US House passes stablecoin legislation, sending bill to Trump
The vote marks a watershed moment for the digital asset industry, which has been pushing for federal legislation for years and poured money into last year's elections in order to promote pro-crypto candidates.
House lawmakers also passed a bill developing a regulatory framework for crypto. That will move on to the Senate for consideration.
The stablecoin bill, called the Genius Act, received bipartisan support, with many Democrats joining Republicans to back the proposed federal rules. The vote on the market structure bill, known as the Clarity Act, was also notably bipartisan.
Stablecoins, a type of cryptocurrency designed to maintain a constant value, usually a one-to-one dollar peg, are commonly used by crypto traders to move funds between tokens. Their use has grown rapidly in recent years, and proponents say that they could be used to send payments instantly.
If signed into law, the stablecoin bill would require tokens to be backed by liquid assets – such as US dollars and short-term Treasury bills – and for issuers to publicly disclose the composition of their reserves on a monthly basis.
The crypto sector has long pushed for lawmakers to pass legislation creating rules for digital assets, arguing that a clear framework could enable stablecoins and other crypto tokens to become more widely used. The sector spent more than $119 million backing pro-crypto congressional candidates in last year's elections and has worked to paint the issue as bipartisan.
The House of Representatives passed a stablecoin bill last year but the Senate – in which Democrats held the majority at the time – did not take up that bill.
Mr Trump has sought to broadly overhaul US cryptocurrency policies after courting cash from the industry during his presidential campaign.
Tension on Capitol Hill over Mr Trump's various crypto ventures at one point threatened to derail the digital asset sector's hope of legislation this year as Democrats have grown increasingly frustrated with Mr Trump and his family members promoting their personal crypto projects.
Mr Trump's crypto ventures include a meme coin called $TRUMP, launched in January, and a business called World Liberty Financial, a crypto company owned partly by the president.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Zawya
an hour ago
- Zawya
Fed reform may move markets more than Powell ouster: Mike Dolan
(The opinions expressed here are those of the author, a columnist for Reuters.) LONDON - Changing the way the Federal Reserve operates or assesses the economy may have a more durable impact on policy and markets than firing the Fed boss. U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent added another twist to President Donald Trump's ongoing criticism of Fed Chair Jerome Powell on Monday by claiming he wanted to review the entire Fed institution and its performance. In an interview with CNBC, Bessent claimed the Fed's "fear-mongering over tariffs" without significant signs of inflation was justification for considering a root-and-branch review of the central bank's functioning. "What we need to do is examine the entire Federal Reserve institution and whether they have been successful," he said. "All these PhDs over there, I don't know what they do." It's not yet clear whether Bessent was merely heaping more pressure on the Fed to speed up interest rate cuts, as Trump has been demanding almost daily, or whether the administration is actually planning to conduct a formal review of Fed operations, analysis and execution. While recent weeks have been filled with anxious noise about Trump attempting to fire Powell, this latest development - possible changes to the way the Fed ticks - could be much more far-reaching and impactful than simply truncating the tenure of one Chair. Of course, the Fed Chair is an important role, and a politically motivated ouster would be a serious challenge to Fed independence. Yet the Fed boss ultimately remains just one vote on the rate-setting board, and the Fed's policymaking structure is partly designed to insulate the central bank from any undue political influence. The Federal Open Market Committee that sets policy is made up of seven Fed board members and five regional Fed bosses, but the FOMC chair and vice chair are voted in by the committee at the start of each year. The Fed Chair typically takes the helm by convention, but not necessity. If a majority of the FOMC members balked at a politically partisan appointee to the top job, they could theoretically vote for a different Chair of the FOMC in an act of defiance. But, regardless, the Chair is still only one vote. PRICE TOO HIGH Changing the Fed's institutional structure would require Congressional approval, a process likely to be protracted as many Republicans, including strong Trump supporters, may be wary of tampering with the Fed. Moreover, a recent Supreme Court ruling also suggested Fed structures should be left in place due to "a special historical status". But influencing the way the Fed thinks, forecasts and operates is a different matter. To complicate matters further, the Wall Street Journal on Monday claimed Bessent counseled Trump against firing Powell, arguing that the current Fed Chair might sue, or Congress could drag its feet on approving a replacement. Both scenarios could result in a leadership hiatus that would see Joe Biden appointee Vice Fed Chair Philip Jefferson assume the role. Bessent argued the price of removing Powell now was potential market disruption and economic uncertainty for no real gain in influence compared with waiting for Powell's term to just expire in May, the WSJ said. Trump, already battling with the WSJ on another story, dismissed the report as 'fake'. Bessent said the decision was ultimately up to Trump. But the messiness of Powell's removal may be why the administration sees other pressure on the Fed to buckle on rates soon as more fruitful. After all, two Trump appointees to the board - Christopher Waller and Michelle Bowman - already arguing for immediate cuts and two more board positions, including Powell's, are likely to come up by this time next year. That would leave a majority on the board being Trump appointees - even though not the FOMC. SGH Macro Advisors' Tim Duy reckons that to reshape the Fed, the White House needs even more seats to shift the board - building a block of Trump nominees sufficient to out-vote the five regional Presidents that make up the rest of the FOMC. Without that, it leaves the Trump team trying to change the DNA of Fed thinking and a major review that shifts standing assumptions, forecasting patterns and public presentations may be significant longer-term. Current favorite to be Trump's pick for the Chair, former Fed policymaker Kevin Warsh, who is a known critic of orthodox Fed analysis, doubts there's a trade-off between