Uzbekistan, EU aim to boost trade ties
Listen to article
There is significant potential for developing economic cooperation between Uzbekistan and member states of the European Union (EU), which will open up broad opportunities for mutually beneficial partnerships.
In the lead-up to the Central Asia-European Union Summit, which will take place on April 3-4, 2025, in Samarkand, the Centre for Economic Research and Reforms organised an event that highlighted the dynamics of Uzbekistan's trade and investment cooperation with EU countries over the past seven years.
Uzbekistan is interested in attracting European investments and advanced technologies in strategically important sectors such as renewable energy, chemical and pharmaceutical industries, agriculture, and transport logistics, according to a statement released by the embassy of Uzbekistan in Islamabad on Wednesday.
Overall, the upcoming summit in Samarkand may become not only a symbolic but also a practically significant step towards a new level of cooperation, based on pragmatism, mutual benefit and a shared commitment to sustainable development. In the year 2024, the major share of Uzbekistan's trade with EU countries was with Germany (19.1%), France (17.8%), Lithuania (9.4%), Italy (6.9%), the Czech Republic (6.8%), Poland (6%), Latvia (4.5%), the Netherlands (4.2%), Belgium (3.3%), Austria (3.3%) and Slovenia (2.8%).
In Uzbekistan's foreign trade, the European Union ranks third by volume of trade turnover, exports and imports, after China and Russia. In 2024, the share of EU countries in Uzbekistan's foreign trade stood at 9.7%, in exports their share was 6.3%, and in imports it was 12%. Uzbekistan's trade turnover with EU countries from 2017 to 2024 increased 2.4 times from $2.6 billion to $6.4 billion.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
16 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Worst foreign policy decision of 21st century
Listen to article There are clear indications that the world is no longer traveling on an upward track. The current journey of the world is on a downward track, and the need for an immediate course correction is the responsibility of the four great powers — the United States, China, Russia and the European Union. Liberal internationalism has failed as an order, and so has the momentum of globalisation, which has been unsuccessful in bringing the world closer together. Democracies all over the world are degenerating, lapsing, regressing and retreating. All anti-communist dictators that the United States supported in the past and installed during the Cold War to create favorable regimes in Latin America, Africa Middle East and Asia are dead, but others wearing democratic suits have taken their place. Nationalism, protectionism and revisionism are eating what is left of cosmopolitanism, and anti-immigration laws and racism are back as the picture posters of a world in a downward spiral. The brutality of the two World Wars forced the world to understand the importance of adherence to international norms. These norms are being set aside now with impunity, and states like Israel now demonstrate that state behaviour is no more constrained by international norms. During the bipolar moment of the world, the world order rested on both the balance of power and legitimacy — a world conforming to laws and rules. Legitimacy today is on a downslide. That can be seen in how Israel is carrying out genocide in Gaza with absolute freedom from the consequences of its actions. Loss of legitimacy is being demonstrated in how the war in Ukraine is being fought, or how India initiated a thoughtless and unnecessary military action against Pakistan. As if this were not enough, the US-Iran nuclear talks have failed, and one can be certain that no international rules or laws may be followed once again to punish another sovereign nation — Iran. Notable historians and scholars of international relations with pro-Western sentiments are referring to President Xi Jinping's no limits partnership with Moscow as arguably the biggest foreign policy blunder by him since his time in power. Yet, the Chinese President's decision is a copycat of what the United States has practiced earlier. Under the Henry Kissinger doctrine of reducing tensions with the weaker rival to concentrate on the stronger, President Nixon warmed ties with China as the United States focused on and targeted the Soviet Union. China now plans to cook the American soup with the same recipe. However, if Israel attacks Iran with or without the consent of the Americans, it will constitute the biggest foreign policy blunder of the 21st century. Calling an unlimited partnership between two great powers a foreign policy blunder is looking at the event from a liberal lens that views revisionism as an international offence. Seen from a realist perspective, the unchallenged power that the United States enjoyed during the unipolar moment changed the dynamics of the global balance of power. The current Sino-Russo partnership is a consequence of the shift in the global balance of power that emerged when the all-powerful American might pushed the interests of the other great powers aside to make the entire world a de facto American sphere. The United States, as a global hegemon during the unipolar moment, had three clear choices to make: create an international system of absolute American dominance of power; allow creation of an international system of shared responsibility for global peace and security; or revert to an international system of power rivalry and sphere of influence. Until the first decade of the 21st century, Americans dragged the international system of absolute American control and dominance of power. By 2012, both President Putin and President Xi rose to power as Russia's President and General Secretary of the Chinese Communist Party, respectively. Two years later, President Putin annexed Crimea. The moment to create an international system of shared responsibility for global peace and security was lost, and an international system of power rivalry and sphere of influence replaced the system of absolute American dominance and power. This was acknowledged by the Trump administration in 2017 when the American National Security Strategy presented in that year welcomed the return of 'great power competition'. Today, the war in Ukraine is a classic example of a return to the clash of spheres of influence in global politics. China showcases this contest in the Eastern Pacific, the Taiwan Strait and the South China Sea. Before the greatest blunder of foreign policy of the 21st century is committed, the United States and its ally, Israel, must give due consideration to the international system in vogue. Sphere of influence is the space where one's great power exercises dominance and control, and if an outside power wishes to challenge that, it will only be at a cost that may be too high or unbearable. In a broader geopolitical sense, a military strike at Iran will hurt the political, economic and commercial interests of the other two great powers, and it is for this reason that such a military misadventure will be disapproved and contested by the rival powers. Russia and China will not compete or cooperate but confront any challenge posed to the sovereignty of Iran. This assumption is based on the current dynamics of regional geopolitics, regional political, economic and commercial concerns, and wider regional insecurity, which is not acceptable and tolerable to both Russia and China. Not just the two great powers but many other countries in the region may cooperate and have their foreign policy driven by this very sensitive and main agenda. President Trump, on his part, represents himself as a liberal internationalist and a peacemaker who rejects the use of military force as a preferred instrument of policy to resolve conflicts. He favours diplomacy, and if the world needs to get back on the right track, he must not become part of committing the biggest foreign policy blunder of the 21st century. Israel's military action in Gaza has already eroded the moral authority of the United States; any military action against Iran will erode the chances of the world traveling back on an upward track. Post Script: As the article is being submitted for publication, Israel has carried out air strikes on Iran. The worst foreign policy decision of the 21st century has been taken.
