logo
This is not just any cyber meltdown: will shoppers forgive M&S?

This is not just any cyber meltdown: will shoppers forgive M&S?

Business Mayor25-05-2025

Unlock the Editor's Digest for free
Roula Khalaf, Editor of the FT, selects her favourite stories in this weekly newsletter.
A potential £300mn hit to profits; a month without online orders; gaps on the shelves; stolen customer data and now the chance the upheaval could last until July — this is the M&S cyber meltdown.
The enduring fallout from the cyber attack on one of Britain's most beloved retail brands overshadowed an otherwise exemplary set of results this week. The numbers showed the City what every middle class female shopper already knew — M&S has finally got its mojo back in both food and fashion. But right now, if we want an Olivia von Halle cat print pyjama set we'll have to go to a store and fight it out for one.
Investors, who have seen around £750mn wiped off the M&S share price since it was forced to pause online orders, were appeased with a 20 per cent dividend increase. But as the FTSE 100 retailer struggles to get its IT systems up and running again, the bigger question is how forgiving customers are going to be.
The surprising conclusion I've reached, after spending hours chatting to shoppers in stores and on social media, is very forgiving indeed.
Yes, customers are frustrated by not being able to order online and the poor availability of certain products. However, the most commonly expressed sentiment was that they were proud to support their beloved M&S, attacked by evil criminals.
'If there was ever a good time for M&S to have a crisis, it would be now,' says Richard Hyman, the veteran retail analyst, noting the 'deep well of goodwill' Brits still hold for the brand that many of our mothers shopped for treats at. Read More Macy's Stock Rises Off The Back Of Tighter Stock Control
In the long years M&S spent struggling with its product ranges, its ability to leverage this affection was weaker. Today, paying 40 pence for a paper union jack bag may make our noses wrinkle, but its recent fashion collaborations, booming beauty business, revamped food halls and tie-up with Ocado have won shoppers back (did I mention the chocolate coated custard creams?)
M&S did not divulge any post-cyber attack sales data this week. Despite all this sympathy, it is bound to be ugly. With the outage spanning two bank holiday weekends, two paydays and a heatwave, fashion rivals with fully functioning websites like John Lewis, Next and Boden will have stolen market share. When online orders finally return, will shoppers flock back?
M&S knows how to do a crisis; it also knows how to do crisis management. After the chaos in the immediate aftermath of the attack, customers have been kept informed with frequent updates — and importantly, apologies — via email and social media. It was open about the theft of customer data, issuing warnings about scam attempts. Shoppers are angry, but relieved it did not include their bank details.
The fact that the Co-op and Harrods have also been attacked, and that a third-party supplier is being blamed rather than weakness in M&S's own systems, helps with the optics. Management may claim it's a 'bump in the road' but this is a nasty wake-up call for all consumer-facing businesses.
With web orders still paused, stores feel much busier than usual. M&S has sensibly responded by increasing the number of hosts stationed by tills and store entrances by 75 per cent. It claims it has a 'zero wait time' for shoppers calling its customer service hotline (I rang to test this and got through to a human straight away). Staffing up will be expensive, but experts think the investment will pay off.
'Many organisations not as focused on the customer as M&S would not survive a £300mn hit to profits,' says Jo Causon, chief executive of the Institute of Customer Service. Incredibly, M&S remains top in YouGov's latest customer trust rankings, which polled shoppers after the hack.
The true extent of the financial damage rests on future fines, insurance payouts and how quickly systems come back online. Analysts agree M&S should not risk customer fury by rushing things: 'They've got one chance to get this right,' says one.
For all his cool handling of the crisis, the dent in the M&S share price means chief executive Stuart Machin faces a £1mn hit to his pay package. However, if anyone deserves a bonus, it is the frontline staff. They have done more than keep the stores open; they have protected the brand, greeting disgruntled customers with stoicism and a smile. These human interactions are crucial and should not go unrewarded.
Given shopper loyalty, it is ironic that Sparks, the M&S customer loyalty programme, is truly pants. There have been no offers in the app for weeks following the hack, but before they disappeared they were rarely very tempting. When the online business finally reopens, rewarding the patience of its faithful 18mn Sparks members with a decent promotional event would be a very good look for M&S indeed.
claer.barrett@ft.com
Claer Barrett is the FT's consumer editor and author of the FT's Sort Your Financial Life Out newsletter series; claer.barrett@ft.com ; Instagram and TikTok @ClaerB