jobs and inflation the way it's currently presented and claims rates can move lower if balance sheet policies were tighter. If markets think it's inappropriate to ease now, of course, then inflation expectations may just build on fears of undue political influence and long-term borrowing rates should rise. But it may not be that clean. "The goal appears to be to keep policy rates low while shifting U.S. Treasury issuance to the front end of the curve," wrote SGH Macro's Duy. "While excessively loose policy would be expected to raise long term rates, there is the possibility that Fed and Treasury manage the debt with an eye toward yield curve control." That's a delicate balance that might come off - but guaranteeing the Fed comes on board will not be easy. The opinions expressed here are those of the author, a columnist for Reuters -- Enjoying this column? Check out Reuters Open Interest (ROI), your essential new source for global financial commentary. Follow ROI on LinkedIn. Plus, sign up for my weekday newsletter Morning Bid U.S. (by Mike Dolan; editing by Nia Williams)
Economy ME
an hour ago
- Economy ME
Crude oil prices rise to $68.75 as U.S.-Japan trade deal boosts market optimism
Oil prices increased slightly during Asian trading on Wednesday after experiencing three consecutive days of decline. This uptick follows a recent U.S. trade deal with Japan that indicates progress on tariffs, although the overall gains were limited by diminished expectations for a significant outcome at an upcoming EU-China summit. Brent crude futures climbed by 21 cents, or 0.31 percent, reaching $68.80 a barrel by 03:51 GMT (currently trading above $68.75). Meanwhile, U.S. West Texas Intermediate crude futures rose by 17 cents, or 0.26 percent, to $65.48 per barrel (currently trading above $65.45). Both benchmarks had dropped approximately 1 percent in the previous session after the EU announced it was contemplating countermeasures against U.S. tariffs, leading to waning optimism for a resolution ahead of the August 1 deadline. President Donald Trump stated on Tuesday that the U.S. and Japan had finalized a trade deal that includes a 15 percent tariff on U.S. imports from Japan. He also noted that Japan had committed to investing $550 billion in the U.S. Low expectations for EU-China Summit Traders are expressing concerns that Trump's tariff policies may result in a slowdown of global economic growth and diminished energy demand, potentially putting downward pressure on WTI prices. Trump mentioned that reciprocal tariffs would increase on August 1 for trade partners that have not reached an agreement with the U.S. Earlier this week, he threatened a 30 percent tariff on imports from the European Union (EU) if no deal was finalized. In the meantime, industry expectations remain low for Thursday's EU-China summit, which will test the bloc's unity and resolve amid escalating trade tensions with both Beijing and Washington. According to the Chinese ministry, China's commerce minister and the European Union's trade chief had a 'candid and in-depth' discussion regarding economic and trade cooperation, along with other issues that both sides face leading up to the summit. Separately, market sources reported that U.S. crude and gasoline stocks saw a decline last week, as cited by the American Petroleum Institute figures released on Tuesday. Distillate stocks, however, increased by 3.48 million barrels. Global supply glut concerns In another encouraging sign for the crude market, the U.S. energy secretary indicated on Tuesday that the U.S. is considering sanctioning Russian oil to expedite the resolution of the war in Ukraine. Additionally, worries about an expanding global oil supply glut may contribute to downward pressure on WTI. The Iraqi government has officially resumed crude oil exports from the Kurdistan Region after a halt of over two years. This move is expected to alleviate tensions between Baghdad and Erbil while boosting national export volumes. Kurdistan anticipates supplying Iraq's crude market with 230,000 barrels per day (bpd) once exports resume. The potential for increased crude exports from Iraq may enhance global oil supplies and undermine WTI prices in the near term. U.S. crude oil inventories decreased last week, which could offer some support to WTI prices. The American Petroleum Institute 's weekly crude oil stock report revealed that crude oil stockpiles in the U.S. declined by 577,000 barrels for the week ending July 18, in contrast to a rise of 19.1 million barrels the previous week. So far this year, crude oil inventories have increased by 11 million barrels, according to calculations from Oilprice based on API data.
Khaleej Times
an hour ago
- Khaleej Times
Trump says Fed's Powell will be out in 8 months, calls him 'numbskull'
US Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell is a "numbskull" who has kept interest rates too high, but he will be out in eight months, President Donald Trump said at a news conference on Tuesday. "I think he's done a bad job, but he's going to be out pretty soon anyway. In eight months, he'll be out," he said from a meeting at the White House with Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. Powell's term as Fed chair runs through May 15, and he has repeatedly said he will not leave the post early. Eight months run until mid-March, and it was not immediately clear why Trump picked that time frame. Trump has been hammering at Powell for months for not cutting rates and has frequently raised the possibility of ousting him, while also saying that firing him would be "unlikely." On Tuesday Trump repeated his view that the policy rate should be 3 percentage points lower than it is. The central bank's Federal Open Market Committee meets next week and is nearly universally expected to leave the policy rate in its current range of 4.25%-4.50% as policymakers wait to see how inflation and employment react to tariffs. "Our economy is so strong now, blowing through everything. We're setting records," Trump said. "But you know what? People aren't able to buy a house because this guy is a numbskull. He keeps the rates too high, and is probably doing it for political reasons." Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, at the same meeting, trained his sights on the Fed for its non-monetary operations, again calling for a big internal investigation. White House officials have recently raised questions about a $2.5 billion renovation of two Fed buildings in Washington which they say are inappropriately lavish. "The Fed has had big mission creep, and that's where a lot of the spending is going," Bessent said. "That's where, why they're building these new, or refurbishing these buildings, and I think they have got to stay in their lane." The Fed counters that the buildings had severe safety and efficiency shortcomings that needed to be addressed.
