Is the treasury hinting at tax rise wiggle room?
He said the promise meant: 'Not increasing the headline rate of income tax or employee national insurance and not to increase the headline rate of VAT. That was a very clear promise coming into the election.'
The thing is that's not what the manifesto says. These are its words:
'Labour will not increase taxes on working people, which is why we will not increase National Insurance, the basic, higher, or additional rates of Income Tax, or VAT.'
As you can read, the only reference to 'rates' is in respect of income tax. In relation to national insurance (NI) and VAT, the manifesto just says those taxes won't be increased.
Now I won't rehearse again whether Labour breached its manifesto pledge by pushing up employers' NI (though the just-exited head of the IFS, Paul Johnson, says in the latest Rest is Money podcast that the hike in employers' NI was a blatant manifesto breach).
I am interested in Jones talking about not increasing the 'headline rate of VAT'. That is because he may have inadvertently opened a window on Treasury thinking about how to raise perhaps £20bn or so in the autumn budget that may be needed to fill a hole in the public finances, to restore Reeves's fiscal rules headroom.
The question is what Jones means by the 'headline rate'. Does he just mean the 20% most of us are conscious of because it applies to so many items, or is he also referring to the 0% on food and the 5% on energy (there are also other lesser categories where the rates are 5% or nil)?
The point is that the chancellor could cut the main rate of VAT to, say 18%, and raise that kind of money by eliminating the vast categories of our spending that incur nil or 5% VAT.
To be clear, the politics for Starmer and Reeves of putting up the price of food and energy when living standards remain squeezed would be difficult. It would seem to contradict Labour's manifesto promise not to put up costs for 'working people'.
But it is striking that Jones' words were about the headline rate (singular) of VAT, rather than ruling out an increase in the scope and burden. He also made the distinction that Labour's working people's pledge in the manifesto relates to 'payslips', not indirect taxes like VAT.
All of which means such a VAT rise is in play, unless and until Jones, Reeves, or Starmer tell us otherwise.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ITV News
40 minutes ago
- ITV News
Joint mayor would 'discriminate' against Cornish people, says Labour MP
A Cornish Labour MP has warned he will vote against his Government's devolution plans if it means the Duchy has to merge with Devon to form a combined authority and elect a joint mayor. Perran Moon, the MP for Camborne and Redruth, has said Labour's current proposal"discriminates against the people of Cornwall" because a change in local governance would conflict with their National Minority Status. "I have had enough of talk about Cornwall joining a Mayoral Combined Authority with Devon or anywhere else to the east of the Tamar, for that matter," Mr Moon said. "The currently proposed English Devolution Bill discriminates against the people of Cornwall, as a change in our governance structure directly conflicts with our National Minority Status." Cornwall 'cannot and will not' join a mayoral combined authority, Perran Moon tells Government. As they currently stand, Labour's plans would see all-remaining areas with two tiers of local authority eventually restructured into single-tier unitary bodies. In Devon for example, a combined county authority has already been given the green light, which includes the merger of Devon County Council with Torbay Council, and Devon's district, city and borough councils. The plans would also see unitary authorities join up with those in neighbouring areas to form so-called 'super councils', run by elected mayors with control over policy areas such as transport, housing and skills budgets. The idea is that these combined authorities would represent a population size of around 1.5million or above. Dorset, Somerset and Wiltshire have submitted plans for a "Wessex" authority, while it's thought North Somerset may attempt to join the already-existing West of England Combined Authority. It all sounds quite complicated, but it effectively means that elected mayors will be given greater control of their local areas and, in theory, things should get done quickly and successfully. However, in Devon and Cornwall, it's not that straightforward. Labour is realising that different parts of the country have very different idea about what successful devolution looks like. To a number of MPs in Cornwall, that doesn't mean joining with Devon. It means a bespoke 'deal' for the Duchy that comes with its own promises of local power and investment. Angela Rayner previously told ITV West Country that she's "enticing" them to embrace the mayoral model, but not forcing, though it's still not clear what that really means. This week, the Camborne and Redruth MP asked one of Ms Rayner's deputies for clarity. Cornwall is "desperate to access the highest level of devolution," Mr Moon said, before adding: "Cornwall cannot and will not join a mayoral combined authority." Jim McMahon, the minister responsible for devolution, said: "We absolutely understand and respect, and are invested in, the Cornish identity. "But we also need to make sure the devolution agenda moves on at pace and that every part of England can realise their full potential." The rhetoric from Cornish MPs on devolution has stepped up a gear, and will no doubt continue to do so. "A Cornwall-only devolution deal is the right deal for Cornwall and I will be significantly increasing the profile of this issue in national media over the summer until we get the devolution deal that respects our unique status," Mr Moon told constituents in a post on Facebook. "If changes aren't made to the English Devolution Bill or we cannot agree a Cornwall-only deal before we are asked to vote on the Bill, I WILL vote against it."