Express Tribune
a day ago
- Express Tribune
Bayern eye Club World Cup treasures
Bayern Munich's Harry Kane scores a goal from the penalty spot during Champions League Round of 16 First Leg against Bayer Leverkusen on March 5. Photo: REUTERS Fresh from lifting a first team title of his career, Harry Kane and Bayern Munich head to the Club World Cup in the United States eyeing more than just another shot at silverware. Long on the receiving end of jibes about not winning a team trophy in his 15-year career despite a glittering array of individual honours, the 31-year-old striker finally broke through when Bayern won the Bundesliga this season. Besides adding another title to Bayern's bulging trophy cabinet, a Club World Cup win would be incredibly lucrative for the German giants. In a bid to boost club buy-in for the expanded tournament, FIFA has put together a whopping $1 billion prize money pool, with the winner expected to pocket $125 million. As with most of the big European sides competing in the tournament, Bayern have been handed a relatively simple task in the group stages. Bayern face Auckland City in Cincinnati on Sunday, before rounding out the group stage with matches against Boca Juniors in Miami and Benfica in Charlotte. Member-run Bayern may dwarf all but a handful of European rivals financially, but the Club World Cup money could make an important difference at an uncertain time. Despite winning back the Bundesliga title this season after Bayer Leverkusen broke an 11-year Bavarian streak last term, Bayern are facing a rebuild this summer. Normally the one and only destination for top German talent, in-demand midfielder Florian Wirtz spurned their advances and looks set for a move to Premier League side Liverpool. With veteran Thomas Mueller leaving after the Club World Cup and wingers Leroy Sane and Kingsley Coman also reportedly headed for the exit, Bayern will need to bring in more attacking talent this transfer window. In defence, Eric Dier has left while Kim Min-jae, Dayot Upamecano and Hiroki Ito have all nursed long-term injury complaints of late. The free-agent signings of Germany duo Jonathan Tah, a centre-back, and midfielder Tom Bischof have however helped tackle two problem areas for the German giants -- and at a fraction of the cost. Both players were released early by former clubs Leverkusen and Hoffenheim respectively, with Bayern paying nominal fees to allow them to make the trip to the US. After recently scoring two goals in two games for England against Andorra and Senegal, Kane heads to the US optimistic of a further taste of silverware. "We're certainly one of the favourites. I think this season has shown what kind of a team we are," Kane told Germany's TZ newspaper on Wednesday. "On a good day, we can beat any opponent in the world." Kane said the players were "taking the tournament seriously and preparing well", despite the long season behind them. "It's a new format with the best teams in the world competing. I'm happy to be part of it because it's an exciting opportunity." While Kane may now have just a solitary team title, his strike partner Mueller is bidding to become the most decorated German footballer ever. Mueller is equal on 34 team trophies with retired Real Madrid midfielder Toni Kroos, but can inch past his former team-mate by lifting what would be his third Club World Cup. The veteran's two previous victories, in 2014 and 2021, came in the previous scaled back version of the competition. Mueller, 35, made clear he wanted to stay at Bayern after 25 years with the club. In April, he said the decision to part ways was made by the club and the club alone, but has not allowed the issue to spoil his farewell. In a social media video as Bayern took off for the United States, Mueller said: "Of course we want to win this thing. "Ready to rumble. Full throttle for the title. Let's go, FC Bayern."
Business Recorder
a day ago
- Business Recorder
Fifth round of Pakistan–European Union dialogue held
ISLAMABAD: The fifth round of the Pakistan–European Union dialogue on Non-Proliferation and Disarmament was held in Islamabad on 12th June 2025. The Pakistan delegation was led by Ambassador Tahir Andrabi, Additional Foreign Secretary for Arms Control, Disarmament, and International Security (ACDIS), while the European Union delegation was headed by Ambassador Stephan Klement, EU Special Envoy for Disarmament and Non-Proliferation. Both sides engaged in a comprehensive exchange of views on issues related to international and regional peace, security, and strategic stability. Pakistan side briefed their EU interlocutors on developments in the wake of recent Pakistan-India conflict. The discussions also focused on various dimensions of disarmament and non-proliferation, with particular reference to the agenda of the UN General Assembly's First Committee, the Conference on Disarmament and International Conventions, including the Biological Weapons Convention (BWC) and the Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC). In addition, the dialogue reviewed recent trends in Multilateral Export Control Regimes (MECRs) and assessed the implications of Emerging Technologies on global security. The avenues for enhanced cooperation in the domain of Science Diplomacy were explored as well. The two sides agreed to hold the sixth round of the dialogue in Brussels in 2026. During his visit to Pakistan, the EU Special Envoy met the foreign secretary and attended roundtable discussion at the Institute of Strategic Studies, Islamabad. The Pakistan–EU Dialogue on Non-Proliferation and Disarmament is an integral part of the broader strategic engagement between Pakistan and the European Union, which has been institutionalised since 2012. Pakistan attaches high importance to this regular mechanism of dialogue, recognising it as a vital platform for constructive engagement on global and regional security as well as on disarmament and non-proliferation issues. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