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Stocks rally as Trump-Musk feud cools down
Stocks rally as Trump-Musk feud cools down

Yahoo

time25 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Stocks rally as Trump-Musk feud cools down

Stocks rally as Trump-Musk feud cools down originally appeared on TheStreet. Crypto stocks bounced back on June 7 as both President Donald Trump and Tesla (Nasdaq: TSLA) boss Elon Musk retreated from their big, ugly feud from the previous day. Strategy (Nasdaq: MSTR), which had dipped around 6% yesterday, was trading at $375.01 at press time, up 1.69% a day. Helmed by Michael Saylor, the company is the largest public Bitcoin treasury company. The largest U.S. crypto exchange Coinbase (Nasdaq: COIN) had slipped as much as 10% the day before. The stock, which made it to the much-coveted spot on the S&P 500 in May, was trading at $254.31, up 4% a day. The crypto and stock trading exchange Robinhood (Nasdaq: HOOD) dipped around 8% on the day of the feud. It was trading at $76.24, up 5% a day. The story of Bitcoin miners was no different as the two men engaged in a heated public exchange over social media and press briefings on June 6. MARA Holdings (MARA) fell as much as 7% yesterday but was trading at $15.93, up 7.02% a day. Hut 8 Group (HUT) had similarly slipped by 7% the day before but rallied an impressive 14.83% to trade at $18.74. HIVE Digital (Nasdaq: HIVE) had slid around 9% yesterday and made the same recovery of 9% today to trade at $2.0042. Bitdeer (Nasdaq: BTDR) had also slipped 9% and successfully recovered by 11% to trade at $14.07 today. Notably, the stablecoin issuer Circle Internet Group (NYSE: CRCL) made an impressive debut on the day of the feud. CRCL was trading at $116.07 at press time, up 40% a day. Musk, who quit the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) by the end of May, has been criticizing Trump's "big, beautiful bill" since then. The disagreement escalated into an ugly public exchange the previous day that shook the markets. Stocks rally as Trump-Musk feud cools down first appeared on TheStreet on Jun 6, 2025 This story was originally reported by TheStreet on Jun 6, 2025, where it first appeared. Sign in to access your portfolio

AudioEye (AEYE) Beats Stock Market Upswing: What Investors Need to Know
AudioEye (AEYE) Beats Stock Market Upswing: What Investors Need to Know

Yahoo

time41 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

AudioEye (AEYE) Beats Stock Market Upswing: What Investors Need to Know

The latest trading session saw AudioEye (AEYE) ending at $12.67, denoting a +2.84% adjustment from its last day's close. The stock exceeded the S&P 500, which registered a gain of 1.03% for the day. Elsewhere, the Dow saw an upswing of 1.05%, while the tech-heavy Nasdaq appreciated by 1.2%. The the stock of company has risen by 3.36% in the past month, lagging the Computer and Technology sector's gain of 9.02% and the S&P 500's gain of 5.27%. The investment community will be paying close attention to the earnings performance of AudioEye in its upcoming release. The company's earnings per share (EPS) are projected to be $0.16, reflecting a 33.33% increase from the same quarter last year. Alongside, our most recent consensus estimate is anticipating revenue of $9.94 million, indicating a 17.31% upward movement from the same quarter last year. In terms of the entire fiscal year, the Zacks Consensus Estimates predict earnings of $0.71 per share and a revenue of $41.51 million, indicating changes of +29.09% and +17.91%, respectively, from the former year. Investors might also notice recent changes to analyst estimates for AudioEye. These revisions help to show the ever-changing nature of near-term business trends. As such, positive estimate revisions reflect analyst optimism about the company's business and profitability. Empirical research indicates that these revisions in estimates have a direct correlation with impending stock price performance. To take advantage of this, we've established the Zacks Rank, an exclusive model that considers these estimated changes and delivers an operational rating system. The Zacks Rank system ranges from #1 (Strong Buy) to #5 (Strong Sell). It has a remarkable, outside-audited track record of success, with #1 stocks delivering an average annual return of +25% since 1988. The Zacks Consensus EPS estimate remained stagnant within the past month. AudioEye is currently sporting a Zacks Rank of #2 (Buy). Valuation is also important, so investors should note that AudioEye has a Forward P/E ratio of 17.48 right now. This expresses a discount compared to the average Forward P/E of 29.63 of its industry. We can also see that AEYE currently has a PEG ratio of 0.7. This popular metric is similar to the widely-known P/E ratio, with the difference being that the PEG ratio also takes into account the company's expected earnings growth rate. The Internet - Software industry currently had an average PEG ratio of 2.35 as of yesterday's close. The Internet - Software industry is part of the Computer and Technology sector. Currently, this industry holds a Zacks Industry Rank of 55, positioning it in the top 23% of all 250+ industries. The strength of our individual industry groups is measured by the Zacks Industry Rank, which is calculated based on the average Zacks Rank of the individual stocks within these groups. Our research shows that the top 50% rated industries outperform the bottom half by a factor of 2 to 1. Be sure to follow all of these stock-moving metrics, and many more, on Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report Audioeye, Inc. (AEYE) : Free Stock Analysis Report This article originally published on Zacks Investment Research ( Zacks Investment Research Sign in to access your portfolio

