Supreme Leader says Iran would strike back if attacked again
DUBAI: Iran would respond to any future US attack by striking American military bases in the Middle East, Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said on Thursday, in his first televised remarks since a ceasefire was reached between Iran and Israel.
Khamenei, 86, claimed victory after 12 days of war, culminating in an Iranian attack on the largest US base in the region, located in Qatar, after Washington joined the Israeli strikes.
In his pre-recorded remarks, aired on state television, Khamenei promised that Iran would not surrender despite US President Donald Trump's calls.
"The US President Trump unveiled the truth and made it clear that Americans won't be satisfied with anything less than surrender... such an event will never happen," Khamenei said.
"The fact that the Islamic Republic has access to important American centres in the region and can take action against them whenever it deems necessary is not a small incident, it is a major incident, and this incident can be repeated in the future if an attack is made," he added.
Trump said "sure" on Wednesday when asked if the United States would strike again if Iran rebuilt its nuclear enrichment programme.
Tehran has for decades denied accusations by Western leaders that it is seeking nuclear arms.
Khamenei said the US "gained no achievement" after it attacked Iranian nuclear sites, but that it entered the war to "save" Israel after Tehran's missiles broke through Israel's multi-layered defence system.
"The US directly entered the war as it felt that if it did not get involved, the Zionist regime (Israel) would be fully destroyed. It entered the war to save it," he said.
"The US attacked our nuclear facilities, but couldn't do any important deed... The US president did abnormal showmanship and needed to do so," he added.
Trump said over the weekend that the US deployment of 30,000-pound bombs had "obliterated" Iran's nuclear programme. However, this appeared to be contradicted by an initial assessment from one of his administration's intelligence agencies, according to three people familiar with the matter.
Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu also declared "a historic victory" on Tuesday, after the fragile ceasefire took effect, saying Israel had achieved its goal of removing Tehran's nuclear and ballistic missile threat.
Shortly after Khamenei's speech, Netanyahu posted a message with a picture of himself and Trump holding hands with the message: "We will continue to work together to defeat our common enemies."
Meanwhile, US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth on Thursday said he was unaware of any intelligence suggesting Iran had moved any of its highly enriched uranium to shield it from US strikes on Iran's nuclear programme over the weekend.
US military bombers carried out strikes against three Iranian nuclear facilities over the weekend with more than a dozen 30,000-pound bunker-buster bombs.
The results of the strikes are being closely watched to see how far the strikes may have set back Iran's nuclear programme. "I'm not aware of any intelligence that I've reviewed that says things were not where they were supposed to be, moved or otherwise," Hegseth said in an often fiery news conference. - Reuters
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Observer
10 hours ago
- Observer
Supreme Leader says Iran would strike back if attacked again
DUBAI: Iran would respond to any future US attack by striking American military bases in the Middle East, Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said on Thursday, in his first televised remarks since a ceasefire was reached between Iran and Israel. Khamenei, 86, claimed victory after 12 days of war, culminating in an Iranian attack on the largest US base in the region, located in Qatar, after Washington joined the Israeli strikes. In his pre-recorded remarks, aired on state television, Khamenei promised that Iran would not surrender despite US President Donald Trump's calls. "The US President Trump unveiled the truth and made it clear that Americans won't be satisfied with anything less than surrender... such an event will never happen," Khamenei said. "The fact that the Islamic Republic has access to important American centres in the region and can take action against them whenever it deems necessary is not a small incident, it is a major incident, and this incident can be repeated in the future if an attack is made," he added. Trump said "sure" on Wednesday when asked if the United States would strike again if Iran rebuilt its nuclear enrichment programme. Tehran has for decades denied accusations by Western leaders that it is seeking nuclear arms. Khamenei said the US "gained no achievement" after it attacked Iranian nuclear sites, but that it entered the war to "save" Israel after Tehran's missiles broke through Israel's multi-layered defence system. "The US directly entered the war as it felt that if it did not get involved, the Zionist regime (Israel) would be fully destroyed. It entered the war to save it," he said. "The US attacked our nuclear facilities, but couldn't do any important deed... The US president did abnormal showmanship and needed to do so," he added. Trump said over the weekend that the US deployment of 30,000-pound bombs had "obliterated" Iran's nuclear programme. However, this appeared to be contradicted by an initial assessment from one of his administration's intelligence agencies, according to three people familiar with the matter. Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu also declared "a historic victory" on Tuesday, after the fragile ceasefire took effect, saying Israel had achieved its goal of removing Tehran's nuclear and ballistic missile threat. Shortly after Khamenei's speech, Netanyahu posted a message with a picture of himself and Trump holding hands with the message: "We will continue to work together to defeat our common enemies." Meanwhile, US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth on Thursday said he was unaware of any intelligence suggesting Iran had moved any of its highly enriched uranium to shield it from US strikes on Iran's nuclear programme over the weekend. US military bombers carried out strikes against three Iranian nuclear facilities over the weekend with more than a dozen 30,000-pound bunker-buster bombs. The results of the strikes are being closely watched to see how far the strikes may have set back Iran's nuclear programme. "I'm not aware of any intelligence that I've reviewed that says things were not where they were supposed to be, moved or otherwise," Hegseth said in an often fiery news conference. - Reuters
Observer
10 hours ago
- Observer
Why Israel must not be allowed to triumph?
