligned with long-term goals. What we now need is a system that makes it easy for talent to arrive, thrive, and lead. The global race for scientific leadership is no longer just about infrastructure or capital. It is about people. Nations that succeed will be those that build environments where the most ambitious minds want to belong. India has the opportunity to be one, however it must act with clarity, ambition as well as urgency. Swapan Bhattacharya is the Director of TCG CREST (Deemed to be University), Kolkata; views expressed are personal.

Democratic senator proposes new safeguards to keep TikTok online
Democratic senator proposes new safeguards to keep TikTok online

Time of India

timean hour ago

  • Time of India

Democratic senator proposes new safeguards to keep TikTok online

Academy Empower your mind, elevate your skills Democratic Senator Ed Markey on Thursday proposed new national security safeguards that would ensure TikTok could remain online as the fate of the short video app used by 170 million Americans remains last year passed legislation to force China's ByteDance to divest TikTok by January 19 or face a ban, but President Donald Trump has directed the Justice Department not to enforce the proposal would eliminate the requirement that ByteDance sell TikTok's US operations if it establishes transparency requirements about content and limits foreign access to the data of TikTok's American month, Trump extended by 90 days to September 17 a deadline for ByteDance to divest the US assets of Democratic lawmakers including Markey argue Trump has no legal authority to extend the deadline and have suggested the deal under consideration would not meet legal requirements."For months, I have been urging my colleagues to find an alternative path to the TikTok ban that keeps TikTok online without jeopardizing national security," Markey said. "With Trump continuing to illegally extend the divestment deadline, it's time for Congress to reassert its legislative power, fix its mistake, and consider a new approach to TikTok."A deal had been in the works this spring that would spin off TikTok's US operations into a new US-based firm, majority-owned and operated by US investors. This stalled after China indicated it would not approve it following Trump's announcements of steep tariffs on Chinese Secretary Howard Lutnick said last week TikTok will have to stop operating in the United States if China does not approve a deal for the sale of the Secretary Scott Bessent on Tuesday said the future of TikTok did not come up in recent trade talks with has three times granted reprieves from federal enforcement of the law that mandated the sale or shutdown of TikTok that was supposed to take effect in January.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store