Column: Full-size electric pickups are failed product planning experiment and industry disaster
Column: Full-size electric pickups are failed product planning experiment and industry disaster

Yahoo

time41 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Column: Full-size electric pickups are failed product planning experiment and industry disaster

There is a statistic in my colleague Laurence Iliff's story on the failure of full-size electric pickups that, pardon the pun, shocked me. The combustion and hybrid Toyota Tundra had more new-vehicle registrations during the first quarter than the entire industry's collection of full-size electric pickups — by a lot. That statistic is in no way a brag on the Tundra, which remains a distant No. 5 in what is now a five-horse segment since the death of the even slower-selling Nissan Titan. According to S&P Global Mobility, the Tundra recorded a meager 36,895 new registrations in the U.S. in the first quarter, while the Ford F-150 Lightning, Tesla Cybertruck, Chevrolet Silverado EV, GMC Hummer, Rivian R1T and GMC Sierra EV collectively posted about 22,000 registrations. By comparison, combustion-powered pickups from Ford, Chevrolet, GMC and Ram reached 478,823 registrations in the first quarter, S&P said. Were it not for investments and expectations that rival the size of the immense front fascias on virtually all of the aforementioned full-size behemoths, this failed experiment would already be over. The score: Newtonian Physics ∞, Hype & Hope 0. Sign up for Automotive Views, Automotive News' weekly showcase of opinions, insights, ideas and thought leadership. I can't begin to fathom how many tens of billions of dollars were spent by automakers and their suppliers developing and building those full-size electric pickups over the last decade. You can, however, get some sense of how bad the miss was when you look at the sales/production volumes auto executives anticipated, including Elon Musk's quarter- to half-million annual sales estimate for the Cybertruck, or Ford's initial F-150 Lightning estimate of up to 150,000 sales annually. So why did full-size electric pickups fail so badly? I would argue that it wasn't just physics — though the need for a bigger, more expensive battery to push these bigger vehicles farther as long as they are not towing anything shouldn't be minimized. But I think a share of the responsibility for this collective flop also lies with the companies' product planning departments. While all vehicles are compromised in some form or fashion by the time they reach consumers, full-size electric pickups lack a fundamental quality that has made their combustion-powered counterparts the U.S. sales champs for decades: Uncompromised utility. The legacy pickups are renowned for accomplishing whatever task their owners set them to. That unstoppable capability is what gave rise to the 'lifestyle' pickup in the first place, as consumers desired at least a taste of that confidence, even if they rarely, if ever, actually needed that power. Product planners and their auto executive bosses failed to account in their sales projections for just how much compromise an electric-pickup owner would face in everyday life. Sure, the trucks have some excellent features, including loads and loads of torque, but so do their combustion counterparts. And while it may cost extra fuel to tow a trailer with those combustion-powered vehicles, a heavy trailer sucks up a battery pack's juice quickly — and recharging is not nearly as quick and convenient as a gas station fill-up. It's the same reason that battery-electric semis are probably doomed to failure: It's just the wrong technology for that use case. Sorry. In a world ruled by logic and not emotion, society would consign new technologies to the areas where they have the greatest advantage. Battery-electric powertrains make the greatest sense in vehicles with limited mass and with limited demands, while hydrogen (and diesel) is more efficient in larger, demand-dependent vehicles where towing capability is paramount. We don't live in that world, unfortunately, which is why full-size electric pickups are failing. Have an opinion about this story? Tell us about it and we may publish it in print. Click here to submit a letter to the editor. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store