Could we imagine a Middle East without Iran — not merely without its current government, but stripped of its strategic presence, historical depth and deterrent capacity? And who would fill such a void? This question invites a cascade of potential chaos were Israel (or the West supporting it) to emerge victorious in the ongoing conflict with Iran. The reality is that Arab states cannot escape their responsibility for what follows if Israel achieves its aims. Regret by then would be too late, meaningless in a region fully dominated and unquestioningly obedient to Israel. The heart of the matter isn't Israel's military might — it has Western backing and near-global silence bordering on complicity — but whether the Middle East could survive the consequences of an Israeli victory. The answer is unambiguous: it cannot. Such a defeat would usher in the greatest danger the Arab world has faced in recent times. Arab perceptions of Iran have long been flawed, often narrowed to sectarian tropes. Yet Iran — both under the Shah and after 1979 — is an ancient civilisation, a state with deep historical roots, a regional vision and jurisdictional sway that cannot simply be erased. The 1979 revolution was not just a religious export — it was a profound internal upheaval, rooted in political, social and economic transformation. Arab states would have done better to engage Iran as a regional partner rather than heed Western calls to isolate and dismantle it. Many policymakers in the Middle East have persisted in the belief that a weakened Iran would bring stability. This notion, fuelled by Western think‑tanks, treats the revolution as an ideological aberration and fails to grasp that dismantling Iran would leave a tremendous geopolitical vacuum. It risks turning Gulf states into mere satellites of a new regime — and could even fracture the Arab world, repeating patterns seen after Baghdad fell in 2003. Israel isn't just aiming to disarm Iran; its Western backers envision full dominance — military, ideological and economic. This would enable Israel to reshape regional dynamics to serve its own long-held interests. In this scenario, normalisation agreements become superficial at best. Israel would define the cultural and geopolitical order. Those who resist would find themselves in the grip of widespread chaos. Alarmingly, current Middle East dynamics could perfectly set this scenario in motion. It is among the darkest moments in Arab history — marked by disunity, ideological extremism and a lack of political coherence. A victorious Israel would also have global consequences. It would convey that diplomacy is obsolete and that military dominance is the only arbiter of power. What may appear as a strategic void — an emerging Israeli hegemony — would instead become a regional vacuum filled by Israeli influence across security, economics and technology. Such dominance cannot yield lasting stability. History shows that it breeds violent resistance — from Lebanon to Gaza to Iraq. The collapse of central authority could ignite decentralised extremist movements, unleashing violence that cannot be contained. This would be worsened by a profound sense of injustice as Iran is punished for its support of Gaza and Palestine. Preventing an Israeli win is not about endorsing Iran's military ambitions but about preserving regional diversity. The Middle East has always balanced on a knife-edge; allowing one power to dominate entirely would undermine that balance. Arab and Gulf states must deploy all their influence to block an Israeli victory — publicly and privately — and forge new regional equations based on partnership, deterrence and dialogue instead of military supremacy. Otherwise, the Arab world will deeply regret dismantling Iran, just as it has regretted Iraq's downfall — and this time, the consequences could be far more catastrophic. At this historic crossroads, the region needs clear-sighted leadership, wisdom and balanced thinking to maintain equilibrium and stability. Allowing Israel to win this war would imperil the Middle East's collective identity, culture and security. Translated by Badr al Dhafri. The original version of this article was published in Oman Arabic newspaper on June 23.
Observer
10 hours ago
- Observer
China, US ease trade restrictions after deal
China and the United States have agreed to ease some trade restrictions, according to statements from both sides. China's Ministry of Commerce announced on Friday that it will review and approve applications for the export of 'controlled goods' that comply with regulations, while the US would lift a series of 'restrictive measures' against China. US President Donald Trump previously mentioned a signed agreement with China but left many questions unanswered. "We just signed with China yesterday," the Republican said at an event at the White House while talking about making deals with other countries. Trump also suggested that there could 'maybe' be a 'very big' deal with India. US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick later confirmed in an interview with financial news agency Bloomberg that the deal with China had been signed. He said China would supply rare earths, while the US will end its countermeasures. Since Trump launched a trade war with Beijing in February, the world's two largest economies have been locked in a tit-for-tat tariff fight that has unnerved global markets. In April, Trump increased tariffs on goods from China to as much as 145 per cent. In response, Beijing imposed counter-tariffs of 125 per cent and introduced export controls on industrially important rare earths and magnets made from them, on which China holds a near-monopoly. At the height of the tariff dispute in May, high-level delegations from both sides agreed in Geneva to significantly reduce tariffs for 90 days while continuing negotiations. It remains unclear, however, what will happen after the August deadline. The US has since imposed further restrictions on the export of important technology, such as software for computer chips and aviation components, for which China still relies on foreign manufacturers. Another meeting between the two sides, in London in early June, focused on the trade restrictions. US representatives eventually agreed with their Chinese counterparts on a reduction, although for a long time no details emerged. Observers interpreted the outcome as a return to the state of play after the Geneva meeting. Both countries' presidents were expected to approve the decisions following the London talks. Beijing's export restrictions on rare earths has put significant pressure on industries outside of China. The measures affected all countries, not just the US. In Germany's important automotive and mechanical engineering sectors, companies are concerned about the supply of important metals used in sensors or electric motors. China justified the controls by stating that the raw materials can have both civilian and military uses. Companies said it was taking along time for China's Ministry of Commerce to process applications, without certainty of approval. Concerns have grown about potential production halts. The Ministry of Commerce in Beijing has repeatedly said it has approved applications for companies in the EU and intends to speed up the process. — dpa