South Wales Guardian
an hour ago
- South Wales Guardian
Chancellor's Leeds Reforms to put money in people's pockets
In the Chancellor's Leeds Reforms, Rachel Reeves has unveiled a package of reforms to the UK's financial system set to be the biggest in a decade, aimed at delivering economic growth and spurring on retail investing. Changes include reforming the bank ring-fencing regime and reducing red tape in the City in order to reintroduce 'informed risk-taking' into the financial system, the Government said. The Chancellor said the 'Leeds reforms', unveiled in the West Yorkshire city, 'represent the widest set of reforms to financial services for more than a decade'. New measures are intended to help drive increased levels of investment among both financial firms and individuals. The Treasury said the ring-fencing regime – which was brought in after the 2008 financial crisis to separate banks' retail and investment banking activities – will be reformed. Economic Secretary Emma Reynolds will lead a review into how changes can strike the right balance between growth and stability, including protecting consumers' deposits, it said. Britain is a global outlier in enforcing ring-fencing, and major banks have been divided over whether the system is necessary to protect savers or is overly burdensome. The Treasury said it was backing regulatory reforms for mid-sized banks to free up money for lending and investment. Furthermore, the plans include cutting layers of red tape for businesses in the City. This will see the UK's Financial Ombudsman Service – which settles complaints between consumers and businesses – modernised and simplified to help create a more predictable system and prevent consumer compensation being delayed. It will also speed up changes to the senior managers regime, which was also brought in after the 2008 crisis to vet individuals before they are appointed and hold them accountable for problems and risk-taking. The Government said it will radically streamline the current regime and cut the burden on firms in half. The Leeds Reforms - named after one of our financial services' hubs and a city I'm proud to represent - will deliver the biggest package of reforms to financial services regulation in a decade. Kickstarting economic growth and putting more pounds in people's pockets. Cuts to City red tape sit alongside efforts to boost the level of investment among individuals. This includes rolling out 'targeted support' from April next year, whereby banks can alert customers with cash sitting in low-return current accounts about investment opportunities. Major banks and financial firms including Barclays, Lloyds, Vanguard and Hargreaves Lansdown are backing a new advertising campaign highlighting the benefits of investing. Risk warnings on investment products could also potentially be watered down as part of a review into possible barriers to investing. The Government also said it will continue to consider reforms to ISAs and savings to strike the right balance between cash savings and investment. Ms Reeves was widely expected to leave cash ISAs untouched in the measures announced on Tuesday (July 15), following speculation that she was planning to cut the annual tax-free allowance in a bid to spark more investment instead. 'We are fundamentally reforming the regulatory system, freeing up firms to take risks and to drive growth,' Ms Reeves told finance chiefs when setting out the reforms in Leeds. Recommended reading: HMRC urging parents to claim £2,000 tax-free childcare HMRC Child Benefit changes with opt-in campaign for parents More than half a million more savers to benefit from HMRC cash - apply today Adam French, consumer expert at says: 'It is encouraging to see steps being taken to make retail investing a less daunting proposition by plugging the advice gap and empowering firms to give more targeted support while maintaining appropriate safeguards. But it is only part of the puzzle. 'It is also essential that we avoid a return to the low interest rates of the past decade which had a significant and often overlooked side effect: skewing investment priorities by driving capital into property instead of more productive areas of the economy. For the Leeds Reforms to work it must be the case that backing the next generation of British businesses looks safer and more rewarding than property speculation.' Brian Byrnes, head of personal finance at Moneybox, adds: "It is encouraging to see steps being taken to support first-time buyers. Enabling people to borrow more is not a silver bullet. What first-time buyers truly need is not just the ability to take on more debt, but meaningful, long-term support to help them start saving and investing earlier in life so they can build up that all-important deposit." Sarah Coles, head of personal finance for Hargreaves Lansdown, also comments: 'It's incredibly positive to see Rachel Reeves take some key steps towards closing the UK's yawning retail investment gap. 'There will be a new era of investment with the advent of new rules allowing companies to offer targeted support to their clients, alongside changes to risk warnings so they actively help retail investors understand their options rather than standing in their way of harnessing the incredible power of investment.'
North Wales Chronicle
an hour ago
- North Wales Chronicle
Key points from Rachel Reeves's Leeds reforms
The measures include reforming key banking rules, cutting red tape in the City, and getting more people moving cash out of savings and into stocks and shares. The Chancellor said the 'Leeds reforms', unveiled in the West Yorkshire city, 'represent the widest set of reforms to financial services for more than a decade'. These are the key points in the package of measures unveiled by the Treasury. The key measures for individuals: – A new advertising campaign will highlight the benefits of investing to individual consumers. Major banks and financial firms including including Barclays, Lloyds, Vanguard and Hargreaves Lansdown have agreed to take part in the campaign to help spread awareness. – Banks will be able to offer a new type of help called 'targeted support' from April next year. This means they can alert customers about specific investment opportunities, in hopes it will encourage groups of people with cash sitting in low-return current accounts to move it into stocks and shares. – Risk warnings on investment products will come under a review to ensure people can make accurate judgements about risk levels – potentially opening the door to some warnings being watered down. – Long term asset funds will be allowed to be held in stocks and shares Isas next year. Susannah Streeter, head of money and markets for Hargreaves Lansdown, said the change will 'open up far more investment' because it means cash can go into private assets and infrastructure projects, which currently are not allowed to be in mainstream Isas. – The Government will continue to consider reforms to Isas and savings to strike the right balance between cash savings and investment. The key measures for banks and building societies: – Looser lending rules will allow banks and building societies to offer more mortgages at 4.5 times a buyer's income, which is expected to mean thousands more loans become available for first-time buyers. – The bank ring-fencing regime, which separates banks' retail banking from their investment and international banking activities, will be reformed. – The Bank of England has raised the threshold at which smaller and mid-sized banks have to start holding emergency funding. Easing capital requirements is expected to help smaller banks scale up by freeing up more money for lending and investment. The key measures for the City:– The UK's Financial Ombudsman Service – which settles complaints between consumers and businesses – will be modernised and simplified and decisions will be more aligned with the financial regulator. – Plans to ease rules around senior manager appointments will be sped up, reducing the number of roles that are subject to regulatory approval. The regime was introduced after the 2008 financial crisis to make individuals more accountable for their conduct and any problems that arise under their watch. – Consumer Duty, a set of rules which set higher standards of consumer protection, will be reviewed by the UK's financial regulator over how it applies to investment banks and asset managers.
